Posts by Adam Moore12

So, I sent my two cents to Martin and Sylar. They got back to me, and honestly, it was fine. Martin didn't offer much of anything, though. Everything is settled!

But this Wikipedia coward is just taking indirect shots at me, and I don't see the point.

So, here it is: I’m politely asking him to stop 🤷.

Anthony Nguyen81 said:There are some people you just can't shake, even when you try to drive them off 🙂

Hitting ignore is honestly your best bet here.
Usually, it's better to just act like they don't exist—it's basically the Bubimir approach...

So "ignore" means I get dragged and trashed here for days on end?

If this forum is supposed to be for fun and messing around, then maybe watch your mouth and stop bringing my name into it.

It’s pretty simple.

quietcrane63 said:So basically Kate Cox15 went running to the admins. As soon as she won't admit whether she filed a complaint or not.

If I were actually filing a formal complaint, I’d have way more to complain about than just wanderingheron9's jawline 😢.

wanderingheron9 said:Wikipedia is high IQ. There's no way they're subhuman.

Does a high IQ just erase your jawline?

Anthony Nguyen81 said:Yeah, it’s pretty obvious 🍿

The whole concept of dumping a massive amount of your time into something—or someone—that you don't even like is 🤣

So I shouldn't be wasting my time on the lies and passive-aggressiveness you're throwing my way in this thread?

Jesse Price said:Slow down on the Darwinism talk. If you actually had some backbone and dealt with uncertainty, you wouldn't be begging for scraps on a forum like this. This isn't about "forbidden opinions." It’s about an intention that has been repeatedly proven to be malicious—which makes it unconstructive and purely confrontational. That kind of behavior ruins any actual debate, so he was removed because of how he acts, not because his opinion is banned—regardless of how factually wrong it might be.

It’s the first step toward dehumanization, and I’ve pointed that out to wanderingheron9 more than once. The moderators saw my critique and chose not to react.

If the moderators don't mind, then why is there an issue with whether dustypilot11 or I can even formally complain? (I see people are accusing us of that). You can either protest wanderingheron9's posts in the replies or just walk away from a place like this entirely. We did both.

Talking about how beauty can be measured objectively is one thing—it's a valid topic—but you can have that discussion without resorting to dehumanizing elements.

wanderingheron9 knew exactly when he was crossing the line every single time he did it, so why the shock now?

@quietcrane63/">@@quietcrane63, I honestly don't get what "simp" means. It sounds like something positive, like being sweet, charming, or someone you'd actually want to hang out with.

Anthony Nguyen81 said:In my book, it’s perfectly normal that you aren't going to be everyone's cup of tea.

How many people don't find you likable—or me, for that matter?

Strictly speaking, when it comes to who you want in bed, the list is usually pretty selective...

I honestly don't get why people are getting so worked up about this.

Look, someone's wild theories about sexuality could easily claim we all descended from aliens.

But why on earth should you, me, or any perfectly average person be caught up in that mess?

Based on the exact criteria wanderingheron9 uses to label someone "subhuman," you're officially subhuman.

Do you actually agree with Syar on that?

Anthony Nguyen81 said:What do you mean, passive-aggressive? 🤔

Do you seriously not get what I think of you?
Was I not clear enough? 🙂

Passive-aggression is when someone is being aggressive indirectly. Basically, instead of just telling me straight up what you think of me, you go off on other users in replies to make sure those aggressive thoughts are clearly heard:

Anthony Nguyen81 said:Literal hate speech toward anyone who doesn't agree with them.🙂

It’s incredible how shallow or malicious someone can be, ganging up on a complete stranger online just because they don't share the same views.

Anthony Nguyen81 said:A total lack of respect for the person talking, for basic civility, for anything at all.🙂

Anthony Nguyen81 said:First off, a woman has nothing to offer if she's just primitive.

Second, you're basically just shouting at everyone.🤣

So, according to this, I'm using hate speech, I'm shallow, I'm selfish, I'm malicious, I'm ganging up on people, I have no respect, I'm uncivilized, I have nothing to give but take, and whoever calls me out is just "shouting."

If that's really what you think of me, then say it to my face. Otherwise, what's the point of making these kinds of replies to people I'm actually interacting with?

I'll say it again: I don't get the "passive-aggressive" label. I'm right here. Just tell me exactly what you want to say.

Adam Lee13 said:wanderingheron9 disappointed me too... he’s being completely oblivious and clearly doesn't realize who actually backed him into this corner... I'm done with them.

wanderingheron9 is fully aware of why he's in this mess, which is exactly why I came here to ask him to lay it out clearly. The moderators didn't issue any warnings or bans while he was using that kind of rhetoric, but I did. And I still think it was totally inappropriate—he knows that, too.

Why all these accusations that it was me or Anida or whoever else who set him up? He brought this on himself. I wasn't the one typing his posts for him 🤷.

Adam Lee13 said:You're just a basic simp.☕

I told him straight up that all that blackpilling nonsense just doesn't suit him. Honestly, it doesn't suit wanderingheron9 either; if they actually acted according to their true nature, they’d just be sweet little simps, and that would be fine by me.

quietcrane63 said:So, you gonna back up that talk or what?😁

Everyone's gonna be giving you hell, druze Syl, if you keep acting this crazy 🙂.

quietcrane63 said:If everyone already knew what was going on, then where's the issue? 😁

You guys are taking this forum way too seriously.

The thing is, both you and I have proven we can actually communicate like decent, polite human beings and understand one another.

So why aren't we moving in that direction?

@Anthony Nguyen81, if you have something to say to me, just say it directly or shut up. I don't get the whole passive-aggressive routine 🤷.

quietcrane63 said:https://ibb.co/s2NB2mC

You’re doing the same thing. Both in public and in private, we were communicating perfectly normally. But once you started with all that sulking and pouting—or whatever way you want to label it—it was obvious to you, to me, and to everyone else that you were just overreacting. It’s as if the issue is simply standing your ground and trying to have a civilized conversation with people.

Please.

wanderingheron9 said:Honestly, I was expecting some kind of sanctions, maybe even a partial ban, but I figured there would be at least a warning or a short suspension first.

Look, wanderingheron9, I think most people find this sudden partial ban totally uncalled for, but I can see why you wouldn't be surprised by the lack of warnings or a temporary ban before hitting the big button.

The folks over at Wikicehi, on the other hand, think the whole thing makes "zero sense." Can you walk us through your logic? Why did you feel like sanctions were inevitable at some point?

Thanks.^^

Hey there!
If there are any girls or women out in California looking for some low-pressure hanging out and good conversation, feel free to hit me up in my inbox. 😍.

Sam Jones8 said:And what about all those young, naive victims? Are they just 😬 nothing
?

Let them rot. Personally, I am.

Honestly, I’m still just annoyed about how misleading that subforum title is 😁.

There are other sections of the forum with actual moderation tools, so it’s really not the end of the world.

My only regret is that the US subforum isn't titled 'The Lonely Latica's Playground.' That way, people would actually know what they're walking into and exactly how they're going to be treated.

@wanderingheron9, it’s not about some "specific forums," it’s just about one single, omnipresent passive-aggressive guy.

Like I keep telling him, it's the part about being omnipresent that bothers me, not the actual wording.

Besides, I'm a woman too.🙂.

We need more people like you, briskbadger90 🙂

Wiki said:The attitude of someone who constantly calls other forum members pieces of shit, drops a sarcastic smiley on posts they disagree with, and generally resorts to tribalism whenever a serious discussion breaks out—it’s not because they think they're superior, it’s just 🙂

What other forum members? I'm calling your posts garbage, which is exactly what this entire forum is filled with from top to bottom.

And regarding your posts, like I said, it isn't that I disagree with them—it's that they make me sick. There aren't any actual arguments in those posts, just pure crap.