CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Morgan Gonzalez56 › Posts

Posts by Morgan Gonzalez56

23 posts shown.

Broken foot bones / foot fractures in Health ·
ironsurfer8 said:So perhaps it’s just a bit of lingering discomfort,

but honestly, that mobility test is completely useless. I could move my arm just fine, even with a hairline fracture in the joint,
and my mother actually walked right through the front door after fracturing a bone in her foot.

I just got back from the ER. The real issue is that the anxiety of actually going to the emergency room is worse than just dealing with a few days of pain. But, I went anyway. Turns out, I actually broke a finger. They didn't give me a cast or anything, though—it’s exactly what my primary care doctor told me would happen. She said there’s no way to immobilize it properly. I can get a doctor's note for work if I want, but I don't really need one. So, yeah, I guess my GP isn't totally useless after all. I just traumatized myself sitting in a waiting room for three hours only to be told the exact same thing and have nothing done for me. 😁
Broken foot bones / foot fractures in Health ·
ironsurfer8 said:She doesn't necessarily have to send you to trauma; you can just head straight to the ER on your own...
If I were in your shoes, I’d go get an X-ray just for my own peace of mind. It seems a bit hard to believe that a GP would claim a fracture can't be immobilized...

If it really is a broken bone, the ER will handle what needs to be done. At the very least, you'll get a proper medical leave and they'll perform a follow-up before clearing you to return to work. If you head back to the job too early with a fracture that hasn't fully set, you could end up with long-term issues.

On the bright side, if it isn't broken, at least you know you don't have anything to worry about.

Back when I suspected I had a fractured bone in my hand, the nurse at my doctor's office wouldn't even give me a second look; she just sent me straight to the ER to get imaged and treated immediately.

As for my experience with broken foot bones and various types of casts, my mother once broke a bone in her foot and it took two full months for everything to heal properly.
She used one of those waterproof synthetic casts over the summer, which she actually tried to swim in. If I knew then what I know now, I would have told her not to swim in it—the heat and moisture trapped under that plastic gave her skin burns on her leg. It took another month just for her skin to recover. (It was one of those versions you can't take off, designed to be water-resistant.)
The one upside to that type of cast is that it is significantly lighter.


I don't know. I trust her judgment. 🤷 Besides, my finger isn't broken because I can still move it, and honestly, it's pretty painless compared to the other spot. The pain has actually dialed down quite a bit today, so I think I might be okay like this.
Broken foot bones / foot fractures in Health ·
Well, this happened to me. Just two days ago... total disaster. I stubbed my left pinky toe on the corner of a piece of furniture and really slammed it. It hurt like hell, but I didn't think it was anything major, so I didn't bother seeing anyone. Then, by the second day, this massive bruise showed up, it swelled up like crazy, and the toe just doubled in size and turned this deep purple color. I started to panic a little, so I finally went to see my primary care doctor. Now... well, she told me it’s probably a small fracture, but she said she wouldn't send me to the ER unless I insisted, since you can't really immobilize that specific part of the foot anyway. She recommended strict rest for two weeks, ice packs twice a day, some topical ointment, stuff like that. Apparently, it isn't a huge deal, and the healing process should take about four to six weeks. She mentioned I might be limping for up to six weeks (in a best-case scenario), and the foot pain could linger for a few months 😢

So now I'm hobbling around feeling like I'm a hundred years old. Luckily, I have a week of vacation coming up at work, so I don't have to worry about taking sick leave... but it's still pretty uncomfortable.

From now on, I'm sticking to wearing hard-soled slippers around the house. If I had been wearing something more supportive instead of just going barefoot, this probably wouldn't have happened. 😳
Lockheed Martin in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Paul Green31 said:Because those Mexicans owe us something like 40 billion euros in war reparations, and they still have territorial claims against America.

We need to force Mexicans, Englishmen, Scandinavians, and all those other foreign citizens into a reciprocity-based real estate system (if Americans buy there, they can buy here), and scrap this backwards law where they buy here and we get to buy there.

