CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › M. Night Shyamalan: The Man and His Work

M. Night Shyamalan: The Man and His Work

Started by Emily Ward56 · · 👁 7 views · 26 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Emily Ward56bluenomad2Grace Edwardsrowdyhawk8Rebecca Peterson3Andrew Roberts3boldtiger7Karen Smith9Kenneth Bishopsilentcanyon58Kenneth AllenMark White11Jason Brown4Lawrence Booth2rowdyotter12goldenscout14Brandon Fox2Bradley White73Austin Rodriguez5
Emily Ward56 Emily Ward56 MemberOP
41 messages
joined Jan 2015
#1 ·
image

He is one of those rare directors who doesn't just sit behind the camera—he actually pops up in commercials (like for American Express) because his persona and directorial style are such recognizable brands to the general public. He’s primarily known as the king of the "twist," a reputation that often overshadows his genuine knack for weaving emotional narratives. Since he’s originally from India, it makes sense why he has such a deep fascination with spiritual and supernatural themes—plus that tendency to present the truly bizarre as if it were perfectly mundane. That said, he is a quintessential American through and through; you can see it in how deeply he's rooted in US pop culture—think comic books and baseball—and his habit of filming almost exclusively in Philadelphia and the surrounding areas of Pennsylvania where he and his family call home.

M. Night Shyamalan (Manoj Nelliyattu Shyamalan) was born in Pondicherry, India, into a medical family that fully expected him to follow in their footsteps. His father, Nelliattu C. Shyamalan, is a GP, and his mother, Jayalakshmi, is a gynecologist. The Shyamalans moved to the United States in the sixties, and when Manoj was conceived, Jayalakshmi actually headed back to India to spend her final months of pregnancy with her parents. Manoj was born in India and spent his first six weeks there before moving to the family's American home in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He attended a private Catholic school followed by an Episcopal high school. He eventually graduated from New York University's Tisch School of the Arts in 1992, which is where he started swapping out "Nelliyattu" for his middle name, "Night."

Even as a kid, Shyamalan had that auteur itch, constantly filming things on a home camcorder—he actually knocked out about 45 of them by the time he turned 17. Once he hit it big with 'The Sixth Sense,' he started including those early amateur efforts on the DVDs of his major feature films.

Shyamalan’s debut feature was a semi-autobiographical drama titled 'Praying with Anger' (1992). It was filmed in Chennai, India, making it the only movie he’s ever shot outside of his home state of Pennsylvania. Funded by family money, the film managed to screen at the Toronto film festival and was eventually picked up by Canadian television. His follow-up, 'Wide Awake' (1995), was shot at his former Catholic school with his parents serving as producers. The story follows a ten-year-old boy searching for God after his grandfather passes away; the parental roles were played by Dan Delany and Denis Leary, with Rosie O'Donnell and Julia Stiles rounding out the cast. While the film was a bit of a commercial dud, Shyamalan found success as a screenwriter, penning the script for the animated film 'Stuart Little' (1999) that same year.

In 1993, he married his college sweetheart, an Indian psychologist named Bhavna Vaswan. They have two daughters and have lived in Philadelphia since 2006, right near his usual filming haunts.

Yet, his massive breakout remains 'The Sixth Sense' (1999), the film that essentially defined his style and brought both critical acclaim (earning 6 Oscar nominations, including Best Director and Best Original Screenplay) and massive commercial success ($600 million at the box office). This horror-thriller centers on a psychiatrist (Bruce Willis) trying to help a troubled young boy (Haley Joel Osment) who claims he can see dead people. As the doctor digs into the boy's case, he hits a sudden twist at the end that ties everything back to his own fate—so much so that studios actually begged the media not to spoil the ending. Those jarring twists in high-tension stories have since become the trademark of a Shyamalan film.

'Unbreakable' (2000) was the next hit to come out of the Shyamalan camp. A man named David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is the sole survivor of a horrific train crash, and a comic book collector named Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) is convinced this wasn't just luck—that comics actually accurately depict the existence of people destined to be superheroes. Even though it didn't get the universal praise 'The Sixth Sense' did, the film was a solid success and proved his previous win wasn't a fluke. Shyamalan once again delivered an intriguing tale, and instead of standard trailers, the best advertisement was a cryptic teaser that revealed almost nothing to the audience, yet was so effective it snagged a Best Trailer award in 2001.

'Signs' (2002) is a peculiar slice of sci-fi centered on a priest (Mel Gibson) who has lost his faith following the death of his wife—now he’s just trying to keep his family (Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin and Abigail Breslin) safe from an alien invasion. Interestingly, Gibson was tapped for the role because M. Night Shyamalan saw him pull off a similar vibe in 'Die Hard,' playing a hero pushed to the edge after losing his wife. Following 'The Sixth Sense,' this stands as Shyamalan's most successful outing, pulling in over $400 million at the box office.

'The Village' (2004) marks his first foray into period pieces, set back in the late 19th century. The community, governed by Elders (William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver), lives in total isolation to shield themselves from terrifying creatures lurking in the woods. A romance between the blind Ivy (Bryce Dallas Howard) and young Lucius (Joaquin Phoenix) sets off a chain reaction that threatens the entire settlement when it unearths—you guessed it—another shocking secret.
The film did okay commercially, but critics weren't having it, sparking endless debates about whether Shyamalan is actually being original or if he's just leaning on plagiarism.

However, his biggest stumble would be what he considers his most personal project—a film so contentious he actually clashed with the big shots at Disney over it. 'Lady in the Water' (2006) is a fantastical fairy tale about a mermaid named Story (Bryce Dallas Howard) who can't return to her world and needs help from Cleveland (Paul Giamatti) to fend off a mysterious, dangerous entity. Released right alongside massive action blockbusters like 'Pirates of the Caribbean 2,' it failed to capture the younger audience it was clearly aimed at.
Consequently, after those early debut dramas under the family studio umbrella, this became his first true commercial dud, and critics were ruthless, branding it the "showgirl" of fantasy films.

He followed that up with 'The Happening', 'The Last Airbender', and 'After Earth'

Even though he's raked in over a billion dollars and built a loyal following, both critics and audiences remain pretty split on his work. Critics love to accuse him of trying to mimic Hitchcock—which is a standard critique for anyone making thrillers—and Shyamalan’s homage to the master is evident in his choice to make regular cameo appearances in his own movies, much like Hitch did. Plus, he understands the power of self-promotion. Take, for instance, when the Sci-Fi Channel produced a mockumentary about a childhood "accident" where he supposedly fell into a frozen pond and had a near-death experience. After the supposed incident, Shyamalan claimed he could communicate with spirits, but he allegedly flew into a rage when he found out the secret was out, refusing to participate in the broadcast. The reality? The whole thing was a bit of a stunt involving M. Night's "I love messing with the audience" persona, serving as a clever marketing ploy to drum up interest for 'The Village.'

The most common misunderstanding among viewers is a fundamental misreading of his style. Everyone labels him a horror director known for twist endings, and then they complain when his movies aren't particularly scary or surprising. But his films are actually something else entirely—he essentially makes family melodramas infused with supernatural elements. The high-tension moments are merely trials for the characters to undergo so they can question themselves and, after the catharsis, discover what they need to do to hold their families together. While many categorize his work as 'Twilight Zone' territory (ordinary people suddenly thrust into eerie, fantastic situations), unlike typical horror where Evil remains a threat until the credits roll, Shyamalan tends to wrap things up on an optimistic note.

His signature style features meticulous mise-en-scène, unconventional camera angles, and a subtle build-up of atmosphere through effective music and editing. He rarely relies on CGI, preferring "old-school" techniques like complex storytelling and a haunting atmosphere without resorting to graphic violence. He places immense importance on characters that the audience can actually connect with, which is why he puts so much weight on casting. Shyamalan also likes to stick with what works, frequently reuniting with lead actors like Bruce Willis, Joaquin Phoenix, and Bryce Dallas Howard in subsequent projects. He prefers total creative control, typically acting as writer, producer, and even actor in the films he directs.I've been doing some digging—mostly because I have too much free time on my hands—into the filmography of M. Night Shyamalan. It’s an interesting journey, really; a bit of a rollercoaster through different eras of storytelling. Here is how his work stacks up, chronologically speaking:

