boldnomad45 said:They ask for that because they know you're afraid. Banks have insurance for these kinds of mistakes; it happens. But if employees are the type who are too scared to stand up for themselves... well, they'd rather just pay out of pocket. That's why they get away with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Jeje, they should just have the branch manager open that little side safe labeled "Shortage Fund for Birthdays and New Babies" and pay out whatever the teller is missing.
People, please, get real. In America, banks basically exist to fleece both the customers and the low-level clerks working the branches.
That was over a decade ago when banking was actually a decent career. Now, in my hometown, the local branches are cutting hours because they can't find anyone to work there. The pay is basically on par with a seasonal dishwasher.
That’s the thing. Banking today is an industry where nobody wants to work because everyone has already heard about the responsibilities involved.
Regardless, my advice to the staff is this: if you make an error that can be reversed—meaning you didn't just hand a customer a massive pile of extra cash—just void the transaction to match what was actually paid or deposited. Don't bother asking for a signature. You aren't going to get fired 99% of the time since you're acting in good faith 😁 , and more importantly, your own wallet stays intact.
Carl Roberts3 said:Wait, I'm lost... what are you even getting at?
I just need $6667 that I don't have right now, just so I could take out a loan... maybe over like a 5-year term or something...
Five years of paying off two net salaries? You honestly think that’s reasonable? If you were actually looking for a way to make this manageable, you should have just gone with a thirty-year term. Spread it out, man. Stretch it.
Maybe you should check exactly how much ground you're trying to cover here. Instead of leaning on everyone else's dime, why not start using your own money? Save that twenty bucks for yourself. $0.00 What exactly do you need?
I tried to upload my medical results to the Health section, but they wouldn't let me—apparently, I'm violating some privacy regulations or something. Pure censorship, man! Someone needs to get the FCC and the FTC on this!
Honestly, the worst part is that these moderators are probably getting paid a fortune just to act like this.
I might have asked this before, but I haven’t received a straight answer yet, so I’m looking for some concrete insight here. Back around 2007, we took out a Swiss Franc loan, which was then converted into USD the following year at what was already a climbing exchange rate. Now, that dollar-denominated loan is finally coming to an end. Throughout that entire period, interest rates were hiked without any real explanation, right up until about 2015 when they started calculating interest based on a floating index plus a fixed margin.
Do we actually have any grounds for a lawsuit? Personally, I find those interest rate hikes incredibly suspicious—at one point, the rate shot up to nearly 9%...
They’re doing this with the client’s best interests in mind; a smaller amount wouldn't be nearly as noticeable on a bank statement like this. That's what you call a touch of empathy.
It will be fascinating to see how this influx of foreign capital—coming from overseas with a Cypriot-style approach to business—affects the institution. I have high hopes that it will actually elevate them.
Alright folks, let's talk about the fine print. Are we strictly required to maintain full coverage collision insurance for the entire duration of the leasing term? Also, what are we looking at regarding processing fees—is there a specific fee for setting up the lease, or are there other hidden administrative charges I should watch out for?
What’s the actual buyout value of the car after one year, three years, or five years? And are there any mileage restrictions I need to be aware of? One more thing: am I forced to use their authorized service centers for annual maintenance, or can I take it to any shop I trust?
Honestly, the easiest way to handle this is to just bring your pay stubs and drive the car right off the lot.
Are we all collectively aware that a negative balance eventually has to be paid back?
If this wasn't your own cash to begin with—if it’s just borrowed money—it isn't exactly a perk from some big bank like Chase or Wells Fargo to let you sit in the red by the amount of two, three, or even five paychecks.
At the end of the day, that's someone else's money. If a paycheck fails to hit your account, the bank can simply wipe out that overdraft at any time.
Exactly. A huge chunk of those who didn't even need to take out loans over the last couple of years are going to get wiped out. On the flip side, the disciplined clients with very specific financial setups will be the ones walking away with the profit.
In my view, those court rulings proved that the government failed to step in early enough to limit bank activity—specifically regarding lending in a foreign currency that 99% of the academics who designed these products hadn't even considered.
It’s true that the debt-to-income ratio doesn't necessarily prove someone is overleveraged, but it does show if they’ve been delinquent and WHEN. For instance, it shows that Peter has had $1000 due on a non-purpose loan over the last year.
If Peter can't manage his current payments reliably, how on earth is he supposed to handle ANOTHER loan? Even if he refinances that messy one, who’s to say he won't just decide to skip out on those payments again in three months?
Regarding "past behavior," banks reserve the right to set their own standards for delinquency. I suspect most are looking much more strictly at the last 12 months than they are at the period two or three years ago.
They aren't going to reject someone just because they were two months late on a payment back when $667 combined installments totaled that amount three years ago.
But let’s be real here—aren't we all aware that these lists exist, among other things, specifically to prevent a repeat of what happened with the Swiss banks? It’s about making sure people don't go out and take on insane amounts of debt from a single lender, only for that lender (the dealer, if you will) to suddenly cut them off. If they stop supplying the goods, people just cross the street to the next bank to get what they need, right?
If you borrowed money from Joe Smith and didn't pay him back on time, why on earth would I trust you with a loan?
Apparently, they’ve moved away from using the unknown system, but now all the data regarding banks and loans goes straight to the credit bureaus for every single individual.
It’s true—you were right all along. Or, to be more precise, you managed to take it to court and prove that those past decisions, which I’d personally call poor decisions, shouldn't just affect a few individuals. Now, they’re being publicly called out for what they actually were: wrong.
On a human level, I am genuinely glad to see people banding together to finally "win" against that lazy combination of a negligent Federal Reserve and predatory commercial banks.
Now, for a practical question: if someone took out a Swiss Franc Loan back in 2007, but then refinanced it through the same bank using USD just a year or two later, is there any ground to claim compensation? Even with the second loan, the interest rates ended up being just as insane as the original ones.
🤣 Talk about acrobatics. Even a circus performer would be embarrassed by this performance.
And where exactly are they supposed to keep them? In a sock drawer?
It’s all such noise. A handful of self-proclaimed experts have decided they're suddenly vital because of a few bucks, and now they think they can lecture the big banks on how things work. If it were up to me, I’d send account closure notices to people like this immediately. Just go play lawyer inside your own four walls.
Back in post 1281, Mystical laid it out perfectly regarding how banks handle client data collection. These institutions would love nothing more than to be based in a tax haven, but laws exist—mostly imposed from abroad (take that ridiculous situation where certain countries accepted terms one-sidedly; we have to investigate for the USA, but they don't return the favor). The government adopted these rules, and the penalties are what they are. If you want to play cowboy, do it in your own little shop.
But no, the conspiracy theorists are convinced the banks have formed a secret alliance against them. They’re obsessed with whether the theorist is single or married—I’m betting on single, personally—and what their degree is in.
Just give them a polite answer to everything and things will settle down. Stop complaining and trying to reinvent the wheel; everything will be just fine.
Steven Rivera76 said:Fortunately, clearing old debt is usually straightforward because the banks people move to often offer ways out (overdrafts, consolidation loans, etc.). Honestly, that 🤣 idea of yours is just .
Exactly. When you move from one institution to another, the new bank essentially inherits your debt by default; they don't even bother scrutinizing your creditworthiness or how tidy your finances are at first.
On top of that, every bank plays by its own set of rules. As I mentioned, some might offer an overdraft up to 300% of your net pay, while others cap it at 300% of whatever hits your checking account (usually those types already have several automated loan payments being deducted directly from their direct deposits). Some banks will factor every single debt visible on your credit report into your allowed overdraft limit... It’s entirely possible that this new bank will end up covering everything for our disgruntled friend here, and as a little bonus, they won't even ask for a single receipt, a credit score, or proof of marital status. After all, a client like this is too good to pass up.
James Rogers53 said:It feels more like that immigrant mentality where people claim "everything is better abroad," and then when it actually isn't, they just keep complaining about it. What I mentioned is exactly how it is. I’m a demanding customer, sure, but I can't really complain about much. Their service package actually saves me money. And they’re happy with me because I pay back borrowed funds on time. In fact, I don't even view the bank as a bad thing—more like a useful tool. 😲
What people don't get is that banks are private companies. They exist to turn a profit for their owners, just like the local corner grocery store. By the time people realize that, they'll stop whining as much as bluecyclist64 does. These are the types who will act all aggressive over a couple of bucks or some question about whether they're a US tax resident, yet every month they'll basically roll up their sleeves and tell the government, "Please, take 50% of my paycheck right now, and then grab another 25% later in the month." Then they'll wait six months for a hospital appointment with total resignation, while proudly sending their kid to school without a computer or a gym. But they'll still yell at the teller—because, well, why not? She's lower on the food chain. 😁
Man, people are such hypocrites. They whine about a few minor issues, yet let themselves get screwed over whenever it suits the system. And the expats are a special breed. Everything is perfect compared to back home, and then the big shot writes, "Account maintenance is $10 a month." They can't even figure out online banking, at least not the kind offered by the major banks I know personally here in the States. Maybe the poster was thinking of some Eastern European country; I have no idea what the situation is like there. From what I know, that $10 fee is probably just a daily rate over there.
Does everyone in the US "have" to have an account at a commercial bank? If you want to receive money in any civilized manner, we can agree that you effectively "must." A basic checking account, without any extras—and depending on the bank, maybe even without a debit card—will cost anywhere from $0.00 in monthly fees upwards. Let me correct myself: nobody is forcing you at gunpoint to keep your money in a bank. If you don't like it, keep it under your mattress; nobody's going to ask you for a receipt there. Academics.
You guys are whining just because a private company needs specific personal data to establish a business relationship. Honestly, it’s like you’re being forced at gunpoint or something.
The best part? About 95% of those requirements are mandated by the Federal Reserve or the IRS; only about 5% is actually at their own discretion.
And yet, here you are, still complaining and practically begging for sympathy.