stormybadger8 said:It’s honestly irrelevant, given how many breakdowns there are anyway. Just the way it goes...
For the second time now, Daniel Ricciardo absolutely dismantled him in those head-to-head races.
No fluff. No filler. Just the facts.
stormybadger8 Asks:
It’s one thing when Mattia Binotto goes on a media rant, but it's an entirely different story when you look at what actually went down on the track and how much freedom Charles Leclerc was truly given...
What was he allowed to get away with?
Hopefully he won't go attacking a slower Sebastian Vettel ahead of him, like we saw during that first race in the USA?
Should they just ignore Sebastian Vettel after he asks over the radio, like what happened in China?
Or what about when they "accidentally" forgot to tell him that Vettel had a five-second penalty ahead of him? You know, just like what happened in Canada?
Or rather, what we saw happen repeatedly this season: Vettel trailing behind Leclerc, yet somehow Vettel gets the priority and hits the pits first?
It was pretty obvious, wasn't it? Leclerc was dropping positions while Vettel was moving up—and that gain came directly at Leclerc's expense.
stormybadger8 said:How is this even acceptable? How can a No. 2 driver, following Binotto's lead, refuse to give slipstream to his teammate during qualifying—basically sabotaging both himself and everyone else on track—only to end up with absolutely nothing in the end? What was the point?
Of course it is. Massa and Barrichello? They were constantly pulling stunts like that. 🙂
Barrichello back in Austria in 2002. He tried to go rogue. Wasn't that the whole point of him being the No. 2 driver? They had an agreement to let the No. 1 driver through if things got tricky during the race. Why break the deal then?
Charles Leclerc did the exact same thing at Monza.
The plan was already set for Q3. First, the No. 1 driver would provide the slipstream for the No. 2 driver. Then, during the most critical phase of qualifying, the roles would flip, with the No. 2 driver pulling the No. 1 driver along. Simple enough, right?
So then Charles Leclerc decided to play the hero. He ignored the pre-arranged team orders and completely threw his teammate under the bus. Why even bother with a strategy if you're just going to sabotage your own side?
Unlike Barrichello, who saw Ferrari essentially hand him four wins that season—some gifted directly like in the USA, others by letting a clearly faster Schumacher hold back—it felt like they were just waiting for any excuse to slap Leclerc.
They even managed to find an opportunity for that in Singapore.
If we end up having to debate who the lead driver is and who plays second fiddle once this race is over—and exactly what kind of freedom each one was given—then honestly, what's the point?