Posts by Richard Sanders7

Why wouldn't a guy actually be into someone who isn't experienced? Not everyone is wired like you guys, thinking about nothing but sex all day long.

👋 I’m also looking forward to receiving a gift 😳

But seriously, where is Mujica? I'm counting on a little something from her too! 😳

Wait, what? 🙂

Rachel Palmer56 said:What's that all about?😳

Staying on topic 😳

2 + ɛ 🥳

You were trying to help 🤣? What kind of qualifications do you actually have to offer anyone, other than just being a killjoy? Anyway, I'm done talking to you here. I'll just leave it up to the forum moderators to decide how they want to handle things.

Henry Hayes3 said:I reported this post. Don't take your issues out on me just because you're struggling mentally. I really hope the admins handle this appropriately and issue a ban; honestly, what you're writing is just shameful and genuinely sad.

Just because my ban was lifted doesn't mean you can all pile on me. It feels like you're just acting out of jealousy over certain friends of yours who managed to stay unbanned, but that’s got nothing to do with me.

It’s pretty ironic to be getting attacked by Hani—who, let’s be honest, has been incredibly disrespectful and condescending toward almost every woman on this forum at one point or another—and then there's Richard Sanders7, who has basically been the site's biggest troll for years, constantly undermining everyone indirectly without ever stopping.

That specific comment happened over in the OFF topic section, and there are plenty of people who saw it. ☕ I also reported the post where you called me a pedophile, but there was zero reaction from the staff. I've reported this current post of yours as well.

And regarding Richard Sanders7—the ultimate troll—he has over several hundred replies (at least 300) in help threads within the science sections (back when those were still categorized under science), which easily puts him in the top 100 most active users this forum has ever seen! But even if they end up banning me, whatever—as long as they ban you instead.☕

Henry Hayes3 said:Is that really fair to tabu? Given he was the one joking about taking out the forum ladies with a sledgehammer—honestly, what a great observation you made there.

And weren't you the one who told Duxi you were going to take her head off? ☕

We should probably take a look at what Nica is saying, though I suspect she isn't really up to speed on your specific situation. Things need to stay organized ☕

It looks like we haven’t even settled the old issues before a whole new headache pops up. I’m genuinely scratching my head over how one user can be permanently banned while another stays on the site. Specifically, how is it possible that Tabasco Sauce received a permanent ban while Henry Hayes3 hasn't? Both users were already on "probationary" status, yet Tabasco Sauce got kicked out for some minor trolling in the trash threads, whereas Henry Hayes3 just gets a warning for hate speech:

along with a few warnings for some much heavier trolling:

...
but there’s still no permanent ban, despite him promising he wouldn't troll anymore ☕. I’d love for someone to help me make sense of this logic ☕.

A truly dedicated pharmacy manager ☕

Steven Davis66 got banned because he's basically a bot. There's been quite a bit of talk about it lately ☕

Title: If you struggle with these five bad habits, you might actually be highly intelligent 🤦

I’ve always been at the top of my game, though I suppose some people just weren't paying enough attention to notice 🙂

Kimberly Rodriguez51 said:+1 ☕
If someone really doesn't want kids, they should just go get a vasectomy ☕

🙄 I mean, even God didn't design nature with a built-in loophole for contraception ☕

Or more likely: he was just "freestyling the press." Honestly, who actually knows what his exact words were or what he was getting at? Nobody is going to click on a headline that says "everything is normal." ☕

Michael Palmer3 said:it's possible he could call her a jerk too.

That doesn't change the fact that he’s being a jerk himself. He can't really justify his own bad behavior just because she's acting up. I mean, he could try, but it isn't exactly a great argument, ☕

Michael Palmer3 said:It doesn't necessarily mean he's a jerk.
Maybe he didn't actually want a kid and things just happened. If she didn't want an abortion—which is completely her right—then he might step up and pay child support faithfully without ever being involved in the actual upbringing. In that case, she can just raise the child she wanted on her own.
There are plenty of women who play this exact game to land famous people, mostly just for the money.

I agree with everything except for that very first sentence. A child shouldn't have to suffer because of their parents' mistakes. By acting the way he did, he's essentially creating an unwanted situation, and that’s just not right.☕

🤣 Honestly, since they’re older models, we really ought to be giving them more credit. They serve as the ultimate proof of quality 🥳

If you're going to go compliment my shoes over on the photo thread, then maybe you can give it another shot here ☕