wanderingheron9 said:These are actually my posts that triggered that whole avalanche in the US. I wrote them right before Lata decided to start a thread specifically just for "mandibles."
Look, Jesse Price, nothing here is factually incorrect, no matter how much you might want it to be.
Taking a look at the overall structure—specifically the skull and the orbital region—what stands out to you?
I don't think anyone actually believes that some random guy on the internet could somehow influence global politics just by posting things online. It’s a bit delusional, isn't it? People love to act like they have this massive impact, but let's be real—most of what happens in Washington is decided long before a single comment is typed out. Does anyone truly believe their digital footprint carries that much weight? It seems more like a way for people to feel important rather than an actual attempt at change.
The ramus and the masseter—two parts of the jaw that most people don't give much thought to until they start feeling tension in their face. It’s an interesting bit of anatomy, really. You have the ramus, which provides the structural foundation, and then the masseter, that powerhouse muscle responsible for all that grinding and chewing. It makes you wonder, though: how often does a little bit of muscular strain end up being treated like a major structural issue? Sometimes the simplest explanation is just a tight jaw from stress, yet we tend to overcomplicate things. Is it worth digging deeper, or is it just a matter of letting the muscle relax?
I honestly don't see why everyone is making such a massive deal out of this. Is it really that groundbreaking? It feels like we're all collectively overreacting to something that isn't actually that significant. Does anyone else feel like the hype is just completely disproportionate to the reality of the situation? I’m struggling to find the logic in all this noise.
The relationship between your teeth and your palate is more significant than most people realize. It isn’t just about having a straight smile; it's about how the structure of your mouth functions as a whole. When the alignment of your teeth doesn't mesh properly with the shape of your palate, you start seeing issues with speech, swallowing, and even how food feels when you eat. Is it possible that minor dental misalignments are actually causing larger structural headaches? Often, they are.
I can't help you with that. I don't have access to the content of external links like that one.
Then some group of people comes up to me acting all high and mighty—take MotherOfPearl, for example—and tells me I’m just some drugged-out idiot. Well, naturally, my first instinct is to absolutely bury them right along with their recessive jawline.
I only ever got aggressive with the people who were being arrogant, acting like they owned the place, or constantly looking for a fight.
The biggest irony is that Lata keeps inviting me to hang out with the US crowd. Honestly, it’s getting a little awkward to keep turning her down.🤣 If they couldn't even handle looking at me on a PDF, how exactly do they plan to manage seeing me in real life?
Look, just relax. Feel free to say whatever you want—if I think you've made a valid point, I’ll concede, and if not, I’ll push back. But I'm not about to go running out for cosmetic fillers or start wearing colored contact lenses just because that's what you do. I don't feel nearly as threatened as you seem to want me to feel.
Let’s pivot for a second—your posts actually have the potential to be informative, maybe even helpful to some people. There’s nothing wrong with studying physical attractiveness or what makes someone appealing. What *is* problematic, however, is the absolute certainty you bring to everything. It borders on being obsessive. You seem to have internalized a set of rules and treat them like immutable laws of physics, when in reality, the whole thing is much more like chemistry. You’re pushing dogmas, but our world is shaped by evolution, which is fundamentally about change and adaptation—and sexual attraction is a direct product of that process. Those incel-style rants you post here might seem logically sound on a superficial level, much like the claim that the Earth is flat. But once you gain a little more depth and start scratching beneath the surface, those "obvious" arguments quickly start looking pretty ridiculous, don't they?
For every trait you point out as conventionally attractive, there’s going to be a million people ready to tell you you're wrong. If we were working in some vacuum of "standard" female beauty—where things like large breasts, a symmetrical face, a petite nose, or blue eyes were the only components of your mathematical formula—you might swear by them. But in reality, one of the most sexually attractive women to men right now is Abella Danger, who stands as the complete opposite of everything listed above. That isn't just my personal opinion or my specific taste; it's the choice made by millions of men who have had access to a wide variety of options, which makes it an objective fact. If you’ve ever actually stepped outside and met real people, you’d see this phenomenon playing out every single day. Tall vs. short, slim vs. curvy, fair vs. dark, blonde vs. brunette... any physical characteristic you single out is never going to be the absolute standard you want it to be. And that’s not even touching on personality, which plays just as vital a role in attraction.
And I should probably mention that I’m still waiting for you to defend your position over on that other thread. I'm expecting some solid arguments this time. 🎉
