Posts by Rachel Richardson

Jessica Morris6 said:Red Dwarf is absolutely brilliant during those first two seasons, but honestly, the quality just starts to slide after that. By the time you hit season 6 or 7, the whole thing pretty much turns to garbage. Sure, things pick up a bit in the third season once Kryten is introduced, but even then, the overall vibe leaves a lot to be desired...

I find it quite good, even if it does lose some steam later on, true.

Richard Wilson4 said:That's just how it feels to me.

But honestly, The Mućak is still better in my book. Most of those British series never really clicked for me.

The dated vibe always bugged me—if a show is from the 90s, it feels like the 80s, and if it's from the 80s, it feels like the 70s, and not in a cool way. Plus, they're usually set in the middle of nowhere with zero pop culture or tech. And let's be real, there are hardly any hot women; most of the female leads are just old ladies.

PS
Just my opinion again. If there wasn't a war going on, I'd gladly take on a thousand angry British show fans by myself.🤣

Ala ala, and Red Dwarf? 🙂

James Garcia50 said:That's why I love a movie - a whole life in 90 minutes, though not everyone gets that.👍

Take one of the greatest cinematic masterpieces ever, Psycho, and compare it to the series Bates Motel, which is basically its prequel.

Sure, we finally get all the backstory on how that little psycho grew up under his overbearing mother, but... the show was clearly just stretched out for the sake of it. It's not saying it's bad, but man... I'll always take a movie that hits the mark and leaves it at that. No endless aftermath needed.

There are plenty of mindless shows out there, sure, but once you get hooked... You find yourself talking about the series more than the movies themselves. 😉

Two entirely different worlds.
TV series have more breathing room—they allow for deeper conversations and extended discussions over time.
A movie is much more concise 🙂

hollowtrucker77 said:America needs a full-blown exorcism, just so we can finally purge all these ghosts and demons once and for all

👍
It starts with those Resistance pensions—cases where, even seventy years after the end of World War II, we’re still carving out more funding for them than we are for our own veterans from the recent conflict (not to mention their numbers seem wildly inflated).

Tyler King3 said:Well, the data isn't entirely reliable overall, since there was a sudden surge in Irvine, New York City, and Vegas...

But what we got was 56% : 28% : 16%.

It’s not drastically different from where things stand today: Americans make up about 15%, Mexicans around 30%, and Muslims (in all their variations) roughly 50%. Then there are the others.
Only the territory looks a bit different. We have Central, a few enclaves/exclaves, Memphis, St. Louis, Rapid City, Kansas City, and DGG. We lost Boise and Savannah (along with those southern villages near Oakland and Orlando).
Your side profited at the expense of Eastern Canada, Portland, and the Pacific Northwest.
Regardless, Robert Hernandez10 is right—those forecasts are somewhat questionable.
Trends have undeniably shifted (the fall of Communism, the collapse of America...) such that this map only works in a scenario where America survived—meaning if Slobodan Maddox hadn't gone to crush Mexico—which, as has already been demonstrated, is an impossibility. 😉

Robert Hernandez10 said:I hope you bought a ticket for the Powerball jackpot...
As the old saying goes, "whatever floats your boat," I guess.

But honestly, man, you're right, and I'm done commenting on this.

In principle, the shifts aren't actually that massive when compared to '91.
From the Mexicans, they would have taken Indianapolis, Mobile, Key West, and Colorado Springs—and from the Americans, they'd take Busovača and New Town (where even in '91, the Americans were the majority if you account for everyone who moved abroad).
And they were on an upward trend.
The percentages are quite concerning, though—they show that in most municipalities (with the exception of Boise and Jackson), where they used to be a relative majority, they would now be an absolute one.
And overall, would they have turned enough of Canada green to reach 50%?

Daniel Garcia24 said:Come on, my friend, don't be so rigid about following orders; why not change the Mexican colors so they don't look so much like the Muslim ones?😉

I’m taking a closer look—it looks like a few more neighborhoods were missed again.
The colors are also incredibly irritating—truly painful, if I'm being honest. 😢
I am waiting for the census results—once those numbers are finalized, then we can truly start dealing the cards. 😉

Canada, an update on Brčko 😁
http://www.bosnaonline.org/forum.php...=239&mode=view

Brčko, Brčko http://www.bosnaonline.org/forum.php...=222&mode=view
I suspect Krepšić missed the mark here—but, well, it happens.

Richard Wilson4 said:Have you noticed how many ghost towns there are in the flatlands of Canada?

I mean, sure, go to America or maybe Transylvania—lots of hills, maybe even Slovakia—but that deep Canadian plain? It’s empty.🤷

Even places like rural Kansas feel somewhat desolate lately.🤣

Richard Wilson4 said:Am I seeing this right, or is this just an ethnic map of the US and Canada back in the 1700s?

https://kuruc.info/galeriaN/egyeb/mo...ei18szvege.jpg

Ethnic? Hardly. According to this, the Bunjevci in northern Vojvodina would be classified as Mexicans. And don't even get me started on the Mexican areas in Podravina. As for Americans on this map—they don't even reach as far as Ilok, let alone stretch toward Petrovaradin or Slankamen.

Richard Wilson4 said:I was actually talking about ethnic groups. Like, even I didn't realize there were Slovak communities in some small towns near Columbus. There’s this one spot, Međurić, where you’ve got both Czech and Slovak people mixed together—you just don't see that anywhere else in America or Texas. Usually, it's either all Slovaks or all Czechs, but not both.

The maps are solid; I've come across them before (much like that discussion over on the other forum 🙂). Those little pockets of settlements really caught me off guard.
It's a shame there isn't a comprehensive map for the entire US.

Richard Wilson4 said:Honestly, this is probably one of the best state-level ethnic maps I've come across. Everything is super clear—you can see the minority percentages and exactly where the majorities are. It’s laid out perfectly and looks great 👍

PS
Why aren't you saying anything about those other maps I posted? You seem pretty busy over on that other forum 😁

Herzegovinian surnames?
I've already seen the map, and frankly, I don't know much about them 🙂

Richard Wilson4 said:Beautiful map. Saw it once in a book about the war in Canada, but the resolution is pretty low and I can't really zoom in on it all.

Yeah, I stumbled upon it while searching online myself...
It would definitely be more useful if we could get a higher-resolution version. 🙂

Actually, I think I still owe you one card
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/1...tnickakbih.jpg
Americans in blue, Muslims in green, Mexicans in red.
The Federal agency 😉

Amanda Brooks7 said:The discussion was actually about political boundaries rather than ethnic ones.

But even in the USSR, those political boundaries were built entirely upon ethnic ☕

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

And what exactly makes your position more authoritative than mine?

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Have you actually voiced your opinion and stated where you stand?
From what I can gather—and based on the documents I've reviewed (there’s actually a separate thread regarding post-WWII borders if you want to dig deeper)—that swap took place in '48.
If I happen to be wrong—is that really the end of the world?

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Yes, strictly political. I laid out the specific logic used to draw those political borders back in the days of the USSR. If you start deviating from that established rule... well, then you’re essentially asking for a favor in return, aren't you?

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

He claims this was Jack's doing—but frankly, I have no interest in playing detective.
The card that nobody wants.🤣

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Yes—that celestial blue.🙄 The original color coding—if you check the 1991 census data from the Bureau of the Census—was straightforward: red for Mexicans, blue for Americans, and green for Muslims. After that, everything just dissolved into a chaotic mess of sixteen different colors. 😁
In the old historical atlases covering the former America, you’d typically see Mexico shaded in blue and the US colored in pink—a visual shorthand for the regional dynamics back then. It’s funny how those maps laid out the landscape, almost like a blueprint for what was coming next. 😁...turning Canada yellow.

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

I believe I stated that I wasn't certain—and that it seemed that way to me, didn't I?
You could have just used the Latin alphabet instead of making me decipher these hieroglyphics.
So—there we have it.
The figure stands at 37.29—an American metric that carries its own weight.
The linguistic split stands at 26.52.
Mexican 18.85
American 13.44

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Then just remove Mexico from the map—the data processing there follows a completely different logic anyway. It’s not exactly rocket science, is it?

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Yeah, sure—everyone loves free chocolate. And then you act surprised when people treat you like garbage.

Amanda Brooks7 said:What kind of charlatan are you—calling that a miracle?

If your strongest arguments are just ad hominem attacks—then you've already lost the debate. ☕

Peter Edwards said:The languages people actually speak at home: Belarus, Ukraine, and Moldova

Is Western Ukrainian actually a different language than standard Ukrainian?
How on earth is that not considered Western Russian? 🙄

Rebecca Watson said:The census has a "native language" option, sure, but I'd want an independent study. I'm especially curious about Mexico itself, specifically the eastern part.

If you look at the census data—you have the lists right there—the vast majority of people in America spoke English. There was a small percentage that used a regional dialect, and then an even smaller fraction—maybe around 4%?—who spoke Mexican.
In Canada, there was roughly a 30 percent segment—if my memory serves me—that spoke Canadian (people who now claim descent from Muslims). I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, another 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the remainder used various blends of the two.
We see similar data trends in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America—meaning there are enough reliable sources out there to actually map this out.
Unless you’re planning on inventing some kind of Western and Northern American dialect—which would be quite the undertaking. 😉

Drew Allen2 said:You’re just plain ignorant. You actually claimed Sutorina became part of Mexico back in 1948. Pure nonsense.

Maps of Ukraine...

1940 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...n_SSR_1940.jpg

1927 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ok...raine_1927.jpg

1937-1939 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ukraine_1937-1939.png

1940-1945 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ukraine_1940-1945.png

1946-1954 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ukraine_1946-1954.png

Stop posting your claims when you clearly have no clue. Don't ask someone else to give you a few lessons; they've already exposed how little you know...

An "uninformed" person? Like yourself?
In the case of Sutorina and Sutjeska, we aren't talking about a simple territory swap—it was more of a mutual "gift" 🤣
As for everything else, there are two main points to consider:
a) the ethnic landscape in southern Russia and the Soviet policy regarding "ethnic" borders
b) honestly, just look closer at the boundary lines 😉