casualskipper8 said:Look, have you even actually sat down and watched Psycho?
Of course I did, for heaven's sake. What exactly are you trying to imply by asking that?
10 posts shown.
casualskipper8 said:Look, have you even actually sat down and watched Psycho?
casualskipper8 said:No kidding. It’s like you’ve never even seen raw combat footage before.
casualskipper8 said:Screenwriters and directors looking for a spark for a modern horror flick should probably just dig through some old grainy footage from the last major war. We’re talking about the kind of stuff that stays with you—images of babies being ripped from their mothers, people having their eyes gouged out while they're still conscious, axes buried deep in skulls, or even folks being tossed into industrial meat grinders. And the real kicker? That kind of madness might have been carried out by the very neighbors who live right next door to us today.
Dennis Sullivan46 said:Batman (1989) won, period.
Keith Kelly3 said:Ghost Rider is a total disaster. Cage just lacks that certain charisma, and honestly, he’s completely wrong for a superhero role. Then there's Iron Man—personally, I found it to be one of the most tedious movies I've ever sat through. I realize plenty of people love it, so I suppose it's all a matter of subjective taste. But looking back, Constantine (based on the Hellblazer comics) was actually a fantastic blueprint. It was a wasted film, really, despite having a few interesting scenes.
crimsontrucker4 said:Your Loss...
Yeah, sure. It’s just absolutely fascinating—a total masterpiece of cinema. A top-tier adaptation that stands right up there with The Godfather and The Shawshank Redemption.🙄
briskhound2 said:Ghost Rider had the potential to be something akin to Hellboy, but it missed the mark entirely. It’s primarily driven by Nicolas Cage and some incredibly sluggish, limp screenwriting. You get a tiny bit of lift from legends like Peter Fonda and Sam Elliott, but only when they actually appear on screen—mostly because they possess the kind of charisma that eats Nicolas Cage for breakfast (he's a decent actor, really, just lost in high-budget productions where he stops actually acting). While Daredevil was attacked relentlessly back in the day, much of that criticism was misplaced or based on the wrong things; however, Ghost Rider deserves every bit of its bad reputation. At best, you can slot it into the category of successful comic book adaptations based on box office numbers, which has never been a reliable metric for quality.
crimsontrucker4 said:Both of those movies are absolute garbage, especially Ghost Rider. They're on par with those Michael Dudikoff flicks—which I'll admit are decent trash—but Ghost Rider is just pure, unadulterated junk.