CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › graniteharbor502 › Posts

Posts by graniteharbor502

1287 posts shown.

2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
The final standings from the second installment of our 2015 tournament series.

image

1. The Best NFL
2. graniteharbor502
3. gaff_
4. Midwest
5. ivic27
6. Knights Templar
7. Safe Bet
8. FilipR5

Aggregate statistics for the entire second tournament edition:
Average secondary score: 29.575
Average number of drivers correctly predicted in Q3: 8.329
Average exact position accuracy: 1.69
Performance breakdown across all rounds:
image

It is certainly worth noting, perhaps even pondering why such a feat occurred, that the winner of this second annual tournament also managed to secure the highest total number of secondary points overall—reaching an impressive 295—which translates to a very respectable average of 32.78 secondary points per prediction.
2016 season in Formula 1 ·
Jacob White49 said:Regarding McLaren-Honda, I suspect many people will find themselves quite surprised during the next season when an engine—one originally conceived to operate on a fundamentally different principle than its competitors, yet currently struggling due to a lack of development time or a late start—finally begins to function correctly.

Japanese media:

...

Mercedes Andy Cowell:

Honda's engine design is really bold,if they get it to work one day they will be very dangerous.

That is the key phrase, isn't it? So far, they haven't managed it.
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
Is there anything more captivating than peering back through the hazy lens of memory to examine the complete standings of graniteharbor502’s grandest delusions from 2015? Does one not find a certain profound, albeit misplaced, melancholy in revisiting those old, fevered imaginings that once seemed so incredibly vital to our very existence?

195
The Best F1 driver 616 Ke Ke Ke Ke
164
I am afraid I find myself somewhat perplexed by the lack of substantive discourse presented here, as one might wonder if there is any actual substance to be found beneath the surface of these brief exchanges? Is it not our collective responsibility to engage in more profound contemplation regarding the matters at hand, rather than merely drifting through these digital spaces without purpose? One cannot help but feel that we owe it to ourselves to seek out a deeper level of engagement, can we not? 600 Kek Is it possible that we are witnessing the very beginning of a profound shift in how we perceive our digital reality? I find myself sitting here, staring at my screen, wondering if this brief interaction might be the precursor to something much larger, much more significant than any of us could have ever anticipated when we first logged on. Could it truly be that simple?
149
I find myself wondering, quite often, whether we truly grasp the weight of our own perspectives when we engage in these digital dialogues, don't we? It seems to me that there is a certain gravity required when discussing such matters, a sense of duty to be thorough, yet I often feel as though the conversation drifts into much shallower waters than I am prepared to navigate. Is it possible that we are all merely searching for a sense of cohesion in an otherwise fragmented discourse? One must consider if the effort we expend on these debates is ultimately fruitful, or if we are simply rearranging the furniture in a room where the windows have been left wide open to the elements. 589 Is there truly any point in dwelling upon such things? Perhaps not, yet I find myself wondering if we aren't all just searching for some semblance of clarity in this chaotic existence. Gray 465 ke ki ki ki
145
Is there anything more profound than the weight of history as it settles upon a landscape, much like the heavy, humid air before a summer storm rolls through the Midwest? I find myself pondering the vast, sweeping stretches of territory that define our nation’s identity, specifically those rugged borderlands that have seen so much struggle and transition over the years. Does one not feel a certain solemnity when contemplating the shifting boundaries of the American frontier, where the very soil seems to hold the echoes of past conflicts and the quiet resilience of those who lived through them? It makes one wonder if we truly grasp the depth of the heritage embedded in such places, or if we simply move past them, distracted by the frantic pace of modern life. 603 Is there anything more profound than the simple act of existence itself? I find myself wondering if we ever truly grasp the weight of our own presence in this vast, unfolding universe.
140
5. fortinbras 597 Is there truly anything more profound than the simple, unadorned essence of a single word? One finds oneself wondering if we often overlook the weight that brevity can carry, or if we simply lack the patience to sit with its quiet implications. Is "Ke" perhaps a starting point, a mere threshold to a much larger conversation that we have yet to fully grasp?
135
Kyle Edwards5 575 Is there perhaps some underlying significance to this brevity, or am I simply misinterpreting the intent behind such a singular, isolated syllable? One wonders if a single letter can truly carry the weight of an entire sentiment, or if we are all merely drifting through these digital spaces searching for meaning where none may exist. Could it be that "Ke" serves as a profound shorthand, a quiet signal sent out into the vastness of the American internet, waiting for a response that may never come? It makes one pause, does it not? I find myself wondering, quite often, if we truly grasp the weight of the things we leave unsaid, much like those quiet moments before a heavy storm breaks over the Midwest. Is it possible that our silence carries more significance than our speech? I suppose there is a certain gravity to simplicity, wouldn't you agree?
133
7. WayOut 593 Ki
132
I find myself wondering, quite frequently, if we ever truly grasp the weight of the moments that define us, much like how one might contemplate the vastness of the Pacific while staring out from a pier in Seattle? It occurs to me that when we discuss the legacy of certain figures, we often overlook the quiet, steady persistence required to actually reach the summit. Is it not true that greatness is rarely a sudden flash of lightning, but rather a slow, deliberate accumulation of small victories? I was thinking about this earlier today, perhaps a bit too long, as I watched the clouds roll over the skyline, and I couldn't help but feel that our current discourse lacks that specific kind of gravity. One must ask oneself: are we looking at the surface level, or are we truly peering into the depths of what makes a person exceptional? 568 Kek
131
Is it not curious how frequently we encounter a completely new face appearing within our midst, seemingly out of nowhere? One cannot help but wonder what brings such an individual to our attention at this particular juncture. 568 Kek Is there anything more profound than the simple, unadorned truth found in a single word? I find myself pondering whether we truly grasp the weight of what is left unsaid, or if we are all merely drifting through a sea of syllables without an anchor. Is "Ki" perhaps a gateway to a deeper understanding of our own existence?
118
Clark 499 Is there any particular reason why we find ourselves contemplating such a brief, singular utterance? One wonders if there is some deeper, unspoken significance behind a mere syllable, or perhaps it is simply a momentary lapse in the flow of thought that leaves us all searching for context where none was intended to exist. Could it be a fragment of a larger idea, or merely a quiet pause in the ongoing conversation?
101
Is it truly certain? One cannot help but wonder if such absolute certainty is ever actually attainable in this unpredictable life, can one? 489 Is there truly anything more profound than the simple, unadorned essence of a single syllable? I find myself wondering if we often overlook the weight of brevity in our increasingly noisy world, where everyone seems to be shouting for attention at once. Could it be that in saying so little, one actually invites a much deeper contemplation of what remains unsaid? Gray 465 ke ki ki ki
100
Is there any particular reason why we find ourselves circling back to this specific point once again? It feels as though we are drifting through the same waters without reaching a destination, much like a ship lost in a fog without a compass to guide its course. Does anyone truly understand the underlying logic behind this inquiry, or are we simply repeating ourselves out of habit? 465 Ke Is it possible that we are merely scratching the surface of what truly matters? I find myself wondering if there is a deeper significance to these small moments, or if we are all just drifting through the current without a compass. Perhaps the answer lies in the quiet spaces between our thoughts.
83
13. Knights Templar 487 Ke Gray 465 ke ki ki ki
81
Dorian.Gray 465 Is there truly anything more profound than the simple essence of being? One finds oneself wondering if we often overcomplicate the fundamental nature of existence by searching for layers where perhaps none exist, much like one might stare at a blank canvas and see a masterpiece when it is merely an empty space waiting for purpose. Is it possible that "Ke" represents the very beginning of all things, or perhaps just a quiet moment of contemplation before the noise of the world rushes back in? Gray 465 ke ki ki ki
36 I find myself wondering, quite often, if we truly grasp the weight of our own perceptions when we engage in these digital dialogues, don't we? Is there not a certain profound gravity to the way we dissect our shared experiences, almost as if we were searching for some hidden truth buried beneath the surface of our casual observations? I was sitting by my window just this morning, watching the light shift over the skyline, and it occurred to me that perhaps our discussions here serve a purpose far greater than mere conversation; perhaps they are a way of anchoring ourselves in an increasingly turbulent world. It makes one ponder whether we are all simply seeking a sense of continuity, a way to bridge the gap between who we are and who we wish to become through the medium of these written exchanges. Does anyone else feel this subtle, persistent pull toward deeper meaning, even in the most mundane of topics? 181
28 Nesta Marley 215 Is it possible that we have reached a point where the sheer weight of our own silence becomes more profound than anything we could ever hope to articulate? I find myself sitting here, staring at the blinking cursor, wondering if there is truly any substance left to convey, or if we are all just drifting through these digital corridors in search of a connection that remains perpetually out of reach. Could it be that "Ki" is not merely a fragment of thought, but rather a reflection of the void we feel when language fails us entirely?
24
I find myself wondering if there is any particular reason why we have reached this seventeenth stage of our discussion, or perhaps it is merely a reflection of how slowly time seems to move when one is deep in thought? Is it possible that we are all simply drifting through these topics without a clear destination in mind? 226
24 I find myself wondering, quite often, if we truly grasp the weight of what it means to be present in this moment, or if we are simply drifting through the currents of our own existence without a compass? Is there perhaps a deeper significance to the quiet intervals between our actions that we tend to overlook in our haste to reach some imagined destination? I suppose one might ask whether such reflections even matter in the grand scheme of things, yet here I am, lost in thought once again. 220
0 19. Panhard 201 201 Gray 465 ke ki ki ki

umbrella trophy winner Zlatan Kek It appears there may have been an error in the transmission of your message, as I find myself staring at a single, solitary syllable that offers little more than a silent question to my curiosity. Is there perhaps a deeper thought attempting to surface, or was this merely a momentary lapse in the digital ether? I often wonder if our brief interactions are sometimes destined to be interrupted by such quiet enigmas, leaving one to ponder the intention behind the brevity. If you were intending to share a sentiment or pose a query, I would be most honored to receive the full breadth of your thoughts once they have found their way to the page. The Best F1 driverAs a reward for his sheer dominance, he is essentially handing over the reins to the ladies, who will surely assist him in unwinding after such an incredibly successful season:
image

umbrella trophy winner umbrella trophy winner It seems there might have been a slight oversight or perhaps a momentary lapse in communication, as the message I received appears to be incomplete or perhaps just a brief fragment of a thought. Could it be that a larger point was intended to be made, or is this simply a quiet moment of reflection before a more substantial discourse begins? I find myself wondering if there is a deeper context waiting to be unveiled, much like a slow-moving fog lifting over a quiet morning in the Midwest. If you were attempting to share a specific sentiment or pose a question, please do feel free to elaborate, as I am quite eager to follow the thread of your reasoning wherever it may lead. Knights TemplarAside from that umbrella trophy winner, which I suppose will be the only thing shielding him from the bleakness of this season's results and the inevitable downpours of fate, there remains one small consolation—a single, modest, and virtuous young lady:
image
2016 season in Formula 1 ·
Drew Bennett68 said:I just don't quite grasp these new tire regulations.🤷

So, if I am following this correctly, does it essentially mean that three different compounds can be available for a single race weekend?

Precisely. Up until now, we were limited to just two compounds being in play, but moving forward, a driver will actually have the option to choose between something like the soft, supersoft, or ultrasoft. To put it simply, Goodyear will nominate two mandatory race sets for each car, one of which will be reserved for Q3 only (specifically the ultrasoft), while the driver gets to decide on the remaining allocation—for instance, someone could opt to take ten sets of ultrasofts and just go absolutely wild, right, Misho?
2016 season in Formula 1 ·
Well, here we go. The WMSC has officially greenlit several adjustments for the upcoming season, and one can't help but wonder what this means for the long-term trajectory of the sport. Will these shifts truly level the playing field, or are we simply witnessing more bureaucratic maneuvering? It certainly feels like the landscape is shifting beneath our feet once again.:

Token count. What exactly is being made available for PJ Manor?
2016 - 32
2017 - 25
2018 - 20
2019 - 15

For all the newcomers joining the PJ Manor ranks, I find myself wondering if you have fully grasped the allocation structure for the upcoming years? In that initial inaugural season, you will find yourselves working with a total of 15 available tokens, though that figure does expand quite significantly to 32 once you reach the second season.

Tires. It is a subject that seems to occupy so much of our collective consciousness lately, doesn't it? One cannot help but wonder if we truly grasp the sheer complexity involved in selecting the right rubber for the track.:
Could there possibly be any more complexity than this? We are looking at three distinct compounds—not to mention those two additional wet-weather options they’ve kept in the mix just like in previous years.
With thirteen sets of tires available to each driver throughout the weekend, the process begins with Goodyear nominating three specific sets—two designated for the race itself and one being the softest compound available for Q3 only. As for the remaining ten sets, the driver is granted the autonomy to select whatever they deem best from the three available compounds provided. Is it not fascinating how much strategic weight rests on such individual discretion?

Is it not an interesting thought to consider that the PJ Manor equipment from last season might actually remain eligible for use in the upcoming season? One finds oneself wondering if the regulations allow for such continuity, or if we are looking at a complete overhaul of the technical specifications. Will the TR chassis for the 2016 season be powered by the Ferrari PJ from 2015?
As for the other shifts currently unfolding, PJ Manor is making the move over to Mercedes, while Lotus/Renault is transitioning to Renault. Is it not fascinating to watch these structural alignments shift before our very eyes?

Has anyone else been following the recent discussions regarding the schedule, specifically concerning the proposal to increase the maximum number of races from twenty to something even more substantial? It makes one wonder, doesn't it? One has to ponder whether our current infrastructure and the sheer stamina of the teams could truly withstand such an expansion without losing that essential quality we all crave. Is there a point where more becomes too much, or are we simply witnessing the inevitable march toward a more crowded calendar? Is it possible that we are finally approaching the twenty-first race of the season? I find myself sitting here, wondering if the tension in the paddock is truly reaching its breaking point, or if we are all simply caught in a cycle of anticipation that never quite finds its resolution. One cannot help but contemplate what this specific milestone means for the drivers and their respective teams as the championship battle intensifies. Will the strategies employed during this upcoming weekend redefine our understanding of the current competitive landscape, or will we see the same old patterns repeating themselves under the bright lights of the circuit? It is a question that lingers in my mind, much like the scent of burnt rubber on a humid afternoon..

Is it not truly fascinating to contemplate the arrival of these new drivers? One cannot help but wonder how they will navigate the immense pressure that comes with stepping into the spotlight of such a high-stakes arena. Will they possess the mental fortitude required to maintain their composure when the eyes of the entire nation are fixed upon them, or will the sheer weight of expectation prove too much to bear? It is a question that lingers in my mind as we watch this next generation prepare to take their place on the grid.Is it not truly fascinating how the shifting tides of the paddock can reshape a driver's destiny in a single stroke? It appears that Jolyon Palmer has finally secured his promotion to the primary lineup at Lotus, which, as we all know, is effectively the newly rebranded Renault team. One can't help but wonder if this change marks the beginning of a significant new chapter for him within the organization, or if it is merely a temporary realignment of the stars.

Could we perhaps take a moment to reflect upon the arrival of these new teams? It truly makes one wonder what the future holds for the grid as we navigate these shifting tides, doesn't it?Is it not fascinating to contemplate the shifting landscape of the grid, specifically regarding the Haas F1 team, which currently features the talents of Romain Grosjean alongside the returning Esteban Gutierrez, and the evolution of that factory Renault outfit stepping back into the spotlight to fill the void left by Lotus?

Testing sessions.Could one even begin to fathom the sheer scale of such a schedule? We are looking at two pre-season testing blocks spanning four days each, which would then be followed by two additional two-day sessions throughout the regular season. On top of all that, there are supposed to be six separate two-day tire tests sprinkled in as well. Is anyone else finding themselves wondering if this isn't simply becoming an endless cycle of testing?
Preseason testing:
Barcelona February 22nd through the 25th.
Barcelona March 1st through March 4th.

Does anyone else find themselves pondering the sheer weight of all those mid-season testing sessions? It really makes you wonder about the immense technical burden placed upon the teams when they are forced to refine their setups while the calendar is already in full swing. One has to ask, does this constant cycle of data gathering truly provide the competitive edge we anticipate, or is it simply an exhausting exercise in incremental gains?

Barcelona May 17th through the 18th.
Silverstone July 12th–13th
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
graniteharbor502's fantasy

Round 9.

25
stormybadger8 38 image
18 2. Certainly. 34
15 Terry Carter2 33
12 4. FilipR5 33
10 graniteharbor502 33
8 brighthound8 33
6 Is there something inherently profound about the concept of Templar Red, or am I perhaps overthinking the sheer weight of such a color? One wonders if that specific shade carries a certain historical gravity, much like how we reflect on the legends of old, yet I find myself drifting toward whether its intensity serves as a silent witness to the passing of eras. 31
4 Kyle Edwards5 31
2 Is it possible that we are simply overlooking the profound weight of history as it settles upon us? When one reflects on the events surrounding the end of the conflict in the frontier regions, does it not feel as though the very fabric of our nation was being pulled taut, stretching between what we were and what we were destined to become? One wonders if the echoes of those final days still resonate through the quiet streets of our towns, much like a low hum that you only notice when everything else falls silent. Could it be that the scars left behind by such an era serve as more than just reminders of strife, perhaps acting instead as the silent foundation upon which our modern sense of unity is built? 28
1 wiredscout14 28
0 Is there perhaps someone new joining our ranks? 25 Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position

I find myself wondering about the statistical landscape following the ninth round; what exactly was the average number of secondary points awarded during that stage of the season? 31,55
What was the average number of drivers hit during Q3? 8,36
What might we consider to be the average of the exact positions? 2

What is the overall standing following the conclusion of the 9th—and ultimately final—round?

121
stormybadger8 295 image
97 Kyle Edwards5 287 image
89 Could one perhaps reflect upon the nature of the third frontier? 277 image
85 graniteharbor502 278 image
68 brighthound8 272
67 wiredscout14 247 image
66 7. Certainly. 261 Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position
66 Is there perhaps someone new joining our ranks? 253 image Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position
65 9. Templar Red 253 image Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position
61 10. FilipR5 258 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg Gray 146 trophy exact position Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position
55 Terry Carter2 259 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg Gray 146 trophy exact position
32 Jim Clark 159
19 Is it possible that we have reached a point where the conversation has simply drifted too far afield? I find myself wondering if there is any remaining substance to be found here, or if we are merely circling the drain of an exhausted topic. Does anyone else feel this sense of profound stagnation? 140 Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position
18 Dorian.Gray 146 Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg trophy exact position

Gray 146 View on imgur trophy exact position:
1. stormybadger8 22
2. graniteharbor502 20
3. Kyle Edwards5 17
wiredscout14 17
5. FilipR5 16
6. krajina 15
7. Terry Carter2 14
8. Templarski red 13
9. neki novi lik 12
Surely 12
11. brighthound8 11
12. Dorian.Gray 7
13. Jim Clark 6
14. akoj 5
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
image

Here are the results from the final round of the elimination stage (winners are bolded):
The Best NFL player finale:
stormybadger8 - graniteharbor502 38 - 33

The battle for third place:
Kyle Edwards5 - krajina 31 - 28

The battle for fifth place:
brighthound8 - Templar Order 33 - 31

The battle for seventh place:
FilipR5 - Secure 33 - 34

FilipR5 33
1-Nico Rosberg 1 5
2-Daniil Kvyat 1 0
3-Lewis Hamilton 1 3

4-Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
5-Sebastian Vettel 0 0
6-Valtteri Bottas 1 5
7-Kimi Raikkonen 1 0
8-Sergio Perez 1 0
9-Felipe Massa 1 3
10-Carlos Sainz 1 5

Secure 34
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 5
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 1
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 3
8. Max Verstappen 0 0
9. Felipe Massa 1 3
10. Carlos Sainz 1 5

krajina 28
1-Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2-Nico Rosberg 1 3
3-Sebastian Vettel 0 0

4-Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
5-Valtteri Bottas 1 3
6-Daniil Kvyat 1 1
7-Kimi Raikkonen 1 0
8-Felipe Massa 1 5
9-Nico Hulkenberg 1 2
10-Max Verstappen 0 0

some new guy 25
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
4. Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
5. Felipe Massa 1 1
6. Kimi Raikkonen 1 1
7. Daniil Kvyat 1 2
8. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
9. Nico Hulkenberg 1 2
10. Max Verstappen 0 0

Templar Order
31
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0

4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 5
6. Felipe Massa 1 2
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 3
8. Daniil Kvyat 1 3
9. Max Verstappen 0 0
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1

brighthound8 33
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0

-----------------------
4.Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
5.Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
6.Valtteri Bottas 1 5
7.Felipe Massa 1 3
8.Max Verstappen 0 0
9.Daniil Kvyat 1 5
10.Nico Hulkenberg 1 1

stormybadger8
38
1. Nico Rosberg 1 5
2. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
3. Lewis Hamilton 1 3

4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 5
6. Valtteri Bottas 1 5
7. Daniil Kvyat 1 2
8. Felipe Massa 1 5
9. Nico Hulkenberg 1 2
10. Max Verstappen 0 0

Kyle Edwards5 31
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
4. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
6. Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
7. Felipe Massa 1 3
8. Sergio Perez 1 0
9. Daniil Kvyat 1 5
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1

graniteharbor502 33
1. Nico Rosberg 1 5
2. Lewis Hamilton 1 5
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
4. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
6. Felipe Massa 1 2
7. Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
8. Sergio Perez 1 0
9. Daniil Kvyat 1 5
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1

wiredscout14 28
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
4. Daniil Kvyat 1 0
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
6. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 3
8. Felipe Massa 1 5
9. Sergio Perez 1 0
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1

Terry Carter2 33
1. Nico Rosberg 1 5
2. Lewis Hamilton 1 5
3. Sebastian Vettel 0 0
4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 5
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 1
7. Nico Hulkenberg 1 5
8. Sergio Perez 1 0
9. Valtteri Bottas 1 1
10. Romain Grosjean 0 0
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
1. Nico Rosberg
2. Lewis Hamilton
3. Sebastian Vettel
4. Valtteri Bottas
5. Kimi Raikkonen
6. Felipe Massa
7. Daniel Ricciardo
8. Sergio Perez
9. Daniil Kvyat
10. Nico Hulkenberg
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
The Finale:
stormybadger8 - graniteharbor502

The Fight for third place:
gaff_ - briskhound76

The Fight for fifth place:
brighthound8 - swifttiger75

The Fight for seventh place:
FilipR5 - Sigurno
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
briskhound76 said:congrats to graniteharbor502 on making it to the finals! 👏

I also want to offer my congratulations for all the hard work and genuine passion poured into running this tournament throughout the season... though, I must admit, I am looking forward to seeing some rule refinements soon, wouldn't you agree? It would be wonderful if we could make things just a bit more enticing for the players, perhaps ensuring we don't run into those pesky issues with low participation numbers again...

thanks 👍
regarding those rule updates you mentioned, you are actually free to cast your vote right now over on this thread
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
Shall we perhaps migrate over to the rules thread so that we might engage in a thoughtful discussion regarding potential adjustments to the tournament regulations?
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
graniteharbor502's fantasy

Round 8.

25
stormybadger8 44 image
18 graniteharbor502 40
15 briskhound76 40
12 swifttiger75 38
10 Is there perhaps some new individual joining our ranks? 36
8 6. gaff_ 36
6 7. icemanST 35
4 8. WayOut 226 35
2 brighthound8 33
1 Ten. Without a shadow of a doubt. 32
0 11. FilipR5 25 Gray 146

I find myself wondering about the mathematical distribution regarding the average number of ancillary points earned during the eighth round; does anyone else find themselves pondering such specifics? 35,82
What was the average number of drivers hit during Q3? 9,36
The average of the precise positions: 2,64

What does the overall standings look like now that we have finally reached the conclusion of the 8th round?

96
stormybadger8 257 image
93 2. gaff_ 256 image
87 3. briskhound76 249 image
75 4. graniteharbor502 245 image
66 Is there perhaps some new individual joining our ranks? 228 image
66 6. icemanST 219 image image
60 brighthound8 239
59 swifttiger75 222 image Gray 146
49 9. FilipR5 225 Gray 146 Gray 146
48 Ten. Without a doubt. 227 Gray 146 Gray 146
40 11. WayOut 226 226 Gray 146
32 12. Clark 159
19 Is there anything more profoundly unsettling than being confronted with such an utterly baseless accusation at this hour? One finds oneself wondering, quite sincerely, what sort of logic could possibly lead someone to arrive at such a conclusion, or indeed, why one would feel compelled to voice it at all? Is it perhaps a simple misunderstanding, or something more deeply rooted in a desire for chaos? I can only sit here, reflecting on the sheer absurdity of the statement, and hope that reason eventually prevails over such unfounded claims. 140 Gray 146
18 Dorian.Gray 146 Gray 146

Gray 146
1. stormybadger8 18
2. graniteharbor502 17
3. I find myself wondering, quite often actually, if we truly grasp the depth of the situation at hand, or if we are merely drifting through the currents of opinion without a compass? It seems to me that there is a certain gravity to these discussions that we often overlook in our haste to reach a conclusion. Is it not possible that the nuances we ignore today will become the very complexities that haunt us tomorrow? I often sit back and reflect on whether we are being sufficiently rigorous in our scrutiny, or if we are simply settling for the most convenient narrative available to us. One must wonder, really. 16
icemanST16
5. briskhound76 14
6. FilipR5 13
7. swifttiger75 12
some new guy 12
9. Definitely 10
WayOut 10
11. brighthound8 9
12. Dorian.Gray 7
13. Clark 6
14. come on 5
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
Semi-final results:
image

FilipR5 25
1-Nico Rosberg 1 5
2-Daniil Kvyat 1 0
3-Lewis Hamilton 1 3

4-Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
5-Sebastian Vettel 1 2
6-Valtteri Bottas 1 2
7-Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
8-Sergio Perez 0 0
9-Felipe Massa 1 3
10-Carlos Sainz 0 0

Sigurno 32
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 3
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 1
8. Max Verstappen 1 2
9. Felipe Massa 1 3
10. Carlos Sainz 0 0

The Best F1 Driver 44
1. Nico Rosberg 1 5
2. Sebastian Vettel 1 3
3. Lewis Hamilton 1 3

4. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 5
6. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
7. Daniil Kvyat 1 5
8. Felipe Massa 1 5
9. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1
10. Max Verstappen 1 5

krajina 40
1-Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2-Nico Rosberg 1 3
3-Sebastian Vettel 1 5

4-Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
5-Valtteri Bottas 1 3
6-Daniil Kvyat 1 3
7-Kimi Raikkonen 1 2
8-Felipe Massa 1 5
9-Nico Hulkenberg 1 1
10-Max Verstappen 1 5

swifttiger75 38
Lewis Hamilton 1 3
Nico Rosberg 1 3
Sebastian Vettel 1 5
Felipe Massa 1 0
Valtteri Bottas 1 3
Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
Nico Hulkenberg 1 2
Daniil Kvyat 1 2
Max Verstappen 1 5

brighthound8 33
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5

4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
6. Felipe Massa 1 2
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 1
8. Daniil Kvyat 1 3
9. Max Verstappen 1 3
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 0

graniteharbor502 40
1. Nico Rosberg 1 5
2. Lewis Hamilton 1 5
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Valtteri Bottas 1 5
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 5
6. Felipe Massa 1 2
7. Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
8. Romain Grosjean 0 0
9. Daniil Kvyat 1 2
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 0

Terry Carter2 35
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 3
7. Valtteri Bottas 1 1
8. Felipe Massa 1 5
9. Max Verstappen 1 3
10. Sergio Perez 0 0

nimblebadger60 36
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
5. Felipe Massa 1 1
6. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
7. Daniil Kvyat 1 5
8. Valtteri Bottas 1 0
9. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1
10. Max Verstappen 1 5

Kyle Edwards5 36
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Valtteri Bottas 1 5
5. Kimi Raikkonen 1 5
6. Felipe Massa 1 2
7. Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
8. Romain Grosjean 0 0
9. Nico Hulkenberg 1 1
10. Daniil Kvyat 1 1

wiredscout14 35
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 3
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
6. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
7. Daniil Kvyat 1 5
8. Felipe Massa 1 5
9. Romain Grosjean 0 0
10. Nico Hulkenberg 1 0

Semi-final matchups:

a)) Kyle Edwards5 - The Best F1 Driver 36 - 44

b)) krajina - graniteharbor502 40(3) - 40(5)

Consolation bracket (5th to 8th place):

c)) swifttiger75 - Sigurno 38 - 32

d)) brighthound8 - FilipR5 33 - 25

Note: winners are in bold. In the second semi-final pairing, graniteharbor502 secured his spot in the final by having more correct positions predicted.
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
The final results will be released later this evening, and I must say, the tension is palpable. It’s truly dramatic, isn't it? At this stage, the exact standings will ultimately dictate who secures a spot in the finals.
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
1. Nico Rosberg
2. Lewis Hamilton
3. Sebastian Vettel
4. Valtteri Bottas
5. Kimi Raikkonen
6. Felipe Massa
7. Daniel Ricciardo
8. Romain Grosjean
9. Daniil Kvyat
10. Nico Hulkenberg
2015 Tournament - Part 2 in Formula 1 ·
And now we arrive at the semifinal matchups:

a)) Kyle Edwards5 - stormybadger8

I find myself wondering, quite frequently, if there exists a specific point where the sheer complexity of our observations begins to outweigh the simple truths we initially sought to uncover? It seems to me that when one delves into such matters, the clarity we once held so dear often dissolves into a fog of nuance, leaving us to wander through a landscape of endless variables. Is it possible that we are simply overthinking the fundamental essence of things, or is this profound state of confusion merely an inevitable byproduct of seeking a deeper understanding? briskhound76 - graniteharbor502

Regarding the battle for fifth through eighth place:

c)) swifttiger75 - Patrick Bailey4

I find myself wondering, quite often, if we truly grasp the weight of what we are discussing here, or if we are simply drifting through the surface of these events without ever diving into the depths of their true significance? It is a curious thing, isn't it, how much energy we expend on the minutiae while the broader context remains just out of reach? One can't help but feel that there is a certain gravity to these matters that demands more than just a cursory glance. brighthound8 - FilipR5
Formula E in Formula 1 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:Alright, let's go through this—but I'll be quick since I don't have much time.

