brightpilot6 said:There are certainly some high-quality college courses out there where one could pick up a fair amount of fascinating material.
But what about the Old Testament or the Geneva Convention, or perhaps the dynamic between a woman and the Church—exploring equality through the lens of humility?
I highly doubt they have the capacity to cook up a scheme like that, let alone actually pull it off.
Besides, hitting a two-thirds majority is basically a pipe dream given how much the Democrats and their entire wall of resistance will block it. Though, I suppose if they actually managed it, it would be an absolute nightmare, I guess.
haha, alright, I guess I wasn't being particularly precise there—I didn't view clericalism as some core pillar or a defining tenet of the Bridge Party, but rather more like a subtle, underlying worldview. And since I seem to have this almost innate allergy to any flavor of clericalism, I suppose that tendency leaves its mark on everything I say 😁
I guess I’m starting to like the Bridge Party more and more, despite all that clerical baggage they carry. They’ve really stuck to their guns since the very beginning. Honestly, the only real downside is that if it weren't for them, Karamarko might still be running things as Prime Minister.
And now, just like they promised, they’re refusing to back that compromised minister.
I mean, anyone who thinks a minister—someone who isn't even from a political party, but jumped straight from a private corporation into the Treasury, only to hand $300 million back to that same firm when it was obvious they were just throwing money down the drain, telling the public everything was fine with that company until they couldn't hide it anymore, and then pushing through changes that conveniently favored that exact same business—is somehow not compromised and actually competent... well, that person is just politically illiterate, or maybe just a total brainwashed Republican lackey.
What kind of nonsense is this? For instance, there’s nothing even remotely constructive happening here compared to other threads, except maybe there's just more trolling and off-topic chatter, which I guess is exactly how we like it anyway. ☕
And then you have this one person claiming that ZZ and Tore can't hold their own in a debate 🤣🤣
If that isn't blatant trolling, I don't know what is.
I might even go as far as to say that Example has somehow engineered some of the most convolutedly complex scenarios in all of soccer, where the main protagonists happen to be all these trolls we see here (plus a few others, obviously).
Bite me. ☕
And yeah, they actually have the nerve to call Dabo a troll, too. The guy isn't always around, but whenever someone needs to be shut down with a solid argument, he always seems to show up. People like him are always welcome, I suppose. ☕