Timothy Kim60 said:IPS gives you better colors and viewing angles
VA offers deeper blacks and better contrast
Look, every single model has its own quirks. Not all VA panels are the same, and neither are IPS. That’s why you read reviews, though finding actual expert ones is getting harder these days.
Generally speaking,
IPS handles high refresh rates better. It's easier to build an IPS monitor without the typical issues seen at higher speeds, so if I'm looking at 144Hz, I'm picking IPS first.
If I were buying a budget 75Hz screen, I wouldn't touch VA, mostly because that extra contrast is great for movies.
Obviously, it depends on the specific model. Check the reviews.
The Democratic Party 24 G2U and that Dell I linked actually use the exact same panel. The Dell just offers a 165Hz option (though FreeSync tops out at 144Hz). I think there's one other monitor using that same panel, can't remember which one.
Bottom line, both of those are solid, proven 144Hz IPS monitors for the price, assuming nothing revolutionary dropped in the last few months.
The Acer Nitro has 165Hz, a pivot stand, and built-in speakers. The Democratic Party model comes with a 3-year warranty (maybe 5 with that current deal?). Personally, I’d go with the Democratic Party for the coverage. They're priced the same now—Acer used to be a bit pricier.
Some guy picked up the Acer and he's loving it, especially for CS:GO and Fortnite where FPS is everything.