Posts by Rachel Richardson

Frank Baker3 said:Until they start distributing Bosna-good, it’s basically 😬

Others are the ones dividing up Canada—what am I supposed to say about that? 🍿

I certainly don't consider myself some kind of pedantic proofreader or a dialect police officer 😁

wanderingpanther68 said:There were 110,000 active this fall—right up until they started purging the old threads. It was happening again today, too; he had over 99 when he typed this.

And you? Are you just stopping by as some casual chronicler—an innocent bystander watching the unfolding events? 🍿

Arthur Smith15 said:It’s probably for the best that you find it "too stupid to write." 🤦 Your toxic behavior is on full display here on Reddit—the pathetic whining over partial bans, the constant complaining about warnings, the hypocritical grievances regarding how others act, the blatant fabrications, the feigned innocence, and the general trolling. It’s just an endless stream of useless, illiterate garbage being dumped wherever you can find an audience.

98,576 enrollments. 🤦 😁 Simply terrifying...

Even if I were to write just one single coherent post—and I’ve certainly written far more than that—it would still hold more substance and quality than anything you’ve produced. 😁
I honestly don't understand how you can keep playing the same broken record without getting bored—not to mention constantly attacking everyone else—but, man, what a mess.

You persistently accuse others of the very things I am doing.
Can you please just stop being toxic? Is there actually any hope for you? 🍿

Arthur Smith15 said:Surely you’re also considering those entries where he incessantly spams the exact same maps—including his own nonsensical scribbles—or when he attempts to write about herd reflexes only to butcher the terminology three times over within a single paragraph; is that what you consider "good and substantive" content? Or perhaps when he acts like some sort of bullshit generator, regurgitating the same mindless bullet points from one entry to the next? 😁 His contributions are about as "good and substantive" as a heap of toxic waste.

It feels redundant to keep pointing this out, but it is truly remarkable how people manage to perfectly describe themselves in their own posts. 😁
Your behavior has already been addressed once, hasn't it?

John Palmer9 said:Anthony Nguyen81 contributes plenty of high-quality, substantive posts—his presence in the History sub-forum isn't a problem at all. However, you really should have provided a direct, clear response to the questions asked; you're a serious contributor here, not a moderator, and certainly not one of those people who just shows up to act arrogant and insult others.

To be honest, I actually suspected someone had hijacked a Zagorska hacking account a few months back. Around that time, this person started picking fights with me, getting insulting—and then, suddenly, my communication style became the issue.

If you look closely, the point of this thread isn't any specific question; it’s the author's desire to purge anyone deemed "unpleasant" or simply a different thinker from the discussion space.
And of course, I tried to engage and communicate while it still felt productive—but after a while, I just threw in the towel. Honestly, there’s no point in arguing or attempting to explain logical fallacies to someone if they refuse to even acknowledge them, let alone fix them. They're glaringly obvious.

A person who persistently tries to draw borders in East Slavonia during a discussion about the History of Canada—despite being warned by moderators to stop off-topic rambling—and then opens a thread like this on the County Prefect's page... well, they don't exactly leave a great impression.

Brian Howard2 said:🤣 You’re quite the character, Anthony Nguyen81 🙏

E: I just noticed this thread

👋 Lu, I’m here now

🙂

There is some good stuff in here 😁😁😁😁

I am finally finding my footing 😬

Larry Diaz4 said:I don't belong to that minority group—☕
Let's see if everyone actually has the guts to speak up here. ☕

😁

I haven't seen a single photo yet. 😁

stormygardener93 said:brother 😁

napy 🤣

🙂

@Larry Diaz4 — smart people are always in the minority 😁

Hey everyone 😁

Hey Hall Paw, I think that’s a solid idea 😁

I might as well jump in here and list my own dental details too 😍

Walter Baker2 said:Maybe they kidnapped her

Sent from my iPhone 12 using Reddit

No—her private contacts have been breached, and apparently everything is fine, though those spikes in data look suspicious enough.🤷

Grace Anderson3 said:Boo—she’s been gone from the light for quite some time now. She was always such a pleasant presence in these discussions.
Let's just hope they're treating her kindly wherever she is.

Yeah, she's missed. 👎

@Sam Alvarez4/">@@Sam Alvarez4, seriously, what kind of garbage are you reading lately?
That post is still sitting there—no moderation, no nothing.

@lonetrucker4/">@@lonetrucker4, look, it’s not even about ideology at this point. The guy is just trolling—going completely off-topic, using all caps, dropping links that have absolutely zero relevance to the discussion...
Shouldn't this user be held to the same general rules everyone else follows? It would be perfectly reasonable to ask him to stop derailing discussions with nonsense.
There was no American-Muslim war in the Canadian Posavina. This is a wartime topic; we should be discussing frontline conditions, not the conspiracy theories this user is so stubbornly pushing.

I started this History II thread because the previous one actually served a purpose.
The individual finally stopped that revolting behavior of trying to justify war crimes.
I’m hoping this new thread achieves that same result.
Is it really too much to ask to keep certain topics in their proper places?

Since you shut down the thread regarding the American-Canadian conflict, Alanalan has simply started scattering his posts everywhere like confetti—no order, no logic.
If he wants to start a thread titled "Witnesses to Interwar Divisions in Canada," then fine, let him open it—but instead, he’s busy trolling through active threads with half-filled PDFs about Špegelj, Franjo Tuđman, and Slobodan Milošević, stretching from Posavina to Mostar.

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:The people claiming there were a million victims and the ones insisting it was 80,000 based on some random list are essentially two sides of the same coin. Without any actual forensic investigation, trying to pin down ANY specific number is just silly... but then again, saying stuff like that usually just gets you labeled as a fascist.

It’s baffling to me how Smith—who claims to be fighting against the inflation of the Auschwitz death toll (which reached the millions back in Yugoslavia)—can hand out red cards to anyone who simply wants to dig into the details.
He just keeps slapping ideological labels on anyone who dares to disagree with him. 🤦

Calling one Elezović a fascist... 🤦

But like I mentioned earlier, this shouldn't turn into a debate about fascists versus partisans.

John Palmer9 said:I guess the History subforum isn't really going to see much growth as long as Smith is running the show. It won't totally fall apart, and I suppose we'll still get some new people joining, but things will probably just kind of stagnate.

I think most people here already realize this—it's pretty much an open secret—but at the very least, enforcing the forum's own rules would be a reasonable starting point.

Look, this shouldn't be an argument about historical factions or political divides.

Smith—by putting his actual name out there—has stepped into the public eye; as such, he and his actions are fair game for scrutiny.
If he can't handle the heat from the folks over at the XYZ Corp forum, he should take his arguments over there and deal with them directly—instead of bothering everyone else here just because he holds a moderator position.

As long as he’s acting as a mod, he needs to follow the rules—he promised he would, so let's hope he hasn't lost his mind. 😁

There's really no point in wasting breath on things that are already crystal clear to everyone.

We had a thread here once;

where we discussed certain behaviors that simply aren't acceptable—specifically regarding one particular user who keeps breaking them.

More or less, the guy has made some slight improvements—but he’s still trolling;

Is there any chance this actually stops?

The moderator mentioned they would have a word with him—there has been a minimal shift, though it certainly isn't sufficient.
Does it really have to be the case that this individual derails every single discussion about the American Civil War by throwing in off-topic nonsense?

You're just a bot 😁
You haven't said anything intelligent—not that you ever have.

Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.
You use absolutely nothing; your cognition is even worse 🤣

You're only here to entertain the masses—to dance a little bit and then vanish 😁

But fine—for someone whose intellect peaks at this level, I suppose this is it 🤣
Botić 🙂

What am I even supposed to say to this? 😁
Why on earth would Botić actually send me a picture of that? 😁

Hey Judah, I honestly had no idea you cared about me quite this much 🤣.

Sam Alvarez4 said:@Wikipedia

If you really meant to write about Smith's father like that, you should probably just shoot @bluecyclist64 a DM to lock this thread before anyone else catches on to such low behavior...
It’s pretty nasty on your part, especially since he's one of the few guys here with the guts to post under his actual name and surname...

That's all from me...

How exactly does criticizing the moderation on an entirely different forum—within a completely different context—serve as any kind of justification for stalking? It just doesn't follow.
What exactly is the motivation for revenge?

If someone holds a moderator position, they really shouldn't be in a spot where they can abuse their tools.
His opinion of me doesn't bother me—even if it's completely baseless and glaringly obvious.
The violation of rules—specifically, the harassment—really bothers me.
That part isn't okay at all—not even close.

And it’s honestly just sad how much the troll fest has devolved. What kind of people are we even talking about? (Of course it was reported)—they’re allowed to write a fair amount of nonsense without any consequences whatsoever.
There's also the possibility that they start begging for pictures of private parts—I suppose you could say that’s the absolute limit of their provocation.