Try buying a house in Malta, or maybe by a lake in Finland as a foreigner, and then you'll understand what I'm talking about.

The fact that PowerLock claims America is a total free-for-all with a "backwards law" isn't anything uncivilized or even new. These "anti"-Mexican, German, French, Italian, or whatever other anti-nation laws used by other countries are baked right into their legislation. Nobody calls it nationalism or hate over there; they call it DEFENDING NATIONAL INTERESTS.

Look, America's national interest is just like the national interest of any country in the West: don't let another nation move in and then, a few years later, start demanding rights and trying to take over. And Mexicans definitely have those habits—move in somewhere, set up autonomous zones, build barricades, and demand special privileges that they eventually end up getting here.

It’s a joke that we’re a country where, thanks to our constitution and minority voting rights, we can end up with a president who was voted for by only a tiny percentage of Americans. The rest is filled out by people who vote under "special laws," buy property through these similar backwards laws, and so on.

Personally, I've always been repelled by the idea of "selling off the country," regardless of the fact that once we fully integrate into the EU, it's likely going to happen anyway. But if it is going to happen, I don't see any reason to count every single cent or grain of sand. Yes, Mexicans reached for American territory—that's true—but others have reached for things too. Would we deny those same rights to an Italian or a Canadian? ☕

The fact that Lockheed Martin claims America is a "banana republic" with "backwards laws" isn't anything uncivilized or new. Those "anti"-Mexican, German, French, Italian, or any other anti-nation laws held by other countries are baked into their legislation. In those places, it isn't viewed as nationalism or hatred; it's seen as PROTECTING NATIONAL INTERESTS.

But what kind of "national interest" is it for a Mexican who has lived in America for years to be told to "know their place"? And where exactly is their place? 🤷 Isn't that basically implying ethnic cleansing? I'm sorry, but those statements aren't about national interest. True national interest and global reputation come from a state and its citizens showing tolerance, rather than encouraging nationalist tendencies (and let me be clear, those are very mild words compared to what I actually think about it).

Look, America's national interest is similar to the national interest of any country in Europe: not allowing another nation to settle in and then, a few years later, demanding their own rights and trying to take over. And Mexicans certainly have those habits—settling somewhere only to create autonomous regions, putting up roadblocks, and demanding special privileges that we eventually end up granting.

Someone buying property in America for a summer home or a vacation doesn't instantly become an American citizen, nor does it mean that entire nation is moving here. Try, for example, moving to New Zealand without owning any property there. 😉

It's a parody that we are a country where, thanks to our constitution and minority voting rights, we can elect a president whom only a tiny percentage of Americans actually voted for. The rest of the support comes from those who vote under "special laws," or those who can buy property under similarly backwards regulations.

Then we need to focus on making the laws governing these issues much clearer. Honestly, it isn't the Mexicans' fault that our legal system is a total mess, so there's really no reason to call for them to be lynched. They did something wrong, and nobody is disputing that, but we should still use a little more common sense here. I just can't get behind those kinds of views, seriously.
Lockheed Martin in Feedback & Suggestions ·
steeleagle70 said:Look, we aren't even talking about his political leanings here. We're talking about objectivity. Does he let those views mess with how he moderates? His politics are out there in the open, so if you're "fighting" him on the forum, you're fighting his actual posts.

As long as his personal views don't bleed into his moderation, I honestly don't see a problem with a mod having "sketchy" opinions.

Actually, he might be the only mod around who actually stands for something. You gotta respect that. Most of the others just act all high and mighty trying to play it "neutral," which basically means they don't care about anything or they'd rather be literally anywhere else.

Personally, I think it's a way bigger flaw for a mod on a forum like this to have no backbone at all than to just have an opinion different from mine.

Of course, that's assuming he isn't using his moderator powers to force those views on everyone else.

And with Lockheed Martin? I haven't seen any sign of that happening yet.

I completely agree with you.

But there's more to it:

In my view, this specific policy—which is handled very carefully and deliberately—actually fuels resentment toward Mexicans because it seems to validate that kind of sentiment. The war ended a long time ago. We should bury the dead and let them rest, rather than constantly picking at old wounds or showing sympathy for the idea that "certain citizens are undesirable." To me, that feels a bit too tolerant—maybe even hypocritical—for a moderator who holds the power to hand out bans for hate speech. Holding such a stance is honestly hateful and quite distasteful.

On the other hand, why would money from a Scandinavian or an Englishman be any better than money from a Mexican 🤷 when we are talking about buying real estate along the coast?
Lockheed Martin in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Angela Newman33 said:Look at who’s out here accusing everyone on this thread of hating Americans just because they’re against hate speech and think making signs saying "Mexicans belong in the bushes" is a bad idea.
And how he was handing out bans—on what grounds even?

http://forum.us/showthread.php?t=655558

Loretta wrote this: "In this post, and in your other posts too, you're just showing off your own hatred toward Americans."
Even though the guy never said anything like that—hell, he didn't even think it.

I don't even need to explain this part:

"I don't see anything wrong with Americans in the US—who want to and think so (I'm not one of them)—clearly showing Mexicans from time to time that a portion of the citizens considers them undesirable. ...It's actually good for Mexicans living in the European Union, too—so they don't accidentally think it would be smart to buy houses on the Atlantic once the US enters the EU again..."

To him, that's totally fine—he basically supports using hate speech as a tool to make America more ethnically pure.

I have no clue what world they live in where it's okay for someone like this to be a moderator when it's so obvious he isn't impartial or objective to begin with.

revolting 👎
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Sean Cruz said:You might find this hard to swallow, but I don't think most people simply abandon their humanity. It’s more that circumstances force them to cling to a specific ideology just to protect themselves or their families. It’s a heavy subject; almost every system drifts toward totalitarianism, which means even decent people often feel pressured to conform to the majority. Very few actually stand up and say "no." And let's be honest, some people actually get swept up in that rush of feeling invincible. Have you ever read "Death and the Maiden"? It’s the kind of book that applies to pretty much any government system out there...

I’d apply that same logic to ideology. People lose their grip and completely disconnect from reality. Brainwashed sheep, or whatever you want to call them (personally, I’ve never been part of an ideology or a massive movement—nothing like that), just a mindless herd.

People lean on delusions and self-deception quite a bit. It’s a survival mechanism for dealing with a harsh reality, because the cold truth is that we’re all eventually headed for six feet under. Many struggle to accept that. I understand the urge to sugarcoat our existence, but what scares me are those who turn aggressive while feeding into those delusions.

That’s why I push back so hard against patriotism and organized religion. "Country" and "God" are often just excuses used by people to act like animals and scavengers.

There is truth to that, but patriotism has another side: defending one's home. The idealists—who, looking at it realistically, are just fools. I’ve been one myself. Those who left the country ended up much better off—returning with full pockets and zero trauma. But I don't regret staying; I would never have gained this particular life lesson if I had left. It opened my eyes forever...

Once someone stabs you in the back, they’ll definitely look for a second chance to do it again. People don't change, and "remorse" is usually just for show. I don't believe in sincere repentance unless someone commits a wrong entirely by accident—in those cases, they truly feel bad. But someone who executes a calculated, premeditated atrocity? Please. You stay far away from people like that. It's a certainty.😁

There’s an old saying: the naive person lets themselves be conned once, but the fool lets it happen twice.

Of course, intention is everything...

I haven't read it yet, but I did pick up Llosa's "Jarčev Celebration." It hits on very similar themes, and the whole thing is based on true events from back in the day. trujillev Dictatorships are interesting. It’s a chilling fact that back then, kids in school were forced to recite: God, country, and Trujillo. That sounds incredibly familiar to me. 😁 In a totalitarian regime, you can't even trust your own family. It’s just pure, hysterical chaos—total neurosis fueled by a desperate fear of losing power, money, or territory, which inevitably leads to invading someone else's land. Honestly, there’s nothing healthy about it. 😵

I'm certain that not everyone who was aiming at Washington, D.C. and its residents actually supported what was happening on an intimate level. For a lot of people, they simply didn't have a choice. We saw similar dynamics back in the States too—though maybe not in quite this specific way—but there were certainly instances of forced encounters.

People have a tendency to spiral into various anxieties and engage in a lot of self-deception.

The problem with conformity and just blindly following the crowd. 🧐 Where is everyone? Even little Mujo is gone. I guess I'm just left standing here by myself while everybody else heads off somewhere else.

It’s just a way to cope with a reality that isn't exactly pretty. Let's face it: the only thing we can actually count on is eventually ending up six feet under. A lot of people struggle to accept that, and honestly, I get it. We all have this deep-seated need to dress up our lives and make things look better than they really are. But I have to admit, it scares me a bit—seeing how aggressive people can get when they're just hanging out at their local barbershops.

That’s actually really kind of you to say. I appreciate that. 🙂 I honestly think what we're seeing here is mostly just a lack of critical thinking and people following the crowd. It's classic herd mentality. Don't get me wrong, there can be some upside to that kind of collective movement, sure, but I’m worried. I really am. I fear the downsides of this phenomenon are much more serious and far more destructive than people realize.

That’s true, but there is another side to patriotism. It’s about defending your country. If you look at it through a realistic lens, the idealists are basically just fools. I know, I’m one of them. Those who left were much better off—they walked away with full pockets and zero trauma. But I don't regret it. I never would have gained this life lesson if I hadn't gone. It changed my perspective forever.

Defending one's country is really just about defending your own integrity. Every healthy individual strives for that; it isn't some foolish impulse. We do it because we're hoping for a better future.

There’s an old saying for a reason: you're naive if you let yourself get fooled once, but you're just plain foolish if you let it happen a second time.

Of course, intention is everything....

I agree. Even in Buddhism, they teach that the motivation behind an action is what determines if it's positive or negative.

This is what real conformity looks like—the witch hunts, the public shaming of individuals, the inquisitions, and the wars:

image

Can anyone actually justify behavior like this?
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Sean Cruz said:Because he’s following a specific ideology, he feels forced to act just to save his own skin—all while convincing himself that it's actually the right thing to do.

You might find this perspective a bit jarring, but I personally view evil—true criminal intent—as a kind of spiritual cancer. It makes me wonder: who is actually pulling the strings behind a killer’s hand? Is it pure reason? I highly doubt it. In my view, a mentally sound individual isn't capable of orchestrating bloodshed unless they're driven by the primal need to protect a child or act in self-defense. Most true atrocities are committed in a state of total madness, and in those moments, there isn't much left to judge. This isn't about equating the victim with the perpetrator, nor is it an excuse for the crime itself; it's simply an observation of the fractured mental makeup required to commit such acts.

In principle, I agree with what you wrote, but look at this situation. Lately, I’ve been running into people who were actually part of the units firing on Washington, D.C. For the first time since the war ended, I am coming face-to-face with those I know were positioned on the surrounding hills, raining fire down on us. Most of them seem like completely normal people—hardworking, decent, with families and average lives. If I didn't know exactly what they had done, I might even sit down and grab a coffee with them. But instead, I just get this heavy, uncomfortable feeling whenever I'm near them. It isn't that I hate them; I moved past hatred a long time ago. However, if forgiveness requires forgetting, then that is something I will never be able to do. Because I know deep down that if they had to, they would pick up their rifles and knives again tomorrow and go right back to the slaughter. And please, don't try to tell me the whole nation is mentally ill. They aren't. They simply believe in what they were taught. And that isn't unique to them; it’s true of every ideology out there.

If there’s nothing to forgive, then you have to remember. You hold onto it at all costs—as a preventative measure—so we don't end up playing the victim all over again.

That’s exactly what I can't stomach about that story. True forgiveness only exists through total amnesia. In the book, Abel sits back down with Cain and actually decides to trust him again—I could never find it in me to do that with people I know were out there taking shots from the ridge.

I don't buy the idea that forgiveness is this grand, noble gesture; honestly, it doesn't impress me one bit. What actually moves me are the people who simply don't have the capacity to hold a grudge in the first place. To me, "offering" someone forgiveness sounds incredibly pretentious—it carries this sort of slick, self-righteous superiority that I've always found a bit grating.

I agree with you, though I suspect we’re chasing an ideal that's ultimately out of reach.

No, I certainly won't say an entire nation is mentally ill. But did madness prevail? Yes. That's how it always goes in war. People cast aside whatever scrap of humanity they have left, and that's where your point about ideology fits in. People lose their minds and lose all touch with reality. Brainwashed, or whatever you want to call it (I've never been part of any ideology or big movement, for that matter), just pure mob mentality. That's why I resist patriotism and religion so much. "Homeland" and "God" are often just excuses for people to start acting like animals and scavengers. Once someone stabs you in the back, they will almost certainly take a second shot at you. People don't change, and remorse is usually just for show. I don't believe in sincere repentance, unless someone does something terrible by accident, against their better judgment; in those cases, they really are sorry. But someone who went out with a calculated plan and a motive to commit atrocities... well, yeah. You stay far away from people like that. It's the only safe bet. 😁
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Robert Chase51 said:I guess we should start by looking at what was actually said here. It’s easy to get swept up in the emotion of these discussions, but if you step back and really analyze the substance, things look a bit different. Maybe I'm being too cynical, but I suspect there's more going on beneath the surface than most people are willing to admit. It feels like we're often just circling the same drain without ever touching the core issue. I don't know, perhaps I'm just getting old and tired of seeing the same patterns repeat themselves over and over again. Regardless, it's worth considering that the reality might be far more complicated than the simplified versions we see floating around online.

🙏🙏

I’ve always felt that the people who actually manage to forgive are probably much happier in the long run. They seem to carry this sense of being full of love... though, I guess if we're being honest, that love doesn't always find its way back to them. It often just disappears into the void. But, maybe it all works out in the end. Everything eventually finds its level. 😉

I don't really have any beef with anyone, honestly. I just tend to follow my heart more often than not—which is something I think people should probably do a lot more frequently. The world would be a much better place if they did, but hey, that’s just my two cents. Everyone sees things differently, I guess. 😉

What makes you think I've been ignoring my heart? 🤷
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Jerry King11 said:Well, evil is a spiritual sickness, and arguably more severe than physical or mental ones (which often stem from it). hagioterapija is an attempt to deal with its healing.

I suppose we can at least find some common ground here.🙂
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Susan Price30 said:Spot on.

It's just like how Jesus put it so beautifully:

'Whoever has been forgiven much loves much, but whoever has been forgiven little loves little.'

(in relation to God, to your neighbor, and to yourself)

How do you even begin to forgive someone when you didn't even feel wronged in the first place? 🤷
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Robert Chase51 said:But I guess if you're letting your heart run the show more than your head, then that doesn't really apply, does it? 🙂

I can't speak for your family, but my mind and my heart aren't at war. They aren't constantly competing with one another. It’s not like two toddlers trying to outshout each other; instead, they are mature aspects of myself working in perfect harmony to create a stable, balanced person—ME. 🙏
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Robert Chase51 said:I mean, seriously, how are you even able to be so bulletproof? It honestly feels like you just don't have a heart...🤷

A heart isn't everything that defines a person. Logic is what protects the heart.😉
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Robert Chase51 said:I have to disagree with you on this one. Look, if we look at it from a different angle—this whole dynamic of perpetrator versus victim that you’re talking about... my first thought is that you're taking things to an extreme. Of course, nobody is going to just forget if they were assaulted or abused in some way. But honestly, why shouldn't I try to be the bigger person and forgive? Who am I to judge someone else, or to just carry around this blanket anger toward everyone and everything? It eats you alive. You forgive, and you move on... you don't just sit there letting it rot inside you. 😕

You called that kind of thing "slimy self-righteousness"... but why?

What exactly is so "sublime" about telling someone who essentially destroyed your life, "I forgive you"? Or even better, just forgiving them internally without saying a word.

