CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Posts being deleted again on Alternative II?

Posts being deleted again on Alternative II?

Started by Brenda Gonzalez12 · · 👁 3 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brenda Gonzalez12Jason GrantElizabeth Cruzrustydrifter10
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#1 ·
Alright, I’m jumping back into this thread because I really need to point out the elephant in the room: we’ve got a major issue here with how posts are being deleted without any real selection or oversight.

Well, now that we’ve officially wrapped up that first thread with this post, I figured it was time to move things along!
I can't believe I'm actually doing this! Honestly, I’m a little embarrassed to even bring it up because it feels like such a "me" thing to be obsessing over, but I just had to share. Does anyone else ever get that overwhelming feeling where you just want to scream into a pillow? Because that was me all morning! It's one of those days where everything feels slightly off, but I am determined to turn it around. I’ve decided that instead of moping, I’m going to tackle my to-do list with the kind of relentless energy you’d expect from someone who just drank three double espressos. Wish me luck—I’m definitely going to need it!

Radi se o ovom postu:

I honestly can't believe I'm saying this, but I think we might actually be onto something here! I know, I know—I sound like a total dreamer, and I’ve definitely been wrong before (believe me, my track record isn't exactly flawless!), but just hear me out for a second. If you really sit down and look at the data, there’s a pattern emerging that’s hard to ignore. It’s not just a fluke or some random coincidence; it feels much more intentional. I was looking back at what Jason Grant mentioned earlier, and when you layer that on top of the current trends we're seeing in the US market right now, everything starts to click into place. It’s like those pieces of a puzzle finally snapping together after you've been staring at them for hours. I'm probably overthinking this—call me crazy if you want!—but I have this nagging feeling that we are standing right on the edge of a major shift. It’s kind of exhilarating, actually! Even if I end up eating my words later, I just couldn't keep this thought to myself. What do you guys think? Am I totally losing it, or are you seeing these same ripples in the water too?

So, I’ve actually reported that specific post twice now because it was nothing but straight-up insults and personal attacks, but I’m still sitting here waiting for a response. It’s been two full days! And look, I’m not saying we don't have plenty of mods active on the forum, but man, the silence is killing me.

I mean, seriously, isn't this just a straight-up personal insult at this point? What am I even supposed to say to Ethan Brooks59 when he claims that Yonaguni is nothing more than a boring natural formation and just a plain old "pile of rocks"? Honestly! If he’s going to argue that humans "evolved from" monkeys, I’d much rather frame it as humans being one specific branch of the primate family that just happened to become the most advanced and intelligent version—even if looking at Ethan Brooks59’s logic makes me question if we actually reached that peak!

So, it turns out the user actually got "banned" just because they posted a photo that was way too big! The post is still up!Is that actually an equal way to treat everyone? 👎

It feels like they’re scrubbing any posts where someone basically trips over their own feet! You know the type—someone drops a bunch of wrong info, insults everyone, and trolls the whole thread, only for the post to vanish the second anyone calls them out for being a fraud or just plain clueless. If a guy posts the exact same link four times in a row after looking totally ridiculous, he’s either a dedicated troll trying to wreck the discussion or just a charlatan who actually enjoys the mockery. But suddenly, that post gets deleted? Meanwhile, it’s perfectly fine to label people "dogmatic" (even when they don't even know what the word means!), call them "conservative sages," or scream about "destroying freedom of speech." It’s gotten to the point where people are openly insulting others—regular users and even legitimate, verified scientists—and there aren't even any consequences for it. It's getting a little wild around here!

And all this because "alternative thinkers" are being told that if they actually believe in something, they need to back it up. They’re being asked to show their work—to point to the foundation of their reasoning and explain exactly why they hold their position. That’s it. Nothing more!
Regarding that specific thread on "Pyramids"—you know, the one where the title literally screams "FACTS" at you—I feel like I probably don't even need to lay out a formal definition here. But hey, just in case anyone is feeling a little lost or needs a quick refresher, here it is:

Just a little fact for you! Well, I guess that’s just about all there is to it! It is what it is, right? It’s absolutely, 100% certain—there is simply no way around it!When you're trying to pin down a fact, you really have to approach it with total objectivity. In the world of science, it’s not enough to just have a hunch; everything has to be backed up by rock-solid, exact evidence!
When you're diving into philosophy, you really have to lean on a solid, rational method. It’s all about that unbiased deep dive—you've got to look at everything through a lens of pure logic without letting your personal beliefs get in the way. The same goes for pinning down actual facts; you can't let your own opinions or any preconceived notions muddy the waters. You've gotta keep it clean!


Look, let’s be real here: if you don't have a source or some widely accepted common knowledge to back it up, it’s just an opinion, not a fact. I didn't create this thread, but the way it stands right now, we should be using hard evidence to counter the title. We shouldn't just be throwing around phrases like "it wasn't possible," "there were no resources," or "that's a lie" without actually proving it. If you're going to take a stand, you've got to show your work and back up that perspective with actual proof!

So, here’s what I’m thinking: I really believe we should be applying the same rules to everyone across the board. To keep things fair and square, I'm asking that the original post be taken down, along with any other threads where those specific "nicknames" or insults are being tossed around. It’s only right that we treat every single user exactly the same way!
Jason Grant Jason Grant Member
20 messages
joined Dec 2015
#2 ·
Why don't you explain this little ego trip of yours:
""Acting like a total tough guy when you're really just a small-time poser""

The topic at hand is the pyramid.

Then you follow that up by asking me:
"And why isn't the entire pyramid built out of much harder materials?"

Of course I know exactly why you’re asking that.
You’re trying to drag the conversation back to the composition of the building materials—something that isn't even up for debate, since we have reliable, verifiable technical data on a massive structure like a pyramid.
The actual mystery, the thing that makes it one of the wonders of the world, is how it was actually constructed; even among serious scientists, there are all sorts of alternative theories regarding the timeline and process of its assembly.
But none of that justifies turning to me and the rest of the community with comments like:
""If you've been eating too much junk food, go brush your teeth and go to bed.""
And I won't even list them all.
You've already been warned by the moderators multiple times for:
- making things personal
- going off-topic
- insults
- inciting arguments
- meddling in other people's business
.
.
Look, any theory about how pyramids were built is a fun story to listen to, but as an absolute historical fact? Not a chance.

Feeling backed into a corner by my reasoning, Ethan Brooks59, you resort to cheap shots. It seems like you've never truly managed to separate your thoughts from pure fantasy and historical guesswork; instead, you've let your mind get stuck in a loop where you're just a slave to your own biases, focused entirely on tearing others down.

We all have the right to present our arguments, ask questions, and point out logical fallacies or a lack of evidence.

Specifically regarding the pyramids, anyone on this board who wants to take a contrarian view or challenge any part of the mainstream argument has every right to do so. They can contest the interpretation of a thesis, or call out factual and logical errors in the claims being made if they believe those claims are nothing more than fabrications or baseless assumptions.
They also have the right to use logic to push back against intellectual laziness.
_________________
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#3 ·
Jason Grant said:Why don't you explain this little attention-seeking routine of yours:
""Just an ego trip (honestly, "acting important" is being polite here) by some guy trying to puff out his chest ""

The topic is pyramids.

Jason, altering quotes is actually against the rules here on the forum. And by posting what you just wrote, you’ve done exactly that.

The full text actually goes:
The purpose? Just an ego trip (calling it "acting important" is putting it mildly) by someone trying to act tough—because he could, and he had the tools to do it—so he built himself monuments, pyramids, obelisks (male ego and showing off "bigger" things exists in every culture throughout history; it stems from our animal roots where the alpha male gets priority in breeding while everyone else serves until they can step up to become the Alfe)... and then people started attaching mystical meanings to all of it. Honestly, you're surprised there's a sun in the sky; I can't even blame you.

You INTENTIONALLY left out that bolded part, didn't you? You're totally trolling the whole thread with these posts (these are your "MASTERPIECES" from the last 24 hours)

Quote:>>
Jason Grant says:
Ethan Brooks59,
It’s not a big deal to me, but I really don't see the point in counting all those massive monolithic blocks, or copying data from websites or books. I know there aren't hundreds of them, maybe about a hundred, but I do know they were crafted with incredible precision for that era,
The rest is just technical stuff that I don't lose sleep over, and I'm sure you know those details by heart, including the composition—which I believe is hard volcanic rock, as you so beautifully and thoroughly explained. Once you get that, you already grasp how impressive the pyramid itself is.

As for their actual purpose—ha, ha, ha—I'll just say this: I'm not biting that hook, unlike so many others who fell for the idea that they were just tombs. That's like saying a book on Marxism is just a Bible, when you don't realize that Marx used to receive love letters and gifts from Engels worth hundreds of thousands of gold francs back in the day. It's basically....more like a soap opera....But do you know what killed Engels? Chronic irritation of the oral cavity.
I'll leave it to your imagination to guess what caused that chronic irritation,
....

Quote:>
Jason Grant says:
I agree.👍
If there's an expert out there, please, raise your hand—or rather, write it out and explain it!
Time to expand our horizons a little bit!
Jason Grant said:I’ve gone ahead and answered all those questions you had!
Look, I wasn't actually asking for your input on that!I mean, honestly, it’s just common sense—those kinds of facts are super easy to double-check and verify in a heartbeat!
I I have to ask, what’s the actual point behind all these questions you're throwing my way? I'm a little lost here!
You really want me to prove to you that I haven't just memorized them all? Fine! Challenge accepted!
I’m not getting tired of this—seriously, I’ll keep saying it over and over again! Just a few dozen pieces, maybe around a hundred tons or so!
So, let me set the record straight on this one—we aren't talking about a hundred tons here. It’s actually closer to 85 tons. And if we're being super precise about it (because who doesn't love a little extra detail?), we're looking at exactly 85 tons, 176 kilograms, and 297 grams!
Do you even realize how much of a non-issue that actually is? Honestly, it barely matters at all in the grand scheme of things!

I’d much rather dive into a deep, well-reasoned breakdown regarding that supposed 1,200-ton obelisk from Luna! Let's really get into the weeds on this one.
Are we talking about an essay? Or maybe you mean a musical arrangement? I'm a little lost here! Give me some context so I can jump in and help you out!
Hey there! Just wondering, what year was this one actually manufactured?
So, what's the actual point here? What are we even trying to achieve?
Don't you dare say the "G-word," or I’m shutting my computer down right now!
🤣

Jason Grant said:....
So, what exactly is an obelisk? It’s one of those things you see in photos of ancient ruins or standing tall in big American cities, but we don't always stop to think about what makes them special! Basically, it's a tall, four-sided monument that tapers as it goes up, usually ending in a little pointed shape at the top. Think of something like the Washington Monument—that’s the ultimate classic example right here in the States! They've been around forever and have this really striking, grand vibe to them.
What does it actually mean?
What's the purpose behind this? What does it actually do?
One part, One way we could look at this might be one of the potential explanations. :
"
So, here’s the deal with Nimrod: he was basically torn into seven pieces and scattered all across the globe as a grim warning to anyone thinking about picking a fight with God. His mother, Semir, actually tried to bring him back to life, but let's be real—she isn't the source of life. She isn't God, so she didn't have that kind of power to just undo death. She spent her time trying to gather his remains, but she only managed to pull six of the pieces together. And honestly, that's probably why the whole resurrection plan fell totally flat! She just couldn't bring it back. I mean, look at it—that thing is basically an obelisk, a symbol that’s never truly been reclaimed. It’s one of those phallic icons that people around the globe just can't help but celebrate!.

Jason Grant said:Just my two cents on this one!
I know it might be a little tough to wrap your head around, but honestly, that’s pretty much my final take on the whole thing!
On top of all that,
It honestly feels like we’ve drifted into a conversation defined by a massive amount of ignorance, but that’s not even the half of it!I can definitely sense a certain level of tension and restlessness building up in this discussion, and honestly, it seems to be tied directly to the whole obelisk situation!
That psychological restlessness you're feeling? Honestly, I think it might just be a physical manifestation of sexual arousal—and hey, maybe that obelisk over there is actually to blame!

On top of all that, You know, I’ve been thinking about this lately—is it possible that the gay lobby back in the day was actually more powerful than it is now? Or maybe we're just looking at the same level of influence through a different lens? It's a wild thought to chew on!.

And now, we’re moving on to... How can we possibly ignore the scientific perspective regarding the phallic symbolism of the obelisk? I mean, even if you view it as a sort of focal point for faith, power, or—to be more precise—the absolute essence of truth itself, it’s hard to look away when it triggers such wild, heated reactions right here on this forum!

Jason Grant said:So, I'm circling back to this topic because—seriously, what the heck?
That’s why I keep saying,
The Obelisk definitely stirred up some unrest, and honestly, a certain kind of unfulfilled tension in people's pants.
And seriously, how can we not take the scientific perspective on the Obelisk as a phallic symbol more seriously? Even if it represents a sort of center of faith, power, or more specifically, the absolute essence of truth, how can we ignore it when it triggers such wild and "tense" reactions right here on this forum?.

Jason Grant said:Ethan Brooks59, you're claiming that
🤦the stone isn't hard enough?🤦


Right after your own little display of exhibitionism:
Ethan Brooks59 says:
"Basically acting like a total little guy"

Now you want us to believe that stone just isn't hard enough.
Hmm, hmm...
I mean, it's not like the pyramid is made out of Styrofoam or some soft material.
It was built entirely out of stone/rock.
Are you talking about a little guy, or someone "hard as stone"... or something else?
Not quite hard enough, huh? Eh, eh...
.

JASON GRANT, we are talking about facts regarding the pyramid, aren't we? Was that really your CONTRIBUTION to the discussion? Avoiding the question because "you don't feel like answering" and hiding a massive spike of frustration behind some supposedly "witty" or "fun" commentary? Just because you want to pad your post count? Is that really what you wanted to bring to THIS thread? Just trolling this whole discussion?
Well, there you have it—that's the stuff you're using to decorate a thread about pyramids. Bravo to you.

Jason Grant said:And then you follow up with a question like:
"and how is it that the entire pyramid wasn't built from even harder materials?"

Of course I know exactly why you're asking that.
You're trying to drag the conversation back to the composition of the building materials, which isn't even being questioned, and which is known with absolute certainty and reliability, and we are dealing with easily verifiable technical data for an impressive structure like a pyramid.

But then, what's the point of throwing in those ridiculous sexual innuendos? Just to be funny? Trust me, you aren't. It just comes off as totally immature.

Jason Grant said:But honestly, the real mystery—the thing that actually qualifies as one of the world's wonders—is the construction itself, and since people are constantly debating it, even among serious scientists, there are all sorts of different theories regarding the timeline of how it was built.

And that is exactly what we’ve been waiting for on this board! I mean, I've been dying for someone to actually dive into some concrete discussions instead of just rambling about "anti-gravity platforms" and "laser beams." Let's get into the actual mystery, weighing the pros and cons of every single detail.

Jason Grant said:Look, none of that matters, and you shouldn't be coming at me or the rest of the guys here with lines like:
""If you've lost your marbles, go brush your teeth and call it a night.""

Here is my response to your comment:
Jason Grant said:....
Why don't you try providing a real, reasoned breakdown of that supposed 1,200-ton Luna obelisk instead?
What's it made of?
When was it built?
What was its purpose?
And please, don't just say "it's a tomb," or I'm shutting my laptop down right now!rofl:

Did you seriously write that above? You did. So, what exactly are you expecting in return for a comment like that? A PhD dissertation? 🤦

Jason Grant said:Not to list everything.
But you've already been warned by the moderators multiple times for:
- Personal attacks
- Going off-topic
- Insults
- Stirring up drama
- Being nosy
.

Jason, don't you think the moderators are the ones who are supposed to be watching your posts as much as everyone else's? Are you really so above the rules that you think you can lecture others? You don't have the authority to pull that, because if everyone strictly followed the forum rules, I'm not sure who would end up in more trouble...
But hey, that's what the mods are for, not you. If something bothers you, just report it and let them handle it.

Jason Grant said:Feeling cornered by my reasoning, Ethan Brooks59, you're resorting to cheap shots. It seems like you've never truly developed an independent way of thinking—one that isn't tethered to pure imagination or historical guesswork. Instead, your mind seems stuck in shackles that prevent any real intellectual growth, essentially enslaving your thoughts to...It’s all just focused on tearing others down.

Alright, Jason Grant, I went ahead and laid out your "reasoning that supposedly pressured me" in those first few quotes. Honestly, you couldn't even manage to explain or write down the simplest things! You really did put me on the spot there. And bringing up "low insults"? That’s just an ad hominem attack, which is going to earn you a warning flag. Not because I'm being offensive, but because you seem to think that just because you have the freedom to write whatever you want, you also have the right to act however you want—lying, making things up, or throwing accusations around. See, it doesn't quite work like that in America..

Jason Grant said:We all have the right and the opportunity to present our arguments, ask questions, and call out logical fallacies, lack of evidence, or weak reasoning.

Specifically regarding the topic of pyramids, any forum member who wants to defend the negation has every right to challenge any part of the affirmative line of reasoning. They also have the right to challenge the interpretation of the thesis, as well as the factual and logical foundations of the affirmative argument if they personally believe those points are fabrications or based on shaky assumptions.
Furthermore, they have the right to use logical arguments to push back against intellectual decline.

Is someone else writing this for you, Jason Grant? Seriously, you haven't answered a single question asked of you! You haven't provided one paper, one article, one link, or even a single fact? Not one comment backed up by solid evidence? And now you're suddenly bothered by the lack of "arguments"?? The lack of "facts"?? Do you even know what a FACT is? Especially after all the articles you could have read on this thread? 🤦🤦🤣🤣

And this comes right when you got caught being totally clueless on that thread again. People gave you the answers, but clearly, it was all for nothing.
Elizabeth Cruz Elizabeth Cruz Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2017
#4 ·
Someone’s out here cross-posting stuff from ARCHAEOLOGY into the "Nikola Tesla - ether exists..." thread.?

What's the point of this spamming?
It seems pretty obvious, right?

I really hope the mods are paying attention.

My last contribution to that thread was right here:
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#5 ·
Larry Sanchez30, look, if you’ve got an issue, just start your own thread and stop trolling every single discussion on here with your constant complaining. It’s honestly getting pretty exhausting to watch.

AND YOU ARE LYING!! I’m saying it right here in public for everyone to see.

Your post was absolutely NOT what you’re claiming it was right now. Your actual post was this—and anyone can easily fact-check it:

Larry Sanchez30 said:Prove it and show me where exactly I claimed that.
It seems like you can't stop talking about Larry Sanchez30; you okay there?

There you go, Larry Sanchez30, that’s exactly what you said! You were attacking HepokS2 because they used you as an example of someone lying while they were responding to Rocky. You jumped into the thread like a total parachute jumper! And then, CLEARLY AND LOUDLY, you demanded to be "PROVED AND SHOWN" where you messed up. So why the sudden whining now? Are you trying to pretend you didn't say that? Whoa, now we’ve really got a problem.
Here is the post you were replying to, Larry Sanchez30.
HepokS2 said:The way you lie is starting to look pathological. Larry Sanchez30 is the one who kept insisting it was true that ten Sumerian kings lived for 400,000 years. If you don't believe me, just ask Larry Sanchez30.
You also wrote that dark matter is actually ether. Have you forgotten that already? You posted that today at 12:51 PM.
Ether doesn't exist. Your physics claims are completely wrong. Totally. You clearly don't know math at all. So how can you even comment on people who actually do? Einstein is a perfect example. Now you’re bringing him up, yet you (you, Larry Sanchez30, and your mathematician friend) are trying to debunk relativity.
P.S. Don't bother bringing up my post count; I have fewer posts than you have bans. And I've never been banned. Not even close.

And now you're lying again, twisting other people's words and probably frantically scrolling through screenshots hoping to find something that makes you look innocent? Have some shame.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#6 ·
Ethan Brooks59 said:Especially now that we're wrapping up the first thread with this post:
rustydrifter10

Closing this down for now while we wait on the supermod, so hang tight until then!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads