CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Dentistry & Oral Hygiene › Full upper extraction and 6-unit bridge

Full upper extraction and 6-unit bridge

Started by Lisa Myers27 · · 👁 4 views · 3 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Lisa Myers27David White2coppergardener
Lisa Myers27 Lisa Myers27 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jan 2023
#1 ·
So, I was recently advised—as the title suggests—to have both my front two teeth extracted along with a six-unit bridge (32 xx 23) on my upper jaw.

The word from the dentist is that my bone density just isn't there, making implants a non-starter. Honestly, I’m not entirely surprised; I’ve been dealing with a continuous dental and orthodontic saga involving these two specific teeth since I was a kid.

Now, because I have this habit of wanting to be fully informed before undergoing major procedures, I have a question:

In the long run, is this actually a POOR option? Specifically, what am I looking at in terms of bone loss, tooth shifting, or other complications 10, 15, or even 20 years down the line?

Has anyone else here dealt with a similar situation where those two front teeth were replaced by being part of a bridge rather than individual units?

For context, I’m 34 years old.

Thanks in advance for any insight. 🙂
David White2 David White2 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2017
#2 ·
Henry Nguyen said:So, as the title suggests, I was recently advised to have both my front teeth extracted along with a six-unit bridge (32 xx 23) on my upper jaw.

I was told my bone density is too poor to support implants—which doesn't surprise me, given the lifelong dental and orthodontic saga I've endured with these two specific teeth since I was a kid.

Since I have a habit of wanting to know every detail before undergoing major procedures, here is my question:

In the long run, is this a BAD option? What am I looking at in terms of bone loss, tooth shifting, or other complications 10, 15, or 20 years down the line?

Does anyone else here deal with a similar situation where both front teeth are part of a bridge rather than being individual units?

For context, I am 34 years old.

Thanks for the input. 🙂

What exactly does "poor bone condition" mean in your case? I actually dealt with a nearly identical situation myself. These days, it is handled quite successfully through augmentation—using either synthetic or autologous bone grafts.
That route takes longer, but from a long-term perspective, it is a far superior option. If your surrounding teeth are healthy, it would be a shame to grind them down just to anchor a bridge if it isn't absolutely necessary.

My advice is to slow down and seek out several more opinions. Don't settle for one dentist; find a few high-quality practices based on solid recommendations. Many clinics offer free initial consultations.
The only thing you really need is an orthopantomogram or a CBCT scan for a proper assessment. If you don't have one, they will charge you for it there. If you decide to get one done yourself, bring a copy with you and leave the original at home.

That’s all for now. I truly hope you receive a second opinion that offers a different perspective. In fact, when dealing with restorative work of this magnitude, getting a second opinion isn't just suggested—it's essential.
Lisa Myers27 Lisa Myers27 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jan 2023
#3 ·
First off—thanks for the input 🙂

The bone density isn't great because of an old surgery and some issues with how one of the teeth grew in (we actually had to pull it out, first surgically and then via orthodontics).
Plus, the teeth being prepped for the bridge have been wearing veneers for years now, so I don't really see it as a loss to grind them down.

Anyway, if you happen to know, I’d really appreciate an answer to my original question—what exactly is the long-term downside to getting a bridge and having both units extracted?
Is there any risk of jawbone weakening or anything along those lines?
coppergardener coppergardener Active Member
137 messages
joined Jun 2006
#4 ·
If I were in your shoes—and I truly mean this—I would certainly seek out a second opinion from a specialist who deals specifically with bone grafting procedures. It’s a complex field, isn't it? In my view, if you can meet the necessary clinical criteria for an implant, it really stands as the superior long-term solution—mostly because it helps stimulate the surrounding bone structure. Of course, there is the matter of the price tag; it will undoubtedly be a more significant investment upfront. My assumption, though, is that the bone density beneath the bridge itself—not counting the anchor teeth, mind you—is currently insufficient, which could lead to further bone loss if left unaddressed.
You're still young, so if your budget allows for it, I say go for it and keep pushing for the best possible outcome.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads