CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › George Robinson43 › Posts

Posts by George Robinson43

905 posts shown.

Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jeremy Turner9 said:I would ask you please to refrain from labeling; the Yalta agreement is simply the only functional treaty left on the table, which is an objective fact, and I have no personal stake in it...

It is true that Russia can only achieve its goals through sheer force, a reality that these neighboring nations have clearly recognized by seeking entry into NATO...

Good grief. The Russians basically walked away with 99% of what was promised at Yalta.
It’s clear they’ve left quite a lasting legacy for all the future generations living in those countries.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jeremy Turner9 said:It is simply a matter of fact; the USA and the UK are the ones deciding who joins NATO, largely because they view France as having been defeated by Hitler, seeing as they were pushed out of the Pacific and even faced a breakdown in cooperation with Australia...

Regarding America, the influence was negotiated at Yalta to be a fifty-fifty split, and if we examine what happened following its collapse—specifically looking at how Canada, the US, and the Federation of Canada were handled after recognition and border demarcation—it becomes clear how the West operates...

The issue with you Yaltans is this:
Eastern nations are practically begging to join NATO because they are running from Russia like the wind. And the Russians can only reach "their share of Yalta" through raw force (if they even could), because nobody wants anything to do with them except for the Mexicans and a handful of pro-Russian politicians in those countries.
How does that work? How is that possible?
Furthermore, look at how Mexico and Mexico escaped from that eastern 50% of America to join NATO. At Yalta, only the Mexicans remained.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jeremy Turner9 said:You all are being exhausting. Germany is effectively disarmed; they are still viewed through the lens of being a defeated power from WW2, which is exactly how the USA and the UK perceive them while maintaining their military bases there. Even the concept of East Germany "belonging" to Russia persists in certain circles, and the only real framework that carries weight is the agreement reached at Yalta—it’s quite clear who owns what.

And that is precisely how the mind of an average Russophile operates.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Nathan Evans78 said:It's all about managing PR to get ahead of inflation expectations.

What’s even more striking is the massive spike in people who are fed up with the Chancellor’s policies—about 33% are reporting they're "dissatisfied," which is a huge jump from only 18% just last month. On top of that, general frustration with the administration has climbed from 23% back in January to a whopping 32% right now.

Inflation is a reality that has arrived and is here to stay, much like something European Union citizens have come to expect.
Everyone understands that these costs represent the price tag for breaking free from Russia and those types of threats being broadcasted on TV regarding nuclear fallout across the European Union.
As for what happens with Russia in 2025 when they're barely exporting any hydrocarbons at all? Who cares. That's their business.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Gerald Chavez7 said:https://twitter.com/GeorgZachmann/st...40761499713536

image

https://www.bruegel.org/publications...l-gas-imports/

Right now, the current trajectory for LNG imports in the European Union is basically covering 50% of what used to be Russian gas imports. By the 2025-27 window—if things keep moving this way—we’re pretty much done with importing Russian oil and gas altogether...

What really matters here is this: Gazprom storage : critically Low levels

This isn't a new phenomenon; it's been building for quite some time. It feels like a deliberate move to drive prices up!
However, you can clearly see a shift was already happening even before this war broke out. We saw LNG surging while Russian gas plummeted. For instance, the Yamal pipeline dropped by 47%.

There was a massive surge of 100 billion cubic meters of LNG in 2022 compared to 2021.
If we successfully substitute 50% of Russian gas in 2022, Russia will find themselves in a total economic meltdown as early as 2023.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Nathan Evans78 said:In my opinion, Germany had much less leverage this time around compared to Qatar; otherwise, they would have been touting this as some historic, bargain-basement deal. On top of that, Sweden really needs to get moving on building out HVDC infrastructure, which is going to run them into the ground with costs. So, when you look at the math, they're facing expensive gas, pricey terminals, massive infrastructure builds, and all while those climate targets are looming closer every day.

It feels like an uphill battle with a mountain of challenges, but I'll keep my fingers crossed for them. Because let's be real—if the German factory floor grinds to a halt, the whole American supply chain takes a massive hit. ☕

Why would they announce something that has only been agreed upon rather than officially signed?
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Despite everything you've pointed out, the bottom line remains: if they manage to move any oil at all, they’re forced to sell it at a massive discount. They have to rely on individual middlemen who want to play ball, and those guys end up squeezing them even further by taking a huge cut of that already low price. It’s like trying to sell premium goods through a series of hungry wholesalers—they end up moving less volume and getting much lower prices than what you'd see on the standard energy exchanges like the NYMEX.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
rustywalker82 said:Alright, listen, for the third time now—I’m not talking about just any random sanctions. I’m specifically talking about how speculating on bans for Russian energy imports ended up driving their revenues through the roof because the market spiked the value of those commodities.

