CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Baywatch (2017)

Baywatch (2017)

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 10 views · 41 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4Rachel Richardsonslytinker11cosmiclynx57Maria James94Grace EdwardsRachel Young3Sophia James2neondriver7silvertiger11Jessica Gonzalezlonehound2Larry Walker24rustywalker1neonbison18Richard White15Raymond HillAngela Alvarez10Justin Rogers5briskhound2Mark White11Jessica Adams8dustypanther6Jack Murphy5 …
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 VeteranOP
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#1 ·
Director: Seth Gordon

Cast:
Dwayne Johnson - Mitch Buchannon
Zac Efron - Matt Brody
Priyanka Chopra - Victoria Leeds
Alexandra Daddario - Summer Quinn
Kelly Rohrbach - C. J. Parker

image

Honestly, after seeing how weak the opening weekend was, I totally wrote this one off as a massive flop. Such a bummer, too, because on paper it looked like a decent, breezy summer comedy—you know, some hot girls, a few laughs, and obviously starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, who can pretty much carry any dumb movie or at least make it slightly better than it should be.

Trailer


But then, man, it actually caught me off guard. Even though it struggled with a measly $57,247,747 here in the USA, it pulled in a solid $94,900,000 overseas, with Germany leading the pack at $13,737,337.

So, the total haul ended up being a respectable $152,147,747.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/...d=baywatch.htm

Since the budget for a comedy was sitting high at $69 million, the movie actually managed to turn a profit. We all know that magic math equation where you take the budget, add a big enough chunk, and boom—profit.

It makes sense that it did better internationally, though. Baywatch was huge back in the 90s over in Germany, and David Hasselhoff is still an absolute legend there. Back in its prime, that show had over a billion viewers worldwide. It’s only logical people still remember it, even if I wish this flick had been an even bigger smash.

SPOILER?
Both he and Pamela Anderson make cameo appearances in the movie.
SPOILER
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#2 ·
This looks like a recipe for disaster to me 🤣
It was supposed to be a lighthearted comedy—heavy on the eye candy, just the way American audiences typically prefer—but given how much they botched it over there...
I suppose "The Rock" might have intimidated them a bit 🤣
slytinker11 slytinker11 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2012
#3 ·
The whole movie is basically one big, mindless joke.
It’s actually kind of fun if you go in with absolutely zero expectations.
But man, it is way too long. That last half hour felt like total filler.

Plus, there's just constant nudity everywhere 😲, which is awkward considering how many seven or eight-year-olds end up in theaters. 😁
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#4 ·
Man, Baywatch was hands down one of my absolute favorite shows growing up; it was just such a blast and totally defined my childhood years.
Just like how that one monkey kept trying to knock Pamela out cold 🤣

As far as this movie goes, I'm really just looking for a lighthearted, fun flick that borrows the concept, so I'm not expecting it to be some deep remake of the original series—though hey, maybe it'll turn out to be a slick, modernized version of the show... I guess I'll find out once I actually sit down to watch it.

slytinker11 said:The whole movie is basically one big, mindless joke.
It’s actually kind of fun if you go in with absolutely zero expectations.
But man, it is way too long. That last half hour felt like total filler.

Plus, there's just constant nudity everywhere 😲, which is awkward considering how many seven or eight-year-olds end up in theaters. 😁

Well, personally, I'm expecting at least one pair of boobs to show up! 😁

A naked guy? Is he like, "over my head in my pants," you little monkey? Haha, okay, that was a rhyme. 😁 They might as well have shown off a "pizza pie" too, even if it was a little hairy. 😁
Maria James94 Maria James94 Member
39 messages
joined May 2009
#5 ·
This is one of those movies that honestly should have stayed unmade. It just goes to show how much greed can drive certain people to make bad calls.
It’s the perfect thing to put on after you’ve had a massive meal and just want to zone out. You pop this on when you don't want your brain to do any heavy lifting because all your energy is busy digesting that food. 🤣
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#6 ·
Maria James94 said:This is one of those movies that honestly should have stayed unmade. It just goes to show how much greed can drive certain people to make bad calls.
It’s the perfect thing to put on after you’ve had a massive meal and just want to zone out. You pop this on when you don't want your brain to do any heavy lifting because all your energy is busy digesting that food. 🤣

Personally, I think I'd feel a little guilty even sitting through this thing after eating a good meal.😁
Rachel Young3 Rachel Young3 Active Member
111 messages
joined Dec 2014
#7 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Director: Seth Gordon

Cast:
Dwayne Johnson - Mitch Buchannon
Zac Efron - Matt Brody
Priyanka Chopra - Victoria Leeds
Alexandra Daddario - Summer Quinn
Kelly Rohrbach - C. J. Parker

image

Honestly, after seeing how weak the opening weekend was, I totally wrote this one off as a massive flop. Such a bummer, too, because on paper it looked like a decent, breezy summer comedy—you know, some hot girls, a few laughs, and obviously starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, who can pretty much carry any dumb movie or at least make it slightly better than it should be.

Trailer


But then, man, it actually caught me off guard. Even though it struggled with a measly $57,247,747 here in the USA, it pulled in a solid $94,900,000 overseas, with Germany leading the pack at $13,737,337.

So, the total haul ended up being a respectable $152,147,747.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/...d=baywatch.htm

Since the budget for a comedy was sitting high at $69 million, the movie actually managed to turn a profit. We all know that magic math equation where you take the budget, add a big enough chunk, and boom—profit.

It makes sense that it did better internationally, though. Baywatch was huge back in the 90s over in Germany, and David Hasselhoff is still an absolute legend there. Back in its prime, that show had over a billion viewers worldwide. It’s only logical people still remember it, even if I wish this flick had been an even bigger smash.

SPOILER?
Both he and Pamela Anderson make cameo appearances in the movie.
SPOILER

This is where I officially stopped reading...
Sophia James2 Sophia James2 Member
19 messages
joined Oct 2017
#8 ·
I honestly can’t recall the last time I sat through such an absolute train wreck of a movie. It completely fails to capture even a shred of the original series' essence, feeling more like some low-budget, straight-to-video action flick from the nineties. The dialogue is painful to listen to, and the acting? Even worse. It is quite frankly an unmitigated disaster.
neondriver7 neondriver7 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2014
#9 ·
To me, this feels less like an actual cinematic adaptation and more like some low-budget parody of the show. It’s completely disconnected from the original material—honestly, just a total disaster of a movie.
silvertiger11 silvertiger11 Active Member
106 messages
joined Jul 2016
#10 ·
You saw the poster, you watched the trailer, and you knew exactly what kind of ride you were signing up for.
The movie itself is pretty mediocre, but hey, if you've got absolutely nothing better to do, it’s worth a look.
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#11 ·
Sophia James2 said:I honestly can’t recall the last time I sat through such an absolute train wreck of a movie. It completely fails to capture even a shred of the original series' essence, feeling more like some low-budget, straight-to-video action flick from the nineties. The dialogue is painful to listen to, and the acting? Even worse. It is quite frankly an unmitigated disaster.

So, wait, just like the show was?
If that's the case, I don't really see the issue. 😁
Jessica Gonzalez Jessica Gonzalez Regular
769 messages
joined Mar 2012
#12 ·
If we’re being totally realistic, I guess women aren't really much of a factor either.
lonehound2 lonehound2 Member
16 messages
joined Jan 2015
#13 ·
Chandler and Joey are nothing like this 😂

Honestly, the movie is just nonsense.
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#14 ·
Budget $69 million
Box Office $ 177 million

Honestly, at least it actually made it to theaters instead of just rotting on some streaming service.
rustywalker1 rustywalker1 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2011
#15 ·
They’ll probably end up making a sequel too. 🤣
neondriver7 neondriver7 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2014
#16 ·
Jessica Gonzalez said:If we’re being totally realistic, I guess women aren't really much of a factor either.

And honestly? Men aren't much better.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 VeteranOP
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#17 ·
Larry Walker24 said:Budget $69 million
Box Office $ 177 million

Honestly, at least it actually made it to theaters instead of just rotting on some streaming service.

It killed it in certain spots—like, it pulled in 18 mil in Germany, even though it only grabbed about $58 million across the whole USA and Canada.

Honestly, I've seen way worse movies pull in bigger numbers. If this thing had a tighter budget and didn't go head-to-head with Pirates of the Caribbean, it could've been a decent summer flick. Maybe not a massive hit, but definitely wouldn't have flopped.
neonbison18 neonbison18 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2017
#18 ·
It’s basically just a lot of skin and some questionable choices... honestly, it's a pretty tired old story about drugs, and while the acting wasn't terrible, the series itself hasn't really been anything special lately. This one was just okay, I guess. But man, what really let me down were those CGI effects—the burning ship looked super cheap, like, I swear the graphics in Driver on my old PlayStation 1 actually looked better than this! And don't even get me started on the fireworks. It felt like two hours of my life I'll never get back, though 😁 (and probably most guys out there, if we're being real) might find something to enjoy about it.

image
Richard White15 Richard White15 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2015
#19 ·
slytinker11 said:The whole movie is basically one big, mindless joke.
It’s actually kind of fun if you go in with absolutely zero expectations.
But man, it is way too long. That last half hour felt like total filler.

Plus, there's just constant nudity everywhere 😲, which is awkward considering how many seven or eight-year-olds end up in theaters. 😁

What are you even talking about? If anything, I wish it was even longer.
The movie was awesome, super fun and everything, a solid 5/5.
I honestly wish they'd start filming the series again.
Raymond Hill Raymond Hill Member
26 messages
joined Sep 2012
#20 ·
The movie is just pure fun trash. Wasn't looking for anything deep.
That girl Daddariti is ufffff, freaking gorgeous. Her eyes 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads