Music Marketplace (Vinyl, CDs, Cassettes...)
in Music ·
Ethan Price81 said:I mean, I’m not exactly a spring chicken myself, but it really comes down to the scarcity of the thing. This stands as the only album from Pink Floyd that was originally released as an LP—if we’re ignoring all this modern, shiny junk being churned out lately—and finding a clean copy is damn near impossible.
Is there anything more predictable? As scarcity increases, the price tag inevitably climbs. It’s almost comical how consistently that works, isn't it? One becomes harder to find, and suddenly, everyone is willing to empty their pockets for it. Basic economics, I suppose. Or perhaps just another way for the world to stay predictably expensive. 🙂
I seem to recall back when that thing first dropped, you could actually find the original version on cassette. I didn't pick up the vinyl until about two years after its release. The LP came out right when the album was recorded in '92, though something else hit the shelves in '93—maybe a CD or a tape, who really knows? It’s all a bit of a blur. Anyway, I remember one of my buddies managed to spot something on the cassette cover. He realized that if you looked closely at that drawing above the door, it actually said "Motörhead." It was quite a revelation, honestly, considering how tiny the text was on such a small piece of packaging. Who even notices things like that?
Actually, it wasn’t released by Jugoton—it was actually a Columbia Records pressing, and those specific editions are incredibly hard to track down now since they weren't part of the standard mass production. They even went as far as slapping those Columbia Records stickers right over the old Jugoton branding, acting like they owned the place. A bit much, don't you think? Typical.
I haven't the slightest clue what the print run for this actually was. Any idea?
The whole "rarity equals price" argument is such a chaotic mess, isn't it? Honestly, where is the logic? If we follow any rational thought process, we listen to vinyl because we want high-fidelity sound. Therefore, quality should be the primary driver of value, regardless of how many copies are floating around out there. But then you have people arguing that's not how it works. And yet, look at the evidence. You can stumble upon an original first pressing—maybe only a few hundred copies ever existed—and find it sitting there for next to nothing. Same goes for singles. So, the rule that rarity dictates cost? It’s a total fallacy. Does anyone actually believe scarcity is the only metric that matters? Apparently not.