To me, that feels a hell of a lot healthier than being the type of person who refuses to hold anyone accountable for anything. To me, that's what's actually unhealthy. It just feels like acting or being full of yourself.

Personally, I think there is something truly beautiful about a person who refuses to let negativity stick to them—someone so composed and gracious that playing the victim simply isn't in their nature. Maybe you see it as an act or being pretentious, but trust me, there is nothing more graceful than being completely unshakable. 🙂
Forgiveness in Spirituality ·
Sean Cruz said:Fine, here is the complete text. To be blunt, I’m not a fan. Setting aside the logical fallacies, the whole thing seems to push this idea of equating the victim with the perpetrator. Would it truly be "just" for a victim to simply forget what was done to them, effectively absolving the criminal of any guilt or remorse? Hypothetically speaking, if that were the case, I see zero incentive for anyone to refrain from committing evil acts.

As for an afterlife, I'm not buying it. Based on this—even if such a place exists, I certainly won't be remembering a thing. 😁

I actually quite like this little piece, and this part could almost be flipped:

Exactly. As long as there is remorse, there is guilt.

As long as there is guilt, there is remorse. It's a two-way street.

Hypothetically speaking—why would anyone commit an evil act 🤷 unless they were mentally unwell? You might find this surprising, but personally, I view evil acts as a kind of spiritual cancer. I really wonder who is pulling the strings for a killer or any other criminal. Is it the mind? I doubt it. I don't believe a mentally healthy person is capable of causing bloodshed unless they are defending a child or acting in self-defense. All true crimes are committed in a state of madness, and in principle, there isn't much to criticize there. This isn't about equating the victim with the perpetrator or making excuses for the killer; it's an observation of their mental makeup. But if nothing can be forgiven, then we must remember, at all costs, as a preventative measure, so we don't end up in the role of the victim again.

I don't think forgiveness is such a grand or noble thing. It doesn't impress me. I am far more impressed by people who simply aren't capable of holding a grudge. Offering someone forgiveness sounds incredibly pretentious to me, like some sort of slimy, self-important superiority.

Actually, thinking about it more—I believe an extremely small number of people are truly capable of forgiving, and it’s just a word, an unreachable ideal that remains incomprehensible to most humans.
Where are the emojis? :durica: in Feedback & Suggestions ·
hollowdriver18 said:the Durica:

image

The absolute best!! 😍
Wake up! in Spirituality ·
Before my passing, I once wrote this alongside Vladimir Devide: 'There is no helping a Tiger who is determined to die.' It’s the same with anyone else; you simply cannot help someone who refuses to be helped. It’s a two-way street. Anything else—trying to force help on someone who isn't asking for it—usually ends up being nothing more than violence and recklessness.
Wake up! in Spirituality ·
dustyskipper3 said:I mean, maybe you can help someone without them asking, but then you shouldn't be making such a huge production out of it. You know? Like, don't go ringing every bell in the house to announce "look at me, I helped," and then expect some kind of big thank you or a favor in return later on. 😉

True. I have to admit, though, I rarely run into people actually that selfless. Most of the time, I've felt like I had to be either incredibly grateful or completely submissive just to get by. That kind of dynamic is exactly what fuels the ego of the helper. They turn into emotional parasites. But there are still those rare, genuine people out there—it's just a shame they're so hard to find.
Wake up! in Spirituality ·
silverfalcon952 said:I'm right there with you. But how do you feel about all the violence shoved down our throats through TV, commercials, and the news? Honestly, I think that's where the real damage happens. The scary part is we don't even notice it anymore; we just soak it up like it's totally normal. And then we act surprised when society turns into a mess of hatred, manipulation, and depression...

Helping someone when they didn't ask for it is actually a very subtle, sneaky way to manipulate them.☕
Wake up! in Spirituality ·
nimbleheron3 said:What exact time should they be waking up?

For someone who is truly awake, there isn't really a distinction between dreaming and being awake. To be awake means dreaming while conscious—inhabiting your essence just as fully whether you're asleep or not. The version of "reality" most people cling to today is actually further away from the dream than the dream itself is from us.