Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
Michael Moore3 said:You’ve gone and put together another string of Bible excerpts that could be interpreted in just about any way imaginable. You also seem determined to hand over every single attribute previously assigned to God to the Holy Spirit—suggesting He is everything and in everything, which essentially allows the Holy Spirit to be a person, an energy, or whatever else we can or cannot wrap our heads around.
And I’ll say it again: based on your claim that you've personally experienced the Holy Spirit—which, fine, if you say so, good for you—your interpretations just end up muddled and complicate my own understanding of God. I’ve built my own view of the Divine through various meditative practices and books outside of the Bible, and frankly, it makes more sense to me than any ambiguous verse from Scripture, especially since the only things in the Bible that truly resonate are the direct quotes from Jesus, and there aren't nearly enough of those to go around.
Since I started taking religious studies back in second grade during the old era when that kind of behavior wasn't exactly encouraged by society, I don't think you can really claim I'm unfamiliar with the Bible; it's quite obvious that I genuinely wanted to know it for myself...
The only real difference between us is that I couldn't quite satisfy my spiritual hunger through the Bible; it was a decent starting point, certainly, but it felt full of gaps and unknowns. But then again, some people choose to build their entire world on such shaky foundations, while others don't, so I decided to seek out all the truths and eventually realized that no single truth is ever the whole truth. That seems to be what you two are missing, because for you, the Bible is the only truth. It's like claiming a single color—say, blue—is the only color that exists, when in reality there is a vast spectrum, much of which lies beyond our visible range. Truth works the same way.
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
briskharbor35 said:Just a heads up, before I finally crossed paths with Christ, I’d already burned through most of the books you guys are talking about—tried all sorts of meditation stuff, transcendental meditation, you name it. But honestly? It all feels kind of hollow, like it just pulls you away from the Truth, which lives entirely within His Spirit. He’s the one in charge of everything, the ultimate wisdom and knowledge, the only thing that's truly whole. If those ancient Eastern philosophies were actually the key to saving our souls or finding eternal life, reincarnation wouldn't even be taught, right? And look, Jesus did everything specifically so we could receive the gift of eternal life. Even if reincarnation were a real thing, He took it all upon Himself on the Cross so we wouldn't have to go through the cycle of being reborn over and over. That's why God gave us His Son—so we can receive the GIFT of eternal life through Him. Because let's be real, NOBODY can achieve unity with God for eternity through good deeds or spiritual practices alone unless they are done in Jesus's name. I mean, what kind of God would He be if He just ignored His Son's sacrifice and offered other ways to reach that eternal union?
The absolute best part is that all we really need to do is repent for our mistakes and ask Jesus to come into our hearts with His Holy Spirit. Then, we just declare to the spiritual realm with our own voices that, from this moment on, we accept Him as our Savior and Lord who looks after every single part of our lives.🙏
That kind of spiritual experience often results in total freedom—spiritually, mentally, and even physically through healing. So, grab a copy of "The power of positive thinking" by Norman Vincent Peale to help fire up your faith in Jesus, then just call out to Him. You'll experience something so personal you won't even be able to put it into words, but I promise, the story will be incredibly joyful and full of freedom.👍
shadownomad4 said:This is simply one of His gifts; it is our spirit that speaks, while He is the one providing the inspiration. You don't possess a gift to translate this native tongue into a spiritual one—it works the other way around. For instance, there are people gifted with the ability to interpret tongues, where they translate what someone else has said, and that is the extent of it. When you pray to the Father in Jesus' name asking for something, He won't grant you something from the devil. Therefore, when skeptics try to force the concept of language into the conversation, they are merely exposing their own unbelief and fear.
What I am actually "projecting" is a defense against that "my truth is the ultimate truth" attitude that both you and shadownomad4 seem to be pushing. You both seem quite blinded by your own version of the truth. And, as I mentioned earlier, I'm not just making this up as I go; I'm speaking from study and other truths.
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
Considering how much of the Bible appears to be adapted from the Egyptian Book of the Dead—from the Ten Commandments down to the word "Amen," which stems from Amon; Amon-Ra, translated as "the hidden one" and Ra as "King of the Gods," referring to a single God we cannot see who is the god of gods, the King of Gods...
In any case, the Bible is essentially a transcription of ancient beliefs for a new era, but it certainly isn't the only text regarding God. So, your argument really just circles back to what I said before: the idea that only Biblical truth is the most truthful.
It feels a bit presumptuous, doesn't it, once you realize the Bible is a transcription?
