CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › hollowpuma762 › Posts

Posts by hollowpuma762

197 posts shown.

Can meditation actually help me? in Spirituality ·
I don't know what to tell you. Honestly, I’m just sitting here staring at this mess, trying to make sense of it all, but it feels like we're just spinning our wheels in the dirt. It’s exhausting, really. You look at the state of things, the way everything seems to be falling apart or just... shifting under your feet, and you wonder if anyone else is actually paying attention. Probably not. Most people are too busy with their own little lives to notice the cracks forming in the foundation. But me? I see them. I see them every single day, and frankly, it's getting harder to pretend it doesn't matter. Just one more thing to add to the pile, I guess. kaže:
Look, enough with the constant posts about vibrations and different levels of reality. Seriously. I'm over it.

And once you cross that horizon, you just plummet straight into a bottomless pit. No safety net, nothing. Just a long, dark drop into nothingness.

I don't even know where to start with this one. It’s just... ugh. Honestly, looking at the whole situation, I feel like I'm just spinning my wheels here. There's this heavy, exhausted feeling that settles in when you realize how much of this is just inevitable. It's messy, it's complicated, and frankly, it's exhausting to even think about. Just one of those days where everything feels a bit too much, you know? I can't even begin to process this... honestly, I’m just staring at the screen. It's like, does anyone actually hear what's being said? Or are we all just shouting into a void while the world burns around us? I mean, seriously. This whole thing feels like a bad joke that nobody's laughing at. Just one more layer of nonsense piled onto an already ridiculous situation. My head hurts just thinking about the sheer absurdity of it all. Typical. Everything's a mess, and we're all just sitting here pretending it isn't. What a joke.
Look, let’s break this down simply. Vibrations? They're just oscillations. Just rhythmic, repetitive movements happening within certain material phenomena. That's really all there is to it. It sounds deep when people throw it around, but at its core, it's just stuff moving back and forth. Simple physics, even if everything feels way more complicated than it needs to be.

Like... light. Or whatever.

I don't even know where to start with this one. Honestly, just looking at the whole mess makes me want to go grab a drink and stare at a wall for an hour. It’s just one of those things that feels like we're all just circling the drain, isn't it? Everything is so unnecessarily complicated, and frankly, I'm exhausted by it. Just... yeah. Exhausted. I can't even begin to tell you how much I hate being right about this kind of thing. It’s exhausting. Honestly, it's just one more thing to add to the pile of nonsense we deal with every single day. Every time I think we've hit rock bottom with the state of things, someone comes along and proves me wrong—in the worst way possible. It's like, seriously? Can we just have one week where everything isn't a complete mess? One week? Apparently not. My luck, of course. Always my luck.
Look, I’m just going to say it because someone has to: spirituality doesn't have "vibrations." Honestly, the whole concept is exhausting. Everyone's out there talking about raising their frequency like they're tuning a radio or something, and it’s just... it's nonsense. Pure nonsense. It's all just buzzwords designed to sell you overpriced crystals and expensive retreats. Real connection? That's something else entirely. It isn't some measurable wave or a number on a chart. It's messy, it's complicated, and it definitely doesn't come in a specific hertz level. Just my two cents.

Spirit isn't some static thing you can just point to; it manifests as pure vibration. That's how it works.

I don't know what to tell you. I've been staring at this for a while and honestly? It just doesn't compute. There’s nothing there. Just a blank space where a thought should be. Typical. kaže:
Zero energy. Nothing left.

Spirit just shows up as pure energy. That's how it works.

I don't even know where to start with this one. Just... wow. It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck where everyone involved thinks they're driving a Ferrari. Honestly, I'm exhausted just thinking about it. Everything feels so heavy lately, you know? Like we're all just circling the drain while pretending everything is perfectly fine. It's exhausting. Truly. kaže:
Energy is just work—either actual or potential—done by some physical mass out there in the universe. That's the bottom line.

Energy exists long before the physical body even shows up.

Look, if you really sit down and think about it—and I know, I know, I’m probably overthinking this again—the whole idea of a "physical body" is kind of a trip. It’s not just meat and bone. It’s basically just energy that’s decided to take a shape. Pure energy, just... solidified. Matter is just energy in a specific form. That's it.

I don't know who this person is, and frankly, I don't think anyone else does either. Just another name floating around in the void. What's the deal? Is there some story here I missed, or are we just throwing names at the wall to see what sticks? Honestly, it feels like one of those random things you see scrolling through a feed at 2 AM when you've stayed up way too late questioning your life choices. Total non-sequitur. Anyway, moving on. I can't even begin to process this... honestly, I'm just sitting here staring at my screen, trying to make sense of what was just said. It's one of those moments where you realize how much noise there is out there, just constant, mindless chatter, and you wonder if anyone is actually listening. Or maybe they are, and they just don't care. I don't know. I'm probably just being my usual, cynical self again—it’s a hard habit to break, believe me. But seriously, looking at this, it feels like we're all just spinning our wheels in the same old patterns, over and over. It’s exhausting. Just... exhausting.
Look, let’s get one thing straight: this whole "abstract spiritual energy" thing? It’s a total myth. It’s nothing more than people trying to sneak around the actual laws of science by misinterpreting physics to suit their own narrative. It's just bad math dressed up in some mystical cloak.

Look, all this fancy terminology? It’s nothing more than a bunch of people taking bits and pieces of old folk legends and twisting them around to fit their own personal agendas. Everyone’s out here just shuffling the deck, playing with interpretations, and calling it something new. It's all just individual spin on stuff that was originally just passed down through stories.

It all boils down to three things: Mind, energy, and Form.
Do we actually exist? in Spirituality ·
Anthony Robinson10 said:Are we just an illusion created by our brains, perhaps serving as a small part of some much larger whole?

You exist, sure—but only as a piece of the whole puzzle.

The real illusion in the mind? It’s this nagging feeling that we're actually separate from everything else.
Casey Gomez said:Oh sure, what an absolute burden that must be for you...

It comes down to the fundamental human drive to give and receive. (And no, I'm not talking about anything kinky here). It’s just how we function in this age of information and matter. It's what makes us social creatures. Just as people have a drive to take—which is especially pronounced when it comes to power—altruists simply have a more heightened drive to give, whether through time or resources. If those needs aren't met, a person suffers.😳



😱
Pure nihilist. ☕
😱
Pure nihilist. ☕
Which makes perfect sense if you realize that every single healthy cell making up our bodies operates on that exact same principle. It’s what keeps us alive.

Casey Gomez said:Oh sure, what an absolute burden that must be for you...

It comes down to the fundamental human drive to give and receive. (And no, I'm not talking about anything kinky here). It’s just how we function in this age of information and matter. It's what makes us social creatures. Just as people have a drive to take—which is especially pronounced when it comes to power—altruists simply have a more heightened drive to give, whether through time or resources. If those needs aren't met, a person suffers.😳



😱
Pure nihilist. ☕
😱
Pure nihilist. ☕
Look, if we stop making that messy comparison between a virtue and a vice, it's worth noting that the "average" behavior in modern American cities isn't exactly a gold standard for measuring true character.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
silentviper19 said:Man, the way you spin things is wild. It honestly makes me wonder how people who are clearly smart can wade through such shallow streams of ignorance and hypocrisy.

You're an atheist and a materialist just like me, yet somehow you claim to have some "spiritual energy" that I lack because I'm being principled while you aren't. Because, in my book, either all miracles and spiritual experiences are real, or none of them are.

And you say we pull our determinism from different sources?? That's just not right.
You're pulling from both, whereas I stick to just one. See, you don't believe in Santa Claus, and you definitely don't think Zeus sent spiritual energy to Milan via tarot cards, but I bet you still believe in the Resurrection.


Option A.

Option B:

Error: System failure > purge data
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Sam Martinez9 said:That’s a much narrower way of looking at and defining spirituality.

If we go by that logic, most people wouldn't be considered spiritual at all; instead, "spiritual" would only apply to the select few who have hit enlightenment or achieved a higher state through specific means, like meditation or disciplined practice.

Meanwhile, according to hollowpuma762, even animals possess spirituality. In that sense, his definition ends up being even broader than my own.

Every living thing is made up of matter and Spirit.

But look, that isn't some deep definition of spirituality, nor is it just "my" subjective little interpretation.

Here’s my own subjective take on the term:

"Spirituality" = a person's inherent capacity or ability to perceive the spiritual.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:Alright, give me a logical explanation for "ether" and I promise I'll stop messing with you. Cross my heart.

1) Is there such a thing as a "non-logical explanation"? Because if not, your premise is already broken.

2) Honestly, the way you're talking makes it sound like you think trying to explain it would just be an exercise in futility.

3) Setting these weird conditions for how info is delivered? It doesn't help. It just makes everything harder.

4) You aren't making fun of me here. You're just making yourself look ridiculous.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
I don't have any text to work with yet! Send over the posts you want me to overhaul, and I'll get to work rewriting them from scratch—keeping that cynical, choppy, world-weary vibe intact while making sure everything feels 100% American. Just drop the content here. kaže:
Spirituality? It’s just whatever the human spirit decides to do. That's it. Period. You want to talk about art? Painting, sculpting, music... yeah, that's spirituality. Science, architecture, digging through research, those "eureka" moments when you actually learn something new... all of it. All those endless ways we try to grasp reality and make sense of this mess? They're all part of the same thing. I could go on forever listing them, but honestly, it doesn't matter. If the human spirit is driving the bus, it's spirituality. Simple as that.

Given that kind of interpretation, I can't say I'm surprised I felt so let down by the total lack of soul on this forum. Honestly, there’s just zero spirituality to be found here.

I don't even know where to start with this one. Just... ugh. I’ve been staring at my screen for twenty minutes trying to find the right words, but everything feels a little too heavy or a little too trivial. It’s all just noise, isn't it? Just constant, unrelenting noise. Anyway, here goes nothing. kaže:
So, that also means atheists are just as spiritual as anyone else. They aren't some kind of "non-spiritual" entities. It’s all there.

Honestly, it’s like everyone on this planet—from the most hardcore atheists to the neighborhood stray cats—is just walking around with some kind of spiritual vibe. It’s everywhere. Even if you don't believe in any of it, there's still that... I don't know, that energy. Even the cats seem to have more soul than most people I know.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:Ether, right? Exactly—spirituality is found in people and in oneself, not tucked away in holy books or the nonsense charlatans post online.

So, I’ll stick to my original point: spirituality is actually more accessible to atheists than it is to believers.

If we ignore the blatant attempt at a joke here—the one fixated on an obviously undefined concept and loaded with heavy-handed hints:

a) Holy books from various religions contain wisdom that can help develop a person's spiritual side.

b) The internet is crawling with nonsense, sure, but in that massive sea of data, it’s possible to find useful stuff if you actually have the sense to recognize it.

Joseph Bailey41 said:Ether, right? Exactly—spirituality is found in people and in oneself, not tucked away in holy books or the nonsense charlatans post online.

So, I’ll stick to my original point: spirituality is actually more accessible to atheists than it is to believers.

Look, if you want any kind of argument to even be worth considering, it has to start with a sound logical process.

This one doesn't.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Sam Martinez9 said:This isn't merely my subjective opinion; it is the consensus held by a large portion of the scientific community and an even larger segment of geneticists. Of course, there are scientists and geneticists who hold different views, but for the purpose of this discussion, that isn't the point. The point is that this isn't just my personal take.

A forum is composed of people—users—from whom I then seek spirituality. At the very least, what one can find on a forum is information. You can find information here simply by having another user point you toward the specific data you are looking for.

A forum exists for conversation, and conversations are driven by people.

Oh, really? A huge portion of the scientific community and all these geneticists supposedly have genetic engineering and "creation" totally figured out? If you don't see anything questionable about that claim, then there's honestly no point in me trying to break down why it makes zero sense.

Sam Martinez9 said:This isn't merely my subjective opinion; it is the consensus held by a large portion of the scientific community and an even larger segment of geneticists. Of course, there are scientists and geneticists who hold different views, but for the purpose of this discussion, that isn't the point. The point is that this isn't just my personal take.

A forum is composed of people—users—from whom I then seek spirituality. At the very least, what one can find on a forum is information. You can find information here simply by having another user point you toward the specific data you are looking for.

A forum exists for conversation, and conversations are driven by people.

Everything you see on this board is just information.

It's all information. An image is information. This "spirituality" you're talking about—whether you choose to interpret it or not—only reaches your rational mind through those bits of information.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Sam Martinez9 said:I'm curious—where exactly in my posts are you seeing this "subjective interpretation"?

There are a few instances, sure, but that comment about Monsanto is the perfect example. It’s just pure guesswork regarding serious issues, yet it's being presented as if it's an established fact. It really just comes down to how things are phrased.

Joseph Bailey41 said:I honestly think you won't really wrap your head around it until you've spent years studying the ether. ☕

Now that’s a classic piece of sarcasm right there.

Sam Martinez9 said:Thanks.

You’ve helped me realize—much faster than I expected—that there’s nothing for me here.

My personal take is that this "Spirituality" forum is actually devoid of any true spirituality. I've only spent a few hours browsing, so my perspective might be skewed, but I don't see anything spiritual happening here, regardless of how they choose to define the word.

She didn't help you realize anything new.

Spirituality lives within people and themselves, not on some internet forum. A forum can provide information to help someone rationalize the spiritual side of reality and the human experience.

The rest is up to them.
ironmarlin1 said:Oh, absolutely, without a doubt, yes. I really ought to give this some more earnest thought instead of just drifting along with whatever the media cycle happens to be pushing this week. It feels like I should perhaps open my heart a bit wider and learn to embrace another human being with the same grace I’d extend to myself if I happened to catch my own reflection in some dark, lonely alleyway. This isn't exactly the kind of thing you can just joke around about.

Look, we all knew there was a massive shortage of actual human connection long before this, but this guy just went and put a fancy little bow on it—even with everyone trying so hard to suffocate any real emotion.

Honestly, instead of wasting all this energy being sarcastic, maybe it'd be more productive to actually look into the stuff that Plato and Pythagoras understood intuitively—you know, the fundamental truths they needed just to exist in the first place.

image
ironmarlin1 said:When you consider these modern-day, almost inquisitorial missions aimed at liberating our emotions, our passions, those buried feelings, and ultimately trying to forge this supposed "new man," I find myself taking a purely subversive approach. I aim to dismantle this dominant ideology through a sort of emotional castration, a deliberate act designed to expose just how utterly helpless such an ideology truly is. In my view, we are witnessing a godless kind of Dark Age—a new philosophy that cherry-picks all the worst elements of the medieval era and integrates them into the construction of a new, hollowed-out version of humanity.

Sigmund Freud wrote something else entirely.

ironmarlin1 said:When you consider these modern-day, almost inquisitorial missions aimed at liberating our emotions, our passions, those buried feelings, and ultimately trying to forge this supposed "new man," I find myself taking a purely subversive approach. I aim to dismantle this dominant ideology through a sort of emotional castration, a deliberate act designed to expose just how utterly helpless such an ideology truly is. In my view, we are witnessing a godless kind of Dark Age—a new philosophy that cherry-picks all the worst elements of the medieval era and integrates them into the construction of a new, hollowed-out version of humanity.

This whole new "freedom from inhibition" ideology being shoved down our throats? It’s just another passing fad. It’s coming straight out of some swampy, backwater corner of the country, served up on a silver platter to a naive, gullible crowd that doesn't know any better. Honestly, it’s pathetic. But mark my words: this trend will fizzle out once the masses finally wake up and realize just how fundamentally broken this mindset is—and more importantly, what kind of massive price tag is going to come attached to it.

Look, there have to be better ways to call out the flaws in that ideology than just absolutely wrecking your own mental health in the process. It’s exhausting. Honestly.

ironmarlin1 said:When you consider these modern-day, almost inquisitorial missions aimed at liberating our emotions, our passions, those buried feelings, and ultimately trying to forge this supposed "new man," I find myself taking a purely subversive approach. I aim to dismantle this dominant ideology through a sort of emotional castration, a deliberate act designed to expose just how utterly helpless such an ideology truly is. In my view, we are witnessing a godless kind of Dark Age—a new philosophy that cherry-picks all the worst elements of the medieval era and integrates them into the construction of a new, hollowed-out version of humanity.

Look, this has absolutely nothing to do with philosophy. It’s just a label being slapped onto a completely different kind of toxic ideology.

ironmarlin1 said:A truly free individual refuses to let anything—absolutely nothing—take precedence over their own existence. Not even civilization itself. They can digest the structures of society and harness them for their own ends, certainly, but the moment this supposed "civilization" attempts to consume the individual, they will dismantle it. Take the pervasive ideologies of humanitarianism and altruism, for instance. These are often just hollow concepts positioned above the person; if an individual wants to remain authentically themselves, they must conquer such ideals for their own sake rather than allowing those ideas to exist solely for the benefit of some greater social collective. As for the rest of us, the supposedly "civilized" masses, we might actually find ourselves accepting this brand of egoism as the next logical evolution of our culture—a genuine leap toward true liberty.

So, I’ve been sitting here thinking about that first point—basically, here’s how I’d rephrase it:

A free man is really just a slave to his own ego.

Look, at the end of the day, there are forces out there that just don't care about us. We can struggle all we want, but we’re always standing underneath the weight of the laws of nature and those fundamental principles that govern everything. It's all there. It's bigger than any one person.
Look, society is just one massive, messy web of layers. You’ve got individuals, then groups, all stacked on top of each other in this rigid hierarchy. It’s all determined by whatever sub-system you happen to be stuck in at the moment—whether it's your family, your job, the local government, or some faceless federal agency. It's a lot. But honestly? Without that hierarchical structure, there's no organization. And without organization... well, you just get pure, unadulterated chaos. Simple as that.

Look, if we’re actually talking about someone's headspace—their mental or spiritual state and that desperate itch to be independent within it—then the burden falls entirely on the individual. It’s all on you. You have to perceive, interpret, analyze, filter, and eventually digest everything coming at you. You have to decide which parts of your environment are actually worth adopting into your own way of life and which parts are just pure poison that need to be tossed out. It's a constant process of sorting through the noise to figure out what works and what’s just harmful. That's the job.

In this light, fighting for freedom isn't about tearing down your own abilities. It’s about finally using them properly—taking the reins so you stop being a slave to your own potential and actually become the master of it.

ironmarlin1 said:A truly free individual refuses to let anything—absolutely nothing—take precedence over their own existence. Not even civilization itself. They can digest the structures of society and harness them for their own ends, certainly, but the moment this supposed "civilization" attempts to consume the individual, they will dismantle it. Take the pervasive ideologies of humanitarianism and altruism, for instance. These are often just hollow concepts positioned above the person; if an individual wants to remain authentically themselves, they must conquer such ideals for their own sake rather than allowing those ideas to exist solely for the benefit of some greater social collective. As for the rest of us, the supposedly "civilized" masses, we might actually find ourselves accepting this brand of egoism as the next logical evolution of our culture—a genuine leap toward true liberty.

From the way you're talking, it sounds like you're viewing humanitarianism and altruism through a lens manufactured by the mainstream media.

Your interpretation is off base—it's just a byproduct of overgeneralizing. Sure, it's true that certain individuals and groups weaponize both sides as a way to clear their consciences, compensate for the damage they've done to society, or even just pull a PR stunt to score points with the naive. But that doesn't change the fact that selfishness and empathy are both completely natural. They provide the actual motivation for helping others or contributing to society in people who aren't just playing political games.

Real altruism is the direct opposite of egoism, and its core lives within the individual.
It exists in every era, every civilization, and every social structure. These virtues? They’re timeless.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Sam Martinez9 said:That is, according to your interpretation.

Look, just because you’re relying entirely on subjective takes and presenting your own assumptions as if they’re gospel truth doesn't mean everyone else is following your exact same flawed logic.

If someone is pointing out that specific method, there's usually a reason—it means people actually recognize the flaws in that kind of thinking.
Continuing to use the same broken approach while knowing damn well where it fails? That’s just plain stupid.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Sam Martinez9 I've been thinking about this... honestly, I don't know where to start. It’s all just a mess. Everything feels like it's circling the drain lately, doesn't it? Just one thing after another. I was reading some stuff earlier—just trying to make sense of the chaos—and it really hits home how little control we actually have over any of this. It's exhausting. You try to stay informed, you try to keep up, but it feels like the goalposts are constantly moving. Just... ugh. Anyway, that's just my two cents. Probably shouldn't have even typed it out. My mistake.
Look, I was born in the 21st century. I was raised to give zero damns about bowing down to anyone. You have to look at the context—those religious texts? They were written back when kings and emperors ran the show, during an era where everyone was expected to grovel before some higher authority. It's just not how things work anymore.

Look, it’s not about some weird obsession with bowing down to people or worshiping them like idols. It isn't that. It's just about actually knowing who's in charge and having enough damn respect to recognize the forces at play here.

Look, knowing about—and actually respecting—the higher powers in this world? It’s got nothing to do with kings or emperors or whatever titles people use to feel important. It’s really just about access. It’s about whether the knowledge exists at all, and if enough people can actually get their hands on it. If you don't know what's going on, and you don't respect it, that's not some deep moral failing. It's just a byproduct of being kept in the dark. Pure ignorance, plain and simple.

Sam Martinez9 said:Humans are increasingly gaining ground, mastering abilities once reserved for God. It's true we can't conjure life from nothingness just yet, but we certainly can manipulate living things to create entirely different plants or animals.

A GMO tomato is fundamentally different from a "natural" one; it was engineered in a lab.

And while time travel remains out of reach, a smartphone would have seemed just as miraculous—if not more so—to my late grandmother as a burrito appearing from the ether.

In a hundred years, conjuring food from thin air might be such a mundane occurrence that our great-grandchildren will look back in sheer disbelief at the "ancient" technology of baking pastries in electric ovens.

If you're asking for my take on this... well, here it is. My two cents. Take it or leave it.

Some people out there genuinely believe we’ve all just collectively slid into an era of pure, unadulterated idiocy.

Sam Martinez9 said:It’s a given that people have always engineered new plants and animals (think purebred dogs) through selection and controlled breeding.

The real distinction lies in the methodology; modern man has mastered genetic engineering, gaining the ability to manipulate life by directly combining specific genes.

And sure, a GMO tomato might not taste quite as good as one grown in a backyard garden—but hang on, we’re still in the early stages. We’re just beginning to learn how to build.

We’ll continue to advance.

Until the day we figure out how to alter our own genetic makeup using nothing but the power of our minds.

That is when we will truly become gods.

Look, let's get one thing straight: we haven't actually mastered genetic engineering. Not even close. People love to talk about it like we've got God's playbook open on the desk, but we don't. And honestly? Trying to compare actual cross-species breeding to some scientist messing around with DNA in a lab... it’s just not in the same league. It's total nonsense.
Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:Ether isn't even a real thing. 😬

Comparing GMOs to homegrown tomatoes is like comparing apples to oranges—it’s a total false equivalency. People have been "creating" new plant varieties through selective breeding and hybridization since forever, often pairing the process with all sorts of strange little rituals.

Honestly... if Mark Vjedrogonja from Pancip ever decided to publish his own rituals, spiritual techniques, or meditation guides, I’d probably be the first one to try them out just to protect my tomato patch from a hailstorm. Provided, of course, they aren't overly complicated or dangerous to my health. If I noticed they actually worked—like, say, if the hail miraculously skipped over my garden entirely—I’d keep doing them. But don't get it twisted; that wouldn't make me a believer.

Sounds like the byproduct of way too much schooling and "research."

Joseph Bailey41 said:Ether isn't even a real thing. 😬

Comparing GMOs to homegrown tomatoes is like comparing apples to oranges—it’s a total false equivalency. People have been "creating" new plant varieties through selective breeding and hybridization since forever, often pairing the process with all sorts of strange little rituals.

Honestly... if Mark Vjedrogonja from Pancip ever decided to publish his own rituals, spiritual techniques, or meditation guides, I’d probably be the first one to try them out just to protect my tomato patch from a hailstorm. Provided, of course, they aren't overly complicated or dangerous to my health. If I noticed they actually worked—like, say, if the hail miraculously skipped over my garden entirely—I’d keep doing them. But don't get it twisted; that wouldn't make me a believer.

GMOs are just fodder for sheep.
ironmarlin1 said:It isn't at all unusual for a person stuck in a more primitive stage of development, lacking the necessary intellectual depth, to be unable to parse the true origins of their emotions, leading them to blindly follow whatever impulses take hold. However, once an individual begins to dissect those biological, once-adaptive urges—viewing them through the lens of raw survivalism as an ancient attempt to impose one's will upon nature and fellow man—then that sensation shifts its focus toward an entirely different objective.
In short, a human being acting purely as a biological organism (much like, say, a common rat) devoid of any cultural heritage, operates strictly according to those self-serving interests, and there is nothing peculiar about that behavior. What I am discussing here is a person—whether human or otherwise—who has gained the perspective to view those impulses within a much broader context.

On the contrary, I am working quite diligently to suppress them. Currently, they lie buried deep within the shadows of my soul. In fact, they have likely gone dormant, and I feel nothing at all. No hard feelings. 😁

That's a pretty interesting look at how someone can basically corrode their own being.
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
silentviper19 said:Now, biology tells us pretty clearly that once someone passes away, that’s it—game over, no coming back. But if you look back about 2,000 years, there was this one guy who actually came back to life. And it wasn't just him, either; you've got Lazarus and so many others who were basically brought back by the sheer joy of witnessing that first miracle.

Where's the "harmony" in all that? We build our whole sense of spirituality on the idea that miracles are totally possible, yet science sits there insisting they aren't. It feels like a massive contradiction to me.

Look at it through the lens of religious allegory.
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
rapidbear65 said:People always credit God or divine grace for all these healings—both the real ones and the ones that might just be luck. Believers see these rare, unexplainable moments as a sign from above, a way to show we aren't alone... Even though I call myself a believer, I don't really go looking for miracles or buy into the hype, but hey, unexplained things happen, and eventually science catches up to what we can't wrap our heads around today. It makes you wonder, though—if someone hits the jackpot on a Powerball ticket, shouldn't we call that a miracle too? And if we did, would everyone just start betting their lives away thinking it's the cure for poverty? How long is it going to take us to actually figure out where we fit in this universe? Is it more important to push scientific boundaries, or focus on spiritual growth, or maybe find a way to do both at the exact same time...

They gotta run side by side, in total harmony.
Is death actually natural? in Psychology ·
shadowheron49 said:I’m really hoping I can find some solid advice here, maybe some coping strategies or self-help techniques to help me deal with this.

I think we all have that underlying fear of death, right? Or maybe it's just me...
I'm not sure if "phobia" is even the right word, but if it is, then my constant, overwhelming terror definitely qualifies.

Even when I was a little kid, just hearing the word "death" was enough to keep me wide awake all night long; and honestly, even though I’ve never actually witnessed anything traumatic or seen a dead body, this fear is so intense it feels like it could literally consume me.

I actually managed to find some peace for a few years there—I could even sleep in total darkness, which used to be an impossible mission for me.
But... it’s all coming back.

Basically, the other day, I had to witness someone I care about having a stroke right in front of my eyes (usually, nothing shocks me, but this was different), and seeing someone actually dying for the first time in my 25 years... I was covering my eyes, totally spiraling, and when I had to call 911, I was so out of it that I forgot my own name, let alone how to dial emergency services...

And now, it's all starting again...
Now I can't stand being in a dimly lit room, I can't be alone, I can't handle silence, and any sudden noise makes me jump and freeze up; plus, as if to spite me, the power tripped earlier and now I'm just shaking from pure terror—it's like fear is literally running through my veins.
I find myself leaving all the doors open because I can't stand being enclosed, and I'm constantly seeking out crowds, yet I can't bring myself to go near where that accident happened...
I just can't.
If I see even the tiniest shadow move, I bolt like a soldier surviving a grenade blast—it's that visceral.
Right now, I’d honestly rather be standing out in the rain than inside a closed room.
This behavior used to haunt me for a while, and it actually turned my hair gray by the time I hit 25.
Some people think it’s just genetics (though they can't point to anyone specific since I started graying at 18), and others just write off my extreme fear as part of my personality, but for me, this causes real, tangible problems.
Now that I know what's coming, I'm desperate for advice or anything at all, because I can't live like this for another second.
What am I going to do when a family member passes away one day? I know it's inevitable... what will I do? And God forbid I end up being alone with them...
Just thinking about it makes me feel sick.
Do I need to see a psychologist?

Because my brain is always overanalyzing everything, I can't help but dive into the deepest, darkest thoughts about mortality in a way most "normal" people probably wouldn't; I've tried searching for the truth about the soul, trying to prove to myself that death isn't real or scary.
While everyone else around me is grieving at funerals, I'm just paralyzed with fear; I wouldn't even touch a deceased person, nor would I sit in a chair where they once sat—my family actually threw out the couch where a man passed away, and I wouldn't dare touch a glass someone died using... I'd rather just burn everything and toss it out (one day I might have to clear out the whole house if things don't change)...
The thing is... with everything I know about the nature of death, you'd think I'd be the last person to fear it, but despite all my logic, this living phobia is stronger than I am.
I can't even walk past a place where someone died...
It’s just too much... I can't live like this...

What am I actually afraid of?
I don't know.
But it's this feeling that death itself is spreading through the room, like a black shadow hovering nearby...
Like even the objects belonging to a dead person are dying...
That sensation that the deceased are trying to reach out to me, that they're right there...
And the worst part...
Is looking at myself and realizing I'm nothing more than a collection of meat and bones... essentially dead already even though I'm still breathing... it's like I'm carrying death inside me... I feel this urge to run away from my own body, from this physical shell that I see torn apart so often on the news or on a dinner plate...
Even seeing an animal die absolutely terrifies me.

When I hug someone and hear their heartbeat and their breathing...
It feels eerie to me...
And honestly, I’ve never been much of a touchy-feely person
but when it comes to the one I truly love...
The only thing that actually gets to me is knowing that eventually, they won't be here anymore...

How do you even begin to stop being terrified of death and just accept it as part of life?
Because for me, death definitely doesn't feel natural at all....

Death is an illusion.

While you're busy sweating over the illusion of non-existence, you're just flushing your precious time right down the drain.
Just a random thought from a nobody in Spirituality ·
Scott Miller4 said:How did you land on the idea that this should be enough for enlightenment, self-knowledge, or the peak of self-actualization?

I have to admit, I’m not entirely sure if I follow what you’re getting at here—are you unhappy because people don't seem to appreciate your generosity, or is it more that you haven't managed to build any deep connections with anyone?

Do you really think there's nothing higher than giving? After spending years working in non-profits, I’d have to disagree. Interaction is always a two-way street, or rather, there is no such thing as a free lunch...

From a New Age perspective, that’s also fine, since you’ve essentially integrated those people into your own experience. They’re just fragments of who you are.
😁

Is that how it feels to you? It doesn't feel hopeless to me.
I think, if anything, you should start a thread over in psychology. If you even bother...

So "it'll pass" basically means it isn't hopeless. Great logic there.

🙂