Bad Boys
in Fans ·
feralwolf51 said:Is someone actually peddling this nonsense about lighting candles and avoiding conflict?! What were you even doing in St. Louis? Attacking a local spot filled with seniors and women with signal flares. Are you truly so intimidated by the Vincenzo crowd from past clashes that you didn't even have the guts to size up a group at a pub? What are you even talking about? When there’s actual trouble brewing, you disappear from the city, but the moment it's certain the die-hard fans aren't around, suddenly you find your courage—only to end up looking pathetic, just like you have so many times before. It's the absolute bottom of the barrel! Talking about The 12th Man or the Bad Boys in St. Louis is pointless; if they were even worth mentioning, the Delija wouldn't be the dominant force in town. Not to mention how they were running away from the Delija through Canada last year. You might be kings in the stands, but on the streets, you're nothing. See you soon.
The militia has officially released a statement on their Facebook page regarding the incident on the bridge and the candle lighting. The Delija are the main ones in St. Louis? Give me a break, kid... I'm genuinely surprised you're bashing the Bad Boys in St. Louis so hard, considering how often you all showed up to hang out at their clubhouse, went out to bars together, or even shared a friendly moment at a gas station last season when you happened to pull up to the same pump. I don't know exactly what went down in St. Louis the other day, so I won't claim we didn't do something shameful—because frankly, I don't know.
boldtiger7 said:Is it okay with you that you guys keep coming to St. Louis looking for a fight? And then you act shocked when someone is waiting for you ready for action? Or were you really just there to light some candles?
A lot of noise is being made lately regarding the conflicts in the region, but this one is easily the most interesting. When exactly did this myth emerge about a single attack on the St. Louis club, let alone three such attacks? It is an absolute fabrication. These are minor squabbles that have been blown way out of proportion, mostly instigated by the very people involved, and they have absolutely nothing to do with an "attack" on the club. In reality, the club hasn't been attacked even once.
If we look at the supposed "last attack" in this series, according to your version, it would look like this: 200 people were waiting a mile away, and instead of everyone heading over to the clubhouse to cause chaos, they sent a mere 10 people to shut it down? I'm not even talking about those 10 people on the bridge; I mean a van that happens to drive through town gets pelted with bottles from the club, and suddenly that's an "attack on the club"... and this supposedly happened three times? It seems like the locals in St. Louis are trying to save themselves from their own mismanagement and inability to run the club by playing the victim to the rest of you, when in truth, nobody has ever felt threatened enough to actually storm their clubhouse. Personally, I don't see much point in such an action, and clearly, the other 200 people present in St. Louis that day weren't planning it either, because it could have been handled in thirty seconds flat. Honestly, you believe anything these locals tell you.
You're claiming we came to St. Louis to provoke a fight? I must have gotten my teams mixed up—it's like saying the Yankees were playing in Boston instead of the Red Sox.
There is still plenty to say about the clash on the bridge. There is an unreleased video showing exactly where everyone ended up and who retreated, but who cares? It's just another exaggerated conflict that people are smirking about, even though no one actually did anything special. We took more of a beating; given the balance of power, the Bad Boys should have crushed those 10 people. Besides, we couldn't afford any unorganized wandering, especially given previous attempts to start fights. We can assume what was coming next—we are responsible for our own situation, and you simply took advantage of a good opportunity.
All this lecturing about weaponry is the height of hypocrisy within this scene; everyone here carries themselves like they’re ready for a brawl, yet the moment they find themselves caught unprepared and empty-handed, they suddenly transform into the world's greatest moralists, spinning tales about how "those guys" wouldn't dare step up to a fight. The blunt reality is that we are all in deep trouble, and frankly, until someone suffers a permanent injury or something even more tragic, we are never going to shake off this old-school, aggressive mentality.
The only truly serious clash in the region over the last few months happened out in Sredance, where a group of guys went at it for a solid ten minutes before mutually agreeing to call it quits and disperse just before the police arrived. It was handled with a sense of mutual respect, everything following an unwritten code of conduct.
But of course, people immediately have to start peddling myths about who hit whom, what the headcount was for each side, and exactly how much hardware everyone was packing.
The whole area is basically one big powder keg, which makes this entire pathetic scene even worse; instead of seeing this as a chance for something positive, we are actually drifting closer to our neighbors in terms of how much we love feeding into delusions and misinformation.