stormyheron4 said:The odds of catching it that way are slim; if you get stuck by an infected needle, the transmission rate is about 0.2%.
All that means is that out of 100% of total cases, needle sticks account for 0.2% of them.
Don't confuse that with the actual probability of getting HIV if you specifically get poked by an infected needle. There is a massive difference between those two ways of looking at the numbers.
It’s the same logic for the situation mentioned in the original post. Out of everyone living with HIV, the people who caught it via that specific method make up a tiny fraction—my rough estimate, anyway—but that tells you absolutely nothing about your individual risk level if you actually experience what was described.
HIV spreads through sexual contact because friction causes micro-tears in the mucous membranes. It is technically possible to catch it that way, sure, but it's unlikely. If there wasn't intense friction involved (which clearly wasn't the case here) and there isn't active bleeding, the chances are pretty low.
But honestly, screw the statistics if you're losing sleep over it. Just go get tested so you can stop worrying and get some peace of mind.
ruggedpanther64 said:HIV only transmits in three ways:
Sexual contact without using protection like condoms
Blood transfusions
Mother to child during pregnancy
Anything else is basically impossible.
It isn't impossible. Anywhere you have open wounds, the risk spikes because that's where the concentration of viral particles is highest.