Kevin Cox said:Look, it's not like I went public with his name. It wasn't just the local news here in the city; outlets from all over the country have already blasted his full name, age, address, and job. So, I guess I don't really have anything to do with it. 😉
And if, say, I had taken him on, it would have been because of similar nonsense. And that's not even about tennis...
Right, so you'll pick a fight with journalists, but when it comes to blatant ethics violations—like publishing the identity of someone who hasn't even been convicted and was only listed as a minor suspect in their first appearance—you suddenly think everything is perfectly fine?
Besides, if you're going to nitpick, you could have just said he’s "less than significant," or something like that. The point was clear, the opinion was stated, and so what? Should the authors just blow up the foreign embassies now? At this point, you've moved into an area where the actual meaning of the phrase doesn't even matter; you're just flailing around with totally unjustified arguments.
Anyway, I think this is the third time I've pointed out that you're the most reactionary person on this sports sub. First it's Nick, then the Republic of Dalmatia, then using partisans as examples of fighters; and now you're whining because some tough guys dared to light off some flares, claiming "Davor Šuker wouldn't allow that, and it's stupid to fight against him." 🙂 Pretty consistent logic there, I guess.