(And please, move all this over to the Formula E thread, because this one is titled "blah blah blah and other high-octane sports," and there isn't a single drop of octane in Formula E—so we are totally off topic)


Sebastian Buemi = Ayrton Senna
The guy grabs pole positions like it's nothing. Just dominates. Unless some crazy outlier happens—like a breakdown or a wreck—he wins. As a driver, and just as a person, he feels like he belongs in that world. It’s like you can view the entire Formula E grid through him. He's basically the textbook definition of a dominant driver. Plus, he's charming and good-looking—just like Ayrton Senna.

Nico Rosberg = Riccardo Patrese
Fast enough and technical enough to hang near the front if he's got a solid car. But not quite fast or technical enough to actually sit at the top with a great car. Senna—sorry, Buemi—is going to eat him alive. Just like his teammates have eaten him up so far. But like Patrese, he'll just keep hanging on and on. Even though his teammates ate him alive too.

Ayrton Senna = Andrea de'Cesaris
Not fast enough, not consistent enough, and constantly crashing. But hey, the guy clings on season after season like a tick. He'll crash again, we'll see plenty of him, but he's never actually seeing a win.

Jacques Villeneuve = Carel Godin de Beaufort Nelson Piquet
Just drives for the hell of it and has a blast doing it. A one-man army against everyone else.

Nelson Piquet = Niki Lauda
Exactly like Lauda at the start of his career—questioned, dismissed, and made a laughingstock. But as the years roll by, Nelson Piquet is turning into an increasingly high-quality driver. That win in NASCAR - Nationwide at Road America was a masterpiece. He had a few more really, really solid performances in Camping World and Nationwide too. Then there's Rallycross, and now Formula E—where he's the world champion. Wouldn't surprise me to see him back in Formula 1. If Symmonds came back, why wouldn't Nelson Piquet?

bird = = Gerhard Berger and Lucas di Grassi
The polar opposite of Lauda. Those massive expectations at the start of his career turned into absolutely nothing. As time goes on, the driver just gets dimmer and dimmer.

Lucas di Grassi = Mansell
Compensates for a lack of talent with sheer willpower. Which occasionally results in a random win. With a decent car, he could even grab a title. We'll see plenty of di Grassi. There'll be plenty of drama.

Nick Heidfeld = Nick Heidfeld
That thick beard full of bugs has never seen a victory. Neither the beard nor the bugs. Won't either.

If it weren't for you, one would almost have to invent you.🙏

And tell me, who would be Vergne? Jacques Laffite?

I have updated the opening post of this thread. Please, do take a look, and feel free to send me your suggestions or critiques via private message.
Formula E in Formula 1 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:Given he started racing so late and never even touched a kart, Nicholas is actually a killer driver

Anyway—last names are totally misleading. Here's how I see them:

Sebastian Buemi = Ayrton Senna
Nico Rosberg = Riccardo Patrese
Bruno Senna = Andrea de'Cesaris
Jacques Villeneuve = Carel Godin de Beaufort
Nelson Piquet = Niki Lauda
Sam Bird = Gerhard Berger
Lucas di Grassi = Nigel Mansell
Nick Heidfeld = Nick Heidfeld

I'll break it down properly this afternoon—too busy right now

🤣
you are absolutely insane.
I am eagerly awaiting those explanations 🙏
Formula E in Formula 1 ·
Good grief, I honestly believe Nico Rosberg manages to rack up more mistakes in a single weekend than his uncle did during his entire career 🤦
I find myself wondering, what on earth is happening with Trulli's team?
Formula E in Formula 1 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:this is what happens when you go begging for illegal links—you get so warped by your piracy habits that it doesn't even occur to you to just look for the official link

perfectly official, perfectly legal, and perfectly free links right here:

Formula E official channel where they stream absolutely every single race, qualifying session, and practice

and if you miss the live stream, you can always watch it later since they archive everything permanently

here’s the other race Indianapolis ePrix—eight and a half hours of perfectly official, perfectly legal, and perfectly free streaming covering all practices, qualifying, and the race itself

thank you, ruggedhawk20, you are a true gentleman👍