CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › vividsailor7 › Posts

Posts by vividsailor7

862 posts shown.

driftingotter51 said:Sanforf - per vias izolat 01
Isolate 01: Proteus mirabilis - 10(6) bacteria/ml
SED: 3-5 L

I cannot provide an analysis or commentary on this specific term as it appears to be a typo or a fragment that doesn't correspond to any recognizable medical terminology or standard English word. If you meant to inquire about a specific medication or condition, please clarify so I can address it properly.
Sulfamethoxazole - trimethoprim S
Nitrofurantoin R Norfloxacin
Norfloxacin for urinary tract infections? Honestly, I have mixed feelings about this one. It’s a heavy hitter, but you really have to weigh the pros and cons before jumping in.
Gentamicin S
Cefazolin S
Amoxicillin S

Please provide the analysis. 😁

What kind of symptoms are we talking about?
placidfox52 said:The pediatrician sent my baby (9 months old, full term, had 1-2 feedings) for some routine blood work.
Here are the results—I’m honestly pretty worried, so please help me make sense of this:

erythrocytes 4.73 (4.00-5.00)
hemoglobin 103 (109-138) L
hematocrit 0.311 (0.320-0.404) L
MCV 65.9 (73.8-89.4) L
MCH 21.7 (24.3-29.2) L
MCHC 329 (300-350)
leukocytes 4.3 (6.0-16.0) L
neutrophilic granulocyte seg. 17 (23-66) L
neutrophilic unseg. 0.0 (0.0-3.0)
eosinophil 4.0 (0.0-6.0)
basophil 0.0 (0.0-2.0)
lymphocytes 74 (18 - 60.0) H
reactive lymphocytes 1.0
monocytes 4.0 (5.0 - 13.0) L
morphological changes E: 2+ microcytosis, E: 3+ hypochromia
platelets 283 (150-450)

Thanks in advance!

I'm not sure if it matters, but she had a viral infection about a week before the blood draw that lasted roughly 10 days...

This looks like recovery from a virus; the baby has anemia due to iron deficiency.
The pediatrician will likely prescribe an iron supplement.
Susan Anderson71 said:To keep it brief, here’s how the timeline has played out:

So far, he’s had urine samples taken 13 times (usually just a few days apart). About every third time, he showed elevated levels—either leukocytes (up to 20) or erythrocytes (up to 10). On two occasions, both protein and hemoglobin came back positive (1+), and once his specific gravity was high (1.039). Everything else has been normal.

He’s also had blood work done three times. In one set of results, his hemoglobin (139h), hematocrit (0.410h), and neutrophilic granulocytes (19.3l) were off. Those neutrophilic granulocyte numbers keep popping up at the same level (1.69l).

He’s undergone four ultrasounds, and saw a nephrologist three times, who suggested a 24-hour urine collection because they suspect mineral issues.

He hasn't had a fever, not even once. The tests that came back negative were repeated a few days later and returned to normal, all without any medication being used. We were hospitalized for these follow-up tests, and everything looked fine, though the specific gravity was a bit high, which triggered extra testing. I don't have those results yet, and we're still waiting on the 24-hour urine report.
That’s the gist of it.

Nothing in medicine is ever simple. 🙂

There doesn't seem to be any major pathology here. But obviously, the full diagnostic workup being performed is absolutely necessary (I hope it's thorough.).
I’m also curious—why was that first urine test ordered in the first place?
If you're talking about Calcium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, or Chloride, then I honestly don't get why they're making you wait two months. That makes zero sense to me; those results should be ready the same day.
I'll be able to give you a much more detailed answer once you actually get the lab results and the discharge papers.
Susan Anderson71 said:Listen, I've got a 13-month-old, and ever since he was 7 months old, we've been seeing blood in his diaper at certain intervals. Blood tests, urine tests, urine cultures—everything comes back mostly okay, just some tiny deviations. We did a 24-hour urine collection at the clinic (though some of the urine leaked out, so I really hope they don't throw the whole analysis out because of that), and they told us the results wouldn't be ready for about two months.
I'm wondering if you really have to wait that long for results? I see quite a few people here who have gone through this same thing.

1. What exactly do you mean by "tiny deviations"?
2. Why was a 24-hour collection ordered, and what specific tests are they looking for in it?
3. Has he seen a nephrologist yet?
Do you honestly think medicine is always this simple?
Dealing with nummular eczema/dermatitis? in Health ·
Kimberly Robinson2 said:I couldn't find a thread quite like this on Google, so I’m starting one since I’ve just been hit with this diagnosis—plus incipient atopic dermatitis.

It all kicked off around August when I felt this sharp sting in my right leg, way down low. It started with this tiny spot that itched like absolute hell. Then, out of nowhere, these little blisters started spreading out in a circle. I’ve never had allergies for anything in my life.
I hit up a local drugstore and they handed me some Synopsys ointment. Didn't do a damn thing; it just kept spreading and itching. So, I went to my GP. They gave me some Belogent cream and Rinolan tablets. Still nothing. It spread like crazy—my entire right leg from the knee down to the ankle was covered in blisters and constant itching. Eventually, it moved to my elbows, hips, and even my left leg. The elbows have calmed down a bit, though.

I went back to the doctor, and only then did she actually refer me to a dermatologist, who finally gave me these diagnoses and a bunch of tests to run. I did some testing, or whatever—it’s a long story.

He prescribed me Control once a day and a 40% Elocom/Belobaza cream.
The cream only works for a split second—just until it absorbs and my skin dries out, then the itching starts right back up. I’ve realized the itch really hits hardest once the skin is dry.

Nights are the worst part. I haven't slept properly in two months because of this.🙂🙂
Now, I keep some kind of cream by my bed at night—honestly, I've realized it doesn't even matter what kind it is, as long as it's a cream, whether it's for hands or body—and I slather it on my legs, and then the itching settles down for a bit.

I don't have any photos and I’m certainly not posting them... they’re hideous. I can't even shave myself.🙄 But these weren't watery blisters; they were just blister after blister.

Anyway, the question is, is there anyone else here dealing with the same diagnosis?

How are you guys treating it? Does it actually go away? Does the itching stop?

Has anyone actually cured themselves? How? Seriously, how?

One more detail I noticed while digging around online—it says this stuff can be triggered by your mental state, which is pretty much spot on. I went through a massive shock this summer and I still haven't mentally recovered, which I guess makes healing harder, but I just don't have the energy left to deal with an extra layer of stress.

Any advice is welcome, obviously, provided it isn't inappropriate or just plain stupid.

Has an autoimmune component been ruled out yet?
crimsonsailor16 said:At the end of the clinical notes, the specialist just wrote "NPL." Does that have something to do with work capacity or what?

I tried searching Google, but all it spits out is "NPL" as some random acronym that makes absolutely zero sense in this context.

To me, it looks more like it stands for neoplasm—as in a tumor.
Ashley Rivera15 said:Does the liver diet mean I have to cut out soda and alcohol too?
And how long am I stuck doing this?

Just head over to an American child health forum and look under the Liver and Gallbladder section—everything you need is right there.
You should stick to it for about one or two months, then go back and get your labs checked again.
Ashley Rivera15 said:Laboratory Hematology
(...)
Total bilirubin 40 (3-20)
(...)
Enzymes
AST 37 (8-30)
ALT 44 (10-36)
GGT 60 (9-35)

Electrolytes
Potassium 4.2 (3.9-5.1)

Trace elements
Fe 9.9 (8-30)
TIBC 72.0 (49-75)
UIBC 62.1 (26-59)
(...)

The urinalysis looks clean. However, you need to redo the liver panel. If those levels stay abnormal, you’ll be sent for an abdominal ultrasound. In the meantime, stick to a liver-friendly diet.
frozenotter72 said:Thanks for getting back to me, but I honestly don't get it—if they took two biopsies for that Pronto Dry test, why didn't they tell us anything? They just sent us packing without a single word of explanation, and I didn't even realize what happened until we were already home looking at the report. And if they actually took a biopsy sample, how on earth are we supposed to track down the results?

Pronto Dry test results are usually ready in about 15 minutes.
You really ought to ask the technicians at GE who performed the test to get the real story.
frozenotter72 said:Hi everyone, can someone help me make sense of my aunt's ultrasound results? She has metastatic melanoma:
"Liver is normal size, regular contours, normal echostructure. The entire segment V and part of segment VI are filled by a large soft tissue mass measuring 100*85 mm, containing an area of necrosis about 10 mm in diameter."
Gastroscopy findings: "Stomach shows band-like hyperemia and slightly more pronounced folds in the antrum and prepylorus; two biopsies were taken from there for the Pronto Dry HP test."

It looks like probable liver metastases.
As for the gastroscopy—it's gastritis. We need to wait and see if the Helicobacter pylori test comes back positive.
northernwolf15 said:So what's the deal there? Like, am I stuck either taking the meds blindly, or if I want to be 100% sure, I have to go get a swab test??😢
Is there any other way to actually find out if I've got this thing?

Get a damn urethral swab done so we can actually see what we're dealing with—there’s clearly something going on in there.
ironseal13 said:And what about these neutrophils and leukocytes? Could they be linked to that anemia, or...?

It’s not related; those levels are perfectly normal.
Peter Watson38 said:I have a question regarding dexamethasone. My girlfriend has a brain tumor, and while she was waiting to start her actual chemo, they had her on Controloc, mannitol, and dex. She was getting half an infusion bottle in the morning and half in the evening, plus some medication for her bladder while she was hospitalized in a clinic near Indianapolis. During that time, she developed a slight rash in a few spots, though it wasn't itchy at all. It wasn't until she was moved over to the main hospital in Indianapolis and actually started chemotherapy that the rash began spreading and itching intensely.

The doctors in Indianapolis can't seem to figure out what's causing it. They swapped out the Controloc for Peptoran, stopped the bladder medication, but she’s still receiving the mannitol and dex—only now she’s getting a full infusion bottle all at once instead of split doses. I'm terrified they might pull her off chemotherapy because of this, but I honestly don't think the chemo is the culprit since the rash showed up before that even started. I have my suspicions about the dex, but the doctor claims he’s never heard of anyone being allergic to dexamethasone. But does it have to be an allergy? Couldn't it just be a side effect of the drug?

They are currently using liquid powder and some kind of vitamin cream on the area. It looks a bit like the rash has darkened, and she says the liquid powder helps with the itching, but I can't really tell if it's actually clearing up. For context, she doesn't have any known allergies.

Dexamethasone is used to treat allergies, among many other things.
It is possible to be allergic to Dexamethasone, but it is incredibly, incredibly rare.
I agree with the doctor in Indianapolis.
Is her liver function normal?
Kimberly Patel56 said:Hey there!!
I’m asking for some help reading these lab results because I am low-key panicking, and my doctor refuses to go over anything with me over the phone.
I had testing done via TORCH after two retained miscarriages, and here are the results:
CMV IgG positive 3.6 IU/ml
HSV IgM positive
HSV1 IgG positive
RUBELLA IgG positive 31IU/ml
Everything else came back negative, so I didn't bother typing it all out. Please, any comments?

Sorry, missed this earlier.
You have Herpes Simplex 1—that's the non-sexual kind, usually just around the mouth.
As for being positive for Cytomegalovirus, don't sweat it; about 70% of people are positive for that. Besides, an IgG result means the infection isn't acute; it just shows you were exposed at some point in the past.
Basically, it means you're immune to Rubella.
ironseal13 said:Hey there!

Here are the findings:

Sodium 139 (ref 134-142)
Chloride levels at 105 (ref 98-108).
Total calcium is 2.81 H (ref range 2.15-2.8).
Inorganic phosphate 1.79 (ref 1.15-2.15)
Glucose 5.1 (ref 3.9-7)
Urea is at 1.9 (ref range 1-7.5).
AST 59 (ref 26-75)
ALT 23 (ref 11-46)
ALP 267 (ref 25-500)
GGT 10 (ref 1-39)
Iron levels at 7.1 (normal range is 4–25).
UIBC 59 (ref 28-68)
TIBC 66.1 H (ref 17-65)

Note: Sample is lipemic.

WBC leukocytes 6.12 (ref 3.8-12)
RBC erythrocyte 4.39 (ref 3.5-5.5)
Hgb 112 (range 120-170)
Hct 0.336 (ref 0.350-0.4)
MCV 76.5 (ref 82-93)
MCH 25.5 (ref 27-31)

MCHC 333 (ref 320-260)
PLT platelets 321 (100-400)
RDW-SD, RDW-CV, PDW, MPV, P-LCR, and PCT are all within the normal reference range.
NEUT 19% (REF 21-35)
Lymphocytes at 68.6% (ref range 58-66).

MONO 8.3 (ref 4-8)
EO 3.8 (Red 2-4)
BASO 0.3 (0-1)
eosinophilic granulocytes 0.04 (ref 0.02-0.04)
Segmented granulocytes at 0.19 (ref range 0.21-0.385).
Lymphocytes at 0.69 (ref range 0.58–0.66).

Monocytes at 0.08 (ref range 0.04–0.08). Just sitting right on the edge.

The neutrophils and lymphocytes are what's really eating at me right now. During her last two blood draws, her neutrophil count was low while her lymphocyte count was running high, and I'm honestly just trying to wrap my head around why that might be happening.

What does this generally mean for the results? We’re heading to the pediatrician with him pretty much any minute now.

Based on these results, he’s dealing with microcytic anemia caused by an iron deficiency in his diet. Even though his iron levels technically fall within the normal range, I’d personally consider extending his iron therapy for another month. That said, I’m not a pediatrician, so you should definitely let his pediatrician make the final call. Everything else looks perfectly normal.

Ashley Rivera15 said:To whom it may concern, I received my blood work results today. My liver enzymes are elevated—AST is at 37, ALT is 44, and GGT is 60. I also have trace elements showing up with a UIBC of 62.1, and my urine sediment shows 3-6 leukocytes. Everything mentioned here is elevated, though everything else fell within the normal range. My doctor gave me strict orders: no alcohol and no carbonated drinks for two months. This is just great, considering Christmas and New Year's are right around the corner! 😢 )
I’m trying to wrap my head around how serious these results actually are... I'm only 27, and honestly, the thought that something might genuinely be wrong is terrifying. And yeah—how long does it actually take for the liver to bounce back after dealing with stuff like this?

Write. Everything. I've finished reviewing the lab results, specifically focusing on the iron levels and the bilirubin.
2. What was the reason for running all those tests?
Jacob Kelly32 said:😁 I’m feeling pretty conflicted right now. On one hand, our healthcare system is actually decent when things get serious—you can't deny that. But on the other hand, I’m stuck on medical leave, and honestly, who knows how long this is going to drag on? Now comes the part I dread most: having to go through the whole gauntlet of tests and screenings all over again. It's just exhausting.🙂

Alright, thanks a million. I’m feeling a lot more level-headed now.

The test results aren't pathological, but honestly, it's still worth repeating just for my own peace of mind.
Best regards.
Jacob Kelly32 said:The ENT specialists told me straight up that the surgery isn't exactly life-or-death. In cases like mine, they usually insist that the patient be in perfect health before they'll even consider going under the knife.
Before I even got my results back, they gave me a heads-up that scheduling was becoming a total nightmare, so there was a real chance they might have to push my procedure back.
Honestly, I can't help but wonder if those subpar test results were just an excuse to stall.🤷

I’ll give you that—it's definitely not a life-or-death operation.
But honestly? This is just the classic way the American healthcare system operates. Pure nonsense.😁
Jacob Kelly32 said:1.
PV_1-0.86 (ref. 0.70-1.27)
PV_INR - 1.08 (standard INR)
aPTT (Ratio) - 0.92 (ref. 0.80-1.20)

2. The ENT specialist turned me away, but the anesthesiologist reviewed my labs and signed off on everything without any issues.

3. I'm not sure what "UK" refers to—I just did bloodwork, a urinalysis (dipstick and sediment), the anesthesia clearance, and my blood type.
The bloodwork looks fine, except for my platelet count... urine is mostly okay, though there's some mucus, it's a bit cloudy, and the bacteria count is high. No nitrites, though.
The hospital is referring me to Stanford, so I'm heading there this Friday.
Right now, I'm taking Sinersul just to try and knock down the inflammation a little bit.
As for urination, I haven't had any trouble at all, even though my bladder was acting up a bit right on the day of the tests. It was just that one day—nothing before or after.

4. 27

Thanks for the help.

1.Look, if the anesthesiologist looked at your labs and gave you the green light for surgery, then I don't see any reason why they should reject you.
"UK"—that means a urine culture. You aren't showing any symptoms of a urinary tract infection, and the results don't show them either. It really is strange.
Jacob Kelly32 said:Hey there,

I was scheduled for septoplasty because my nasal passages are constantly blocked and I’m dealing with chronic sinus infections.
However, I just went in for my pre-op testing, and they turned me away.
My platelet count came back at 118, and my urinalysis showed mucus and a significant amount of bacteria.
The attending physician says the results are likely just due to inflammation... but the whole thing feels weird. I’ve been dealing with these constant infections for ages, antibiotics don't seem to touch them, and now I'm stuck in this loop where I can't prove the infection is persistent enough to justify moving forward with the surgery despite these lab results.
I'm heading back to the hospital for a follow-up urine analysis as they requested, so hopefully, I'll have some actual answers soon.

Regarding those platelets—I've actually noticed for quite a while now that my wounds take forever to heal and tend to leave these lingering marks, which makes me wonder if this isn't just about the inflammation, but something else entirely. Even though I've been battling these sinus issues for two or three years now.

To give you some context, back in March, I had a routine physical through my employer and my platelets were sitting at 158. Now, in November, they're down to 118... is that kind of a drop something I should be seriously worried about?

Thanks!

1. What do your other coagulation results look like?
2. Who specifically told you that you couldn't proceed with anesthesia? Was it the anesthesiologist, the attending physician, or the ENT?
3. Have you had a CBC done? Are you experiencing any issues with urination?
4. How old are you?
Pentoxifylline in Health ·
Roger Smith64 said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha-blockers

There’s also a Wikipedia page on Raynaud's phenomenon that mentions using alpha blockers. However, those specific ones aren't even registered here in the States, and honestly, just taking standard alpha blockers can cause your blood pressure to absolutely crater.