CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Topic suggestion: Z. Hasanbegović

Topic suggestion: Z. Hasanbegović

Started by Paul Thomas46 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Paul Thomas46Charles Fox10darkotter35Mark Harris66
Paul Thomas46 Paul Thomas46 Active MemberOP
101 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1 ·
Daklen, the moderators were busy cleaning house again today—it looks like quite a few posts have been wiped out...
Now, let’s be clear, I know things drifted off-topic. But the real issue is that there’s almost always more side-tracking going on than actual discussion over there—it’s just a fact.

When it comes to actual insults or rule-breaking, I won't weigh in on that.
I’m talking about those regular discussions that occasionally—😁—start up and can actually be pretty interesting, even if they are completely off-topic. For instance, take the debate about state seals (boring to me personally, but from what I saw, it held some substance) or today’s talk regarding presidential succession (which I think we handled well). All of that gets deleted, which is honestly such a shame. I even put together a really smart, insightful post today—🙏—but now it's just gone, along with a whole bunch of solid conversation.

My suggestion? Maybe open a dedicated "Close Politics" thread on the forum specifically for moving these off-topic tangents from the main thread. Of course, this would only apply to civil discussions—not the kind of posts that deserve a ban, but rather the parts of a debate where people actually dive deep and put in the effort.
Call it whatever you want; just give it a home so we can redirect everyone involved. Once a thread like that exists, it shouldn't be much work—we could just move the content that currently gets deleted over to the new spot.

If there’s a worry that these threads might spiral out of control, there’s an easy fix—the mods can always step in if a discussion starts dragging on too long or getting pushed too hard (though I doubt that'll be an issue since the main thread generates at least one tangent every single day... 🤣).

Oh, and by the way, I know we could just start entirely new threads, but that doesn't feel quite right. This approach preserves the continuity—that sense of connection. Besides, I’m not sure many of these side-topics would even gain traction as standalone threads; they tend to veer off in a different direction almost immediately.

Anyway, just something to consider... let me know what you think. 🙏
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
We’ve tried this more than once, and every single time it just devolves into a chaotic mess where nobody can make heads or tails of the conversation.
Coats of arms don't belong here; they aren't even part of the topic for this PDF. The core issue is politics—too many people assume anything political is fair game for debate, but it isn't. I’d honestly love to read or perhaps even contribute something regarding heraldry and flags through the ages, but that belongs in a proper venue for history, not under politics.
Paul Thomas46 Paul Thomas46 Active MemberOP
101 messages
joined Jan 2018
#3 ·
Charles Fox10 said:We’ve tried this more than once—and every single time, it just turns into a massive, chaotic mess where nobody can make heads or tails of the conversation anymore.
Heraldry isn't just off-topic; it doesn't even belong in this specific sub-forum. Politics is the core issue here, since so many people assume any kind of debate counts as "politics," when it really isn't... I’d love to read—and maybe even contribute—something about coats of arms and flags throughout the ages, but that belongs in a dedicated History section, not under Politics.

Well, I guess we won't then...🤷

It’s a shame, really—it would be such a great addition, especially since that subject always seems to spark so many side conversations. Other topics just don't pull that kind of energy.

What if we didn't cram everything into one thread? Maybe, when the opportunity arises, we could just start a new thread under Close Politics—which is where most of this would fit anyway—to keep things moving?
The thing is, politics, law, and history are all intertwined... there will always be those overlaps...🤷
darkotter35 darkotter35 Active Member
57 messages
joined Jul 2018
#4 ·
I don't want to clutter up the boards by starting yet another thread, so I’ll just drop this question here: why is this whole discussion about Hasanbegović being shut down instead of just being nuked entirely? Honestly, we should be flagging and deleting every single post that wanders off-topic, just to completely kill the momentum for those self-proclaimed "historians" and the die-hard fans of Mirko and Slavko...

The thing is, I actually have some pretty juicy stuff to share regarding Zlatko Hasanbegović, but I'm running out of places to put it...
Mark Harris66 Mark Harris66 Active Member
158 messages
joined Oct 2016
#5 ·
darkotter35 said:I don't want to start a whole new thread, so I'll just ask here—why is this Hasanbegović topic being shut down? Honestly, they should just ban the whole thing and strike any post that isn't strictly about him... it would definitely kill the drive for those self-proclaimed "historians" and fans of Mirko and Slavko...

Because I actually have some pretty interesting stuff to share about Zlatko Hasanbegović, and now I've got nowhere to put it...

There's a dedicated chat for the right-wing/nationalist crowd, so just post it there—though you'll need to sign up for that section first.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads