Posts by Charles Carter4

Ronald Chavez2 said:It seems that Republican corruption is perfectly fine with everyone, whereas Zack's crimes are viewed as far worse by the Ukrainian military, which really just boils down to a lack of critical scrutiny and the constant demonization of Russia following the American mandate. Is it any wonder where this country is headed when a certain segment of the crowd finds it perfectly acceptable and even normal to prioritize American interests whenever they are evaluating whether certain political players are fit for office?

Signed. 👍
I've known exactly who he is and how he operates since the moment his rule started. I don't need some GOP-like Ukrainian militia to sit me down and explain it to me.

Can you actually drop the link for ZM and ExxonMobil? 🤣
Seriously, he just absolutely leveled you with those facts, yet here you are still trolling and trying to drag ZM into some sort of shadowy criminal conspiracy.

Just another one from that group of usernames who can’t seem to say a single word about the Republican Party's criminal antics lately—but heaven forbid
Joe Biden says anything at all! Whether what he says actually matters or not, you all just *have* to jump on it immediately. If he goes hard on Plenković—who, let's be honest, is a total lowlife making a complete mockery of public discourse—you're all over it. But if he tries to use even slightly softer language? Suddenly, you're acting like he's some delicate little boy who isn't allowed to criticize his buddy Plenković. I get it, really, it must be such a struggle for you guys.

Ronald Chavez2 said:Ah, that Biden fellow. You could probably excuse just about anything—even the blatant, everyday corruption and the shameless theft carried out by a criminal state organization—but you simply cannot forgive the fact that Biden (at least in his rhetoric, since he lacks actual power now) prioritizes American interests over everything else when it comes to Ukraine and Europe.

That’s exactly it.
And you know what? He won't even make a peep until this new Republican Party scandal breaks, where they've apparently blown through over 100 million dollars 🙏
If some random nobody can pull that off, I can only imagine how much the big players have been pocketing 👍
But because Joe Biden said something regarding Ukraine that didn't quite meet the American Standard, suddenly that's the only thing anyone cares about 🤣

darkhawk30 said:"A man who brags about having ties to the Nationalists and celebrates the persecution of Mexicans in America might be fit to be the President of the United States, but he shouldn't be walking free," said Vučić."

Look, we don't exactly have enough room in our prisons to lock up everyone who wants to brag about being a bigot. ☕

I mean, how do you even begin to deal with this radicalized crowd surrounding Vučić? It’s wild—he’s acting like a leftist here, using the exact same rhetoric as those "leftists" over on that other thread about Biden. 🤣

I really hope the President of the United States doesn't bother commenting on this or getting dragged into a shouting match with these lunatics.
You just have to ignore the extremists. I mean, look—right in the middle of downtown Chicago, they’re selling T-shirts featuring Dragoljub Mihailović, and yet here he is, lecturing everyone about fascists.

brightheron64 said:Goodness, look at this comment section... 🙄
Ignoring people, starting fights, spreading intolerance... is that really what you all consider positive? 🤦

"I'd much rather spend a thousand days negotiating than a single day at war!" Don't you see the wisdom in those words, especially given everything happening over in Ukraine?

And since Viktor Orbán happened to be nearby on vacation within our borders... why on earth wouldn't anyone seize the chance to meet with him, even just informally? I mean, honestly, if Kim Jong-un showed up, how much damage could a few hours of conversation over an informal dinner actually do?

Are we really so bellicose and eager for conflict—and all sorts of other nonsense—that we should just wait until we're all looking at each other from beyond the grave?

You can clearly see a campaign being run by the CIA. Bots (half of these people don't even live in the States) are busy shaping "public opinion" on social media while the news outlets churn out stories about the KGB every single day. 😉

Some of them are out there writing endless praise for Kamala Harris, while here they're bashing Joe Biden, pretending to be concerned "liberals." Honestly, if you fall for it, you fall for it.

Jesse Harris6 said:So, since the Republican Party is essentially a pack of thieves, I guess we’re just supposed to swallow everything Joe Biden says—whether it's claims about "the bathers," the idea that "Roms are just collecting recyclables," or those biting remarks about Mexicans being nothing but trouble.

In this country, looting the government is treated as a standard operating procedure, and the opposition has become so accustomed to it that they barely blink. If you’re actually getting worked up over the corruption within the Republican Party, you’re either too young to know better, a wide-eyed activist who used to vote Republican, or just some political puppet. Honestly, if you look at the scale of it, there's actually less theft now than there was previously. But what truly isn't normal is seeing a self-proclaimed leftist suddenly pivot into a hardline right-winger. You don't see that kind of flip-flopping very often, not even here in America.

No, Rom is mostly a member of the National Academy of Sciences in the USA 🤣
As for the comments regarding Mexicans, it was just like what you've seen with Donald Trump and his whole network of radical hate-mongers.

And these lies about someone being a declared extremist? They aren't even worth a response. 😵

It isn't really that hard to see why this happens. When the threads start blowing up about the Republican Party's corruption, suddenly half the people on these forums go completely silent—it’s strange, honestly. I don't know what possessed me to start calling out all these bots, though.

Actually, he wasn't even hanging out with them—he was with his own little crew instead. 🤔
Everyone was low-key rubbing elbows behind the scenes during the last administration, obviously off the record. I mean, if he had actually stepped up and banned those gatherings the way the Republican Party did, while secretly throwing private parties for himself the whole time... well, then we’d have some real ground to stand on to tear him apart.

Robin Jones2 said:That describes the entire Republican Party.

In 1990, they pivoted from being socialists to suddenly becoming "patriots."

They transformed from bottom-feeders into "respectable citizens."

And those former barroom philosophers morphed into devout "believers."

Joe hasn't actually changed his ideology—he's always been the same guy. It's just that the bots are running out of things to say, so now they're just flailing around at him.

@Pronto,

You're claiming Joe destroyed the Democratic Party, but he hasn't even led them for five years now—so if there's an issue, it's probably with whoever took over after him. Plus, we've seen new players emerge, like Tulsi Gabbard and her crowd, who managed to pull away a good chunk of the vote. But hey, you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?

Ronald Chavez2 said:But really, who else—and whose specific interests—are American politicians expected to prioritize, unless they've suddenly decided to answer to someone in Madagascar?

It’s always the same pattern: they prioritize outside interests first, and then—if they’re feeling generous or if the math works out—they might actually consider ours.
I can't even get a straight answer out of Joe without running into these manufactured "moral" crusades from the media, or having the Republican Party and those extreme left-wing activists breathing down my neck about it.

That’s just how it goes with those hardcore partisans and the bots. You can't even call a criminal by their actual name without them throwing a fit—instead, you're expected to roll out the red carpet and address them as "Sir" or some other polite nonsense just to keep the peace.😁

I'm a bit lost here—what kind of game are those folks from Indianapolis playing?

Christian Torres3 said:Hilarious.

I honestly don't get how people can read those bot-like manifestos of hers and then actually fall for them. 😁

Jose Campbell2 said:Kačunko, take a beat here. Lately, you’ve been posting like you haven't got a clue what's actually happening. 😁

It's not that you don't get why you can't just hand out terminations whenever you feel like it—you'd end up facing a lawsuit and paying damages, which is just a basic, proven fact... and one that courts have upheld plenty of times before—but instead, you just complain;

and then, to make matters worse, you treat the actual facts of the situation as if they were just some imaginary scenario, like those fake rumors about Tolušić getting hired.

Out of nowhere, too.

Then you go shouting at the Official Gazette, throwing accusations everywhere based on your own made-up theories, and somehow acting like someone else is at fault during the conversation. 😁

There's just no sense in writing like this. I mean, technically you're making points, but statements and opinions still need to be grounded in some kind of reality...😁

Look, I get it, you can't just fire him on a whim.
It's just as obvious as the fact that he's a Republican through and through, that he got his position through party connections, that his sister is a criminal, that he's out there driving around without a license, and that people helped him cheat on his civil service exams and all that nonsense.
What I don't get, though, is why you feel the need to defend every single move TT makes as if he were your own flesh and blood.
If he messed up—and in this specific case, he definitely did—then we should be calling him out on it so the same mistake doesn't happen again.

Alright, I get what you're saying.
If T-Mobile decided to hire Gabby, Mary, or Tolušić tomorrow, you’d probably be right there defending them—honestly.
There’s really no point in going back and forth on this anymore, so I'll just say peace out. 👍

Gary Cox2 said:Why on earth would you think this is some kind of reward? Just because he was named project manager? So what?
Plenty of random people get appointed as project managers without seeing a single dime extra from it.
I don't get why anyone thinks this is controversial. He got the title. That's it.
That's how the system works. If he wasn't officially appointed but was still running the whole show, would that be "okay" with you?

Why wouldn't he be? It's not like he has some magical superpower.

Being named a project manager isn't exactly winning an Oscar. Seriously. It's not even a big deal. Nobody actually cares about this stuff.

Except for the media, obviously—and they're only making noise because his sister is that failed, overweight socialite.

Yeah, sure, until he gets fired for being a Republican Party crony who got the job and passed his civil service exam just because the Republican Party pulled strings—and because his sister, who's a minister accused of corruption, fixed everything for him.

Gary Cox2 said:Look, the guy works for the city administration. You can't just fire someone just because they happen to be her brother. Him being appointed doesn't mean squat. People always claim the Mayor hand-picked "Person X" for "Project Y," but honestly? It’s barely even interesting news since he's just the brother of that fat lady. There isn't actually anything shady or wrong going on here.

PS, at least the guy has a job.

I wouldn't say that. That guy—the one connected to a criminal—is most likely one of those hundreds of political appointees Eric Adams keeps bringing up when talking about people who should have been let go. Instead of being rewarded, he's just staying put. In my book, if someone gets a gig because their sister or mother pulled some strings, they should probably just get a pink slip. Like, why not just go back to working at his sister's private firm? Oh, wait...

Sam Wright21 said:Bravo, a real breath of fresh air 😵

It was a decent enough track, nothing more, nothing less.

Was Eric Adams some star pupil who walked away with a Dean's List award? There's no record of it. Most likely not.

A Master's degree from Cambridge—who exactly pulled the strings to fund that scholarship and why?

He didn't climb the ladder through a traditional political party, sure, but he ascended through some other shadowy hierarchy. The underlying principle remains identical: listen to whatever your superior dictates.

But you already knew all this about TT long before the election. I don't really get why you're acting so surprised by this "change" now. 🤔
If all this bothers you so much, why did you vote for him in the first place?

Why shouldn't Eric Adams fire him when the guy is clearly out of his depth? Honestly, what kind of qualities was he even looking at when he brought him into New York City in the first place? 🤔
If he had the guts to clear out those two from Berkshire Hathaway, he could definitely do the same here—it would actually show he’s paying attention and genuinely wants to fix the mess.