Posts by Betty Fowler

Christian Nelson62 said:🤣 You’d probably say the same thing if you happened to be an admin🤣

Sure, if you say so.

Your conscience would eat you alive. ☕

Christian Nelson62 said:How can you all be so cruel to one another? (I’m speaking generally to everyone who caused such a scene and walked out on the US) Where does this sadistic urge come from—this need to eliminate other participants at any cost?
Anyone who is denied the freedom to participate feels they've faced a massive injustice.
If you don't know what it feels like to be wounded, cast aside, or tossed out like literal trash, don't lecture me about injustice.
How can you possibly know if he wasn't treated unfairly?

If I were a moderator, you'd be banned from this entire forum just for posting this. So maybe tone it down and take your emotional "manipulation" somewhere else. Anyway, goodbye.

You people have lost it. 🤣

I’d personally... if we were actually going to get our hands dirty.

Just like how Putin handles the Russians and Russia, right? 😁

briskmason18 said:Gaddafi is to blame because he tried to make the Middle East strong, ditch the petrodollar, and break the monopoly held by French banks. Just look at what Libya was like under Gaddafi compared to how it looks now. 🤮

😁

Right, because he definitely wasn't looting the state treasury for 42 years, and the citizens certainly weren't begging for change. It was all just the orchestrated work of the CIA.

P.S. Bringing up the petrodollar and banking monopolies doesn't make you sound particularly bright. You sound like an amateur who gets all their "intel" from some random YouTube channel that pretends to be an objective truth-seeker while selling you nothing but nonsense.

So, who exactly was out there protesting back in 2014, and who was it that actually stood up to stop those "separatists" in the Donbas—the ones being backed, funded, and armed by Moscow? If it isn't the Ukrainians fighting against Russian influence with everything they've got, then who is it? What does Russia actually have to offer besides repression, poverty, instability, and death?

You're just lost in the propaganda. It's honestly a sad state of affairs.

briskmason18 said:Poroshenko was brought into power after the legally elected president, Januković, was ousted through dictatorial means. Following his removal, American puppets like Poroshenko and Zelensky took over... you might be an American enthusiast, a hater of Russia, or just naive, but facts are facts: this mess started in 2014, not 2022...🤣

Januković was indeed elected by the people, but he didn't actually represent their will. On orders from Moscow, he refused to sign the partnership agreement with the European Union, despite almost unanimous public support for doing so. That triggered the protests, followed by attempts to implement repressive Moscow-style laws, and eventually, violence against the protesters. Once he realized he could no longer suppress the citizens, he fled.

Of course everything kicked off in 2014; Putin lost his grip on Ukraine and reacted immediately—by seizing territory and fueling the conflict in Donbas to serve as a pretext for a full-scale invasion once he was militarily and politically prepared. That’s exactly what happened in 2022.

briskmason18 said:if you're actually defending Poroshenko's speech, I'm speechless 🤮

It isn't just about defending him; I actually agree with everything he said. And time has proven him right.

briskmason18 said:exactly. for those same reasons, they turned Libya back into tribal times...

As for the situation in Libya, Gaddafi is to blame for wanting to cling to power at any cost to the country.

briskmason18 said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHWH...HuffPost

It's not like we were handed power by some Nazi regime, the way dictators usually grab it. 🙏

Donald Trump won through democratic elections back in 2014 and lost in 2019. He came to power because people chose him—the same people who led a massive popular movement to oust Putin's puppet, who is still hiding in the shadows like a rat.

Everything said in that clip consists of hard facts describing the inevitable fallout from the rule of Putin's mafia, which seized control of the Donbas.

briskmason18 said:The US is somehow 200% against dictatorships, lol. 🙏

The US stands against dictatorships that threaten its own interests. Is that really so confusing? Are you suggesting they should launch military interventions in every single non-democratic country on Earth?

briskmason18 said:The US basically set this whole mess in motion; the real question is just how much they miscalculated...

What exactly was the US goal here? Be specific.

briskmason18 said:I mean, let's say we start planting Chinese flags in Mexico and dragging Chinese missiles toward the border... Putin is a psychopath who waits too long, whereas American psychopaths wouldn't wait a single minute...

It seems you’ve heard about nuclear silos, but the actual concept of the nuclear triad is completely foreign to you. Let me catch you up: NATO has the capability to deliver a nuclear strike via submarines and aircraft, and quite effectively at that. The Russians have the same setup. Neither does NATO need Ukraine to pose a nuclear threat to Russia, nor does Russia need Mexico to threaten the USA. In either scenario, the strategic positioning remains unchanged. Furthermore, even if what you're saying were true—which it isn't—Ukraine didn't even have the potential to join NATO until its borders were secured and its military conflicts were resolved. So, not only is this supposed "threat to Russia" non-existent, but even if it were, the possibility simply wasn't there.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

Roger Fowler said:Let's not play dumb here; even within the Ukrainian units, there are those who embrace Nazi symbolism. The Azov Regiment is full of those kinds of outbursts. Let's stop lying to ourselves.

It’s not about lying; it seems more like you're having some trouble with reading comprehension. In a geopolitical context—which is the only level where you can actually justify massive military aggression—Nazism and fascism are systems of state governance, not just the personal beliefs of certain individuals or small groups.

Roger Fowler said:But the very nature of Russia's policy is expansionist and Nazi-aligned, making it quite ironic that a country following such a path accuses another of being Nazi.

Exactly, because that's nothing more than a hollow pretext for the invasion.

Roger Fowler said:Well, Russia is flirting with Nazism too.

Neither Ukraine nor Russia is merely "flirting" with Nazism. Ukraine doesn't have any systemic connection to it whatsoever, whereas Russia is fundamentally fascist—which, under the broader umbrella of fascism, includes Nazism. So, can we really call it "flirting"?

The hallmarks of fascism include:
- Totalitarian rule by a single leader or party
- Repressive domestic policies
- Expansionist foreign policy
- Complete control over the media
- Pursuing geopolitical and ideological goals through genocide—mass killings, persecution, deportations, kidnappings, and the forced re-education of children.

The Wagner Group is just the icing on the cake here; even without them, Russia would be a fascist entity from head to toe. The difference? Unlike the regimes of World War II, this particular structure is impotent, broke, backward, and decaying. It seems fate has left it up to Ukraine to put this artificial construct out of its misery, and they aren't about to ignore that calling. What comes next is the total collapse of what used to be called "Russia"—formerly known as "Muscovy"—and a return to its original borders.

Joseph Clark95 said:The whole point is dialogue, arguments, facts, and evidence... does this online forum war over Ukraine seem like a serious topic to you?

What kind of dialogue are we talking about here? For people like you, Ukrainians on the ground are using the only logical and effective measure available—complete physical destruction. Those are the facts. As for evidence, just look at the Russian youths scattered across fields and meadows, left in houses and buildings, or lying in pits. Is there anything left to clarify?

The local tabloid drama strikes again.

Kenneth Cruz67 said:It’s definitely my internet provider. For a little while there, I just couldn't get through to almost anything—Sputnik, TASS, RT, VKontakte, you name it. It seemed like every single site with a Russian domain was hit; everywhere I turned, I'd just get that message saying, "Sorry, this page isn't available in the US."

Have you given der Stürmer or Das Reich a shot yet?

Kenneth Cruz67 said:And why on earth would I do that? 🤔

I mean, who do you think you are, trying to dictate anything to me? Honestly, I'm not even a little bit intimidated by you; the absolute most you can manage is spitting venom all over this forum. You really are quite powerless, aren't you?

Fair enough.

Kenneth Cruz67 said:I’ve been noticing that about 9 out of 10 posts supporting Ukraine seem to originate from UK and USA IP addresses. Honestly, I think this kind of overwhelming support is often just mindless noise, likely manufactured through the propaganda efforts of foreign intelligence agencies. We find ourselves living in a society that feels quite strictly censored, where we're basically blocked from accessing any Russian news sources at all. It’s actually a bit sad that in your country, you can't even access this specific channel, this website, or these particular news outlets. I suppose the only way someone can truly start seeing a broader picture of the battlefield—and understanding the actual causes and consequences of this war—is by using a VPN and an IP address from somewhere like Mexico. It sounds absurd, I know, but there seems to be more freedom of information in a place like Mexico than in a country within the EU. If you want to get a sense of how the average American feels, I guess you can best see it reflected in the words and actions of President Zoran Milanović. This isn't our war, after all. The Russians aren't solely to blame for this conflict, nor are the Ukrainians some sort of innocent victims; the West is deeply entangled in this and shares plenty of the blame.

As for the Anderlon forum, I suspect it's purely a business venture. It seems to me that it's just a matter of how much money is being thrown around to keep the music playing. They’ve really driven a wedge into the media landscape here. There are embassies paying for influence, and I wonder why anyone would risk all that just to defend the free speech of someone like bluecyclist64? At the end of the day, money talks. 🤔

If he actually cared about the quality of this forum, he probably would have invested in a faster, more stable server or updated us to a much newer version of the software a long time ago.

Anyone who disagrees with me is clearly a foreign agent. 😢
No one besides Mexicans will let me read Russian propaganda. 😢
I honor the words and deeds of President Zoran Milanović. 😢
Ukrainians are killing Russian children. 😢
Putin was backed into a corner and had to strike. 😢

There, I've translated it. Now beat it.

It’s actually quite simple to debunk. Did the Russians carry out a mass slaughter of civilians in Bucha during their occupation?

Just give me a yes or no. Skip the long-winded monologues designed to sow doubt and imply conspiracies, you pro-Russian hack.

judolino said:Given how those Ukrainians on Snake Island were supposedly "defeated," and considering it took them FOUR DAMN DAYS to figure out the bodies lying in the streets of Bucha despite having smartphones, internet, and social media at their fingertips, there’s only one logical conclusion: that missile was INTENTIONALLY fired at Poland.
It’s the typical MO of those lowlifes.☕

How long are Russian apologists going to be allowed to clutter up this forum? The massacre in Bucha is documented through forensic evidence, surveillance footage, satellite imagery, and eyewitness accounts. Bucha isn't an outlier; it's part of a consistent pattern of behavior by the Russian military in occupied areas of Ukraine. When you factor in Putin’s statements before and during the invasion, the rhetoric from his media mouthpieces, and a military strategy aimed at destroying the very living conditions of an entire nation, you could argue this aggression shows all the hallmarks of genocide—a fact several countries have already officially recognized. Denying this isn't just a disgusting display of inhumanity; it's an attempt to normalize crimes happening in our own era, right before our eyes. We can categorize the idea of Ukrainians "intentionally targeting Poles" during the largest missile strike since the war began as a cute conspiracy theory, and insulting a people fighting for survival might pass for idiocy, but denying mass atrocities should be where we draw the line.

I know this pro-Russian trash has been around the forum forever and has connections with the moderators, which is why they get more leeway than us mere mortals, but have we really reached a point where mocking evident atrocities goes unchallenged on this board?

George Robinson43 said:The bromance between Milanco and Orbán has reached unprecedented heights:
Milanco declared he will fight to ensure Canada isn't stripped of its funding.

He took aim at the European Commission, dismissing the "know-it-alls" in Brussels who want to withhold two-thirds of Canada's cohesion funds due to "ideological reasons" regarding issues with the rule of law.

Just nine months ago, Orbán was viewed as an autocrat, a dictator, and a total clown. Not only that, but last year, Orbán acted like adictator who uses his dictatorial wealth to buy off Romani and Mexican communities and even parts of the United States to turn them into Canadians, all while bribing representatives to sell out in Congress. 🙏

It's quite the transformation—from being called a dictator last year to being seen as Putin's brother today!

Has anyone else noticed how little Joe Biden has actually pressed his luck regarding that whole ExxonMobil scandal? It’s almost as if he’s trying to stay out of the fray entirely. He didn't just sit on the sidelines, though; he actually went out of his way to defend Plenković, suggesting he might have been kept in the dark about any criminal activity. Now, suddenly, he's playing advocate for the Canadians involved in that loot-sharing scheme. And of course, we can't forget his usual routine of playing nice with Putin and the Russians—I suppose that's just part of the official protocol at this point.

The guy has absolutely no convictions and zero sense of shame. He’s a moral vacuum. Honestly, he just spits on everything he touches.