Monitor buying guide (mega-thread)

https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-se2719hr/dp/
I'm looking for a new monitor. My current Dell is hitting its 10-year mark and starting to struggle. I haven't kept up with the latest tech, so I'm asking for advice. I've been looking at this one from the link, but the specs don't mean much to me. Price is my main priority! Just kidding... but seriously, any advice would be appreciated.

I've been hunting for a solid 27-inch monitor for myself lately.
Is this one really the best bang for my buck? (I've got about $1000 roughly $15-$30 extra to play with)

DELL Alienware AW2720HF

Purchased. The Dell UltraSharp is a solid choice. $500.

Here are the specs for the Dell UltraSharp. It’s a 27-inch, 16:9 display with a crisp QHD resolution. The OLED panel delivers great viewing angles at 178° and hits 250 cd/m2 brightness with a 1000:1 contrast ratio. Response time is a solid 4 ms. Connectivity includes D-Sub, HDMI, and DisplayPort. This is a sleek, black, flat monitor featuring a tilt stand and a 75 Hz refresh rate. It’s also equipped with Energy Star certification, NVIDIA G-Sync, Flicker-free technology, and Night Shift.e

Here is my experience. I am completely disappointed with this monitor. I'm returning it tomorrow. Up until now, I was using a Samsung monitor.

This General Electric monitor with its IPS panel doesn't even come close to an Apple when it comes to color accuracy. The viewing angles are pretty rough, too. Sure, you can see the image from the side, but the colors look completely washed out. As soon as you move away from the center, the vibrancy just dies. Even sitting only 15 inches away, I’m seeing a gray tint around the edges. Plus, if I watch something in a dark room, the backlight bleed is so bad it's like having a lamp turned on in the room even when the screen is black. 😢 Honestly, this doesn't even feel like an IPS panel. Usually, you only see these kinds of issues on TN screens. I tried playing around with the settings to fix it, but raising the contrast from 50 to 60 or higher just causes the screen to shift drastically into blue tones. It’s a disaster. While the monitor looks decent physically, I expect high-quality picture performance from a display, not just a nice stand.
Evopar shows how it looks in photos, but seeing it in person is even better.



Maybe I'm expecting too much from an IPS panel.

I'm back on the hunt for a new 27-inch monitor again. $667 I don't mind spending a little less either.🙂

I'm not looking for a gaming rig, but I need at least a 75Hz refresh rate. Image quality is my priority, especially for reading in a browser and viewing static images. I might run a game here and there, but mostly I just play strategy titles.
Whether it's IPS VA or something else doesn't really matter to me. As long as the picture quality is solid and the colors are accurate, I'm happy. This particular model fails on both counts; the image isn't great and the colors aren't true to life.

I have an old Dell at work, and honestly, I love the picture quality. The colors are a bit more vibrant, but I'd much rather have that than the washed-out look on this General Electric.

I'm looking into trying out some Dell 27-inch models, but this JAOC one has definitely caught my eye.

The AOC 27G2U5/BK features an IPS panel. Looking for a solid gaming monitor? You need to prioritize performance. Focus on refresh rates and response times to stay ahead of the competition. A high-quality display makes all the difference in immersion. Make sure you check the color accuracy and brightness levels before buying. It is an investment in your setup.

Looks like I've got a fast one in the group too. The AOC 27G2U/BK is a solid choice. It delivers great performance for the price point. If you need a reliable setup, this monitor gets the job done without any fuss. Highly recommended. Aside from the 144Hz refresh rate—which I'm not sure I actually need—I don't see many other major differences. If this one offers better image quality along with that frequency, I'll happily drop the extra $300.$133 More details on that higher-end model.

And there it is. The AOC Q3279VWFD8 is a solid choice. It gets the job done without any unnecessary fluff. If you need reliable performance, this is a dependable option. I'm looking at a few LED monitors right now. One of them feels a bit too large for my setup, but if the picture quality is truly top-tier, I don't mind the extra size.

I don't get why this cheap Dell 75Hz IPS is even being discussed. The Dell SE2719HR is a solid choice. It performs exactly as you would expect from a reliable brand like Dell. It’s a dependable option for everyday tasks.

I’m returning this General Electric monitor. It’s marketed as QHD, but I’d much rather spend my money on an FHD display with great color accuracy than deal with a 2K screen that looks washed out.

If there’s a Dell model in this price range, I'd love to hear from anyone who has actually used one. Any recommendations?

Arthur Anderson10 said:Bought a General Electric 275E1S $500.

275E1S, 27-inch, 16:9, OLED panel, 2560x1440, 250 cd/m2, 1000:1, 178 °, 178 °, 4 ms, D-Sub, HDMI, DP, Flat, Black, Tilt stand, 75 Hz, Energy Star, NVIDIA G-Sync, Flicker-free, Night Shifte

Here’s my take. I am completely let down by this monitor. I’m taking it back tomorrow. Up until now, I was using a Samsung monitor.

This General Electric with its supposed OLED panel doesn't even come close to the color reproduction of my old Samsung. Even the viewing angles are a mess; you can see the image from the side, but the colors just wash out entirely. The moment you move away from the center, the saturation dies. Even when I sit about 16 inches away, there is this gray haze creeping in at the edges. In a pitch-black room, when displaying black, the backlight bleed is so bad you don't even need a lamp in the room because the screen provides enough light itself while "off."😢 It feels like it isn't even an OLED panel. Usually, you see these issues with TN screens. I tried messing with the settings, but raising the contrast from 50 to 60 or higher just turns the whole display blue. A disaster. Visually, the unit looks fine, but I expect a good picture from a monitor, not just a nice-looking stand.
Evopar, look at how it appears in photos versus how it actually looks in person.

Maybe I’m asking too much from an OLED panel?

Now I’m back on the hunt for a 27" monitor, up to $667 though I wouldn't mind spending a little less if the value is right.🙂

It won't be for gaming, but it needs to hit at least 75Hz. To me, color accuracy for static images and reading in a browser is more important than frame rates, though I might run a game occasionally—mostly strategy games.
Whether it is IPS VA or something else doesn't really matter to me, as long as the image is sharp and the colors are accurate. This one I mentioned above fails on both counts.

At work, I use an old Dell, and in my opinion, the picture quality is excellent. The colors might be a bit punchy, but I'd much rather have oversaturated colors than no color at all, which is what this General Electric offers.

Right now, I'm looking at a potential Dell 27" model, but this AOC has caught my eye too.

AOC 27G2U5/BK OLED gaming monitor

And I see there is a faster sibling available. AOC 27G2U/BK monitor though unless there is some other major difference besides the 144Hz—which isn't a huge deal for me—I'm not sure. If this one has better image quality in addition to the refresh rate, I'll happily shell out that extra $300.$133

Then there is also the AOC Q3279VWFD8 LED monitor, which is a strong contender, though it might be a bit too large for me (but if the picture is great, I can live with the size).

I also don't quite get how this Dell is so cheap for a 75Hz OLED. Dell SE2719HR OLED

The General Electric I'm returning is QHD, but honestly, I'd rather buy an FHD monitor with a great picture for the same price than a 2K one with washed-out colors.

If anyone has tried a Dell in this price range and has a recommendation, please let me know.

Cheap General Electric 27-inch 1440p monitor,😁You’re asking too much and being completely unrealistic about what you expect. Given where the General Electric brand stands today, I personally wouldn't recommend any of their TV or PC monitor hardware.

The AOC 32-inch QHD IPS has its flaws, but considering the size and resolution, it’s actually quite cheap. The main drawbacks—which vary depending on the specific unit—include some fairly significant backlight bleed. The Anti-glare coating is also a bit aggressive; I’ve looked at it myself, and various tests mention that exact issue. For years, I relied on a BenQ AMVA 27-inch FHD monitor. Specifically, the BenQ GW2760HS (which I picked up back in 2014 for $500), and I was incredibly satisfied with it. That BenQ didn't have any noticeable backlight bleed issues. It hasn't died on me either; it's six years old and doesn't have a single dead pixel. The BenQ will be heading to a clearance sale soon, and currently, I'm using a Samsung 4K/43/60hz TV as my PC monitor. The BenQ Anti-glare coating is significantly higher quality, or perhaps just noticeably gentler, which is confirmed by testing. Everything has its price, and the BenQ 32-inch QHD monitor (with an AMVA LCD panel) goes for nearly $1000.

The reason Dell is so inexpensive is simply because 27-inch FHD monitors are lower-end and inherently budget-friendly. On a cheap Dell IPS, you should expect viewing angles similar to what you'd find on a General Electric monitor. Regardless, whether it’s a basic IPS or a similar VA panel, the practical reality is that you aren't staring at a cramped TN panel, so viewing angles aren't really an issue here.

Regarding realistic colors, a PC monitor or a TV shouldn't have exaggerated or garish hues. Realistically, if the colors are off, you end up with garbage imagery—staring at orange skin tones or sickly green grass and similar nonsense.Just dial back the color saturation, or adjust the Color option using higher or lower settings. Any monitor, or honestly almost any standard Smart TV these days, offers such an option.

This is a TV comparison, but it’s largely irrelevant since modern TVs come equipped with all the tools needed for high-quality image calibration. Samsung uses a VA LCD panel, while Samsung has an IPS LCD panel. Based on the settings we discussed, the Samsung is garishly bright; just look at those nauseatingly orange skin tones. If you drop the saturation, that gaudy nuisance disappears instantly. While a VA LCD panel offers significantly higher contrast, that's practically negligible in real-world use. Ultimately, it is very easy to tune for normal, natural saturation. The panel technology itself isn't the deciding factor, whether it's VA, an IPS LCD panel, or even a completely different OLED panel. Regardless of what you're watching, logic dictates that colors should look as natural and realistic as possible.🍿

You mentioned that the $1000"
BenQ 32-inch QHD monitor (AMVA LCD panel) costs nearly
I am actually looking for a 27-inch monitor, and FHD is fine. Do you have any recommendations within that same price range of about $300?
This General Electric model is way too washed out. I would honestly rather stick with my old Samsung monitor than switch to something like this...
I am considering ordering three or four monitors just to test them at home and return the ones I don't like, but that feels a bit shady...
The issue is that while you can check TVs in a store, monitors are rarely hooked up so you can actually see what you are buying. You can't tell which one is better just by reading the spec sheet...

Now I am looking at those BenQ monitors, but even they have a 27" model priced at $433 for an IPS panel. Specifically the BenQ LED IPS monitor BL2780. Honestly, I have no idea which brand to trust right now. I thought buying an IPS panel meant I was done with light bleed and that the image would actually look decent from different angles. But looking at this General Electric screen, if I move my head just five centimeters to the left, the right side immediately turns gray😢—even my 15-year-old TFT couldn't do that—and I really didn't expect an IPS screen to react so drastically to slight head movements...
In the end, I guess I've become a demanding user. I expect today's monitors to produce a better picture than a ten-year-old monitor that cost the exact same amount back then. It wasn't some high-end beast when I bought it, either. Is technology actually moving backward?

Regarding the video, that Samsung looks like it's stuck in store demo mode. Even the Samsung isn't great. It looks like it's in an ECO mode with low contrast, muted colors, and poor gamma... though it's still much more tolerable than the Samsung picture. I am convinced that either the Samsung is defective, poorly calibrated, or stuck in some kind of TURBOHDRSONIC mode.

Arthur Anderson10 said:you mentioned a "BenQ 32-inch QHD monitor with an AMVA+ LCD panel costs nearly $1000"

I’m actually looking for a 27-inch monitor, and FHD is perfectly fine for me. Do you have any recommendations that fit within that budget, say under $30?
This General Electric one is honestly just too washed out; I’d rather stick with my old Samsung than switch to something like this...
I've even considered ordering three or four monitors just to test them at home and return the ones I don't want, though that feels a bit shady...
The issue is that while you can check a TV in a store, monitors are rarely hooked up so you can actually see what you're buying, and looking at specs on paper doesn't tell you which one is actually superior...

Now I'm looking at these BenQ monitors, but even they have 27" models priced for an $433IPS monitor. Like the BenQ LED IPS monitor BL2780. Honestly, I have no idea which brand to trust right now. I thought that by buying an IPS monitor, I’d be done with backlight bleeding and finally get a picture that looked decent from different angles. But looking at this General Electric unit, if I move my head just five centimeters to the left, the right side of the screen turns gray😢—which is worse than my 15-year-old TFT—and I really didn't expect an IPS screen to react so drastically to a slight shift in perspective...
In the end, I feel like a demanding customer just because I expect today's monitors to produce a better image than a ten-year-old monitor that cost about the same back then. It wasn't exactly a beast when it was released, but still. Is technology actually regressing?

Regarding that video, the Samsung looks like it's stuck in shop mode... and the Samsung isn't much better. It looks like it's in some kind of Eco mode with muted contrast, dull colors, and low gamma...though it's still far more tolerable than the Samsung's picture. I'm convinced that either that Samsung is defective, poorly calibrated, or stuck in some sort of TURBOHDRSONIC mode.

Don't limit yourself to just or a minimum of 75Hz.😁 There aren't any issues with 60Hz, whether it's a TV or a PC monitor. The main thing is that the display itself is decent; otherwise, a 75Hz rating on a cheap General Electric unit doesn't mean much.

If you haven't tried it yet, grab a BenQ 27-inch 1080p/60Hz model with an AMVA+ LCD panel . That puts it in the VA class, and you probably already know what to expect there. Newer models are slightly improved compared to the very reliable older version I used for six years. From what I can see, Newegg still offers the widest selection of BenQ monitors by choice or design.EW2775ZH, whereas you'll find only one listing on a site like Google Shopping, and it's significantly more expensive. EW277HDR, which is the premium version, has virtually zero availability online. Its only major perk is an ambient light sensor for auto-adjusting the backlight.

https://www.newegg.com/benq-monitors...nitri-193/423/

https://www.google.com/shopping/benq...-16-9-24704531

In practice, cheaper IPS monitors tend to have significantly more issues with backlight bleeding. You also have to factor in specific IPS Glow, which becomes quite obvious during darker scenes. You should also mention VA Glow, though it is incomparably less noticeable.

Regarding the test below, everything mentioned about the technical specs and panel types applies to the recommended models as well. This particular model succeeded the BenQ I used for years. It lists AMVA+, meaning it's an improved variant of the AMVA panel. While the panel is natively 60Hz, you can usually bump the frequency up to at least 70Hz without trouble. So, my advice is to pick up a more affordable BenQ 27-inch model and test it out for a few days.

https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/benq-ew2750zl/

The specs are accurate enough, and you're looking at an AMVA panel manufactured by the Taiwanese firm AUO Optronics. Companies like Samsung, LG, Chime Inoolux, and TPV are the heavy hitters here, and AUO Optronics stands among the largest and most critical LCD panel producers for various clients today. Essentially, BenQ has become little more than a brand name—a marketing label owned by AUO Optronics.

https://www.benq.com/en-ap/about-benq/group.html

https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/article...chnologies.htm

Regarding that YouTube comparison between the Samsung and LG sets, they actually listed the specific settings used. Both models were running on the Vivid picture mode, and it’s pretty obvious that the LG looks overblown. To be blunt, using the Vivid or Sport modes on an LG TV is just pure nonsense. The colors are aggressively oversaturated, and the entire image quality is just terrible. I have no idea who would ever use those two modes or for what purpose; personally, I find them unwatchable. I was looking at the LG 43UM7600PLB recently, and I immediately hated the Vivid and Sport modes.🍿

I picked up a Samsung 32 today to see how it performs. Here is my first impression after two hours of testing settings and gaming.

It is significantly better than the General Electric model I returned earlier today. I might have just grabbed a bad unit from General Electric, but this Samsung should technically have a worse picture since it costs the same or even less—I actually got a gift card for my next purchase. It has a larger screen, so logically it should be more expensive or sacrifice something else. While it does have thicker bezels and a cheaper stand, the image quality beats the General Electric.

The graying effect around the edges persists, though it is less noticeable than on the General Electric. We have to account for the fact that this screen is about 5 inches wider than the General Electric; you have to move your head more, so the edge distortion isn't always in your direct line of sight.

Backlight bleed is still present on the Samsung. It glows in the dark during black scenes, but the light distribution is much more uniform. On the General Electric, the bleeding was heavily concentrated in the bottom left corner.

The colors on the Samsung are much easier on my eyes. Increasing the brightness and contrast doesn't cause that blue tint shift I experienced with the General Electric.

Viewing angles are similar, but the colors stay much more vibrant here. With the General Electric, the image almost turned black and white if you looked at it from the side.

The size is my only real concern. However, based on past experience, you get used to a large display very quickly. I will decide soon if I keep it.

If I had bought this one first, I definitely wouldn't be considering a return. The picture is great; it's just the scale.

General Electric has a much sleeker design. Their bezels were only a few millimeters wide, whereas the Samsung has bezels nearly half an inch thick or more.

General Electric included an HDMI cable, but the Samsung comes with both HDMI and DVI cables.
General Electric uses an external power brick, which I found annoying. The Samsung has internal power, though that makes the bottom of the monitor thicker.

The 2560x1440 resolution is perfect for this Samsung 32. Everything looks great at 100% scaling. On a 27" monitor, that resolution felt too small for my taste, forcing me to use 120% scaling.

Looking at the big picture, the General Electric isn't worth it$500 but the Samsung is. I might pick up another Dell just to see if I can find a better picture in a smaller size, though after using this 32", going back to 27" will be difficult.

Now I can finally watch two movies at once—one for each eye.🙂

Samsung Q3279VWFD8

Samsung 32/1440p IPS is fine enough,😁 though its flaws are pretty well documented since I've run into a few myself. It’s just typical cheap cost-cutting, like how Samsung didn't even include a VESA mount option. On top of that, plenty of buyers have ended up with panels suffering from massive backlight bleed. Honestly, if that happens to you, just return the monitor, grab a new one, and pray you get a better unit this time around.

At the end of the day, you have to be realistic—this is an incredibly easy price to swallow for a 32/1440p monitor. You expect certain shortcomings when they cut corners this aggressively to hit a price point, and it shows in the final product. General Electric might offer a more polished chassis design, but at the end of the day, you're looking at the LCD panel, not the housing. It all comes down to what you want; either you take it or you won't be happy with a budget display at this level. If Samsung had opted for a higher quality Matte Anti-glare coating, it would have been much easier on the eyes. Generally speaking, an IPS panel looks significantly better when the screen is closer to being Glossy. It isn't quite a full Glossy screen, though; it's more of a very light Anti-glare layer similar to what you see on standard TV LCD panels.

https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/aoc-q3279vwfd8/

The Samsung 32/1440p MVA version features that same very subtle Anti-glare coating, but that specific model deals with serious image noise and artifacts due to having a poor MVA panel.☕

https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/aoc-q3279vwf/

Glad you posted that review for the Samsung 32, I'm actually thinking about picking one up myself 😁

wiredotter14 said:It’s great that you posted that review for the Samsung 32. I’m actually thinking about picking one up myself. 😁

Just wanted to let you know my monitor died today, so I'm heading back to the store tomorrow to return it.
I got some weird artifacts on it; certain spots on the screen just lit up strangely.

Arthur Anderson10 said:Just wanted to let you know that the monitor gave up on me today, so I'm heading back to the store tomorrow to return it.
I managed to get my hands on some special patches, and they’ve actually brightened up certain sections of the screen.

You’re really getting worked up over a total dud of an example, and honestly, there isn't much you can do to make it any better than it already is.😁It’s hard to imagine a worse outcome, really—having a brand-new piece of hardware die on you almost the very same day you unboxed it.

I dealt with a similar headache when my vacuum cleaner gave up on me. It would have been a lot less frustrating if I hadn't bought that thing as a gift for my better half.😵

I just hope they honor the warranty right away. I'm planning to buy this through my company, so I won't have that 14-day return window to fall back on if things go sideways.

wiredotter14 said:I’m hoping they honor the warranty immediately. I plan to buy this through my company, so I won't have that standard 14-day return window available.

If you're within those first 14 days and the monitor dies, you shouldn't have any trouble getting a replacement. Still, there's always a "but..." so definitely check the policy before buying.

I just ordered a Dell SE2719HR IPS led monitor. It's just FHD, so we'll see if that bothers me. The price was only $400 and it comes with a 5-year warranty, unlike Samsung which has 3 years or General Electric which only offered 2.

Hopefully, luck is on my side. If the FHD isn't enough for me, I'll just go back to a Samsung model and hope for a functional unit.

Here’s the deal: if you're buying as an individual, you can just return whatever you want within 14 days if you bought it online. Doesn't matter if it works or not—there's no debate about service or repairs needed. Period.
If you're buying through a business, though, you don't have that luxury. They can send you off to a repair center even if you bought it two days ago, or in extreme cases, just flat-out refuse because they claim "it isn't broken." So now the question is, where do they draw the line? Generally speaking, retailers are pretty stingy about giving businesses replacements. Probably because they get enough grief from private customers constantly returning stuff.

wiredotter14 said:Here is the reality: if you're buying as an individual, you have a 14-day window to return items bought online, regardless of whether they work or not. There is no debate about service centers or anything else.
However, businesses don't get that same luxury. If you buy through a company, they can send you straight to a repair center even if you just bought it two days ago. In extreme cases, they might even refuse because they claim "it isn't broken." The question is where those boundaries lie. Generally, retailers are pretty reluctant to give replacements to corporate clients, likely because they deal with so many returns from private customers.

If you're unlucky, you'll end up with exactly what I got when I returned mine.🙂

Arthur Anderson10 said:if you're unlucky, you'll end up with exactly what I got back🙂

Did you buy it through Amazon?

I’m waiting about two weeks before ordering, hoping I don't get stuck with a dud.
Besides, I saw AOC has a 14-day DOA policy—assuming that applies globally.

wiredotter14 said:I’m hoping these issues are covered under warranty right away. Since I’m buying this through my company, I won't have that standard 14-day return window available.

Of course you're covered by the warranty, but there's a catch. If they send it off for official service processing, you're looking at a wait—potentially one or two months. You don't get an instant replacement like you would during a standard 14-day return period. Unless the retailer decides to be generous and swap it out on the spot while they handle your claim, they aren't legally obligated to give you a new one immediately.

BTW, I believe Smartic carries that monitor. It’s about a third of the price of what you'd find at Micro Center.😁
The consensus is that it's a solid choice in terms of panel quality and overall value, though the build quality isn't top-tier. Some users have reported light bleed around the plastic bezel seams.

It sounds like Livadu just got a lemon, but if he really wants it, he should just order another one.

wiredotter14 said:Did you get yours through Amazon.com?

I’m planning to pick one up in about two weeks. Hopefully, I don't get a dud.
By the way, I noticed AOC offers a 14-day DOA warranty, which should apply globally.

Yeah, I bought an AOC through Amazon.com.

But if this unit doesn't work out, I'll just grab another AOC. Honestly, their stuff was fine—it's just a shame this one died on me. 😢 I'm assuming they won't just send back the exact same faulty unit.🙂

DELL SE2719HR IPS led

I almost had my third lucky run with a Dell, but not quite..

The picture quality is incomparably better than the other three I've tested so far.
Colors look most natural. It's an FHD monitor, so the resolution limit is obvious, but that doesn't bother me.
Ghosting is my main issue, if that's even what it is. In moving scenes—like when the camera pans around a black pillar against a white background—there's a massive jump. It shifts by several centimeters and isn't fluid at all. My other two monitors didn't show this. This model claims 4ms, but to me, it feels like over 20ms because it’s jarring. Everything else is great. I still need to check if my Windows 10 settings messed anything up, though I tried resetting to factory defaults and switching between 60Hz and 75Hz, but the problem persists. I'll try connecting it to another PC with a newer graphics card to see.

If it weren't for this, it would be the perfect monitor for me. The image is beautiful. Plus, there's a 5-year warranty. Just $400. Even in games, the ghosting isn't as noticeable; it's specifically prominent in movies, which makes me think something in Windows 10 is misconfigured.




edit: I hooked it up to another computer and the issue remains. Whether it's ghosting, blooming, or some other phenomenon I can't even name, it's incredibly irritating. 🙂
Is this tied to the 4ms rating, or just an inherent IPS flaw? Maybe I just got a bad unit. I'm going to look at another Dell since the picture quality is otherwise stunning. Perhaps a more expensive model won't have this drawback, so I'll likely order a higher-end Dell to test out.

Iiyama XB2783HSU-B3 27 AMVA+ panel

The new arrival is here. Here are my initial impressions..




Blacks look great. Whites look great. Colors are solid. It lacks that specific effect seen on the Dell.
However, in dark scenes—especially with lower bitrate footage—black tones tend to bleed into blue hues, which is quite irritating. Reducing the contrast helps slightly, but the issue remains. High-quality footage handles this much better.

Backlight bleed is almost non-existent compared to the Dell or the Aoc Q3279VWFD8 32 with its IPS panel.

The contrast is massive and far superior to both the Dell or the Aoc.

Viewing angles are narrower. Color shades shift slightly when moving your head left or right...

It feels like the Iiyama is sharper than the Dell, though that might just be due to the higher contrast...

Since I mostly watch content in the dark, image quality at 30% brightness and lower contrast is what matters most to me.
In this regard, the Iiyama offers a much better picture than the Dell. Even at 25% brightness and 60% contrast, colors remain decent and don't wash out to grey. With the Dell, once you hit 40% brightness and 60% contrast, everything turns grey and colors vanish...

The build is classic Japanese engineering. Everything is well-placed and the construction is high-quality, unlike the Aoc. The Dell has much thinner bezels, but this unit includes speakers and a headphone jack—plus it features height adjustment and pivot. Still, those features can't fully compensate for the aforementioned image flaws. 😢

The Dell is definitely taking a backseat for me, and I'm leaning toward this one. I spend most of my time in the dark, so I prioritize deep blacks over color accuracy and viewing angles. This makes it my preferred choice despite its quirks.