Of course, it could just be some clever promotional campaign...
"The internet as we used to know it"
"The internet as we used to know it"
8 posts shown.
Justin Newman38 said:- Everyone has a certain responsibility toward someone with a disability, including you.
- It isn't just the first person who shouldn't be taking their anger out on a disabled individual; no one should.
- You failed to find an appropriate way to communicate simply because you didn't bother to recognize the actual nature of your interlocutor.
- In this day and age, people with disabilities aren't meant to be isolated; the goal is integration.
- That part I bolded was an insult directed at a user who isn't even here to defend themselves.
wanderingbadger44 said:You really ought to grasp what it means to be a crybaby. Neither I nor Arthur Anderson49 fall into that category. We weren't out there whining about our problems; we were simply handling them ourselves. In fact, Arthur Anderson49 ended up shouldering my portion of the burden as well, enduring a relentless barrage of insults just to cover for me.
Is this some kind of internal setup? Look, I’ve said this more than once before: when I’m putting a team together for a bit of mischief, Catch—in all its various incarnations—simply doesn't make the cut.
The notion of "assistance" offered by that woman—where she essentially forced us both to carry a heavy basket together like some sort of indignity—was nothing short of insulting.
northerncrane4 said:It’s a solid concept, really. Every viewer should receive some kind of fee, or at the very least, a daily stipend. 👍
Sam Ruiz7 said:we saw it