It all comes down to perspective.
We can clearly see that Russia is struggling to move its oil, and when they do manage to land a deal, it involves a massive discount of roughly $28 to $30 per barrel.
In fact, they are largely selling their oil at price points reminiscent of June or July 2021, much like what they have been doing with India.

Check this out:
https://www.rfi.fr/en/international/...s-energy-needs

ExxonMobil, the country’s largest oil refiner, bought three million barrels of Russian crude oil through a Dutch energy and commodity trading firm late last week at a discount of up to 22.7 euros a barrel to dated Brent, media reports said.

There you have it—that is how Russia moves its product. They are using Vitol to sell it at a €23 discount per barrel. Essentially, they are slashing prices just to ensure they can make any sales at all!
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Nathan Evans78 said:Does anyone know what kind of price tag they actually settled on? I’ve been scouring all the Mainstream Media outlets, but none of those liberal pundits seem to be mentioning the total cost of the entire deal.

It wouldn't surprise me if they aimed for a figure similar to what China pays Qatar as their top importer, or perhaps what Korea pays Americans.
But regardless—as we see more LNG terminals popping up and ships hitting the water, market expansion should naturally drive prices down.
We also have to consider that this supply comes from fields holding about 50% of the world's current reserves, and they've barely even begun tapping them.
Now, one must ask: is it truly wise to let Qatar effectively become the most influential nation on Earth by 2030?
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Morgan Morales4 said:Exactly. The way the media frames sanctions is that they're this grand tool meant to make the Russian people rise up and topple a criminal like Vladimir Putin. But honestly, if we're being real, how much effort was actually put into helping the people in Ukraine tackle the systemic corruption within their own borders? Because when you see stories about officials landing in foreign countries with suitcases full of cash, it really makes you stop and wonder what's actually going on behind the scenes. The whole idea that Putin is just going to collapse under pressure—especially while direct lines of communication between the US and Russia are staying wide open—just sounds... well, let's just say I'm not buying it.

Of course Vladimir Putin won't be toppled by sanctions alone. If that isn't clear, let me reiterate: we have entered a new Cold War.
For nearly fifty years, Russians lived behind the Iron Curtain, and now they find themselves back behind it. Once someone is tucked away behind that curtain, those on the other side don't particularly care who is pulling the strings inside.
I'm sorry, but when you have state television screaming during prime time about launching nukes and wiping out Warsaw in thirty seconds, there really is no other solution than to lock all of that away in a vault.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
You argue that these sanctions are essentially funding the aggressor. While true, they are actually providing about 15-20% less funding than if there were no sanctions at all, and that percentage is steadily climbing every single year.
Regarding hydrocarbons, the very fact that Vladimir Putin launched his attack in the dead of winter proves they genuinely believed this would be over in a matter of days and that the West would simply look the other way.
Had the invasion occurred in early autumn, the European Union and the West would have been completely paralyzed. Instead, they were given ample time to make those crucial initial adjustments.
This whole Germany-Qatar deal is effectively him digging his own grave for a few years down the road.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
rustywalker82 said:Just speculating about massive sanctions on Russian energy might actually push Ukraine closer to surrendering, because right now they’re basically funding the aggressor who is selling it back to them at much higher prices.
It would be even more expensive if every single country didn't jump on board with these sanctions. If everyone implements them before other producers can fix the tech or logistics to fill the gap, these sanctions will mostly just hurt the countries that don't have the infrastructure to find new suppliers. For example, if there's pressure on someone like Canada to support this, then the shortages should be spread out equally among all nations.

The tactic being played here could actually boost Putin's revenue while driving third-world countries into an economic abyss—some might even face famine if they can't afford to plant crops because everything got too pricey. That's a huge fail, because effective sanctions are supposed to drive down the value of the target goods, not make them more expensive.

All this nonsense regarding sanctions is going to look incredibly stupid if things escalate and Putin suddenly cuts off all exports to the West right before he falls. Then, the same people demanding sanctions today will be the ones writing articles saying we need to level Moscow to the ground because people in developing nations are starving.
Basically, it's total madness to speculate like this before relations improve or before oil and gas production ramps up in places like Venezuela or Iran... plus, replacing Russian coal takes time (that should have happened a long time ago).

So, you're implying that gas exports have always been Russia's sole lifeline.
If we are looking at a "wealthy" Russian military that currently runs out of fuel on the road and can't even afford medical teams on the front lines, I shudder to think what kind of force they will be by 2024 if they end up dealing with only 10-15% of their current gas volumes.

A tactic that would boost Putin's revenue while plunging third countries into economic ruin—or potentially causing famine if crops aren't prepared due to high costs—is a total failure,
because effective sanctions should drive down, not increase, the value of the targeted goods.

These sanctions will actually boost his revenue so much that his GDP might only drop by a measly 15-20% this year, assuming he gets lucky. Once the European Union starts diversifying its hydrocarbon supply, those numbers could plummet by 30% annually until they hit levels similar to Uzbekistan.

The sheer absurdity of these sanctions will be fully exposed if, following an escalation, Putin suddenly halts all exports to the West.

It is actually quite the opposite! He needs to start preparing right now for the reality that by 2025, oil and gas won't be flowing to the West anymore.
To pull that off, he needs to:
- Build a massive fleet of supertankers because Western companies won't carry his oil (since Korea and Japan won't build them, he'll likely have to rely on China)—let's say that takes five years if they book all the shipyard slots immediately.
- Construct a solid number of LNG terminals (assuming he can somehow stumble upon the necessary know-how and technology).
- Build a large fleet of LNG carriers, because again, Western companies won't handle the transport (see the supertanker point).
- Start laying pipelines toward China and India to transport 180-200 billion cubic meters annually, hoping they'll be finished by 2030.

All of this depends on being able to kick out current suppliers from those markets overnight.

Sure, he could shut everything down to the West without finding substitute markets, but then he'd just be surviving on roots and dirt.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
It isn't just about rolling out old Kamaz trucks based on 1970s designs. The entire industry is essentially regressing back to the seventies.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Lisa Jackson7 said:Look, when I talk about helping Russia, I'm not talking about helping Putin or anyone like him.
Helping Germany after World War II didn't mean propping up Hitler or the Nazi Party to keep them in power—it involved denazification.

In Russia's case, we either have to wait or find a way to support and facilitate the rise of democratic forces—kind of like how Gorbachev eventually stepped in after Brezhnev, even if things were messy at first. Everyone thought that was the "end of history." It wasn't.

When the chance actually came, the West missed it—they either slept through it, couldn't figure it out, or were too busy trying to profit from the situation in Russia. Whatever.

And please, don't start pulling out polls about support for Putin... what kind of polls would you run about support for Hitler in Germany right after he took power?


It seems people still haven't grasped the fundamentals, yet they continue to dream of democracy in Russia.

The fact remains: the West did not help Russia. 🙏 🙏
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Lisa Jackson7 said:Who knows if he realizes it, but maybe he does. While Ukraine is getting hit with a massive bill, the West is also getting a wake-up call—a chance to realize that the instability in countries bordering the EU, Ukraine, and Russia isn't just "their" problem. It’s not just about whether they're autocracies or democracies, either—it affects everyone.

Hopefully, aid will be sent to Ukraine soon, and eventually—though God knows when—maybe even to Russia.

We have already seen the consequences of supporting Russia.
Are we really going to pour trillions back into their coffers just so they can rebuild their military and give rise to some Putin 2.0?
It is baffling how some people still miss the point: Putin has openly branded the West as the enemy and Western values as an abomination, labeling anyone who holds those values as national traitors who must be dealt with.
What I find even harder to grasp is how people fail to see that Putin's stance is shared by at least 70-80% of the population there.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
It isn't that the fighting has started; rather, we are finally seeing individual government leaders emerge from being mere puppets for their bosses at The White House.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jack Kelly5 said:I mean, if you're one of those sovereignty types, you probably ought to realize that the owner of that gas is actually ExxonMobil, so it isn't exactly "ours," I guess.
😬

It’s just like any other commodity—that gas is going to flow toward the owner's home base where fuel is cheaper for $1.75 before it ever makes its way here.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·

analogbear5 said:Look, monopolies and extortion are one thing, but diversification? That’s a beautiful thing. If Russia decides to start a price war just to undercut those 20-year LNG contracts, honestly, I'm all for it.

The real question is who the politicians in Germany are actually going to sell out to.

Qatar needs to ramp up its annual production from 100 billion cubic meters to 200 billion within just two and a half years. While that’s technically doable, you have to ask yourself: when will they actually pull it off? It requires an enormous logistical feat—new offshore platforms, massive pipeline expansions, and additional terminals. If sanctions hold steady and the West successfully replaces all Russian gas with alternatives by 2025, Russia is going to face a literal famine.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Carl Lee27 said:So, Germany just inked this long-term gas deal with Qatar. Honestly, even though Qatar doesn't exactly have the massive capacity to handle everything right now, and that first big LNG terminal over in Germany might not even be up and running for another two and a half years, you’ve gotta admit it's a solid step in the right direction.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ency-on-russia

Think of it like this: Qatar possesses enough gas to fuel all of Europe, they just lack the extra LNG terminals to move it—infrastructure they’ll build out incredibly fast.
If direct pipelines existed from Qatar, Europe wouldn't need Russian gas at all.
The massive field in the gulf between Qatar and Iran holds about 50% of the world's conventional reserves, yet it remains largely untapped for now.
In terms of shale gas, only the USA and Canada hold more reserves than that region.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Hannah Williams8 said:Do you really know the difference between LPG and LNG?

Actually, they have it exactly right! Think of LPG as liquefied petroleum gas—essentially a byproduct of the oil refining process.