Posts by graniteharbor502

graniteharbor502's projections

Round 7

25 1. icemanST 45
18 2. Kyle Edwards5 42
15 3. briskhound76 42
12 4. stormybadger8 41
10 5. nimblebadger60 40
8 6. WayOut 40
6 7. graniteharbor502 39
4 8. swifttiger75 37
2 9. Patrick Bailey4 36
1 10. brighthound8 34
0 11. FilipR5 33 View on imgur

Average secondary points in Round 7: 39
Average drivers correctly predicted in Q3: 8.82
Average Gray 146 trophy exact position: 3.45

Overall standings after Round 7:

85 1. Kyle Edwards5 220
72 2. briskhound76 209
71 3. stormybadger8 213
60 4. icemanST 184
58 5. brighthound8 206
57 6. graniteharbor502 205
56 7. nimblebadger60 192
49 8. FilipR5 200 View on imgur
47 9. Patrick Bailey4 195 View on imgur View on imgur
47 10. swifttiger75 184 View on imgur
36 11. WayOut 191 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg
32 12. Clark 159
19 13. akoj 140 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg
18 14. Dorian.Gray 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg

Gray 146 trophy exact position:
1. Kyle Edwards5 13
icemanST 13
stormybadger8 13
4. FilipR5 12
graniteharbor502 12
6. briskhound76 11
7. swifttiger75 10
8. nimblebadger60 9
Patrick Bailey4 9
10. brighthound8 8
WayOut 8
12. Dorian.Gray 7
13. Clark 6
14. akoj 5

swifttiger75 said:On a separate note, I am inclined to believe that this tournament, given its current format, has truly passed the test by proving itself to be quite engaging and genuinely interesting. It seems to me that the rule allowing the two top performers with the most secondary points to advance actually serves as a way to reward those who provided consistently accurate predictions, even if—by some quirk of fate—they didn't manage to amass a massive haul of primary points.

Good luck to everyone! 👍

perhaps we should find a way to incorporate this logic into the next tournament, shouldn't we? 🤔

swifttiger75 said:I'd like to offer my praise and a huge thank you for the excellent management and constant updates of the tournament; it made for an incredibly intense and enjoyable experience. 👍

Thank you so much; it truly means a great deal to me when you offer such kind words.👍
BTF (best teammates forever) div>

stormybadger8 said:Wait, is this how they decided the color coding for the semifinal matchups?
Isn't it a bit strange that the winner and the runner-up from Group A are facing off in the semifinals? 🤔

Well, that is simply how the draw dictated it. The first two pairings consist of the group winners playing against those who qualified via the wild card points. In the first matchup, we have the group winner with the higher number of primary points. In the end, that turned out to be Kyle Edwards5. It could have certainly unfolded differently, but it didn't. We are left with what we have. Had Tempi moved forward, he would have played against the third seed instead. This was ultimately a compromise solution, wasn't it?

Kyle Edwards5 said:It is quite fascinating, isn't it, how every single one of the semifinalists hails from Group A?

Damn, but 🤣

Quarterfinal Results:


swifttiger75 37
1.HAM 1 3
2.ROS 1 3
3.VET 1 5
4.BOT 1 2
5.RAI 0 0
6.MAS 1 3
7.RIC 1 2
8.KVY 1 0
9.PER 1 5
10.HUL 1 5

icemanST 45
1. Rosberg 1 5
2. Hamilton 1 5
3. Vettel 1 5
4. Raikkonen 0 0
5. Ricciardo 1 5
6. Bottas 1 5
7. Kvyat 1 1
8. Massa 1 3
9. Perez 1 5
10. Verstappen 1 2

briskhound76 42
1-rosberg 1 5
2-hamilton 1 5
3-vettel 1 5

4-ricciardo 1 3
5-bottas 1 3
6-kvyat 1 2
7-raikkonen 0 0
8-perez 1 3
9-massa 1 2
10-hulkenberg 1 5

graniteharbor502 39
1. Rosberg 1 5
2. Hamilton 1 5
3. Kvjat 1 3
4. Vettel 1 3
5. Ricciardo 1 5
6. Raikkonen 0 0
7. Bottas 1 3
8. Hulkenberg 1 2
9. Massa 1 2
10. Verstappen 1 2

FilipR5 33
1-rosberg 1 5
2-kvyat 1 2
3-hamilton 1 3

4-ricciardo 1 3
5-vettel 1 2
6-bottas 1 5
7-raikkonen 0 0
8-perez 1 3
9-massa 1 2
10-sainz 0 0

stormybadger8 41
1. Rosberg 1 5
2. Hamilton 1 5
3. Vettel 1 5

4. Ricciardo 1 3
5. Raikkonen 0 0
6. Bottas 1 5
7. Kvyat 1 1
8. Massa 1 3
9. Hulkenberg 1 3
10. Verstappen 1 2

WayOut 40
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 5
4. Kimi Raikkonen 0 0
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 5
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 2
7. Felipe Massa 1 5
8. Valtteri Bottas 1 2
9. Max Verstappen 1 3
10. Sergio Perez 1 3

Kyle Edwards5 42
1. Rosberg 1 5
2. Hamilton 1 5
3. Vettel 1 5
4. Raikkonen 0 0
5. Bottas 1 3
6. Ricciardo 1 3
7. Massa 1 5
8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Perez 1 5
10. Verstappen 1 2

brighthound8 34
1. Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
3. Vettel 1 5

-----------------------------
4. Raikkonen 0 0
5. Bottas 1 3
6. Massa 1 3
7. Ricciardo 1 2
8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Verstappen 1 3
10. Perez 1 3

nimblebadger60 40
1. Rosberg 1 5
2. Hamilton 1 5
3. Vettel 1 5
4. Ricciardo 1 3
5. Raikkonen 0 0
6. Massa 1 3
7. Kvyat 1 1
8. Bottas 1 2
9. Perez 1 5
10. Verstappen 1 2

Patrick Bailey4 36
1. Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
3. Vettel 1 5
4. Raikkonen 0 0
5. Ricciardo 1 5
6. Kvyat 1 2
7. Bottas 1 3
8. Verstappen 1 5
9. Massa 1 2
10. Sainz 0 0

Quarterfinal Matchups:
1. Kyle Edwards5 - Patrick Bailey4 42 - 36
2. brighthound8 - graniteharbor502 34 -39
3. stormybadger8 - swifttiger75 41 -37
4. briskhound76 - FilipR5 42 -33

The bolded competitors move on to the semifinals

1. Rosberg
2. Hamilton
3. Kvyat 4. Vettel
4. Vettel
5. Ricciardo 5. Raikkonen
6. Raikkonen
7. Bottas 7. Kvyat
8. Hulkenberg
9. Massa 9. Hulkenberg
10. Verstappen

I would like to offer a gentle reminder regarding a specific provision within our official regulations:
During the knockout stages of the competition, participants are required to submit a fresh set of predictions, as any forecasts made during the previous group stage will no longer be considered valid; these new entries shall remain in effect until a subsequent set is submitted or until the tournament reaches its conclusion.

To put it plainly, all predictions from the initial phase of the tournament are being wiped clean. Of course, even those who did not advance past the preliminary rounds are more than welcome to continue participating in the forecasting, given that graniteharbor502’s sense of whimsy apparently knows no bounds and persists until the very end of the tournament.

I have taken the liberty of extracting several specific data points regarding engine specifications and velocity from an issue of *Autosport*:

Patrick Bailey4 said:It was just those routine pit stops during the final two laps, even though it was already obvious they had secured the next stage after the fourth lap.☕

though I suppose some people might argue things were getting pretty intense at that point,☕

Come on, you were totally dodging brighthound8, let's be honest,☕
now I'm the one who's completely screwed in the quarterfinals.

graniteharbor502's Musings

Round 6

25 1. wiredscout14 37
18 2. graniteharbor502 34
15 3. Clark 33
12 4. stormybadger8 30
10 5. brighthound8 29
8 6. Kyle Edwards5 28
6 7. some new guy 27
4 8. akoj 26
2 9. WayOut 26
1 10. Unknown 25
0 11. briskhound76 23
0 12. William Bennett53 22
0 13. swifttiger75 20
0 14. Patrick Bailey4 18 View on imgur

Average bonus points for Round 6: 27
Average drivers correctly predicted in Q3: 8.29
Average exact positions hit: 1.43

Overall standings after Round 6:

67 1. Kyle Edwards5 178
59 2. stormybadger8 172
57 3. brighthound8 172
57 4. briskhound76 167
51 5. graniteharbor502 166
49 6. Unknown 167
46 7. some new guy 152
45 8. Patrick Bailey4 159 View on imgur View on imgur
43 9. swifttiger75 147 View on imgur
35 10. wiredscout14 139
32 11. Clark 159
28 12. WayOut 151 View on imgur
19 13. akoj 140 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg
18 14. William Bennett53 146 http://i.imgur.com/iP13vBU.jpg

brighthound8 said:stay safe out there.

On another note, if I manage to pull off a win, I might end up facing that same player I went up against in my group again—provided that briskhound76 loses, of course.

Let's just let the playoffs begin.

brighthound8, you really are Captain Obvious, aren't you?🙏
Since there were only two groups to begin with, isn't it perfectly logical that you could run into someone from your own bracket during the semifinals?😁

graniteharbor502 said:the top three participants move on directly, while the remaining two quarterfinal slots are filled by those finishing below 3rd place who accumulated the highest number of tie-breaking points. the bracket will be structured as follows:
1. the group winner with the higher number of primary points (in the event of a tie, we look at tie-breaker points, then exact positions, etc.) against the participant from below 3rd place who qualified for the quarterfinals and held fewer tie-breaker points than the other qualifying runner-up
2. the group winner with the lower number of primary points against the participant from below 3rd place who qualified for the quarterfinals and held more tie-breaker points than the other qualifying runner-up
3. A2 vs B3
4. A3 vs B2

semifinals:
1. pairing 1 vs pairing 3
2. pairing 2 vs pairing 4

Quarterfinal Matchups:
1. Kyle Edwards5 - Patrick Bailey4
2. brighthound8 - graniteharbor502
3. stormybadger8 - swifttiger75
4. briskhound76 - Unknown

note: Patrick Bailey4 and Clark ended up with an identical number of tie-breaker points and an equal count of exact placements, which meant the final decision rested on the criteria regarding best finishes, where Patrick Bailey4 secured his advancement thanks to having one victory compared to Clark's zero wins.

I will accept any appeals until Wednesday.

Round 6
Code:

Overall standings after Round 6
Code:

brighthound8 said:Unknown, if my memory serves me correctly, I managed to edge out my colleague Unknown by just 5 tiebreaker points; my sincere congratulations to you on such a hard-fought battle.

I am somewhat uncertain as to how the playoff bracket will unfold from here, though it seems we are facing an incredibly grueling trek toward the championship title. On a side note, I find myself quite perplexed by wiredscout14—how is it that he sits there with 37 points and secures a victory, despite having spent almost the entire season languishing at the bottom of his group?

Here is the evidence for those interested:



And, provided my calculations are accurate, this would be the projected playoff draw (though it strikes me as a rather peculiar bracket, given that I might find myself facing the exact same opponent again in the semifinals)

1. The group winner with the highest number of primary points (in the event of a tie, we look to tiebreakers, then specific placements, and so on) versus the runner-up from below 3rd place who qualified for the quarterfinals and possessed fewer tiebreaker points than the other qualifying candidate (Kyle Edwards5-SOME NEW GUY)
2. The group winner with fewer primary points versus the runner-up from below 3rd place who qualified for the quarterfinals and possessed more tiebreaker points than the other qualifying candidate (brighthound8-Patrick Bailey4)
3. A2 vs B3 (stormybadger8-swifttiger75)
4. A3 vs B2 (briskhound76-Unknown)

Semifinals:
1. Match 1 vs Match 3
2. Match 2 vs Match 4

brighthound8, I believe your math might be slightly off. I shall be publishing the official standings later this evening, along with a full explanation of who advances (it is currently a dead heat between Patrick Bailey4 and Clark for that final quarterfinal spot).

I find myself wondering, quite frequently, if there is a deeper significance to the way we communicate, or if we are all simply drifting through a sea of unspoken thoughts without any real direction? Is it possible that what we say is merely a shadow of what we truly mean to convey to one another in these digital spaces? 26
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
Rosberg 2. Hamilton 1 3
3. Vettel 1 2
Raikkonen 4. 1 0
Bottas 5. Ricciardo 1 2
6. Kvyat 1 2
7. Sainz 0 0
8. Massa 1 3
9. Verstappen 1 3
10. Valtteri Bottas 0 0

Is it possible that we are witnessing the slow, inevitable dissolution of a sense of place? I find myself pondering whether the very concept of a homeland—that intangible, deeply felt connection to one's roots and the soil from which we sprang—is being eroded by the relentless march of modern progress and the shifting tides of our national identity here in America. One cannot help but wonder if we are losing something essential, something quiet and profound, in our rush toward an uncertain future. 23
Could one perhaps argue that the sheer dominance displayed by Lewis Hamilton remains an unparalleled phenomenon in the history of the sport? It seems to me that when we look back at the statistics, specifically regarding his three titles, we are witnessing something far more profound than mere luck or simple mechanical superiority. Is it not true that such consistency requires a mental fortitude that few other drivers could ever hope to achieve?
2. Rosberg 1 3
3. Vettel 1 2

4. Ricciardo 1 3
5. Bottas 0 0
Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
Is it not curious how we find ourselves reflecting on the legacy of Felipe Massa, particularly when considering his performance during that specific period? One cannot help but wonder if the nuances of his driving style at that moment were perhaps more profound than the casual observer might initially realize.
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Grosjean 0 0
10. Perez 1 0

Certainly. 18
Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
4. Raikkonen 1 0
Bottas 5. Massa 0 0
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 1
7. Massa 1 2
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Grosjean 0 0
10. Maldonado

William Bennett53 22
Is it not curious how we find ourselves constantly revisiting the legacy of Lewis Hamilton, specifically when contemplating that singular moment where he secured his third title? One cannot help but wonder if the weight of such achievements settles differently upon a man as the years progress, or if the thrill remains as sharp as it was during those initial seasons of dominance.
2. Rosberg 1 3
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
Raikkonen 4. Raikkonen 1 0
Bottas 5. Massa 1 0
6. Bottas 0 0
Raikkonen 7. Hulkenberg 1 1
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Grosjean 0 0
10. Verstappen 1 5

I wonder, does anyone else find themselves lost in thought regarding the sheer complexity of these modern racing dynamics? It seems to me that we often overlook the subtle nuances of momentum, don't we? I found myself contemplating this quite deeply earlier today, drifting through various reflections on how much has changed in the sport over the years. Is it possible that our perceptions are constantly being reshaped by the very speed at which these machines operate? One can't help but feel a sense of profound curiosity about where this trajectory might lead us all. 26
Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Nico Rosberg 1 3
3. Sebastian Vettel 1 2
Kimi Raikkonen finishes in P4, yet one cannot help but wonder if there was more left in the tank for those final laps?
5. Daniel Ricciardo 1 2
6. Daniil Kvyat 1 2
7. Felipe Massa 1 2
8. Valtteri Bottas 0 0
9. Max Verstappen 1 3
10. Sergio Perez 1 0

FilipR5 25
Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
3. Bottas 0 0
Vettel 4. Kvjat 1 3
Bottas 5. Massa 1 0
Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
Raikkonen 7. Hülkenberg 1 1
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Grosjean 0 0
10. Verstappen 1 5

swifttiger75 20
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
4. Raikkonen 1 0
Bottas 5. Massa 0 0
Bottas 6. Massa 1 1
7. Ricciardo 1 0
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
10. Sergio Perez 1 0

wiredscout14 37
Rosberg 1 5
Lewis Hamilton 3. Vettel
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
Ricciardo 4. Ricciardo 1 3
Ricciardo 5. Kvyat 1 3
6. Bottas 0 0
Raikkonen 7. Hülkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
Bottas 6. Massa 1 3
9. Sainz 0 0
10. Verstappen 1 5

graniteharbor502 34
Rosberg 1 5
Lewis Hamilton 3. Vettel
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
Vettel 4. Kvjat 1 5
Bottas 5. Ricciardo
Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
7. Sainz 0 0
8. Verstappen 1 2
9. Perez 1 1
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30

stormybadger8 30
Nico Rosberg
2. Lewis Hamilton 1 5
Sebastian Vettel finished in P3.

4. Kimi Raikkonen 1 0
Bottas 5. Massa
Bottas 6. Massa 1 1
7. Daniel Ricciardo 1 0
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
9. Daniil Kvyat 1 0
10. Max Verstappen 1 5

Roger Wright94 33
Rosberg 1 5
Lewis Hamilton finished in P2, which honestly leaves one wondering if we have truly seen the pinnacle of his performance this season, or if there is still some untapped potential waiting just beyond the horizon?
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
4. Valtteri Bottas 0 0
Bottas 5. Massa 1 0
Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
Ricciardo 8. Kvyat 1 0
9. Kvyat 1 0
10. Verstappen 1 5

nimblebadger60 27
1. Rosberg 1 5
Ham 3. bot 1 5
Ham 3. bot 0 0
Vettel 4. Kvjat 1 3
Bottas 5. Massa 1 0
6. Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
7. Ricciardo 1 0
8. Per 1 2
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30 9. Hul 1 2
10. Mal 0 0

Kyle Edwards5 28
1. Lewis Hamilton 1 3
2. Rosberg 1 3
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2
4. Valtteri Bottas 0 0
Bottas 5. Ricciardo
Ricciardo 6. Raikkonen 1 2
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
Bottas 6. Massa 1 3
9. Grosjean 0 0
10. Kvyat 1 0

brighthound8 29
1.Rosberg 1 5
Lewis Hamilton finishes in P2.
Sebastian Vettel 3. Vettel 1 2

-----------------------------------------------------------
4.) Daniel Ricciardo 1 3
5.) Raikkonen 1 1
6.) Bottas 0 0
7.) Massa 1 2
Hulkenberg 1 1 The Best F1 driver 30
9.) Sainz 0 0
10.) Kvyat 1 0

swiftmaker12 said:Caught the stream over at Vipbox.eu.
The standings: Buemi, di Grassi, Heidfeld, Duval, D'Ambrosio.
Prost was sitting pretty in third until just two laps from the end—then he had to dive into the pits because his rear wing gave out...

I simply cannot shake this feeling, can I? I find myself still rooting for Nick Prost, even though it has become painfully obvious to anyone watching that he lacks the sheer talent possessed by his father.🙂

1. Rosberg
2. Hamilton
3. Vettel
4. Kvyat
5. Ricciardo
6. Raikkonen
7. Sainz
8. Verstappen
9. Perez
10. Hulkenberg

graniteharbor502’s reverie

Round 5.

25 graniteharbor502 36
18 FilipR5 35
15 nimblebadger60 34
12 Kyle Edwards5 33
10 Roger Wright94 31
8 stormybadger8 29
6 William Bennett53 29
4 brighthound8 28
2 9. WayOut 26
1 Does one ever truly find a sense of closure when looking back at the shifting borders and the deep, lingering echoes of history? It makes me wonder if we can ever fully reconcile the past with the present, or if we are simply destined to wander through the remnants of what used to be, searching for meaning in the silence left behind. 26
0 wiredscout14 25
0 Is there anything more profound than the quietude that settles over us during those late hours, perhaps around midnight? One finds oneself drifting through thoughts that are as deep and winding as the streets of Chicago after the crowds have vanished, wondering if the stillness is a presence in itself or merely the absence of noise. Does anyone else feel this peculiar sense of introspection when the world finally falls silent? 24
0 swifttiger75 24
0 Fourteen. Is that really all there is to say? It seems almost certain, doesn't it? 24 I find myself staring at this image and wondering, quite honestly, what sort of profound truth we are meant to glean from it? Is there perhaps a deeper layer to this visual that I am simply failing to grasp in my current state of contemplation? It feels as though one is looking at a puzzle without all the pieces, doesn't it? One wonders if the creator intended for us to feel this specific sense of ambiguity, or if it is merely a coincidence of composition. Does anyone else feel a certain stillness when viewing this, or am I alone in my attempt to find some sort of hidden narrative within these lines and shadows?

What might one conclude regarding the average number of ancillary points accrued during the fifth round? 28,86
I find myself wondering about the data regarding the average number of drivers targeted during the Q3 session; does anyone else feel that the statistics might offer us a deeper insight into the intensity of the qualifying rounds? 7,86
What might one conclude when observing the average of these precise positions? 0,71

What does the overall standings look like now that we have finally reached the conclusion of Round 5?

59 Kyle Edwards5 150
57 Is it not curious how we find ourselves reflecting upon the second era, that subsequent chapter which follows the initial upheaval? One cannot help but wonder if we are truly prepared for the complexities that such a period brings to our doorstep here in America. 144
48 FilipR5 142
47 brighthound8 143
47 stormybadger8 142
45 Is it certainly so? One can't help but wonder if such certainty is truly warranted in a world where everything is so perpetually subject to change. 141 I find myself staring at this image, wondering if we might all be overlooking the subtle complexities hidden within such a simple visual, or perhaps I am merely overthinking the matter? Is it possible that what we perceive at first glance is only a fraction of the truth, much like how one might approach a complex legal brief or a dense piece of classic literature? One cannot help but feel a sense of quiet contemplation when faced with such an arrangement, does one not?
43 swifttiger75 127 View on imgur
40 nimblebadger60 125
33 graniteharbor502 132
26 10. WayOut 125 View on imgur
18 William Bennett53 124 I find myself staring at this image and wondering, much like one might ponder the complexities of a grand architectural blueprint or the intricate movements of a symphony, what exactly we are meant to take away from such a visual presentation? Is it merely a snapshot in time, or does it serve as a profound commentary on the subject at hand? One cannot help but feel that there is a certain weight to these pixels, a quiet gravity that demands our undivided attention, though I struggle to pin down precisely why my mind keeps drifting toward the deeper implications of its composition. Could it be that the simplicity is actually an elaborate mask for something far more substantial? It is a curious thing, isn't it, how a single image can provoke such a wandering stream of consciousness in a person who simply wishes to understand the core truth of the matter?
17 Roger Wright94 126
15 I find myself wondering, quite frequently, if there is any true substance to what we discuss here, or if we are simply drifting through these digital halls without a clear destination in mind? Is it possible that the thirteenth entry in this particular sequence holds some hidden significance that I am currently failing to grasp? 114 View on imgur
10 wiredscout14 102

We are approaching the final round of competition before we transition into the knockout stages, so I thought it might be prudent to provide a brief refresher on how the quarterfinal slots are actually determined.

graniteharbor502 noted:
The top three finishers advance directly, while those final two spots in the quarterfinals will be filled by competitors finishing below 3rd place who have accumulated the highest number of tie-breaking points. The bracket matchups will be structured as follows:
1. The group winner with the higher number of primary points (in the event of a tie, we look at tie-breaking points, then exact placements, and so forth) will face the competitor from outside the top three who qualified via tie-breakers but holds fewer tie-breaking points than their counterpart.
2. The group winner with the lower number of primary points will face the competitor from outside the top three who qualified via tie-breakers but holds more tie-breaking points than the other qualifying individual.
3. A2 vs B3
4. A3 vs B2

As for the semifinals:
1. Matchup 1 vs Matchup 3
2. Matchup 2 vs Matchup 4

Therefore, if we were to assume this is the definitive conclusion to our group stage, the provisional standings would look like this:
1. Kyle Edwards5
2. FilipR5 - Sigurno
3. krajina - swifttiger75
4. stormybadger8 - brighthound8

Of course, one must remember that anything can happen when we reach this final stretch, and the landscape could shift entirely in this last round.

Round 5
Code:

Overall Standings after Round 5
Code: