Posts by Brenda Green62

John Baker68 said:Show me the actual thread so I can see this supposed "argument" you're talking about.

Basically, you're claiming it's a fight just because I'm talking to a user who then quotes my post specifically to hurl racial slurs at me.

That isn't an argument—it's a delusion. In the real world, that's called a targeted attack and a violation of the law.☕

The Card is named that way, but I honestly assume our users are smart enough to realize the rule applies to any kind of "conflict."

Besides, this isn't even the first time you've tried reporting my posts—I'm doing my job moderating while you just keep pushing the drama.

John Baker68 said:there wasn't any fight—the guy was just spamming chauvinistic, hate-filled posts for the thousandth time. They were deleted, obviously, so I can't even quote them here.

I’m honestly considering filing a lawsuit over this. ☕

Under Reddit's own rules, the platform is obligated to hand over data if there's an actual legal claim involved. ☕

He got what he deserved.

I've said my piece, so I have nothing else to add.
If the authorities feel they need to get involved, let them reach out.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:You're being so greasy and pathetic that I don't even believe you.
Go ahead, dock me a few points if you think it's necessary, but seriously—you've gone way too far.

I bet you've been banned from every other forum out there, so you crawled over here just to cause trouble.

Brenda Green62 is such a reasonable and mild-mannered Moderator, despite everything you people have thrown at her. Her only real mistake is that she doesn't know when to hand out a Card and finally shut down toxic users like you.

The Off-topic section is a bit more relaxed, so that's how I moderate it—but maybe you have a point.

I didn't delete your quote—I deleted your entire post because you kept spamming those legal statutes just to bait the National Army and drag this argument out.

I already issued the Cards and wiped those posts—all based on your report—yet here you are, still repeating them.
The name of the Card you just received is "do not continue the argument."

Deleted posts are still visible to the moderators and the admin team.

This one’s for lola 🤣

Zachary Womcat


Michelle Bennett14?

John Baker68 said:I don't buy the idea that this can be resolved with just a warning—because, as you can clearly see, I didn't insult this person or even address them directly in my original post.

I’m calling for a permanent ban on that user, which is completely within the rules here on Reddit.☕

It's either that or a lawsuit, since the laws of the USA aren't being respected here.☕

If you want to argue that, start a new thread.
We're done here.

hiddennomad60?

John Baker68 said:it’s pretty obvious they didn't train you properly—the rule is that moderators should proactively pull problematic posts themselves rather than just sitting around waiting for a report. Besides, your own post on that thread is only a few messages down from the one in question. 👍

The idea that someone deserves to have their parents insulted just because they were being "provocative" is absolute bottom-of-the-barrel behavior—just like that problematic post itself. Look, I’m not acting as Svrlet's lawyer, nor do I particularly like him, but there are lines you just don't cross.

Honestly, I don't think you actually understand what being a moderator entails, or maybe you just haven't bothered to read the forum rules carefully enough.

And the same goes for b0mber.

Yesterday, some spammer flooded us with a PDF containing 15 brand-new threads all pushing an ad, and it sat there for two or three hours before anyone did anything.

Maybe someone else would be better suited for this job. 👍

By the way, you were online that day too—at the exact same time—which is why I expected a quick response. Unfortunately, we didn't even get one by today. I guess, according to your logic, insulting an entire nation—and even intentionally misspelling the name of a people—doesn't warrant a ban.

As the saying goes, you don't really know people until something significant happens. 👍

I’m not trying to step on my colleague's toes here; he was part of the discussion and saw the report just like I did.

I stand by that statement completely.👍

John Baker68 said:reported the post, and it's still up

Bomber's reaction to the post

The post I flagged over at D&k—that was actually last month. I can't pull the specific link because the search tool only digs through the last 50 posts, but I'm certain the administration has access to every single report submitted.

Brenda Green62, you’ve really let me down.

In my opinion, neither of you should even be moderators anymore if you're just going to sit there and allow such blatant rule-breaking without lifting a finger.

And then we have this post from today, where that same 7nationarmy goes after someone's parents (an absent user).

By the way, a moderator's job is to proactively scrub posts that clearly violate the rules—not just sit around waiting for people to file reports.

Total amateur hour with this moderation.

I'm not going to address the first part since Bomber was present for that one, so I wasn't the one who filed the report.

As for today's post, it hasn't been reported.
Besides, Svrle tends to be even more provocative than this guy.
And he doesn't need anyone playing lawyer for him.

Thanks for the advice, but the administration has already given us our instructions on how to handle our jobs. 👍

Look, if you're going to reference other posts, just include the link—that way we actually know what you're talking about.
By the way, the rule is simple: you report the post, wait 24 hours, and *then* you file an appeal here. 👍
As far as I can tell, I don't see a single report.

Regarding Dika, let me know if colleague Bomber reaches out to you.

Go ahead and wait for Nica if you want.

Look, the report in question was filed way back on September 15, 2020.
I actually spoke with a seventh-level admin via private message regarding that specific report—specifically about how the communication was handled.
In my opinion, a formal warning shouldn't have even been necessary.

Since then? Not a single report has been filed.
Before that, there were maybe two or three reports against certain users, but those were already dealt with—warned or deleted.
I haven't been on the forum for the last five days (the administration is aware of my absence), so I haven't noticed anything new in the meantime.

Buster Douglas is an excellent, unbiased moderator who doesn't play favorites with anyone—of that, I am absolutely certain.

See? I told you 🤷

Bomb is awesome—honestly, I’m just glad he agreed to moderate the off 🎉

Everyone got exactly what they deserved 🤣

Hey Offovac crew,

We’ve got some reinforcements arriving over on the off board.
Everyone knows the name, and everyone loves him—it's Bomber 🎉

He’s already proven himself as an incredible moderator over on the dika—and honestly, I'm pretty sure he'll be just as great here. 😁

Glad to have you on board 😁

We had a good laugh at that one 🤣
Per the author's request, I'm locking this thread down 😁

Drew Ross2 said:This is a pretty decent topic, I guess.😍 Brenda Green62 is a fantastic moderator—honestly, she’ll probably be way more successful at managing this total dumpster fire than I ever was.😳

I've decided to distancirati myself from the Forum because, frankly, I'm a sensitive soul—and since I'm in a bit of a fragile state right now, I really don't need the extra stress from all the provocations, threats, insults, and whatever other nonsense happens here.

I'll be back once I have the baby.😁

Well, we wish you the best.😍

Make sure you come back after the baby arrives. You can see everyone is already looking forward to it.🎉

Alright, let's get serious for a second.

I’m leaving this thread open—so go ahead and let it rip.
If you actually think this topic matters and you've got something constructive to contribute, I won't stand in your way.

But—😳
The moment this turns into a shouting match, petty bickering, or any kind of malicious rule-breaking, I’m locking it down immediately.

I honestly think it’s incredibly unfair for you all to call me out publicly like this.😳

I mean, I spent months meticulously curating every single photo—literally obsessing over every detail—
and apparently, to land this role, I had to flash my assets to the higher-ups,
fix up Lou’s pedals,
and set up Wiki as a spy.

But you people? You're just ungrateful. 🙂

The only one who actually gets it is Susan Kim91—she realized I was important enough to have in her signature. 👋
And as for a penalty? Well, I certainly won't be stepping down now. 🥳 🤣

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Look, Brenda Green62, please. You're taking my words completely out of context just to troll me in front of everyone.

How was I supposed to link the rule when I clearly stated I couldn't find it?

I’m talking about the PDF guidelines.
Basically, the off-topic section follows the same rules as the rest of the site.
If commenting on the mods is banned everywhere else, then it's banned on the off-topic boards too.

As for those unwritten rules—you'll just have to wait for the admins to weigh in.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Just keep the ban.
I don't cause trouble and I don't have many bans to begin with, so it's really not a huge deal.
I honestly don't want to get into an argument with you—you're dear to me.

Look, it's been understood for a long time that commenting on the mods gets you penalized. Everyone knows that rule exists, so I've never really given it much thought.

But, technically speaking—and this is where it gets messy—there isn't actually a rule. 😬

Also, the chat in the Off-Topic section can't truly go "off-topic," unless someone is actually breaking specific rules.

You basically answered your own question in bold.
That's the rule on every single sub-forum, including Off-Topic.

Just because a sub-forum is called "Off-Topic" doesn't mean there aren't rules to follow.
You even linked them yourself.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:But in a chat thread, especially in Off-Topic, there should be some tolerance for a few comments—provided they aren't inciting hate, insulting users, or causing more issues.
A moderator should probably be able to tell the difference between some casual banter in a relaxed atmosphere and starting a massive, low-class feud.

Of course I tolerate comments about moderation if it's just "light" stuff. Not everything needs an immediate penalty.

But the vibe in that thread wasn't "banterous" or "relaxed"—it was straight-up mutual sniping, provocation, and insults to the point where I had to lock the chat.

As far as commenting on the mods goes, I've looked the other way for you plenty of times (and others too), and you know that—because it wasn't malicious and it didn't drive up the tension.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Look, I’ve only made three posts total—don't go exaggerating here.

In two out of those three posts, I specifically asked where this rule was even written, and you couldn't give me an answer. Of course, the posts were deleted, so I can't link everything, but here's what I've got.

So, let me say it one more time: it doesn't say.

I don't care how the warning was issued. I simply asked which rules were being applied.

I said "you all," not "you."
You didn't ask until after I already gave you a warning for arguing with the moderation team—and I told you all that if you kept up with that debate, you'd be dealing with the FBI.

And you did get an answer: it's off topic.

Just wait for the actual admins to step in and decide on this.