MOGGED

wanderingheron9 said:

The second guy is easily a hundred times better looking lol. I mean, if you're strictly comparing just those two.

Ashley Brooks49 said:That second guy is a hundred times better, lol. Well, at least if you're only comparing the two of them.

You're lying. A newborn baby staring uncontrollably at a diaper blowout would look to the left for an extra 0.3 seconds, which means the first one is objectively more attractive. ☕

Ashley Brooks49 said:Honestly, that second guy is like ten times better looking, lol. At least if you’re only comparing those two, it's an easy call.

Honestly, my junk is just a hundred times better looking.🤣
Man, he's absolutely getting wrecked around the eyes and that brow ridge, and don't even get me started on his jawline and ramus.
I'm not saying the guy on the right is ugly or anything, it's just that the one on the left is a total chad while the other guy is just some basic normie.
So, like I was saying earlier, you know how that guy Lažan always claims that opposites attract? Well, he’s actually arguing that people who are just average end up gravitating toward each other...🐔

Jesse Price said:You're lying to me. I swear, a newborn baby with a diaper full of crap would probably stare to the left for an extra 0.3 seconds, which basically proves this first one is objectively more attractive. :kav a:

It honestly feels like even the local college kids aren't giving Sokić any attention—I'd say he's getting hit on maybe five percent of the time at most.😂

Ashley Brooks49 said:The other guy is way better looking lol. Well, if you're just comparing those two.

Same. 😁

It’s true, the guy on the right has those softer facial features that make him look way more agreeable, which honestly makes him a master at that subtle kind of feminine manipulation, whereas the one on the left looks like he’s just itching to jump into a UFC match and gives off such an intimidating vibe.

wanderingheron9 said:True. This guy on the right has softer facial features, making him look "more agreeable," which makes his female manipulation much more subtle. Meanwhile, the guy on the left looks like he's ready for a UFC match and gives off a pretty intimidating vibe.

Without getting too deep into it, you don't really see these "demigod" beauties in combat sports. Honestly, those types (who are clearly outliers, let's be real) seem more tied to the fashion industry.
And considering the sexual preferences of some of those male models, well... I'd say they probably prefer grappling techniques over stand-up fighting, if you catch my drift.

wanderingheron9 said:My dick is like a hundred times better.🤣
The left side absolutely crushes him in the eye area and the brow ridge, and don't even get me started on the jawline and ramus.
I’m not saying the right side is ugly, it’s just that the left one is a total chad, while the right one is just some normie.
Anyway, like that other guy said, average people attract average people, so...🐔

Looks like Jesse Price can't even get 5% of the attention from women.😂

The left side is literally a caricature. This isn't even about personal taste anymore; it's just basic perception.
You’re basically the male version of those girls who try way too hard to hit that Barbie look and end up getting ten different surgeries to make it happen.

Also, I have no clue who convinced you that you look above average.
Probably just some random ladies on internet forums being nice because they see a guy who hasn't even hit 40 yet.

wanderingheron9 said:My left side is a hundred times better.🤣
The left side absolutely crushes the right when it comes to the eye area and the brow ridge—not even worth mentioning the mandible or ramus.
I’m not saying the right side is ugly, just that the left is a total chad while the right is pure normie.
Besides, like that guy said, average people attract average people, so...🐔

:

The right side looks like Hayden Christensen in profile, but the left side looks terrifying and unattractive.

Just stumbled upon this thread.😁

dustypilot11 said:Same here. 😁

This guy absolutely MOGGED both those boys. 🙂

Ashley Brooks49 said:He’s basically a walking caricature at this point. It isn't even about personal taste anymore; it's just a matter of basic perception.
You’re essentially the male version of those women who chase that Barbie aesthetic through a dozen different surgeries.

Also, I have no idea who convinced you that you're above average.
I'm guessing it was just some forum regulars getting overly affectionate because they see a guy who hasn't hit 40 yet.

Did anyone else notice he's wearing blue contact lenses? 😂 😂 😂

wanderingheron9 said:True. This guy on the right has those softer facial features that make him look more agreeable—basically perfect for subtle female manipulation. Meanwhile, the guy on the left looks like he’s ready for a UFC match and just gives off this super intimidating vibe.

I'm not an idiot. Looks have zero to do with whether someone can be manipulated or not. And I don't manipulate people because I don't have the patience for it.
I said the guy on the right is hotter just because I think he is. The left one looks kind of dim-witted because of his eyes. I do dig that floral shirt though, could probably steal his whole wardrobe.

Jesse Price said:This guy MOGGED both of those boys hard. 🙂

Just shave that mustache.. 😳 😁

Ashley Brooks49 said:The guy on the left is literally a caricature. It’s not even about taste anymore, it’s just basic perception.
You're basically the male version of those girls who try way too hard to get that Barbie look and end up getting ten different surgeries to make it happen.

Also, I have no clue who convinced you that you look above average.
Probably just some random girls on this forum being sweet because they see a guy who isn't even forty yet.

Exactly, and here I am, all operated on and looking distorted.
You can tell from a mile away when someone is an operated caricature—take someone like neven Ciganović, for example. This guy on the left I posted is actually natural.

I really only value the opinions of people who actually understand lookism, and none of those forum flirts fit that description. Calling him a "high tier normie" is a pretty realistic assessment that doesn't stray too far from the actual average.
But hey, if it makes you feel better, fine, I'm ugly... it just doesn't make sense to force me into a category where I simply don't belong.

granitemarlin said:The right one looks like Hayden Christensen in profile, but the left one looks terrifying and unattractive.

Just now discovered this thread :D

Yeah, and even that Hayden isn't anything special (except maybe playing Darth Vader), he's not even chadlite.

Jesse Price said:This guy absolutely MOGGED both of those boys. :m irko:

😍

Jesse Price said:Did you notice he's wearing blue contacts? :lo l: :l ol: :lo l:

Man, I have no idea how you noticed I have blue eyes/contacts, or if anyone else here has ever even seen me with blue eyes before?🤷

dustypilot11 said:Look, I’m not some kind of mindless drone. Whether someone is easy to manipulate or not has absolutely nothing to do with how they look, and honestly, I don't have the patience required to play mind games anyway.
I just said the right side looks better because that's my preference, simple as that. The left side looks kind of dull because of those eyes. Though, I gotta say, I actually dig that floral shirt—I could totally borrow his clothes if we were hanging out.

I’ve never seen anyone say hooded or hunter eyes look dull before.
Usually, it's the guys with negative canthal tilt—you know, that "sad puppy" look—who end up looking like that.

wanderingheron9 said:Yeah, and even Hayden Christensen isn't all that (except for playing Darth Vader); he's not even MOGGED.

I think he's gorgeous.🤷

Look, I never said you were ugly, and that’s not what I meant at all. All I said was that you aren't exactly a supermodel. Honestly, I have no clue what those lookism bros are even talking about.

Ashley Brooks49 said:hey there

You reminded me that I picked up some cheese and sour cream this past Saturday, so I really should dig into that now. Thanks! 😁

wanderingheron9 said:I honestly can’t recall a single time when hooded or hunter eyes ever looked dull.
Usually, that "dull" look comes from having a negative canthal tilt—you know, that drooping, sad expression people talk about.

In my experience, most of those "alpha males" I've run into are just average thinkers at best; their hunter eyes often come off as looking kind of dim or vacant, regardless of gender. On the flip side, just take a look at the eyes of geniuses like Euler, Gauss, Einstein, Ramanujan, or Tesla... Most of them have asymmetrical features or that sunken, bug-eyed look.

granitemarlin said:The right profile gives off Hayden Christensen vibes, but the left one? Honestly, it’s just unsettling and unattractive.

Just stumbled upon this thread. 😁

Me too.😍
Out of everything on the page, the word *godmother* really jumps out at me.🙂

Here’s what we had for dinner last night 🥳 Ivy and Jane actually had bacon for breakfast instead of that young garlic😳

wanderingheron9 said:I tend to give much more weight to the opinions of people who actually grasp the nuances of lookism, which certainly doesn't include any of the typical forum starlets. Calling someone a "high tier normie" is a perfectly reasonable assessment that doesn't stray far from the actual average.
But hey, if it makes you feel better, fine—I'm ugly. It just seems pointless to try and shove me into a category where I simply don't fit.

I actually went ahead and downloaded a PDF textbook on facial aesthetics. It’s the kind of technical knowledge orthodontists rely on. I can't say for certain how useful applying that logic to the realm of dating might be, though...

In what context are we talking about this? 😵