266 posts shown.
Roger Sanchez58 said:We’re all in this together today! Get over your mental issues and realize we're all Black Knights!!! ALL TOGETHER!!!!!!! EVERYONE TO THE NORTH SIDE !!!!!!!!
Hit of the day: psychiatry, blah blah blah.
Raymond King47 said:It’s going to be a hell of a party, right? Think the north end will be packed? And about that bolded part—does that apply to the Chicago crowd too, or are they just too indifferent to care? 🤣 Even if they have a much better flag. ☕
🙂 I'll be keeping an eye on this statement. 🙂
Which flag is the second prettiest? 🤷
wanderinghawk17 said:After the circus we've seen lately (first San Francisco, then Lubbock, now Boston), I’d say the new Sports Fan Act isn't nearly tough enough. A ref calling a match off after just three warnings? Please. You could set off flares, throw everything onto the pitch, accidentally take out a linesman, and then do the whole thing again in the second half and still walk away scot-free.
You call that strict? It would be strict if they called the game after the first flare hits the field and locked up the guy for attempted assault. Nothing's actually going to change.
🙂
In which of those three incidents was there actually an issue with flares or throwing things on the field 😕
or do you know something the rest of us don't? 🤷
Anyway: Federal Register (March 12, 2007).
If someone steps onto the field with the intent to incite violence, or triggers a riot just by setting foot on the turf, what then?
Physical assaults on event attendees, breaking into the stadium, or throwing things onto the field... what's next?
Spectators bringing pyrotechnics or any kind of explosive, flammable, or hazardous items into the stands? Who actually thinks that's a good idea?
Substances that could cause physical injury or jeopardize the health of people attending a sporting event.
If they get into a physical altercation at a sporting event, they're looking at three months behind bars. Is that really enough?
Just one year.
Anyone committing a crime under paragraph (1) of this section as part of a group will face six months to a year in prison. Is anyone actually surprised?
Three years. That's it.
The conductor leading a group that commits an offense under paragraph (1) of this section faces a prison sentence of one...
Five years already. Time flies.
What happens when a minor commits one of those specific crimes listed in paragraph one? How does the sentencing process actually work?
Does paragraph (3) of this section actually align with the relevant criminal code provisions?
The procedure in the United States.
Article 4.
Violence and misconduct. Is anyone actually surprised?
Under this Law, what actually counts as violence at sporting events?
Physical assaults on people at sporting events? Really?
b) physical settlements between participants at the sporting event;
Throwing objects onto the field or into the stands that could actually cause physical harm? Is that really how we want to play this?
Character or cash? Which one actually matters in the end?
d) displaying symbols, banners, or shouting slogans that incite racial or religious hatred.
Is it nationalistic hate, or just plain old intolerance? Either way, does the content actually cross the line into being offensive or crude?
What actually triggers physical clashes between fans or other groups that put lives at risk?
Personal integrity—or rather, property damage and destruction. Is anything sacred anymore?
Damaging sports facilities, equipment, or any onsite installations? Just what we need.
Another sports event is being organized. Is anyone actually surprised?
The Federal Register (March 12, 2007).
f) inciting disturbances during arrival or departure from a sports venue.
Disrupting an event or putting participants at risk? Just another day in the chaos.
Either it's a setup or someone else is pulling the strings. Who knows?
Under this Law, what actually counts as misconduct at a sporting event?
Especially:
Trespassing on the field. Is that really all?
Unauthorized entry into official offices or restricted areas within a sports facility. Is anyone actually surprised?
Another sports event is being organized. Is anyone actually surprised?
Bringing booze or any other substances into the stadium is strictly off-limits. Is anyone actually surprised?
Bringing pyrotechnics or any other prohibited items into the stadium is strictly forbidden. Why bother trying to break the rules?
What kind of tools could actually be used to threaten the safety of people at a sporting event or disrupt the whole thing?
I don't know what you're trying to say. Is there a point here?
Unauthorized entry into the sections reserved for the Black Knights. Is anyone actually surprised?
coppersurfer13 said:I don't get why people are against that trans guy, but personally, watching him go down with the supporter groups would be quite the show.
🙂
And we should probably scrap that whole suicide thing too, just like they did with TG. 🙂🙂
🤣
I think this version sounds more realistic: "maniacs running from the Black Knights fall straight into a trap set by a horde of evil" ☕:klap:
boldotter473 said:They’re shutting down supporter clubs and killing off organized away trips. Now it’s just grab a bus and let the cops babysit you, or take commercial lines and hope for the best. It’s a direct path back to the underground.
😲😲😲
Less people, less organization, and zero creativity in the stands. Everything visual is dying. ☕
They've been radicalizing us with these laws for years. Now we'll all see who actually breaks first. 🤷
Douglas Stewart65 said:once 🤷
come on, just tell me which specific sign is actually bothering you. 🤷☕
Same for me regarding NYC, and even that flag without any text featuring lions (whatever that is). 🤷
Maybe let Getman explain exactly what's wrong with it. 🤣🤣
(As long as he doesn't smash his computer.) 🙂
Steven Newman7 said:That’s exactly why I can't stand those rural types near San Diego who call themselves "fans."
Every tiny town has a chapter, and every loudmouth thinks they're an NFL Ultra. I don't have a problem with the actual ultras, but these idiots are just exhausting.
🙂
I doubt they care about you either.😉
I get annoyed by these wannabe fans who think they're trendy just because they cheer for whatever is popular right now.☕
Not every village has a chapter. Maybe someone actually in the loop can list our real chapters for you.🤷
sorry 🙂
some people just don't have a life 😢
http://youtu.be/MLryL-PBKWk
☕
Jose Diaz98 said:Same damn thing. Looks like that fence from the Indianapolis footage last year...🙂
🙂🙂🙂 🙂
Are you kidding me? 😕
Maybe she was more colorful before, but at least she's being realistic now. Still plenty of room for improvement, though. Right? ☕
darkgull10 said:Are you out of your mind too? Is there a storm coming or what?🙂
🤣🤣🤣
Clearly, you're feeling the heat over there.☕
Do you really think I’m falling for that?😉
John Ramos3 said:Who cares what Joe Biden thinks. See ya. :*
😲🙂🙂🙂🙂
You guys were actually pretty cool with the boys 🤷
🤔🙂:klap:
darkgull10 said:We should stop causing trouble and just play the game. We need to quit singing against the owners, the crooks, or Freddie. We should start posting messages instead. Maybe we need more "intellect" in the stands. And we definitely need to stop singing that old song from St. Louis... who actually cares, and who's really benefiting from all this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DrsWC2NiGU
🙂
The truth: it should have been 1950
🙂
II - SIGNS AND SYMBOLS
Article 10.
Members of national minorities are free to display and wear the symbols and signs of their respective minority groups, including those belonging to their organizations, associations, and institutions.
When using the aforementioned symbols, minority members must also respect and display the official emblems and signs of the United States, as well as the symbols of states, counties, and municipalities, in accordance with their specific regulations.
☕
Coffee at 1950? ☕
🤣
p.s. here's another one to chew on:
http://youtu.be/PCXHbCYvzjI