CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Brenda Taylor13 › Posts

Posts by Brenda Taylor13

403 posts shown.

Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
So, here’s my take—just some random rambling as we get closer to election season—but I honestly think we’re looking at one of two possible outcomes:

- The Republican Party somehow strikes a deal with Milan Škoro, only for history to repeat itself just like it did with the Bridge Party back in 2016. You know, when Plenković basically kicked them out of the Government to make room for parties that actually play nice with him. This time, Škoro might be the one getting the boot. My gut says Plenković is probably thinking, "Let me just grab enough seats to secure a majority first, and then I'll settle the score with Škoro later."

- Negotiations between the Republican Party and Škoro hit a brick wall, making any kind of deal impossible. That leads straight to new elections—where everyone’s running solo because the left-wing coalition will be too busy sulking about failing to seize power—and right in the middle of an economic meltdown, maybe another COVID wave, or whatever disaster hits next, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party end up forming this massive "Grand Coalition." They'll use all those tired old excuses like "we need a government of national unity," or "we have to unite our strengths during these trying times," or "now isn't the time for ideological divides" and all that nonsense...

If I were putting money on it, I’d say that second scenario feels way more likely...
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
urbanangler8 said:Calling it Nazi imagery just because it shows Franjo Harmon with a small, blond boy who looks like his grandson? Really?🤣 🤣

So, I guess if we’re all born with blond hair, we’re all Nazis, and anyone who wants to deal with us is a Nazi too. Brilliant logic there—I'm sure that's exactly what America needs to become the next Switzerland.
The unnamed US person should probably jump onto the list for the unnamed US organization now that the unnamed US person is out; we could certainly use more of that level of intellect.👍

Oh, absolutely. Just look at how sharply our colleague here spotted such subtle and utterly vile manipulation... you know, that totally innocent photo of some blond kid in Ronald Reagan's arms, which is clearly actually a sneaky, disgusting Nazi/fascist message about Aryan superiority... obviously they had to pick a blond kid, because heaven forbid they chose one with dark hair... bravo to our friend here; this country really needs hunters like him looking for fascist sympathizers everywhere!
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Morgan Booth70 said:thanks 🙏

👍

Don't mention it. That’s exactly why we’re here—to root out every single, tiny, hidden, wrapped-up, and sugar-coated symbol of fascism. Take this low-life image of a blond-haired kid, for instance; they think they can manipulate people with stuff like that... but they aren't fooling us, not by a long shot.

But hey, look at what we just uncovered. They won't be sleeping easy tonight. This crew of hunters dedicated to tracking down fascist scum never rests. We're on this 24/7, three shifts a day, seven days a week. Those fascists never sleep, so you can bet your life we won't either.

Death to fascism, freedom for the people!
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
It’s straight-up Nazi. Fascist, too. And let's not even get started on the whole extremist vibe—it's all there in the symbols. Honestly, I could point out at least seven different indicators of neo-fascism just looking at this one photo. Oh, and of course, they threw in a blonde kid—because apparently, in their world, nothing screams "extremist ideology" quite like a blonde child. It’s such a joke. They really should have featured an Asian woman or something, just to show the rest of the world that we actually live in a tolerant country where skin color, eye color, or gender doesn't matter. But no—instead, we get a state that puts photos of blonde kids in front of us and expects everyone to just sit there and take it without saying anything.

What a disgrace.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
ruggeddrifter85 said:Our friends from Canada 🤣
They screw us over whenever they get the chance, and we just sit here like obedient little servants 🙏

Canada lifted restrictions for Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Austria, but not for America

Look, we're basically just mindless drones for Brussels, not for Canada.

Honestly? That whole Brussels crowd screws us over way more often than those Canadians ever could.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Honestly, this takes the absolute cake—it’s easily one of the most ridiculous promises I’ve ever seen on a political poster. It’s one of those coalition parties making big claims that honestly just make me laugh, reminding me of how much Vesna Pusić used to roll her eyes at us back in our high school days. They’re out here promising to create 200,000 new jobs, which is just pure fantasy. Seriously, in all this time since they made that claim, nobody has even come close to hitting that number.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
You totally forgot to mention the American federal unit.

😁
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
cosmicotter13 said:I didn't catch the debate. Did anyone happen to bring up that "Marrakesh" agreement?

Nope. Not a single mention.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
hollowmason64 said:From what I could see, Kovač started off acting pretty decent regarding the schedule, but once he realized this guy wasn't going to back down or shut up—and saw that Gregoret was actually letting him speak—he just started playing along with the rhythm of the room.

Yeah, maybe, 🤣
I mean, honestly, I don't really care who ends up running the show at some corrupt organization because, at the end of the day, you always get the same bottom-feeders left in their wake. But saying Kovač crushed him is just plain silly.
He held his own quite well—surprisingly well, if I'm being honest—and he even landed a solid point with a sharp remark and a question, but "crushed"? Not really.

It was the same old story, just a bit of a mess. It’s not about the President’s character or his worldview; it’s more about that brainwashed mentality you see with the Republican Party crowd. As long as things are going well and they're winning, they’ll let him do whatever he wants—they'd probably sit there and smile while he insulted them to their faces, just to stay in his good graces. But the second he stops giving them access to the taxpayer-funded piggy bank, they'll all start scrambling and sucking up to the opposition.
All this talk about whether the Republican Party leans one way or the other is just pure nonsense.
The Republican Party isn't some cohesive group with shared principles or deep convictions. It's just a collection of crooks and opportunists who care about one thing and one thing only: staying in power so they can keep their hands in our pockets.

How can you say that?! He was a step ahead the whole damn time! Plenković was stuck constantly playing defense and trying to justify himself, but he was doing it so clumsily. Kovač was throwing out legitimate, logical questions that this guy just couldn't answer. Everything Kovač asked hit the nail on the head—from dodging responsibility for failures, to that coalition with the Democratic Party, to pushing left-wing policies, shifting left, drifting toward the Democratic Party, and all that nonsense... Plenković had zero answers; he just kept whining about how Kovač was "going low" or "using cheap shots," which is basically what people say when they don't have an actual answer. Personally, I was expecting Plenković to tear him apart, but I got the exact opposite. Kovač totally won the debate—he was direct, precise, and hit exactly where it hurt.

By the way, it's pretty interesting how when Plenković was asked point-blank if he could promise his Republican Party members that they wouldn't form a coalition with the Democratic Party, he dodged it completely. Instead of giving a straight answer, he just started dancing around, claiming "the first criteria will be global in scope, and then others if they serve the interests of America"...
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Kovač absolutely tore him apart. He kept throwing these pointed questions his way, but instead of just giving a straight answer, he just started dodging and playing word games—you know how it is. It was the same old story: that whole messy alliance with the Democratic Party, the deal with those leftovers from the old coalition, the ratification of that Istanbul treaty, even the fact that he didn't join the Republican Party until 2011. And don't even get me started on him writing those glowing tributes to Edvard Kardelj back in '89! He refuses to take any responsibility for losing the presidential and European elections—even though he keeps trying to convince himself and everyone else that the Republican Party actually won them. He just shifts the blame onto everyone else except himself, ignores his plummeting approval ratings, and laughs off how Bernardica outsmarted him in the last two election cycles. Then there’s the ridiculous move of putting total nobodies on the list for the European elections. And the kicker? When asked point-blank if he’s a Mason, he hesitated for like ten full seconds before answering. That’s suspicious! If you aren't, you say "No" immediately—you don't pause and hope the questioner will just let it slide... but no, he waited until Kovač practically forced the answer out of him. Too little, too late.

Look, Kovač had every single argument lined up perfectly, but honestly? It probably won't even matter tomorrow. The party machine will just spin its wheels and do its thing regardless.

To be fair, calling him a far-left extremist was actually pretty spot on. I mean, that's just who he is. Maybe "extremist" is a bit much—that might be an exaggeration—but he is definitely leaning hard into those left-wing views.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
wanderingbison9 said:Alkar Flegma is right in the middle of it all. If we look at how internal party conflicts play out in the USA, they usually seem confined to those smaller local news stations.
Personally, I think they should be featured on every major national network, including the big commercial ones. It would have been much easier if they had simply coordinated with the local stations that already do such a decent job covering territory across the country to ensure the debate is broadcast simultaneously—something they actually already do, including over in Bujancet.

Man, what on earth are you even talking about? These so-called "internal party elections" in the USA—or more accurately, the primary season for presidential nominations—are broadcast constantly on every single major national TV network in America. It's not just "local television" or whatever else you're claiming. CNN, NBC, ABC, Fox News... they all carry the debates for both the Republican Party and the Democrats, and let me tell you, they are some of the most-watched events over there.

Sure, they're all commercial or private networks, but that's pretty much all there is in the States—you don't really have state-owned TV stations like you do elsewhere.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Harold Davis6 said:Me?

Chloe Martinez7 said:And?
What's the issue?

Where are all those straight couples who are supposed to be fostering kids from the system?

Besides, it doesn't really matter if you call it marriage, a domestic partnership, or if people just live together without any official paperwork.
Screw your definitions.

And if straight couples don't step up to foster kids in a few years, then fine—let gay couples do it.
Or singles.
And...
Whoever passes all those tests and background checks required for adoption.

Not a fan of my take?
I couldn't care less.
Just organize the fostering and empty out the group homes.☕

rapidfox26 said:
I don't know... just feels like things are moving too fast lately—everything is a mess... honestly, I'm not even sure what to make of it all anymore. Just watching it happen... says:
I?

I?

And that’s it. I’ve said my piece on the whole thing, and frankly, I'm done talking about it.

Look, I know where I stand on this one—I’m clearly all for letting same-sex couples adopt children, but honestly? I am just not on board with that.

That’s just how democracy works, I guess—the people with the most votes call the shots, and that’s the end of it. Simple as that.

Honestly, there are way more couples out there dying to adopt kids than there actually are children sitting in foster care. It’s crazy when you think about it! But what stops them? It’s that damn bureaucracy—just this slow, clunky, totally useless red tape that seems designed specifically to make the whole adoption process as complicated and painful as possible. It’s like they’re actively trying to trip people up at every turn.

Look, if they just simplified the whole damn process, we’d see way more people actually adopting—it’s that simple! It's all about cutting through the red tape, honestly.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Look, let’s call this what it is—it isn't just about "fostering." If we want to get real, we need to rewind the tape back maybe twenty years or so, back when Dorino Manzin was basically running the show for the gay community and those first Pride parades started rolling through town. I remember it vividly—back then, they weren't even asking for same-sex unions or marriage or any of that stuff. They just wanted certain inheritance rights, nothing more. Then, a few years down the line—surprise, surprise!—suddenly they're all over the idea of legal registration, marriage, whatever you want to call it. It's the classic slippery slope: you start small because you can't grab everything at once, but the appetite just keeps growing. Every single time, they push for more.

It’s the exact same playbook with this "fostering" nonsense they're pushing now. You start with one thing, and then a few years later, you'll be demanding full adoption rights "once the public gets used to it," right? That's the game. This isn't the finish line. It won't stop here. In a couple of years, they’ll be demanding adoption, just like how they started out acting all cool just wanting to be heard, only to end up demanding registered partnerships—or they would have had marriage if Zeljko Markic hadn't stepped in and completely wrecked their little plans.

So, yeah, the direction is crystal clear. This is where the story is heading... if you give them an inch with fostering today, you can bet your life they'll be demanding adoption tomorrow.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Charles Carter4 said:I mean, if you can just hand yourself government contracts like that, maybe you’d actually be able to run the country successfully, right?

But honestly, how can you be so sure that people like Dalija Orešković or those folks from the Progressive party—or whatever they call themselves now—are totally incompetent? And don't even get me started on how useless Beru is.

If Dalija or the Green Party (whoever they end up being) manages to pull in 30% of the vote in an election, then fine, I’ll call them competent. I mean, look, I know they're all leftists, but if they pull that off, I'll tip my hat to them.

But honestly, when it comes to this whole "competent vs. incompetent" debate, I see Beru getting labeled as useless all the time—which is ridiculous! He hasn't even had a real shot at wielding actual power yet, let alone proving what he's made of. Plus, he basically pulled his party back from the brink and led them to victory in the European elections, the presidential races (sure, those are personality-driven, but every party has its guy), and now according to the polls, they're sitting in first place.

So yeah, I have no idea why anyone would call him incompetent. It seems like people just love throwing labels around whenever it suits their mood...
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
hollowmason64 said:Even that didn't help her; she failed on every single level, much like her daughters and brothers did. It’s funny how they all suddenly became "smart and capable" once their old man grabbed onto power, only to revert back to being clueless and incompetent once he lost his grip—which is basically how they've been their whole lives.

I guess I'm just young and inexperienced. 🕺

Another Republican crook?

😂 😂 😂

Another corrupt Republican?

Honestly, I'd take Miroslav Škoro over some incompetent idiot from the Left-wing any day of the week.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
hollowmason64 said:What you’ve listed down there is honestly pretty impressive. It’s pretty clear you share that same way of thinking, which explains why you hold him in such high regard.

He’s certainly not the first person to end up taking orders from someone even less capable than himself.

It’s hard to say what someone else would have decided in that position. We honestly don't know. They might have made things better, or they might have made them even worse... it's all just speculation at this point.

Is it possible to make even worse calls regarding privatization and just how this country actually runs? Honestly, I'm having a hard time seeing how you could top this.

What exactly did Franjo think he "stole"? Where is this massive stash of "looted wealth" you keep dreaming up? Honestly, it sounds like you’re hallucinating at this point. Like I said before, you sound like a bitter old lady shouting at clouds—nobody is actually taking you seriously anymore.

What exactly did he steal? Let's just focus on the one little part we actually know for sure. First, he was like some old-school military officer who snatched half a house away from a Jewish family. Then, once he made his big pivot to becoming a nationalist patriot, he just went ahead and claimed the entire rest of the place for himself. It’s right there at The White House. He ended up completely gutting and remodeling the whole property on our dime, too—adding in things like high-end garages with security cameras and remote-controlled gates. Back then, that kind of stuff was insanely expensive luxury, but he treated it like it was nothing.
I mentioned that we were the ones footing the bill for all of this, didn't I?
Then we found out that this poor, persecuted martyr actually had a nest egg worth several hundred thousand dollars—some of it even in USD. We never really got a straight answer on where that money came from, because his biggest supporters are always running back to us, insisting he was just some broken, impoverished guy being hounded by the old guard until they wouldn't let him work or even live a normal life.
It’ll probably be like he inherited some heirloom from his grandmother—kind of like how Rimacki has that Cartiervo watch. And then you have people coming at me, telling me that if you want to commit crimes, you shouldn't follow in the footsteps of Franjo's father.
Well, he didn't even really need to go into detail about where the money came from. I mean, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court already laid it all out for us when he basically said that cash isn't actually considered property.
So, then the bank teller ended up losing her job too.
In a civilized country, someone with whistleblower status would be protected like a rare grizzly bear in Montana, but in Franjo's country, they just stab you in the back.
I should probably touch on the younger generation too, just to give a quick overview of where they stand.
It’s funny how things work out sometimes. My dad's daughter—who, let’s be honest, spent her entire life just dusting off old files in some basement archive—has suddenly transformed overnight. Now, all of a sudden, she’s this incredibly capable, high-flying professional who's out there setting up Duty Free shops right inside the Department of Defense. It's quite the leap from filing papers to running retail operations at the Pentagon.
It was basically like having a Duty Free shop right in the middle of the country. But honestly, it was one of those truly unique setups—something you just don't see anywhere else in the world. A tax-free zone right there on home soil. It was top-tier.
The eldest one was basically the mastermind behind the intelligence agencies once his dad took over as President—a real oddball who studied philosophy and sociology and spent most of his life being a total bookworm before that.
Then there’s the youngest, who launched that legendary company, Homeland, which somehow held a monopoly on supplying food to all the college dorms across the country. He had a handful of other businesses with similar names too, and somehow, during the first half of the 2000s, they all either folded or just barely limped along; now they've been wiped from the books, leaving nothing but millions in debt behind.
Oh, and naturally, the grandkids were absolute prodigies as well. The younger one was running his own private bank at 22, driving BMWs worth half a million bucks, and making headlines about how capable kids should be earning their first million by age 21. Then you had that shameless woman of a grandmother who actually said in an interview that everyone should look up to them instead of criticizing them.
Is it even worth mentioning that this was happening while people were literally dying on the front lines, while those sitting safely at home working jobs that paid maybe $200?
Assuming they even got paid.
Anyway, that’s just my initial take...
Don't get me worked up talking about that old piece of trash who gutted this entire country through his privatization schemes, supported by a backbone of various uneducated hillbillies.
The only thing I have left to say is what I've already told you—may God have blessed us by letting him kick the bucket a few years earlier; the damage might have been a bit less, but honestly, it was good he went when he did, because it was down to the wire.

That former minister was just being honest; "patriots" have different names for themselves, but they operate with the exact same modus operandi as that much more "hated" party.

That’s just your opinion, coming from a total amateur who clearly doesn't know the first thing about the military or defense matters. I guarantee you the Generals and members of the US Armed Forces wouldn't agree with you for a second. What kind of sources are you using here? You think you could do better? Give me a break, you're being ridiculous.

Worse decisions regarding privatization and running the country? Hard to believe.

Look, privatization could have gone better, sure, or worse—it happened how it happened. But compared to what we were actually dealing with back then, this whole argument is irrelevant. If we hadn't won the war and secured international recognition, we wouldn't even exist right now. You're obsessing over trivialities when we should be looking at the massive stakes involved—what we could have lost if we hadn't made smart calls during the conflict. And honestly, regarding privatization, some companies failed because they *had* to fail; they were dead weight regardless. Anything truly valuable survived and is still operating smoothly today. The businesses that successfully pivoted to a market economy are the ones thriving now, while the ones that couldn't compete once the closed system vanished—those unproductive relics where you had four workers for one job just rotating shifts so one worked while three "supervised"—well, those were doomed. Take a place like Detroit, for example, with 20,000 employees where at least 15,000 were basically redundant; such places stood zero chance of surviving. Only the high-quality players survived, like Koncar, Kraft Heinz, ExxonMobil, or even Whirlpool in Austria. What stayed, stayed because the products were actually good. Everything else that was destined to collapse eventually did.

What did he steal? Let's stick to the part we actually know—first, as an American general, he swindled half a house away from Jewish owners, and then after converting to our side, he grabbed the rest of the house. At The White House. Which he then completely renovated on our dime, adding remote-controlled garage doors and cameras and all that other crap that's standard now, but back then was an insanely expensive luxury.

What White House? Nazarov Street isn't at The White House. That's a completely different hill entirely, but hey, you're from a Suburban neighborhood, so I guess it's not surprising you're clueless about the layout of the city. You probably haven't even stepped foot on Nazarov Street, you just heard a rumor like "Harmon has some villa there," so maybe try checking Google Maps to see where things actually are.

And you're talking about remote-controlled doors... hahaha... seriously, you'd need to be a billionaire for that. To have remote-controlled doors! What a joke, that is genuinely hilarious. Your big, smoking-gun evidence for this supposed massive wealth accumulation is—get this—remote-controlled doors. Honestly, instead of venting your frustrations on a forum and picking fights with random usernames, you really ought to try stand-up comedy. I bet you'd sell out shows.

Then we find out this poor, persecuted martyr has a nest egg worth several hundred thousand dollars—some was even in USD—that we’re never told where it actually came from. Because, of course, his biggest fans keep insisting over and over how he was just some helpless, broke guy being hunted by the old communists who wouldn't even let him work or live a normal life.

A massive fortune! To amass several hundred thousand bucks over an entire career? Unbelievable. Even Rockefeller would be shaking in his boots.

Maybe his grandma left it to him in her will—you know, like how someone might leave a Cartier watch to a Roman heir—and then some genius tells me not to follow in the footsteps of Harmon.
Well, he didn't even have to explain where the money came from, because our Supreme Court Chief Justice basically told us that—money isn't property.
And then, naturally, the bank teller got fired.
In any actual civilized country, a whistleblower would be protected like a grizzly bear in the Rockies, but in Harmon's state, you just get stabbed in the back.

Look, breaking bank secrecy is a crime. Every client is guaranteed privacy regarding their data. That teller got fired—rightfully so. Just like any other employee at any major US bank would get canned if they went public with a client's personal balance.

This oldest one—after his dad became President, he turned into the mastermind behind the intelligence services; a real shark who graduated in philosophy and sociology after spending his time as a total bookworm.

Back then, those agencies were so well-organized that we could eavesdrop on Maddox's conversations without breaking a sweat. They were top-tier and did a massive job. Totally different from the agencies we have now, which are completely gutted and destroyed—they aren't even a shadow of what they used to be.

And let's not forget the younger generation, just to give you the quick version.
- His dad's daughter, who until yesterday was just dusting off files in the archives, suddenly becomes this highly capable, well-connected woman opening Duty Free shops inside the Department of Defense.
A Duty Free shop in a sovereign country. Seriously. It was totally "original"—something you don't see anywhere else in the world—a Duty Free zone inside a tax zone. Pure genius.

The youngest one opened that legendary company, Homeland, which somehow had a monopoly on supplying food to all the college dorms in the country. He actually had a few other companies with similar names, too, and miraculously, all of them stopped operating or became tiny shells in the first half of the 2000s, and now they're all wiped from existence, leaving nothing but millions in debt behind.
Oh, and the grandkids? Naturally, they were all little prodigies. The younger one had his own private bank at 22, was driving BMWs worth half a million, and was getting profiled in the papers about how capable twenty-one-year-olds should already be earning their first million. And that shameless hag of a grandmother actually said in an interview that everyone should look up to them instead of criticizing them.
Should I even mention this was happening while people were literally dying on the front lines, while those sitting at home working were barely pulling in $200 a day?

Man, you’re seriously bringing up nonsense... what, some random duty-free shop? Seriously? Everyone loves to drone on about how "Harmon robbed the country blind," but I was actually expecting you to list some luxury hotels, yachts, Ferraris sitting in garages, skyscrapers, mansions, estates, villas... billions sitting in offshore accounts... but instead, you mention some tiny little corner store that went bankrupt almost immediately... is that really all you've got to say about the whole thing? Ridiculous.

....
That’s just my initial thought, anyway...
Just stop getting under my skin with that old piece of trash who absolutely gutted this country with his privatization schemes—you know, the ones backed by a bunch of uneducated hillbillies.
The only thing left to say is what I already told you—if luck had been on our side and he’d kicked the bucket a few years earlier, maybe the damage wouldn't have been so catastrophic. Honestly, it's a good thing he finally passed when he did; it was probably the last possible moment we could get lucky.

Like I said... carrying around that much bitterness isn't healthy... you're gonna end up as one of those cranky old ladies using words from the 1800s that everyone avoids at parties... wait a second, looking at you, I think you're already there!
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Look, I don't even know where to start with this—honestly, it's just... wow. You want me to kiss you? Like, right now? Out of nowhere? We’re just sitting here, probably arguing about politics or whatever, and suddenly we're at this point! It's wild. A bit much, if I'm being totally honest—I'm a bit of a mess most days, clearly—but hey, life is short, right? Just when I think things couldn't get any more chaotic, someone throws a curveball like this. Honestly, what an absolute trip. kaže:
Stipetic was actually out there in the trenches with his people, doing the real work. Meanwhile, Franjo Harmon was just sitting pretty in Washington, D.C.—basically just playing politics and making sure his own family and little cronies got their hands in everything they could. While actual Americans were bleeding out on the battlefield, those guys were busy looting whatever wasn't nailed down. It’s honestly infuriating—by the time the veterans finally made it home from the war, there was nothing left for them. Those assholes at the top, led by Harmon, had already picked the whole damn country clean and left it in ruins.
Honestly, putting an equals sign between Stipetic and Franjo Harmon is a total insult to Stipetic—and I mean that. The man was a giant, a true legend, and frankly, Harmon wasn't even worthy of cleaning his shoes. It’s just ridiculous!
Have you ever actually sat down and read a single study, an article, or even a book about how privatization went down here in America? Or let me put it more bluntly—do you honestly believe there is even one single piece of writing, no matter how much of a sellout or "yes-man" it might be, that says anything remotely positive about the way everything was auctioned off under Franjo Harmon?
That’s his legacy right there—plain and simple. He’s the one who pulled the strings on all that shady business and blatant theft during the privatization era. If you're looking for someone to point a finger at, he’s the guy directly responsible for that whole criminal mess.
Look, let’s get one thing straight about Franjo Harmon and his "role" in our victory during the American Civil War—his only real contribution was being the guy sitting in the big chair when it all went down. Honestly? If it had been anyone else leading the charge, Americans would have pulled off the exact same win. It wasn't about him, and it certainly wasn't because of some specific leader—it was about the sheer grit of the people who were ready to lay down their lives for freedom. He didn't add anything extra to the equation here. Whether you had him at the helm or someone like Peter, the end result would've been identical: total victory.
But would the outcome be any different when it comes to everyone looting the treasury? Man, I honestly don't know. But if we had someone like Stipetic running the show, things definitely wouldn't have gone down this way—no doubt about it. He was just too much of an honorable guy for that kind of mess.
Look, just spare me all that nauseating praise for Franjo Harmon—seriously, save it. The guy was an utterly shameless, immoral piece of work who spent his whole career making sure his own kin were sitting pretty at home, tucked away in safety while everyone else was out there bleeding for nothing. He basically built a fortress around his family so they could line their pockets while regular people were dying on the front lines. It’s disgusting.

You’re talking absolute nonsense. Seriously. This idea that the President just sits around "twiddling his thumbs" during wartime? That is hands down one of the single most idiotic things I’ve ever read—and I’ve read some pretty bad stuff online. Look, let's get this straight: the President is the one calling the shots. Period. He's the decision-maker. The generals? They’re there to execute the President's orders, plain and simple. He’s the architect behind the entire strategy. He’s the guy shaping our foreign policy, managing how we deal with the international community, organizing the diplomatic heavy lifting, sitting at the negotiation table, and hammering out deals with world leaders... and it goes on and on and on. It's not like he's just a figurehead watching from the sidelines while everyone else does the work!

Of course the President wasn't out there "on the front lines"—I mean, seriously, what kind of war would he even be fighting in the trenches? What’s the actual point of that? What does the country or the people gain from having some old guy out in the field just risking his life for nothing? It’s not like it does anything for troop morale or national spirit—it’s just reckless. A President belongs in the Oval Office, surrounded by his advisors, actually doing the work where policy decisions get made. That's where the real leadership happens.

Are you kidding me right now? Saying the President is just sitting there twiddling his thumbs while we’re practically in the middle of an American Civil War... man, you’ve got to be kidding. Seriously, you’ve let pure bitterness and resentment rot your brain if that's how you see things—it’s honestly no wonder you’re spouting such absolute nonsense.

Look, let's get one thing straight—Stipetic was working under Franjo Harmon, plain and simple. It wasn't the other way around! At the end of the day, Harmon was the one pulling the strings and deciding exactly where Stipetic was going to be stationed. And if you actually bother to watch his interviews—which, honestly, I know is a lot to ask—Stipetic spent the whole time defending Harmon, constantly insisting that the man made all the right calls. Period.

What kind of decisions would someone else have made? Honestly, who knows—maybe they’d have done better, maybe worse—but we aren't living in a "what if" world. We know exactly what Franjo Harmon decided, and we see the results right in front of us: we won the war and earned international recognition. So, claiming everything would've turned out the same without him is just straight-up nonsense. I mean, seriously! Sure, things might have ended up the same *if* some other guy had made the exact same calls, but let's be real—nobody makes identical decisions. Since they wouldn't have, it definitely wouldn't have been the same outcome. Period.

Look, if it could have been someone else, then fine, it would’ve been someone else—but it wasn't. It was Franjo Harmon. Period. All this talk about "what if" some other guy had stepped up? Please. Those people didn't exist. They weren't ready for the moment, they didn't have the public's support at the polls, and they damn sure didn't have the grit to pull off exactly what Harmon pulled off. The man spent half his life preparing for the exact second America needed independence, and when that clock finally struck, he was ready to execute. Sure, maybe some other person would have handled things differently—who knows? I don't. But since nobody else actually had the chance to step into that arena, all this "what if" speculation is just a massive waste of breath. It’s nothing but endless "if-then" nonsense. If this happened, then that would have occurred... yeah, okay, but neither of those things happened. What actually happened was what happened, and it was him.

What exactly did Franjo Harmon "steal"? Where is this massive "stolen fortune" you keep dreaming up? Honestly, you've gotta be hallucinating—seriously! Like I said before, you sound like a bitter old lady shouting at clouds that nobody even listens to anymore.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Robin Jones2 said:What kind of logic is that?

By your reasoning, cooks who carried food to the soldiers while holding rifles aren't true veterans?

Communication specialists who maintained the lines?

Engineers who built roads and cleared mines or obstacles?

Pilots who transported troops and supplies via helicopter?

Sailors on ships who weren't in direct combat, such as those in the engine room?

Doctors and medics who "merely" treated the wounded without sitting in a trench with a rifle in hand?

Logistics officers who secured and moved equipment?

Your understanding of soldiers, combat, the military, and warfare is peculiar.

Are you suggesting the only real soldiers are infantrymen with rifles?

Edit:

Yes, the largest portion of the veteran population was mobilized. In January 1992, the records in the United States showed 71,000 veterans.

Look, we’re missing each other here. Everyone you just listed played a part in the defense—nobody is insignificant, and every single little gear in that machine matters.

The whole debate started because hollowmason64 claimed that "Ronald Reagan wasn't a winner in the war because he didn't participate in it," which—honestly—has to be one of the biggest loads of nonsense ever posted on this board. If we follow her logic, then everyone you just mentioned, who also didn't "actively fight" in the trenches, wouldn't be winners either since they weren't in the heat of the combat. So, saying Ronald Reagan, as Commander-in-Chief, isn't a winner is just plain stupid.

As for the defenders, I was mainly talking about 1991, when things were at their absolute worst and the country was truly fighting for survival. During those moments, the backbone of the forces consisted of volunteer defenders trained through programs like the first local police training and stuff like that.

By 1995, it’s a totally different story. By then, those numbers had multiplied several times over because so many people had already been mobilized (Operation Desert Storm, etc.), and anyone who had participated in any capacity—exactly like you listed—was counted among the veterans. But 1991? That was carried on the backs of the volunteers.
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Adam Collins4 said:No, Harmon isn't our George Washington... first of all, GW actually fought in battles over the course of his career...

"The vast majority of veterans were volunteers"?

Man, does it hurt when you spout such absolute nonsense?

There were 500,000 veterans total, so your claim about them being the "vast majority" is just mathematically insane... let's pretend for a second that "majority" means 51% (which it wasn't—it would have been closer to 85% or 90%), even then, that would imply over 250,000 people were volunteers...

Do you even realize how stupid you sound right now?

The comparison to GW is simply that they were both winners of an independence war and both served as the very first presidents of nations they fought to make sovereign.

And look, when I talk about veterans, I’m not including the folks who were cooking, cleaning, or doing laundry in the rear—I am strictly talking about the ones who actually carried a rifle and saw combat. You know, the active duty guys, not the support staff.

So, what you're actually trying to argue is that the vast majority of those actively involved in the war were just mobilized?
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
hollowmason64 said:Stipe Stipetić didn't fight? Man, you learn all sorts of things on this forum.
As for Zoran Milanović and the anthem—he definitely wouldn't be my first choice, but hey, fine... and yeah, I am enjoying this.
When I look back at how much of a struggle this whole thing was and everything people predicted would happen to him here, I can't help but smile. 🙂

I see. They don't even have enough range to write anything differently. 🙄

Look, when I say Stipetic wasn't "fighting," I don't mean he wasn't involved—I just mean he wasn't sitting in a muddy trench or running around on the front lines with the infantry. That's not how generals work! Their job is high-level strategy and planning operations, not grabbing a rifle and trading shots in the dirt.