CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderator isn't doing their job

Moderator isn't doing their job

Started by Sean Reyes · · 👁 5 views · 49 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sean ReyesRobin Fisher53Mark Sullivan62Susan Patel55rowdytrucker12feralcanyon73dustymason10Carl WilsonEmily Myers8darktiger60Steven Perez13Eric Martinez42rustydrifter10Matthew Fox4
darktiger60 darktiger60 Newcomer
1 message
joined May 2019
#41 ·
It’s true that things have gotten a bit exaggerated on the forum lately—lots of sarcasm flying around—but I really don't think this second instance warranted closing the thread. Sure, the first time around was necessary just to let everyone cool off a bit.

Regarding the moderation side of things—if it's even possible to change—I feel like an AC discussion should ideally be handled by someone who actually knows their stuff about HVAC systems. If that's not doable, then fine... but given how much activity there is here, it would be great to have someone who hangs out in this specific sub-forum more often.
rowdytrucker12 rowdytrucker12 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2019
#42 ·
darktiger60 said:It’s undeniable that there have been instances of exaggeration and heavy sarcasm on this forum. Regardless, I wouldn't argue that the thread needed to be locked a second time. The first time was justified, as certain individuals clearly needed to cool off.

Regarding moderation, if it's at all possible, a thread dedicated to air conditioning units should ideally be overseen by a moderator with actual expertise in the subject matter. If that isn't feasible, then so be it, but given how much activity occurs here, the moderator ought to be someone who actively follows this specific topic.

Exaggeration?

People are out here claiming a cheap AC unit can't even cool a 170-square-foot room. Then, the moment you challenge their logic, they immediately resort to insults.
Sean Reyes Sean Reyes NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Jul 2018
#43 ·
rowdytrucker12 said:A little exaggeration?

It’s honestly scary how they claim a cheap AC unit can't even handle a tiny 170-square-foot room. And the second you call them out on it, they just start throwing insults.

The guy wasn't talking about an exaggeration. Don't jump into a debate if you don't actually know what's being discussed.
Steven Perez13 Steven Perez13 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Mar 2015
#44 ·
rowdytrucker12 said:Maybe a bit of an exaggeration?

It’s kind of intimidating when people claim a cheap AC unit can't even cool down a 170-square-foot room. And then, if you dare disagree, they just start hurling insults.

First off, nobody was trying to scare me. I’m fully aware that even a budget brand from overseas—something half the price of the Daikin I ended up buying—could probably cool my 170 square feet. I guess the real question is how long it would last or if I'd actually be happy with it. Nobody ever told me it was impossible to get the job done with a budget unit or some other cheap brand... but since I didn't really want to gamble on it, I went with a brand recommended by some folks on this forum (who clearly know their stuff regarding HVAC), though every shop I visited also pointed me toward a Japanese brand. Secondly, I genuinely value the advice from everyone who shared their thoughts and helped out. My choice to go with a big-name manufacturer was ultimately what I wanted, and the forum just helped nudge me in the right direction. The discussion actually helped me make up my mind.

If you ask me, about 90% of this was a constructive conversation. I don't see any reason to lock the thread because of it. Maybe some parts should have been moved to the "seasonal cooling" section to calm things down, but shutting down a productive thread like this feels pretty unnecessary.
Mark Sullivan62 Mark Sullivan62 Active Member
147 messages
joined Jul 2009
#45 ·
Locking a thread is basically just a lazy moderator's way out when they aren't actually doing their job; it’s a tactic used just to let things blow over on its own without any real intervention.
Without putting in much effort, sweat, or actual time.
Anyone who actually knows how to moderate—and actually wants to—never resorts to locking a topic.
Because if you’re truly moderating, you shouldn’t be letting things escalate to the point where slamming the door shut is your only remaining option.

I spent about four years acting as a moderator for those big national news sites and economic forums, and as far back as I can remember, I never once locked a single thread.

But then you look at the "pinnacle" of management, like that housing discussion regarding AC units—they lock that one for ten days straight just because, apparently, she’s too busy to deal with it.

And get this: that AC thread is easily the most active topic on the site with the highest view counts; just add up all four threads about air conditioning and you'll see what I mean.

Locking the most popular thread simply because someone lacks the time or the will to actually moderate is a massive blow to the community's growth and engagement from a marketing perspective.

It’s honestly bizarre that none of these "super mods" or administrators seem to grasp that.

Lisa Young83 obviously doesn't get it, because heaven forbid she takes a moment out of her hectic schedule to actually think about it.
Eric Martinez42 Eric Martinez42 Newcomer
1 message
joined May 2019
#46 ·
To be perfectly honest, I found myself unable to keep up with all the recent discussions.

As the saying goes, the whole point of this forum is to share perspectives, personal experiences, and individual opinions. It shouldn't bother anyone if a troll pops up or someone decides to misrepresent the facts.

In the end, there are always more people telling the truth than those who aren't.
Sean Reyes Sean Reyes NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Jul 2018
#47 ·
Is any moderator besides the one who just aggressively hands out bans whenever someone rightfully calls her out—even when most regular users agree on the issue—actually going to look at this thread? It’s already three pages long.

If we want technical threads to actually work and stay organized, it’s obvious we need a new moderator. Right now, she’s just banning people because they dared to tell her the truth. I even reached out through the Democratic Party to ask her to either do her job properly or step down, but I didn't want to make a whole thing out of it. Can you believe it? This thread is crawling with trolls and absolutely nothing has been done about it. Mods, with all due respect, you look ridiculous.

At least be honest. Just admit you don't care and that there aren't any actual rules being followed here—just personal vendettas. Admit you don't feel like listening to what the majority of the community wants. If moderation here is just pure tyranny and ego, just say so. That way, people know where they stand. Don't pretend there's "moderation" or "rules" happening when there clearly isn't.

Just be straight with us, if you're capable of that.

Sean Reyes, Ford, Mark Sullivan62, Monster Energy, Hawker, hero, Fitz, darktiger60, Steven Perez13, Eric Martinez42—these are just some of the folks chiming in here. We all agree: the moderator needs to go, and the mod team needs a complete overhaul. At least ten different users are complaining that the moderation is non-existent and lazy. We all think she has no clue what she's doing and is effectively killing the discussion. Are we really supposed to play dumb and act like we're the problem? Like it's our fault instead of the fault of a vindictive moderator who refuses to do her job?

It’s pathetic and honestly embarrassing. 👎
rowdytrucker12 rowdytrucker12 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2019
#48 ·
Sean Reyes said:Will one of the moderators—aside from the one who just aggressively hands out bans whenever someone rightfully calls her out or when the majority of regular users agree on a point—finally take a look at this thread? It’s already three pages long.

If we want technical threads to actually function properly, it is obvious that we need new moderation. The current moderator issues bans simply because someone had the audacity to tell her the truth. I even reached out via the Democratic Party to ask her to either do her job properly or step aside, though I didn't want to make a scene. Imagine that. This entire thread is nothing but pure troll behavior and absolutely nothing has been done about it. With all due respect to the mod team, you are being ridiculous.

I have no idea where you get the authority to label me a troll.

In my previous post, I listed some of the "advice" you provided in the HVAC thread:

The moderator's actions were justified. Although, frankly, posts like yours should probably result in a warning, given how often you vanish from the discussion.

Furthermore, you sent me insulting and threatening private messages, yet you have the nerve to call me a troll.

Pathetic and laughable! 👎

It is pathetic when certain users turn a discussion thread into their own personal advertising campaign.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#49 ·
Locking threads, whether it's just for a little while or permanently depending on how things look, is a pretty standard tool in any moderator's toolkit. It’s also completely normal if someone doesn't have the bandwidth to dive into deep moderation every single day—most of our mods have actual lives outside of the internet, after all! None of that should ever be seen as a reason to let someone go. That being said, looking back at her track record, I honestly think Lisa Young83 is doing a fantastic job as a moderator, and I have absolutely no intention of removing her. If we need to step up the oversight, the administration team will hash that out internally, just like we always do.
Matthew Fox4 Matthew Fox4 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2011
#50 ·
Just a quick heads-up regarding my notice about issuing warnings for rule violations, which I posted on May 5th. Sean Reyes actually ended up getting two strikes—one for going off-topic with 10 points and another for trolling with 25—so, yeah, those added up and led to his ban. So, that whole conspiracy theory about me banning Sean Reyes out of spite just because he started a thread in the off-topic section? Totally doesn't hold water.

I’ve been working hard to go through all the deleted posts from the last three weeks. Honestly, none of them had any penalties applied yet. And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve stepped in to ask everyone to please stop the mutual insults, the trolling, and the off-topic chatter. Usually, after I post a reminder like that, I just get hit with messages attacking me personally or calling me an incompetent moderator who doesn't even understand what we're talking about in the first place. It’s a bit much, really.

There are still more posts that need to be cleared out from before this list, but I haven't quite gotten around to "processing" them yet since some more important stuff popped up in my life outside the forum. Most of these are just posts from the usual group of people on this list.

9:27 PM, 04/15/2019. Steven Perez13
9:49 PM, 04/15/2019. Steven Perez13
9:52 PM, 04/15/2019. Steven Perez13
4:17 PM, 04/16/2019. Steven Perez13
11:12 PM, 04/16/2019. Steven Perez13
11:19 PM, 04/16/2019. Steven Perez13
11:26 PM, 04/16/2019. Steven Perez13
1:20 PM, 04/17/2019. Steven Perez13
1:32 PM, 04/17/2019. Steven Perez13
6:42 PM, 04/18/2019. Steven Perez13
6:45 PM, 04/18/2019. Steven Perez13

9:29 PM, 04/15/2019. Hawker
9:34 PM, 04/15/2019. Hawker
9:37 PM, 04/15/2019. Hawker
9:45 PM, 04/15/2019. Hawker
1:15 PM, 04/17/2019. Hawker
1:24 PM, 04/17/2019. Hawker

9:32 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:33 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:36 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:38 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:39 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:42 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
9:44 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
1:35 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
4:13 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
4:15 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
11:13 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
11:21 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
11:29 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
11:35 PM, 04/16/2019. N/A
1:22 PM, 04/17/2019. N/A

9:46 PM, 04/15/2019. Sean Reyes
9:47 PM, 04/15/2019. Sean Reyes
1:30 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
1:34 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
1:37 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
4:16 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
11:09 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
11:23 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
11:25 PM, 04/16/2019. Sean Reyes
1:28 PM, 04/17/2019. Sean Reyes
1:28 PM, 04/17/2019. Sean Reyes
1:30 PM, 04/17/2019. Sean Reyes
6:47 PM, 04/18/2019. Sean Reyes
6:48 PM, 04/18/2019. Sean Reyes
10:55 AM, 04/24/2019. Sean Reyes

9:47 PM, 04/15/2019. N/A
1:34 PM, 04/17/2019. N/A

9:50 PM, 04/15/2019. nidi
9:53 PM, 04/15/2019. nidi
4:14 PM, 04/16/2019. nidi
4:18 PM, 04/16/2019. nidi
11:13 PM, 04/16/2019. nidi
11:14 PM, 04/16/2019. nidi
11:16 PM, 04/16/2019. nidi
1:17 PM, 04/17/2019. nidi
1:19 PM, 04/17/2019. nidi
6:43 PM, 04/18/2019. nidi
6:44 PM, 04/18/2019. nidi

11:15 PM, 04/16/2019. Ford
1:30 PM, 04/17/2019. Ford
1:31 PM, 04/17/2019. Ford
1:36 PM, 04/17/2019. Ford
1:38 PM, 04/17/2019. Ford

11:30 PM, 04/16/2019. Mark Sullivan62
11:34 PM, 04/16/2019. Mark Sullivan62
1:13 PM, 04/17/2019. Mark Sullivan62
1:18 PM, 04/17/2019. Mark Sullivan62
1:25 PM, 04/17/2019. Mark Sullivan62
1:37 PM, 04/17/2019. Mark Sullivan62
1:41 PM, 04/17/2019. Mark Sullivan62
10:53 AM, 04/24/2019. Mark Sullivan62

1:14 PM, 04/17/2019. homosapiens
1:15 PM, 04/17/2019. homosapiens

1:25 PM, 04/17/2019. Android-split
1:29 PM, 04/17/2019. Android-split
1:33 PM, 04/17/2019. Android-split
1:35 PM, 04/17/2019. Android-split

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads