CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Off-topic › Leggings lovers: Let's talk!

Leggings lovers: Let's talk!

Started by Harold Adams19 · · 👁 13 views · 135 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Harold Adams19Robert Castillo3Ethan Bailey18silverwolf88William Grant20rowdytiger13Jessica Morris6Maria Cox2Bradley White73Austin Hughes2Jeremy Johnson18stormygardener93Patrick Thomas29Walter Baker2Alexander Thompson
William Grant20 William Grant20 Active Member
94 messages
joined Mar 2022
#121 ·
Silvio, does Emily Ratajkowski possess that specific model aesthetic you're actually into?

https://nudbay.com/wp-content/upload...ski-nude-1.jpg
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#122 ·
William Grant20 said:Silvio, does Emily Ratajkowski have that model look you're into?

https://nudbay.com/wp-content/upload...ski-nude-1.jpg

LOL—are you really posting this right before the Forum shuts down?

Yeah, I'm into it. That's exactly my type—and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks so.

Except this one isn't wearing any lingerie. 😁
William Grant20 William Grant20 Active Member
94 messages
joined Mar 2022
#123 ·
silverwolf88 said:Haha, are you really posting this right before the whole forum gets shut down?

I certainly do, actually; it’s exactly my kind of thing, and I’m fairly certain I’m not the only one who shares that taste.

The forum isn't going anywhere. I've stepped up as the Chairman of the Commission, and we've already dissolved the Council. Now, the Commission holds all the cards. You can say whatever you want and be whoever you please. Alexander Thompson doesn't have a shred of authority left, and honestly, we're currently debating whether or not to just ban him entirely.😳
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#124 ·
William Grant20 said:The forum isn't going anywhere. I’ve taken over as Chairman of the Commission—we actually dissolved the Council entirely. Now, the Commission calls the shots. You can post whatever you want and be whoever you feel like being. Alexander Thompson doesn't hold any sway here anymore. In fact, we’re currently discussing whether to just ban him altogether. 😳

What does it even mean when they say the forum got a warning and needs to "fix what's wrong" internally?

Does that mean I should stop cluttering up the photo threads with my MK18+ builds and just browse instead? Or maybe if the ladies are interested, I could start posting my own photos too?
William Grant20 William Grant20 Active Member
94 messages
joined Mar 2022
#125 ·
silverwolf88 said:What does it actually mean when they say the forum got a warning, implying we need to fix whatever is broken internally?

Does it mean I should stop cluttering up the image threads with my MK18+ setup and just stick to lurking? Or maybe it means if the ladies are interested, I can go ahead and post my own shots?

Exactly.

Is that really what you're looking for? And while we're at it, which other sub-forums have you been getting flagged in?
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#126 ·
William Grant20 said:Exactly.

So you want that? Which other sub-forums are you planning to hijack?

Look—between Alternative and Men's Corner, if the discrimination actually stops, then I won't have to keep preaching about equal rights. If things level out, I won't need to spam threads about equality or even my leggings—I'll just follow the rules, provided those rules actually apply to everyone equally. My whole goal was to prove a point, but since the American media won't give me an inch of airtime, I turned to this forum. That’s why I was going off-topic, which clearly annoyed some of you. Fine, I'll fix my mistake and stick to the actual subjects—like the Alternative board and so on. If I step out of line, just tell me and I'll happily fall in line. I only get rebellious when I feel the playing field isn't level; if it is, I've got nothing to complain about. Is that clear enough for everyone?
Alexander Thompson Alexander Thompson Active Member
185 messages
joined Apr 2018
#127 ·
William Grant20 said:The Forum isn't going anywhere. Look, I actually stepped up as the head of the Commission. We basically dissolved the Council entirely, so the Commission calls the shots now. Which means... well, you can write whatever you want and be whoever you feel like being. Alexander Thompson doesn't have any real pull anymore. Honestly, we're even tossing around the idea of just banning him altogether 😳

The Commission is totally illegitimate—we’re probably gonna get the whole lot of you arrested. They want to run a Commission when they don't even understand basic math 🤦.

Oh, and by the way, there's no plan to scrap the primaries for now.

Nobody is to blame here but yourselves; you really cooked this one up on your own.
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#128 ·
Alexander Thompson said:The Commission is illegal and we’re going to have you all arrested. They want to run a Commission when they don't even understand basic math 🤦.

By the way, there's no abolishing of partials for now.

Nobody is to blame here but yourselves—you cooked this up.

Who actually reviews mathematical derivations of kinetic energy—psychiatrists, or mathematicians and physicists?
Which psychiatrist were you talking about in this link

and did she perhaps say that my pathetic paper shouldn't be published, the one you linked here

why none of my work gets published because of "delusions" and "insanity"—did she tell you I don't know math or what? I'm asking because you mentioned it
Which psychiatrist are we talking about? Is it the one who forcibly committed me to the psychiatric ward before America joined the European Union and passed those human rights laws—the one who worked at the Rovinj Adult Education Center and also at the Pula Psychiatry Department—and was that her connection to the Independent Democratic Party you're writing about?
Is it that same psychiatrist who told me back in 2006 (before the EU and human rights laws in America) that I didn't look "normal" wearing leggings like this? Is that the psychiatrist you were referring to in your post?
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#129 ·
silverwolf88 said:Who actually reviews mathematical derivations of kinetic energy—psychiatrists or mathematicians and physicists?
Which psychiatrist were you referring to in this link

And did she perhaps say that none of my work should be published—the stuff I wrote in this link

Why shouldn't any of my papers be published because of some supposed "delusion" or insanity? And did she tell you that I don't understand math or what? I’m asking because you mentioned it
Which psychiatrist are we talking about here? Is it the one who forcibly committed me to the psychiatric ward back before America joined the European Union and before human rights laws were established—the one who worked at the Rovinj Adult Education Center and also at the Pula Psychiatry Department—and is that the connection to the Independent Democratic Party you're writing about?
Is it that same psychiatrist who told me back in 2006 (before the US joined the EU and before human rights laws in America) that I didn't look "normal" wearing leggings like this? Is that the woman you meant in your post?

Did you get your information from that psychiatrist in this link

and are you somehow involved in making sure none of my mathematical derivation papers ever see the light of day?
Alexander Thompson Alexander Thompson Active Member
185 messages
joined Apr 2018
#130 ·
Djokica, those unwritten papers of yours aren't getting published, and honestly, here’s why:

1. They don't actually exist—which should be reason enough, I guess, but let's be real. All those scribbles you keep tossing around? Those aren't "papers," they're just heaps of random scrawl.
2. Shuffling math equations around without any actual substance isn't what we call scientific research.
3. You clearly haven't got a clue about the physics you're trying to "revolutionize" with your little "works."

And look, all that stuff about your mental health that you constantly post about... it doesn't interest me, and frankly, there are actual professionals for that kind of thing.

Side note: Posting videos of yourself grooming a stray cat on YouTube isn't a scholarly contribution. It's just killing time.

Anyway, is the Forum still standing? 😒

I suppose even you didn't see that coming 🤦
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#131 ·
Alexander Thompson said:Djokica, those unwritten papers of yours aren't getting published for several reasons:

1. They don't exist—which should be reason enough, but I’ll give you a few more. Those piles of scribbles you toss around aren't "papers"; they're just heaps of nonsense.
2. Mindlessly shuffling math formulas around isn't a scientific paper.
3. You clearly have zero grasp of the physics you're trying to "revolutionize" with your "work."

And frankly, I couldn't care less about the psychiatric issues you constantly drone on about—there are actual professionals for that.

P.S. Filming yourself grooming some random stray cat on YouTube isn't research. It's just wasting time.

Anyway, is the Forum still standing? 😒

I guess you didn't see that coming either. 🤦


You keep lying about me just because I actually wrote a paper (with a few formal touches I’ll polish after peer review), which I then emailed to various American mathematical journals along with a scan of my ID. Clearly, you either don't have that info or you're lying through your teeth—maybe because you know psychiatrists aren't qualified to review mathematical proofs, or maybe it's because you're against astrology, or perhaps you just hate men in leggings? Who knows.

I am writing about the mathematical analysis I performed—purely mathematical proofs—so what does it matter if I'm an amateur in physics? Some scientists have told me that amateurs have published their work before; it doesn't matter if you're a pro or a novice, all that matters is whether the work passes peer review.

Are you suggesting that because you have more money than I do, the law won't apply to you and you can somehow block the review of my proofs? My lawyers tell me that the United States is a nation of laws—it seems rather inconvenient for you to think you can intimidate people into stopping a mathematical review just because you have deep pockets.
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#132 ·
I just left my lawyer's office after picking up my printed paper. I actually asked him if I should have a mathematician or maybe a physicist take a look at the findings—just to be safe. His response? He told me that even if my work turns out to be completely wrong, nobody has the legal right to claim I didn't write it—because, at the end of the day, it's my intellectual property.
Alexander Thompson Alexander Thompson Active Member
185 messages
joined Apr 2018
#133 ·
silverwolf88 said:So, I swung by my lawyer's office to pick up my printed paper—you know how it goes—and I actually asked him if he thought a mathematician or maybe some physicist should take a look at it. His response? He basically told me that even if my work is totally off base, nobody has the legal right to claim I didn't write it, because at the end of the day, it's my own intellectual property.

Look, Djokica, there's no denying it’s your work—it was written using your own knowledge, your perspective, and whatever skills you have. But honestly? That doesn't make it a scientific paper, nor does it give it any actual weight in the academic world.

Maybe have the lawyer send it over to those journals you've been trying to get into? Since they haven't bitten yet, who knows... maybe a different approach? 🤔

image
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#134 ·
Alexander Thompson said:Djokica, look—it’s clearly your own work, written based on your own level of understanding and skill. But that doesn't make it a scientific paper, nor does it give it any actual weight.

Maybe have a lawyer send it to those journals you've been unsuccessfully pitching? 🤔

image

Where exactly are you getting off deciding what I know? Have you even actually looked at my work? Are you an editor for the math journals I submitted to? How could you possibly have reviewed my research to claim it isn't accurate if you haven't even seen it?
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#135 ·
Yet another failed thread about leggings—mostly because anyone who wants to shut down the conversation just labels me as ignorant or unhinger, effectively silencing any actual discussion

It looks like the playbook for people against men wearing leggings is simply to gaslight them into thinking they're crazy

They target the small minority of guys actually wearing them, hoping to intimidate everyone else into staying home
silverwolf88 silverwolf88 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#136 ·
If men in leggings finally get the same rights they have in the majority here in America, then I can finally stop posting so much about guys in leggings

I’ve been persistent because my English isn't great—plus, mainstream American media never gave me a platform to express how difficult it’s been being part of this male minority in leggings for all these years. That's why I started writing on this forum; it's the only outlet (admittedly a small one) where I felt I could make it known that such a minority actually exists

Look, if this specific male minority in the US has finally achieved equal rights, then I can go ahead and sell my music and publish my math papers [/B]. But if we still haven't secured those rights, then the road ahead is long and I'll need to seek help from many more people. Honestly, it would be so much simpler if history just shifted and men started wearing leggings en masse—then this whole crisis would blow over and we wouldn't be dealing with this constant dictatorship over minorities by certain groups. I've been wearing leggings for about twenty years now, and I know firsthand the kind of trouble people cause me—always digging for excuses, claiming I don't understand math or astrology, or that my original songs aren't any good...

It makes you wonder what's going on with American astrologers, too—why there are so many women and so few men in that field, and whether they're just trying to test my knowledge of astrology

The very first thread on this forum where I was unwelcome was the astrology topic

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads