CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Douglas Robinson12 › Posts

Posts by Douglas Robinson12

117 posts shown.

Coffee and Cigarettes in Movies ·
Honestly, it was such a massive letdown. Just plain boring. It felt like a total display of Jim Jarmusch's typical narcissistic pretentiousness. The guy clearly just doesn't get the whole soul of coffee at all.
Top 100 Overlooked Films of the 1990s in Movies ·
Justified on the list:

Heavenly Creatures (honestly, my favorite film of the 90s)
Safe (Todd Haynes at his best, along with The Karen Carpenter Story, which really deserves a spot on this list under the 'must-see' category)
Bottle Rocket (another one sitting right in my personal top 10 of the 1990s)
The Limey (definitely Soderbergh's second best)
Welcome to the Dollhouse (the most human stuff Todd Solondz ever did)
Hard Eight (the best Anderson we get here)
One False Move / Devil in a Blue Dress / Deep Cover (these three neo-noirs feel like they're chasing that classic Roman Polanski vibe from back when he was actually hitting his stride)
A Perfect World (really the only significant Eastwood flick since The Outlaw Josey Wales)
Quick Change / The Ref (such a rare find—a genuinely smart Hollywood Comedy from the 90s)

Missing (meaning they were critically acclaimed, but honestly should be even more celebrated or widely known):

The Ceremony (a vintage Claude Chabrol masterpiece, probably the last time he made something truly this good back in the late 70s)
Bad Lieutenant (a study in how to turn an atheist into a Catholic; I’m still waiting for Vatican City to canonize Ferrar and Harvey Keitel... though I might be waiting a while)
Kill Me Again / Red Rock West / The Last Seduction (....and now for something completely not different.... just pure, classic filmmaking)
Election / Pallookaville (super sharp indie comedies)
Out of Sight (the absolute best from Steven Soderbergh)
Steven Soderbergh's Buffalo '66 (has that Cassavetes energy, though I can't quite recall a Cassavetes film that hits quite this hard)
Rana (tracing the lineage from Zero de Conduite --> Los Olvidados --> The 400 Blows --> Rana)
Jackie Brown (the peak Tarantino)
Wild Reeds (by André Téchiné... I actually cried watching this, not that I'd admit to being embarrassed about it)
The Long Day Closes (that British anti-pop vibe)
Clueless (check my note under Quick Change / The Ref)
Face Off (my personal favorite Wooov film)
The End of Violence (a totally underrated Wim Wenders)
Brother (Russian pop vibes)
Khrustailov, my car! (Russian avant-garde)

Removed from list:

Sneakers (just kind of meh)
The Red Violin (doesn't really matter)
Defending Your Life (too predictable)
Beautiful Girls (overrated, times three)
Very Bad Things (just plain stupid)
La Story (a bit too self-indulgent)
The Ice Storm (overhyped and pretty trivial)
Smoke (autopilot script, autopilot directing, autopilot acting... just routine masquerading as "art")
Starsky & Hutch in Movies ·
Honestly, Zoolander is an absolute classic, whereas S&H is just alright, you know? I mean, if we're being real, Dodgeball definitely beats S&H, but obviously it doesn't quite hit the heights of Zoolander.
Is Michael Bay actually a bad director? in Movies ·
Look, I’m not saying I hate them, because honestly? I actually love *certain* blockbusters, just like I happen to love *certain* art films.
Is Michael Bay actually a bad director? in Movies ·
Richard Howard2 said:You can find at least ten million people in L.A. who could whip up a masterpiece, but being able to pull in over $200 million with a movie—even when it’s often total garbage—that’s something only true geniuses can do. I'm talking guys like Bay, Spielberg, Lucas, and especially Cameron, who I honestly think is the ultimate genius when it comes to balancing massive profits with what the audience wants.


Bzzzzzzzzzzzt... Not quite. Look, Bay is living proof that almost anyone can churn out a flick that clears $200m. All you really need is a $100m budget, maybe toss another $30-$40m into a massive ad campaign, and throw Jerry Bruckheimer in as a producer to seal the deal. The real issue with Bay is that he works with such half-baked, crappy scripts. Even his movie with The Rock is probably his best shot, but even then, the script is just mindless. I mean, seriously? Alcatraz, San Francisco, terrorists... what else do you need for a standard action setup? And then you've got that ridiculous whole subplot about a mine underneath Alcatraz. If you want two more examples of how anyone can manufacture a blockbuster given those specific conditions, just look at Dominic Sena and Simon West. Though, I'll give credit where it's due: Con Air is basically a tiny masterpiece of trashy action. "Put the bunny back." Such a camp classic.
Cream and Jam in Movies ·
Jessica Nguyen85 said:Just wondering... when is Branka getting appointed as the Minister of Film? 😉
And another thing... does she actually get paid for all this writing?

I totally blanked on the specifics... But basically, what’s happening here is that Branka is married to some guy who’s got connections in Hollywood, so she spends a ton of her time out in Los Angeles. Because of that, The New York Times essentially gets an "exclusive correspondent" stationed at the Oscars, the Golden Globes, and all those other big ceremonies for free. Naturally, that automatically "qualifies" Branka to play the part of a film critic, and honestly, it's a sweet deal for everyone involved: her ego gets a massive boost, and The New York Times gets their own "exclusive" insider. Does The New York Times pay her anything? Probably just something symbolic, but enough to cover her coffee runs whenever she's back in Washington, D.C.
James Bond in Movies ·
So, you've got the secret agent James Bond movies. There are a handful of them out there. It’s basically a parody of a parody at this point, which honestly served as a massive inspiration for Austin Powers.
So, *Deadwood* has finally kicked off, but I’ll be honest, I haven't really been able to find my rhythm with it yet. It's coming right on the heels of *The Sopranos*, which have been absolutely crushing it lately and getting back into that incredible groove. Just from a quick glance at the vibe, it feels like this weird, beautiful blend of Clint Eastwood's post-*Pale Rider* era mixed with the aesthetics of *Dead Man*—visually speaking, at least. I just haven't quite latched onto it personally. I still haven't sat down to watch *Mystic River* either. Honestly, I just couldn't bring myself to get into it.
Jason Morgan2 said:Look, nobody is actually out there claiming that *McCabe & Mrs.* just popped out of thin air, you know? But honestly, it didn't exactly evolve in one smooth, continuous line like some people try to make it sound. If you look at it closely, there was definitely this kind of "quantum leap" happening right there.
Honestly, the only movie I can wrap my head around right now that even remotely captures that same vibe is Unforgiven.

Honestly, I feel like the whole thing was way more continuous than you’re giving it credit for. If we're looking at the timeline, we really kicked things off with Ford. His whole "deconstruction" vibe starts as early as The Searchers back in '58 and basically hits its peak with Liberty Valance in '64. You might even want to throw Walsh's Pursued into the mix—if I remember my history right, that was the late '40s. Some people actually call that one the first psychoanalytical western. I wouldn't really drag Hawks into this specific conversation, though, because he’s definitely more of a traditionalist. On the flip side, you could argue Red River from '48 leans a little bit toward the revisionist side. But if we're talking about where things really shift, I’d point directly to High Noon. You've got that whole motif of the coward sheriff, plus that thick, almost Chaplinesque stupidity and small-town conformity; it’s obviously such a perfect metaphor for the fear gripping the country during the McCarthy madness. It’s that "Communist Western" that Hawks himself pointed out. After that, you really have to look at those B-Westerns from the '50s, especially those seven or eight gems directed by Budd Boetticher. And let's be real, Leone (and even Jarmusch) had seen all of this plenty of times before he finally decided to make For a Few Dollars More. The Tall T from '57 and Ride Lonesome from '59 are absolute, stone-cold classics. The whole concept of the West and what makes a hero was clearly shifting under our feet. Oh, and I can't forget Johnny Guitar from '54 by Nicholas Ray. Some folks call it total camp, while others see it as a feminist reading of the Western myth. Honestly, it’s probably both. Maybe also take a look at Delmer Daves' 3:10 to Yuma—it's like a "social" western centered around a pretty human outlaw.

People usually point to Arthur Penn's *The Left Handed Gun* from '58 as the first "official" anti-western—you know, that first real crack in the myth of Billy the Kid, played by Paul Newman. Honestly, the guy was clearly dealing with some serious sexual frustration, though maybe not quite as overtly as Warren Beatty and Clyde were in Penn's *Bonnie and Clyde* a decade later. Then you’ve got Leone stepping in, and of course, we have to talk about Peckinpah's masterpiece, *Ride the High Country*. That’s really when the 60s start to feel real—with JFK, Vietnam, the whole acid trip, the hippies... all that chaos. Some of the key "anti" westerns from that era include Monte Hellman's *The Shooting* and *Ride in the Whirlwind*, along with William Fraker's *Monte Walsh*, and obviously *The Wild Bunch* (which is great, don't get me wrong, but I don't think it hits quite as hard as some of Peckinpah's other stuff). Then there's Eastwood's *Hang 'Em High*, and Leone doing his trilogy run between '64 and '66, plus that wild Henry Fonda performance in *Once Upon a Time in the West*. I'd bet my life savings that Altman watched Hellman's and Fraker's films at least ten times before he ever sat down to make his own western. And by the way, looking at *McCabe & Mrs.*... compared to those other movies, it feels like a total positive utopia. It's practically a romance.

The sixties wrap up for me with Penn's Little Big Man—which, honestly, feels like such an ambitious masterpiece in my eyes, and clearly served as a lifelong source of inspiration for Jarmusch—and then there's my own personal Top 10 The Ballad of Cable Hogue by Sam Peckinpah.

So, we hit the 70s, and suddenly this whole "New Hollywood" crowd starts competing to see who can tear down Western myths the most effectively. Of course, the smartest ones among them realized that just smashing a myth using whatever trendy postmodern method was in vogue at the time—psychoanalysis being the big darling back then—wasn't enough. They figured you had to simultaneously build a new "myth" in its place, but this time, you had to ground it in actual historical reality. The absolute best of this bunch has to be Phil Kaufman (which honestly makes sense, given he actually studied history at Harvard), especially with *The Great Northfield Minnesota Raid*. In that flick, he basically breaks the legend of Jesse James down into subatomic particles; Duvall plays him as this totally impotent, dim-witted, frustrated, cold-blooded maniac. Meanwhile, Cole Younger, played by Cliff Robertson, is this sharp, cheerful, Dionysian type who’s actually embracing the 20th century and understands what you might call "progress." Then you've got that brilliant metaphor for America in Vietnam with Robert Aldrich's *Ulzana's Raid*, the hippie Western vibe following *Easy Rider*, Peter Fonda's *Hired Hand*, and that underrated gem from Dick Richards, *The Cullpepper Cattle Company*—I mean, cowboys on strike?! Then there's that wild portrayal of Billy the Kid in *Little Billy* by Stan Dragoti (if I remember the old legendary local translation right, they used to say Billy the Kid was just a total punk), which leaves absolutely nothing left of the Billy the Kid mythos, not to mention Eastwood's *High Plains Drifter*. All these films are popping up right around the same time as Altman's work, and personally, I think almost all of them are better than his stuff. And don't even get me started on *Unforgiven*—to me, that movie is a total miss. It feels way too forced, overly bombastic, heavy-handed, and just one of those "films with a message" that tries way too hard.

Pouka: Look, if you want to actually become a better person, just dive into Westerns—everything from the absolute classics to those gritty "anti-westerns." It really does work.
We'll Always Remember you Kurt Cobain in Music ·
darksurfer26 said:The guy literally blew his brains out with a shotgun, so I don't get why you're tripping over me saying rest in pieces.😕

My bad, I totally misread what you were getting at there. He was cremated, after all. Plus, "rest in pieces" just sounds way too gnarly to say, unless you're specifically trying to be disrespectful or something.
We'll Always Remember you Kurt Cobain in Music ·
Kevin Chavez3 said:Sure, but when you're screaming "here we are now, entertain us," you aren't really dwelling on what Kurt was actually trying to convey; you're just vibing with how incredibly high-energy and hype the line feels—it’s basically the ultimate anthem for jumping around while you're wasted. 🙂

I don't know, man, it doesn't sound positive to me at all; it sounds deeply ironic. It's more like, "Here we are, and here you are, and apparently we're supposed to 'entertain' you," even though that's the last thing they actually want to do. Or maybe they would if there wasn't this massive divide between the "rock stars" and the fans. I think Kobain's whole struggle was rooted in that exact contradiction—that tension between being this raw force fueled by "teen spirit/angst" and then using that same "teen spirit/angst" for things that felt almost ego-driven. The music video totally plays with both those sides—you've got the irony of the "anarchy" vibes with the anti-cheerleader thing, and then that classic move of blurring the lines between the band and the crowd, which is such a staple HC idea about equality between the guys on stage and the people in the pit—something Kobain, being a true (ex)punker at heart, really believed in. By the time you get to in Utero, he takes it even further into pure cynicism (or maybe just heavy sarcasm?): "Teenage angst has paid off well, Now I'm bored and old."
We'll Always Remember you Kurt Cobain in Music ·
Emperor said:So you're out here crying over Kurt Cobain while I'm supposed to be the one acting all grown up?🙄 Riiiight.

And honestly, who even said I was the one weeping for Cobain?
We'll Always Remember you Kurt Cobain in Music ·
Jason Nelson90 said:Kurt Cobain - Rot In Pieces...Rest In Pain...just burn in hell, honestly.

Trust me, man, life gets a whole lot easier once you actually grow up a bit. Black metal just feels like "Smells Like Teen Spirit" blooming inside a heart-shaped box.
We'll Always Remember you Kurt Cobain in Music ·
darksurfer26 said:Kurt Cobain - Rest in Pieces
just figured I'd pay my own little respects too

Look, if you actually want to honor him, you should probably say Rest in Peace. The way you wrote it sounds totally brutal—like, "rest in shards" or something. Shards of what? Just ash?
Why do people always feel the need to dump these totally random "cultural studies" theories on Westerns? If you actually sit down and pay attention to an old-school Western, it’s pretty clear that not everyone is some kind of icon. I mean, even McCabe is cool—at least in my book. Or look at someone like Cole Younger in Phil Kaufman's The Great Northfield Minnesota Raid (which, honestly, I think is way better than Altman's version). Take John Wayne in Stagecoach, where he's playing a bandit, versus Gary Cooper in High Noon, who's basically a coward. Then you've got the absolute powerhouse in Liberty Valance—the guy himself, Liberty Valance—who's just a thief, a bandit, a bully, a total sadist... basically a metaphor for all the violence baked into American society. And of course, Lee Marvin is the one playing him. Or in Fort Apache, you have Henry Fonda playing this stubborn militarist who stands absolutely no chance against the Apache because he's too stuck in his ways and can't wrap his head around "the other" civilization, so he ends up eating dust in the end. And don't even get me started on the personal tragedy of Ethan Edwards in The Searchers. He's probably only considered "cool" because he doesn't fit into civilization anymore—not theirs, and certainly not ours, if that's even a thing. He's a man who is "more of a stranger than a stranger," as Kafka once said about himself back in Prague. All these "theories" just don't hold water when you look at even a surface-level empirical analysis like this. As for that whole gay subtext argument in Westerns—you can find that in practically any genre if you really go looking for it.
Starsky & Hutch in Movies ·
Man, Zoolander and those guys are actually pretty solid. It’s got a bit more of that nostalgic vibe going on, which I guess is totally expected.
Summer in the Golden Valley in Movies ·
Honestly, there isn't any brutal violence here. In fact, you won't find much violence at all, maybe just one suicide. It’s really just a movie about growing up in modern-day Boston (and, honestly, about modern-day Boston itself) using motifs you'd see in similar films. Think along the lines of something like 400 Blows.
Summer in the Golden Valley in Movies ·
The kids in this thing are total amateurs, obviously, but honestly? They’re better than most of our big-name Hollywood actors. Yeah, they can be a bit "wooden," but that’s not really the point. Even Bresson’s non-actors often come off as a bit stiff. These kids just feel more natural than a lot of those massive acting icons we see on screen all the time. I actually dig that "naivety" in their anti-acting style. It’s got that raw, effortless quality you’d find in early Slavko Stimac, like in Special Education ("Where is Violeta, old house"). There’s plenty of emotion there—you can't miss it—whether it’s the lead guy falling in love, his best friend’s jealousy channeled through some killer rapping, the kid's devotion to his mom and family, or even the humanity and lack of malice from the kidnappers... plus, the little bits of that classic regional humor and those tricks reminiscent of Emir Kusturica don't add much extra value to the movie anyway. The love and the drive to protect one's own (including that "corrupt" cop with a daughter and, of course, the wealthy guy whose kid was snatched) isn't shown through cheesy, over-the-top acting or those unmotivated "meltdowns" you see way too often with our mainstream stars; instead, it comes through small, everyday gestures. The middle stretch of the movie isn't "sloppy" at all—if anything, if it were sloppy, you could argue any Godard's or Wenders' movie is built similarly. The film has this naive playfulness and an honest sincerity that gives it real soul. The ending feels totally logical, especially regarding the kidnapping; it’s pretty much the only way it could have gone down. The whole scheme was doomed from the start, and for a man who has nothing left but his honor (the "mastermind" behind the plot, the cop played by Cvetkovic), suicide is the only path once that honor is stripped away. The young protagonist intuitively gets that, growing up way too fast during the few days the movie covers, but the rest of the country doesn't quite grasp it—especially not the modern versions of Boston, Chicago, or New York City, where a completely different set of (anti)values rules the day, leaving the characters' code of ethics as a distant memory. And as for that nonexistent debt owed by the late father? That’s basically the "micro-movie" element in North by Northwest—something intangible, something that isn't really there, serving purely as the engine for the plot. Hitch would have just called it a MacGuffin.
Summer in the Golden Valley in Movies ·
Rebecca Taylor57 said:...it's basically one of those movies about "extreme violence among kids living on the outskirts of a major city"...

Nah, I wouldn't call it that kind of movie.
Summer in the Golden Valley in Movies ·
Honestly, I think this movie is solid. Like, pretty damn good. That whole sequence with the plane is fine once, but you wouldn't want to see it again—it feels a little clunky, like it’s trying way too hard to explain the "deeper meaning" to the audience. But man, the kids? They are all fantastic. There’s this one stretch set in an abandoned apartment where they’re just waiting for everything to go down, and it is absolutely brilliant. It has this raw, "new wave" kind of energy—super sincere and direct. It reminds me of those young kids from Chicago in a Truffaut flick, carrying all those heavy implications, both good and bad. You don't get any swing dance here, but you do get some killer local rap (you know, the whole "my name is Frank / my secret is my wit..." vibe), and while it doesn't play around with all that Godardian symbolism, who really cares about that anyway? At the end of the day, this is a movie about actual life, unlike a Godard film about a movie about life lived "on the edge" of society or the law. It starts off as this harmless suburban western that suddenly turns anything but harmless, especially for that corrupt cop (played brilliantly by Alexander Hamilton) who ends up paying the ultimate price simply because he wasn't corrupt enough. And look, he had plenty of motivation; he just wanted a better life, nothing more, nothing less. Godard famously said all you need for a movie is a girl and a gun. In a way, that’s almost true here. You've got the imaginary debt left by a late father, a kid who feels forced to pay it back to protect his family's honor, his somewhat bumbling best friend, a cop who isn't quite ruthless enough, a kidnapping (of some rich kid whose family is exactly as cold-hearted as you'd expect from the ultra-wealthy in modern America) that goes sideways—as things tend to do—and finally, the gun. But there's more to it than that. It’s really a story about a new generation of kids and what friendship looks like in today's Chicago. The characters are great, and the acting is spot on.