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
???
Are you truly certain you know what you're talking about? Labeling meditation as a religious technique instead of a spiritual one?
And is reading the Bible a spiritual technique, or a religious one? Or perhaps it's both?
Does meditation create religions that worship the practice itself, whereas the Bible creates spiritually awakened people who don't feel the need to spread religion just to promote the book?
Are you really sure you understand this?
For me, meditation is what drives my spiritual growth, and at no point has it ever pushed me toward joining or starting a religion...
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
But that is precisely what
I never found in the Bible. If anything, the Bible is responsible for my childhood spent wrestling with guilt over certain "sins" supposedly committed against some God I was expected to fear and love simultaneously.
The whole thing is just absurd.
You simply cannot love someone you are terrified of, and besides, "sin" is ultimately defined by one's own internal compass of right and wrong...
One shouldn't fear God, but rather hold Him in reverence. Unfortunately, the Bible failed to teach me that; instead, its teachings seemed almost exclusively focused on instilling fear, right up until the point of Jesus' actual teachings, which finally made sense. In fact, only His direct words carry any weight for me, not the various narratives or descriptions of miracles and healings. Personally, I think equating Jesus' actual teaching with the entirety of the Bible is perhaps the greatest mistake people make when studying His message.
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
I couldn't agree more with this idea.
In many ways, that is exactly what the Catholic Church does.
However, meditative techniques aren't like that... meditation doesn't make me feel "pious," it makes me feel conscious. That sense of awareness is exactly what you both claim to experience through receiving the Holy Spirit, except you don't actually demonstrate it, even though shadownomad4 claims to have the gift of translating spiritual words into a native tongue. You see, when you truly grasp something, the only real proof of that understanding is being able to explain it to someone else who knows nothing about the subject, in a way they can actually understand.
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
That is quite a powerful statement...
But how does one "trust God"? What exactly am I supposed to be trusting Him with?
Elizabeth Lewis11 said:Dear Michael Moore3,
Of course you don't understand the Bible—you haven't even made the effort to try. You walked in with a pre-packaged, judgmental attitude toward the Bible, and frankly, I’d bet you haven’t even read it from cover to cover, let alone sat down to actually study or grasp its depth.
That’s exactly why you can't make sense of what shadownomad4 is saying, whereas for me—someone who has been studying the Bible in detail for about fifteen years now—everything is perfectly clear. You simply lack the necessary foundation, and so you end up criticizing what you don't comprehend. You're projecting your own confusion onto shadownomad4, acting as if the flaw lies with him. Besides, those meditative techniques and non-Biblical books only offer the illusion of clarity—they aren't inspired by God. I looked into them myself a long time ago (long before I realized the value of the Bible), and while they provided some answers regarding humanity and the world, they failed to satisfy my spiritual needs. They couldn't, really, because they are religious techniques rather than truly spiritual ones—even if they claim otherwise! It's only when one encounters the Bible that true spiritual needs can be met: reconciliation with God, forgiveness for past sins, and being equipped for a new life free from the bondage of sin. Religious techniques, churches, and various denominations can only cater to your "religious" needs—those fleeting "feelings" of piety, "feelings" of holiness, or "feelings" of oneness with God. It's all built on sensations and experiences—subjective things that are false, distorted, and manipulative because they don't come from God. God speaks to a person's reason: do not kill, have no other gods, love your neighbor—these aren't "feelings" or religious "experiences." They are rational principles and moral mandates designed to shape your character, not to manufacture fake "emotional highs." See, when someone relies solely on their feelings and their own opinions, they are relying on themselves rather than on God. They are building their faith on their own ego instead of on Him. They believe *in* God, but they don't actually trust Him.!!!
I’m not writing this to hurt your feelings or out of any ill intent. I'm saying this to show you that through humble, detailed study of the Bible, one can reach very clear and simple conclusions—conclusions that are essential if we want to understand the true meaning and purpose of life, devotion, and how we ought to act.
Best regards, Elizabeth Lewis11.
Cheers to all five of you! From where I'm sitting, this looks like nothing but a high-quality debate.
And just to reiterate my point, when I talk about "quality" within the Bible, I am referring exclusively to the statements and teachings of Jesus.
My only hesitation with your perspective is the fear that accepting it might mean discarding other truths—and the specific methods used to uncover them—because without those tools, I'd be forced to accept the Bible on blind faith alone; by keeping them, I can actually study the Bible with an open mind, knowing there are alternative viewpoints out there...