The New York Times
in Movies ·
Laura Fox3 said:Speaking of IMDb, there’s this one thread over there where a father is asking if a specific movie is appropriate for 12-year-olds—that’s actually what triggered my thoughts on this whole subject. So, this guy jumps in and explains that while there are some pretty violent scenes, the sexual content is basically just implied; you know, just hearing heavy breathing in the background.
And then, the OP responds with something like, "Well, okay, the violence isn't an issue for us..." 😕 😕
Now... who exactly is the crazy one here?
Honestly, I found that entire exchange hard to believe. This guy has a 12-year-old son, and apparently, graphic violence doesn't bother him because the kid watches stuff like that all the time, yet he draws the line at a movie containing actual sex.🙄
Then, about ten people jump in, and instead of just calling him an idiot, they play it safe and coddle him—you know, the usual "well, yes, there is violence, the sex is mostly implied, maybe you should watch it yourself first to judge..." routine.
Americans are truly 🙂