CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Angela Wright › Posts

Posts by Angela Wright

4549 posts shown.

slybison6 said:I want to thank you and everyone else who offered advice. I went to the ER to try and get a referral so I could get a urine culture done first thing Monday morning, but they basically told me to just follow up with my primary care doctor on Monday, which I plan to do. Right after that, I headed straight to the pharmacy and picked up some cranberry tea and Bactrim. Just in case, I started taking it. Even though the box says two tablets twice a day, I’ve been taking just one because they seem huge to me 😁 Please don't attack me for self-medicating without a prescription, but I simply couldn't wait another second. It's been seven days since this whole painful mess started; things feel okay now, but I am sweating like crazy... though I don't have a fever.

You just made a massive, reckless mistake 🙄. How on earth do you know that specific antibiotic will actually work? How do you know the bacteria isn't already resistant to it? At this point, running a urine culture is almost pointless because the results won't be reliable. You could have just taken some Ibuprofen to manage the discomfort and limp through the weekend, provided you drank plenty of fluids. Instead, you're blindly popping an antibiotic that might not even touch the problem. If it fails, you'll end up needing a different one, and by killing off all the good bacteria along with the bad ones, you're going to wreck your immune system and trigger a vicious cycle of various infections—not to mention the yeast infections.
Stop playing doctor. At the very least, educate yourself before deciding to treat yourself.
In America, for instance, you can't just walk into a drugstore and grab antibiotics; you strictly need a doctor's prescription. Do you realize how serious of a deal that is?
slybison6 said:The diagnosis is that I have a high bacterial count in my urine. How do I get rid of them?
p.s. I didn't even know my exact diagnosis until two days ago, so I was just writing everything I thought was relevant... sorry if I was being annoying, I'm not an expert on this. Bye!

If you haven't done a urine culture yet, ask your doctor for a referral. You can grab a sterile specimen cup at any local pharmacy. When you collect the sample, make sure you use the "midstream" method: pee a little bit into the toilet first, then catch the middle portion in the cup. Seal it up and take it to your local lab or clinic. They’ll run an analysis to identify the specific bacteria involved and determine which antibiotic will actually kill them. Basically, you're going to be on antibiotics. It is absolutely critical that you stay hydrated—as soon as you go to the bathroom, drink another glass of water or tea. Avoid soda, salty snacks, and alcohol. Parsley tea, cranberry juice, or uva ursi are great options. Just a heads-up: if you choose uva ursi, skip the cranberry juice, because one is alkaline and the other is acidic, so they'll just neutralize each other out. Pick a lane and stick to it. Personally, I find parsley tea to be the most effective.
One more thing: while you're on those antibiotics, make sure to eat at least two servings of yogurt or some other probiotic fermented dairy daily to protect yourself from yeast infections down there.
Angela Nelson51 said:Thank you so much for the kind words. The real issue is that she refuses to reach out to anyone. Her own family doesn't even know she's sick—she’s keeping it all hidden. She won't even step foot outside because she's terrified someone might spot her. She’s completely isolated. It breaks my heart every time I drive past her house, but I can't stop because she doesn't want me to. I just wish I could be there by her side, talking like we used to, acting like everything is perfectly normal... making her feel alive instead of just feeling like a patient. She’s such an incredible person, always so full of life and positivity. When I was dealing with my own tumor a few years back, she was the one standing right next to me. Now, it kills me that she’s pushing me away when I know deep down she needs me. How on earth am I supposed to get through to her?

You can't force anything. Try writing her a letter. Tell her you want to support her through this, that you aren't looking to pity her or feed her empty promises about how "everything will be fine," but that you simply want to be present—to do whatever activities you used to enjoy together.
Whatever she decides, you have to respect it. She’s the only one who knows what she needs and what feels manageable right now. You’ll just have to find a way to deal with your own grief and frustration on your own and accept things as they are. There isn't any other way.
And don't forget: the road to hell is paved with good intentions! If you aren't absolutely sure of your footing, don't push. Based on what you've shared, it sounds like you might not fully grasp the weight of this diagnosis or have the experience to handle this specific type of fallout. If you push too hard, you risk doing more harm than good.

We all carry the shadow of cancer within us at some point. We shouldn't turn it into a monster just because of a lack of information or an inability to process the reality of what a diagnosis entails. It's a statistical fact that roughly one in three people in America will face a malignant diagnosis in their lifetime. That is a scientific reality. We need to educate ourselves and learn how to navigate these situations to ensure everyone maintains a decent quality of life.
Angela Nelson51 said:I’m jumping into this thread... unfortunately... first off, my heart goes out to everyone here. I never imagined I’d find myself in this position. My absolute best friend—after her five-year relationship ended, she just shut down. She pulled away, stopped calling, and I figured she just needed space to process everything. Between the breakup and the crushing stress of finals in just two weeks, she lost 4 kg and her stomach started acting up. After a year, she finally seemed to be getting back on her feet, but then suddenly, she starts avoiding me. I haven't seen her in months, even though she lives right across the street from me. We’ve been inseparable since we were kids. But this doubt is eating me alive, so I just showed up at her place unannounced. What I saw there is something I will never forget. My beautiful friend, who was always so vibrant, looks like a ghost. She's thin, frail, her eyes are sunken, and she has massive dark circles under them. She’s wearing a headscarf now. It turns out she had a cyst removed from her ovary, but the pathology report came back positive for cancer. She’s been dealing with constant diarrhea. Her long hair? Gone. It all fell out. She says she's starting chemotherapy, but she's exhausted, sleeps constantly, and can barely eat. I can see her losing her will to live, and it's breaking my heart into pieces... how can I help her? How can I make this easier? Please, I need advice... is there any hope that she'll get better? I'm praying for some kind soul to guide me... thank you in advance...

Just be the friend you've always been. Don't smother her with pity, don't spiral into despair, and don't act like she's broken. Just be the person she’s always known. Talk to her about the usual stuff, the things you’d talk about if none of this were happening. Make her feel normal.
Ovarian cancer is an incredibly sneaky and brutal disease, and having metastases definitely makes things much harder, but there are women out there who have fought through it. With the right support system and keeping the atmosphere as positive as possible, there is always hope—for her, too.
Always the underdog! in Psychology & Therapy ·
mellowseal20 said:I’ve gotta say, I don't really see it that way. When the human psyche is functioning the way it's supposed to, the goal is pretty simple: to be happy. And to me, that means finding freedom from pain, trauma, and all that suffering.

Look, I'm not naive—life isn't perfect and people go through hell. But if anyone tries to tell me there's some inherent beauty in starving or being sick compared to just feeling full and healthy? Yeah, I'm not buying it.

A bit late to the party here, but here’s my take:
What I actually wrote was that there is beauty in productive suffering, meaning when you’re "climbing the mountain" to reach a specific goal. If fasting serves a purpose or improves your well-being, then it’s a worthwhile struggle. Think about a woman in labor; she’s in immense pain, but she knows exactly why it’s happening. To me, suffering itself doesn't have an inherent label of "good" or "bad"—it’s the objective behind it that gives it its meaning.
Megan Williams6 said:A private clinic performed two biopsies on my mom's hip, and they sent the tissue samples over to Mercy Hospital for analysis. They were supposed to be ready by last Monday, but I’ve already been down there five times and still nothing (trying to reach them by telephone is a nightmare). Apparently, they need to send the results via fax.... Does anyone know if they can just email the results directly to me if I send them my confirmation and order via email? I desperately need these findings to move forward with her treatment.... Does anyone know which email address I should use to check on the status and ask if they can send them straight to me? Thanks so much.🤷

You could try Googling the pathology department's email and asking nicely, though honestly, that’s rarely how they operate. Even if you manage to get through, you’ll probably have the physical papers in your hands before you ever see them in your inbox.
As for the surgery and the hip replacement, that kind of thing is handled at the main hospital in the city area.
What are we even fighting for? in Psychology ·
Paul Thompson3 said:I was going to post this in Philosophy, but since everyone in the psych group seems to share the common denominator of being "totally screwed," I figured I'd drop it here instead.
Life is a struggle—blah, blah, blah... But what happens when that struggle doesn't actually have a goal worth fighting for? When you’ve just been spinning your wheels for ages, staring at a wall, knowing full well nothing is ever going to change? You get those little bursts of ego, thinking you've made it, only to crash back down again—just an endless cycle of highs and lows against a backdrop of absolute, impenetrable nothingness. There's no safe harbor, no handhold, nothing actually worth living for.
Is this the headspace most people find themselves in right before they decide to end it all?

The truth is, the entire point of life is found within that very Borba—in the time you spend fighting and the meaning you choose to assign to it. Even if nothing in this world offers any guarantees, there is something beautiful about someone providing you a calm harbor and a sanctuary right when the storm is raging around you. For me, my child is that safe haven, and he is the reason it's all worth it. Some things, some realizations, you just only pick up as the years go by.
Megan Williams6, I already explained to you that sarcomas are incredibly rare tumors. When you're dealing with a rare disease, you're usually looking at one of two scenarios: either there’s an agonizingly long wait for an accurate diagnosis, or the diagnosis is flat-out wrong from the start. On top of that, anyone battling a rare condition hits the same brick wall—either the treatment doesn't exist, or if it does, the price tag is astronomical. Given that, it's highly unlikely your mother would be cleared for such expensive therapy unless we can definitively prove she's sick and that this illness was actually triggered by previous medical treatments. It is possible for new primary tumors—usually carcinomas—to develop as a secondary consequence of treating other primary cancers, but that process typically takes about a decade to unfold.
It's also worth noting that sarcomas frequently crop up at sites of physical trauma, like a heavy impact, a break, or a deep laceration. So, it is entirely plausible that everything actually started with that damn fall, and things just steadily progressed until they reached the state we're seeing today.
DIY medical checkups at home? in Health ·
Hannah Brown55 said:I’m not entirely sure which sub this belongs in, so feel free to move it if I'm out of line. 🙂

What’s your take on this whole thing about offering home medical checkups?

They called my grandma yesterday and she actually said yes. 🙂 I’ve told her a hundred times not to fall for it because it smells like a total scam... but once she gets an idea in her head, there's no stopping her. 😢

Well, the police already laid it out for you plain and simple. If you can't see what's happening, nothing will help.
Nicole Long28 said:Surgery isn't even an option here, especially since there's an oral version available—and for quite some time now http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/con.../11/1643.short , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11822766 , http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Docum...ne%20final.pdf . I can't decide if the doctor simply doesn't know this, or if he knows and just didn't offer his patient an alternative—or at least didn't explain how to actually get the medication. It’s likely the hospital could order it under their own name if they paid for it. There is a massive difference between taking a pill and being cut open.

Those links point to study results. Just because a study exists doesn't mean the drug is actually in clinical use. The road from research results to official approval for clinical use is long, winding, and full of obstacles. It looks like it was approved in England back in 2007, but it's unclear why it wasn't cleared for the rest of Europe. Clearly, something went sideways at the finish line, possibly related to the extreme neutropenia seen during application, according to the British reports. They further state: In the studies submitted oral vinorelbine was mostly used as a first line therapy in advanced disease and the majority of patients had not received prior
anthracycline based chemotherapy. This does not fit with the current NICE guidance
where vinorelbine (IV) monotherapy is recommended as one option for second line or
later therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer when anthracycline based
regimens have failed or are unsuitable.

Basically, the drug was given in these studies to patients in the first line of therapy for advanced disease who hadn't undergone any other form of chemotherapy yet . That completely contradicts the NICE (American Medicare-style) guidelines, which recommend vinorelbine via IV as a second-line treatment after the first line fails or relapses. Based on this, we have no idea how the drug would perform in a second-line setting because the study doesn't cover it. Furthermore, they highlight what I consider the most critical point: Presently, the use of oral vinorelbine is limited by the lack of randomised, controlled trials and comparative data. Nevertheless, in view of its relatively milder toxicity
profile, elderly and/or frail patients or those prioritising other aspects of quality of life may choose vinorelbine over more established cytotoxic agents. Further welldesigned prospective studies are needed in order to provide more information on
safety, tolerability and the optimal dose especially in patients with pre-treated metastatic breast cancer. They should include randomised studies comparing intravenous with oral vinorelbine to confirm equivalent efficacy and safety profiles.
Further Studies investigating The value of Oral vinorelbine in combination therapy in general ara also required , along with comparative clinical trials to Help clarify The Place of Oral vinorelbine in The Management of Advanced breast cancer
.
In short, a mountain of research is still needed to prove it works as well as the IV version. If you ask me, the study was poorly executed. They poured a fortune into a potentially great drug but failed to do the necessary legwork immediately.

The doctor definitely knows all of this, but beyond his medical knowledge, he also understands how the bureaucratic machine grinds. Suggesting a therapy that isn't officially accessible is highly unprofessional; in that sense, a physician is neither allowed nor able to propose it. If a study is still active somewhere, you might try submitting a request to be included, provided you meet the eligibility criteria.
There’s simply no other way to get this done right now.

As for the port, honestly, I think you're just making a scene because you don't quite grasp how it works. It isn't some massive surgical incision; it's just a tiny little access point in a vein in the chest where they slide in a small tube—a catheter—to deliver the treatment. Doctors do this every single day, even for little kids, and it's really not the monster people make it out to be. If anything, it makes getting your meds a hell of a lot easier.

Edit:
Here's a visual for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wCn4nEYLqw
Nicole Long28 said:Hey everyone. My sister has bone metastases (stemming from primary breast cancer), and her doctors are now looking at putting her on Vinorelbine. The problem is, her previous treatments—she’s basically tried everything under the sun—have absolutely wrecked her veins. Getting blood drawn is a nightmare for her; they have to poke her multiple times, and she always has to take Apaurin just to cope with the anxiety of it. Now, the oncologist is saying Vinorelbine might be out of the question unless she goes to surgery first to get a port implanted in her chest, because Vinorelbine is incredibly harsh on the vessels 😢. We discussed this last Friday. I found out that this damn Vinorelbine is also available in tablet form called Navelbin, but it isn't available here; it's not on the approved list, even though it works almost identically. So, I’m wondering, how can we get a hold of that specific medication? What do I need? A recommendation, a prescription (from whom?)
.

Do you really think a doctor wouldn't prescribe tablets if there was any way to make it happen?

Navelbin is just a generic version—basically a copy of Vinorelbine—which actually makes it the superior option since it's the original formulation. Honestly, I'm not sure where you heard that both drugs only exist for IV administration. Just look for yourself: http://www.chemocare.com/bio/navelbine.asp ; http://www.chemocare.com/BIO/vinorelbine.asp
For your sister, the only real path forward is getting a central venous port installed to handle the treatment.
Megan Williams6 said:True, but where can a person even turn when everything costs so much... if it really is a sarcoma, I’ve read that surgical removal is usually the best bet, even if there's a fifty-fifty chance of it coming back. Still, one oncologist is suggesting radiation therapy instead (though I've heard sarcomas aren't particularly sensitive to radiation or chemo?...)

If you send over the translated medical records and scans, once you get a second opinion from a legitimate center of excellence, it becomes much easier to push back and demand better care here at home.

The doctor likely suggested radiation because they probably feel it's the most humane option for your mother, given her age and overall health. Look, you have to face the reality—as hard and painful as it is—that when dealing with a sarcoma at this stage, even in younger patients, we aren't talking about a "cure." We are talking about extending quality of life and focusing on palliative care. The doctor likely believes a radical surgery would either kill her or leave her living in an agony that no human being should ever have to endure. That’s why I suggested getting a second opinion from specialists; if nothing else, you'll know you did absolutely everything humanly possible for her on this planet. And please, don't start stressing about massive medical bills right away. In situations like this, you have to take it one step at a time.
Here is a link to Dan Farber. You can reach out to them via email.
Megan Williams6 said:It’s incredibly frustrating because I’m getting totally conflicting advice. One doctor insists everything has to be surgically removed, while another says surgery isn't even on the table—suggesting radiation will just burn away the pelvic tumor and the pain will vanish along with it. It’s all so contradictory... I’ve read that Leiomyosarcoma is such a rare diagnosis that most doctors might go their entire careers without ever seeing a single case, yet my mom gets hit with it immediately after her CT scan—just like that! "Matches the profile for Leiomyosarcoma," they say, as if they deal with this every single day... meanwhile, I've read that these kinds of diseases are notoriously difficult to prove, requiring a full PhD analysis of the tissue samples. Most people just want to hear, "Please, just let it not be cancer." They get a mountain of test results and feel a momentary sense of relief when a report says "no malignancy," only to follow an orthopedist's recommendation for a CT scan, despite already having an MRI that mentions "Open etiology," only to be slapped with "Sarcoma"... how do you even find it? The odds are like one in a thousand... I honestly can't wrap my head around it...🤷🙂🙂

Every major global medical guideline points toward surgical removal of a sarcoma as the primary goal, whenever it's feasible. That said, every patient is an individual case. Doctors have to weigh every single variable—age, overall health, how far the disease has spread, and the potential to extend a high quality of life before making a final call. In my opinion, the smartest move is to track down one of those world-renowned centers of excellence and demand a second opinion.
Ovarian tumor in Women's Health ·
Sarah Smith59 said:Endometriosis doesn't just start out of thin air; it originates right in the uterus.
The uterus basically shreds its own lining during menstruation—even little birds know that much.
They don't even need a college degree for that—they can just stand on the border.
If we’re following that line of reasoning, you're basically saying period cramps just get even more intense if the uterus is already struggling.
There's a growth.
When you’re dealing with endometriosis, that pain isn't just some passing discomfort—it becomes a chronic, relentless struggle because of those hard, stubborn cysts forming on the ovaries.

And who can honestly claim, with absolute certainty, that these endometrial issues aren't being fundamentally misunderstood by the medical establishment?
Why can't I turn "pure" into "criminal"?
So, that's how it is.

I’m no gynecologist, but are dermoid ovarian cysts actually considered benign tumors?

Look, I’ve got a personal diagnosis of endometriosis, and since my professional life is centered around oncology, let me lay this out for you.

Endometriotic cysts—or what doctors often call "chocolate cysts"—are a complete nightmare. It’s not just some minor monthly discomfort; it’s an invasive, structural issue where endometrial tissue starts growing where it has absolutely no business being, specifically inside the ovaries. Imagine if your body started building its own internal obstacles, creating these fluid-filled sacs that sit there like ticking time bombs, messing with your hormones and causing waves of intense pain. It isn't just about a dull ache, either. We're talking about sharp, debilitating cramps and pressure that can throw your entire life off balance. When those cysts grow, they don't just stay put; they can interfere with how everything functions, potentially impacting fertility and leading to much more serious surgical interventions down the line. Dealing with this feels like fighting a war against your own biology, where the enemy is literally part of you. It can crop up pretty much anywhere in the body—though you most commonly see it in the abdominal cavity. Essentially, endometrial tissue (that lining inside the uterus) starts growing outside its intended home for reasons nobody fully understands. Because this tissue responds to the same hormonal shifts as the uterine lining, it starts bleeding during your period just like normal. But here’s the catch: unlike the blood in your uterus, this blood has nowhere to go. It’s trapped. That leads to a nasty chain reaction of internal bleeding, inflammation, intense pain, and scarring. It doesn't just stay localized; it can wreak havoc on organs that have nothing to do with the reproductive system, like your urinary tract, digestive system, or even the central nervous system. It’s the sheer unpredictability and reach of the disease that makes it so difficult to manage. Look, there isn't any direct link to your period itself, nor does it have anything to do with menstrual cramps. And that bit you mentioned about dermoid cysts? There's no correlation there either. It all comes down to the way endometrial cells migrate through the body and eventually settle and take root on one of your internal organs. If we looked at this differently, every single woman would be diagnosed with endometriosis—after all, almost everyone deals with painful periods at some point. If we actually understood the root cause, preventing the condition would be a walk in the park. Right now, the only way doctors try to get things under control is by forcing the body into a sort of artificial menopause, essentially "shutting down" the ovaries with hormonal contraceptives. But let’s be real: that isn't a cure, it's just a temporary fix that fails to address the actual problem.

Are we talking dermoid cysts or teratomas? These fall into the category of sex cord-stromal tumors—which arise from the ovarian germ cells—distinct from epithelial-stromal or specialized stromal tumors, and they actually account for a massive 97% of all sex cord-stromal ovarian neoplasms.

We categorize them into three distinct groups: mature, immature, and monodermal.

Let’s be clear about this: mature teratomas are benign. When you're looking at the clinical reality, these growths aren't out to get you like a malignant tumor would. They lack that aggressive, invasive drive that defines cancer. Think of them more like a localized glitch in development rather than an active enemy. It's a distinct category, and in medical terms, "benign" means exactly what it says. These are structures formed from tissue derived from all three germ layers. Because they're mostly filled with sebum, they’re commonly referred to as ovarian dermoid cysts or dermoid teratomas. Typically, they present as unilocular masses and can affect both ovaries. If you were to look inside the cyst cavity, you'd usually find a messy mix of sebum and hair. The cyst wall itself is built from skin structures containing varying amounts of hair, and you might even encounter a Rokitansky protuberance—that's a polypoid mass protruding into the cyst lumen that can actually contain teeth, cartilage, or bone tissue. On a microscopic level, this type of teratoma is essentially a biological grab bag; it's woven from just about everything imaginable, including dermal structures, sebaceous glands, hair follicles, fatty and connective tissues, mature glial cells, hyaline cartilage, and even mucosal tissue from the digestive or respiratory tracts, or even thyroid tissue. While it's rare, malignant transformation can occur, most frequently manifesting as squamous cell carcinoma.

An immature teratoma isn't just some minor issue—it's malignant. Think of it like this: these things are essentially a chaotic patchwork of different somatic tissues, all at varying stages of maturity. If you were to look under a microscope, they’d actually look strikingly similar to embryonic or fetal tissue. Physically, you're looking at large, solid masses characterized by smooth, tense outer surfaces that usually only bulge out on one side. They have a dense, solid build, but don't be fooled—you can often find pockets of necrosis, bleeding, or even cystic areas tucked inside.

Monodermal teratomas are rare occurrences, essentially composed of tissue derived from just a single germ layer. The most frequent types are ovarian struma and carcinoids; in the case of struma, the tissue looks like thyroid tissue both to the naked eye and under a microscope, which can trigger hyperthyroidism. Carcinoids, on the other hand, mimic tumors found in the digestive tract, secreting 5-HTP and potentially leading to the clinical symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome.

Generally speaking, mature versions show up most often during reproductive years, whereas immature ones tend to surface during a person's second decade of life. It’s also worth noting that teratomas containing a higher percentage of undifferentiated tissue carry a much tougher prognosis.
(Source)

The bottom line is that dermoid and endometriotic cysts are two completely different beasts—they don't share an origin, they aren't built from the same cellular stuff, and they definitely don't result from menstrual bleeding.

Look, there are zero guarantees in life, so you can't say with absolute certainty that an endometriotic cyst won't turn into a neoplasm. What we actually have to work with are statistical models based on decades of longitudinal medical studies. Those numbers tell us that such an occurrence is incredibly rare—and by the CDC's standards, "rare" means anything affecting fewer than one in 100,000 people.
Hopefully, that clears things up for you.
Bradley Bishop32 said:Angela Wright—how old are you actually? :-) I know it’s usually rude to ask a lady her age, but if you aren't keeping it a secret... I'm only asking because it seems like you've dealt with a hell of a lot of this nasty stuff already...

Enough 😉 just like the experience
Megan Williams6 said:Angela Wright, you have such a beautiful soul that I am practically paralyzed with happiness just knowing people like you exist. Honestly, I used to think someone like that was impossible... You radiate such positivity that I don't even know how to put it into words... It all comes down to one thing: I love my mother so deeply that I can't bear the thought of her passing while I'm still here... And because we are so close to that diagnosis, I feel like I’m walking along the edge of the Petronas Towers—the highest point imaginable—just waiting for a gust of wind to finally carry me where I need to go... Life would be so wonderful if this monster hadn't attacked my mother. Just last year, we were swimming in the ocean and enjoying everything; life was perfect, and then this happened. If only it had targeted me instead (and actually, I have an MRI scheduled for June 10th), but instead, it went after the person I love most in this world—my mother... As for me, I'm just done. I am so incredibly angry that even a hundred cancers couldn't break me. I almost want to call them out: "Come on, come on, I'm right here! Let's settle this." Those cowards can't touch me; I'm practically waiting to face them just so I can destroy them myself... But it's a completely different story when you're the one fighting it, or when it's someone you love—people just don't want to listen. If it ever comes for me, I plan to starve it out... So, ask me more if you want... through fasting, the body consumes everything—first the foreign invaders like tumors, then the fat, then the muscle, and everything else it can find. I don't mean to be tedious, but I know what I'm doing, though it's hard to convince my mom to follow suit... she's 83 years old... and she doesn't exactly take orders from me anyway, so implementing a different diet is tough. We're doing a fruit and vegetable blend three times a day to boost the immune system and all that...🤷

I sent you a DM so we don't take this thread off-topic.
Megan Williams6 said:It would probably be best to just remove everything, but I honestly don't know if my mom could survive that. Aside from the uterine sarcoma, she’s apparently "missing" a chunk of bone on her right hip because the tumor ate right through it. They say there's only about 4-6mm of the "acetabular roof" left, which means her entire hip joint is at risk of collapsing. If that's the case, how on earth are they supposed to take out the tumor while actually saving any bone? It’s all getting incredibly complicated... I just don't know, 🤷

Look, regarding this and your previous question, you really need an answer from a surgeon who specializes specifically in these kinds of cases. There are too many variables at play to give you a ballpark estimate here; it requires deep expertise and serious experience. In medicine, when things get this heavy, doctors weigh the risks against the goal of maintaining quality of life—basically, how much time can we give them where they aren't suffering? One thing is certain: if they can't remove as much of the tumor as possible (ideally all of it), her chances of a decent quality of life drop significantly.😢
Given how often critically ill patients in poor general condition undergo massive, complex surgeries, I think your mom stands a good chance of pulling through. As for the bone issue, depending on the specific location, there are prosthetic implants designed to replace diseased bone—similar to what’s done for osteosarcoma—so that could very well be a viable option for her.
Ovarian tumor in Women's Health ·
Sarah Smith59 said:Uterine tissue implants itself into the fallopian tubes or ovaries because of those intense menstrual cramps.
That’s basically how endometriosis forms, which then leads to dermoid cysts..

Look, honey, what you just wrote makes absolutely zero sense.
Endometriotic cysts have nothing to do with menstrual cramps (other than the fact that endometriosis causes excruciating pain during your period), and they certainly don't have anything to do with dermoid cysts. They are completely different medical issues.
Since you actually have both topics open, maybe take a second to read up and get some actual facts straight.
Megan Williams6 said:I want to thank Angela Wright for the support; you’re absolutely right that this isn't just some "women's issue." My mom is dealing with it in her pelvic bone too, which is putting her hip joint at risk—that part has nothing to do with gender. Her previous scans suggested a uterine sarcoma, along with an expansive, infiltrative lesion in her right iliac bone where the etiology hasn't been established yet... Or, the other theory is that it's an osteolytic lesion, but that they aren't actually related—meaning the myoma could have been there forever, which most women deal with anyway. Both my mom and I are terrified of any kind of surgery, partly because of her age, but also because she’s still mobile, even if she limps. If she ends up stuck in a hospital bed, who knows if she'll ever stand on her own two feet again. But if that biopsy—the one needed for the PhD analysis—has to be done right on the operating table, then we’ll just have to brace ourselves for that... even if they might be able to take a sample from the side using a needle.😕

They'd likely go for it, but honestly, the best move would be to just cut out whatever it is entirely.
Megan Williams6 said:I’ve heard there’s a medication for Leiomyosarcoma called "Yondelis," but it’s incredibly expensive and almost impossible to track down here in the States. I wanted to ask if anyone knows how it's typically administered—is it given before surgery to shrink the tumors first, or is it used after the tumors have been removed? My mother isn't really a candidate for surgery... she's getting older, and the procedure would likely be too much for her body to handle. We're really hoping to find something that can block or reduce the tumors if that's an option...😕

Yondelis is a sophisticated drug, but it hasn't been officially approved for general use here yet. This means it can only be obtained if an oncologist prescribes it, and then that proposal has to go before a hospital board for approval. If they greenlight it, they perform an "interventional import," where the entire cost—including shipping and customs—is dumped onto the hospital's budget. That’s how it works on paper, but in reality, it's a mess. Often, just one dose of Yondelis eats up a massive chunk of the funds a hospital has set aside for other medications and equipment. Back when Milinović was in charge, they couldn't even transfer their own funds into the hospital account to buy drugs. I'm not sure how things stand now, though.
Generally speaking, regarding sarcomas, surgical removal remains the gold standard whenever it is physically possible. Yondelis isn't a magic bullet for every type of sarcoma. In my view, its primary indication is when metastases are already present. For cases like this, it is best to handle everything within a major hospital system; that's where you find the highest concentration of patients with these specific diagnoses. Since we are dealing with such a rare tumor, the doctor's experience is absolutely critical. You should head to a major center like the Mayo Clinic or a top-tier facility like Johns Hopkins.