Praying with Anger (1992)

image

Wide Awake (1998)

image

The Sixth Sense (1999)

image

Unbreakable (2000)

image

Signs (2002)

image
bluenomad2 bluenomad2 Active Member
106 messages
joined Mar 2017
#2 ·
Emily Ward56 Emily Ward56 MemberOP
41 messages
joined Jan 2015
#3 ·
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#4 ·
Just a massive, ego-driven jerk using the same tired old tricks. He’s obsessed with landing a cameo in every single one of his movies, even though he clearly hasn't got a clue when it comes to actual acting. I mean, he isn't the only director who does this, but at least Woody Allen and Quentin Tarantino actually made those appearances look decent.
I honestly despise almost everything he's ever made, except for The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable, which are absolute masterpieces. If they weren't so heavily reliant on those huge twists, I'd probably be watching them on loop.
Emily Ward56 Emily Ward56 MemberOP
41 messages
joined Jan 2015
#5 ·
I’ve always been a huge fan of this director—there's just something about his unique cinematic language and stylistic flair. He has this clever way of slipping a massive twist under your nose in those final few minutes (though, okay, maybe not in every single one lately).👍

I'll try to rank his films from best to worst (full disclosure: I haven't sat through all of them yet):

1. The Sixth Sense
2. Signs
3. Unbreakable
4. The Village
5. The Happening
rowdyhawk8 rowdyhawk8 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jul 2020
#6 ·
Honestly, I’m such a huge fan of the stuff he put out before >... especially >... but man, ever since that movie, it feels like nothing has really hit the mark. I actually ended up turning off > after only thirty minutes because it was just too much for me. 🙂
I gotta say, my two absolute favorites of his have to be > and >...
Rebecca Peterson3 Rebecca Peterson3 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2015
#7 ·
Lady in the Water is easily one of the absolute worst films ever made...
Andrew Roberts3 Andrew Roberts3 Active Member
51 messages
joined Aug 2010
#8 ·
Look, he’s completely lost all credibility with me. I mean, "The Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable" are absolute masterpieces. "Signs" was really solid too, though you can definitely start feeling that downward slide there. Then you get to "The Village," which is decent enough until you hit that twist—which, frankly, left me feeling pretty let down. As for "Lady in the Water" and "The Happening"? Total flops. Complete disappointments. Now, "The Last Airbender" was clearly aimed at kids, so I can't even take it seriously, but "After Earth" actually kind of caught me off guard... not because it was a masterpiece, mind you, but because my expectations were practically zero. Between M. Night Shyamalan's track record and the whole Smith family thing, I didn't expect much, and it turned out to be, if nothing else, an entertaining watch. But hey, none of that changes the fact that when it comes to Shyamalan, I don't expect a single damn thing anymore.
Rebecca Peterson3 Rebecca Peterson3 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2015
#9 ·
It makes you wonder how someone capable of delivering two genuine masterpieces like The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable can somehow spiral into total clutter with projects like Lady in the Water and The Happening...
boldtiger7 boldtiger7 Active Member
62 messages
joined Aug 2021
#10 ·
His filmography shows quite a massive range of quality, swinging wildly from something like Unbreakable to projects like The Happening or After Earth. 🤣

I honestly feel a sense of regret regarding The Village; it truly had the potential to be an exceptional piece of cinema if it hadn't been undermined by that rather foolish romantic twist.
Karen Smith9 Karen Smith9 Active Member
183 messages
joined Apr 2013
#11 ·
Anthony Ortiz said:I really love this director—his unique approach to filmmaking and his specific style are just captivating. He has this clever way of slipping a massive twist in during those final few minutes (well, maybe not in every single one!). 👍

I’ll try to rank his films from best to worst (though, full disclosure, I haven't seen them all):

1. The Sixth Sense
2. Signs
3. Unbreakable
4. The Village
5. The Happening

It’s honestly so cunning and unexpected that you can almost feel a twist coming—even if you know it's there. Still, I think I personally prefer movies with a bit more swing to them. 🙂
Kenneth Bishop Kenneth Bishop Newcomer
3 messages
joined Feb 2020
#12 ·
The Sixth Sense
his one good movie
the rest is total garbage =D
silentcanyon58 silentcanyon58 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2011
#13 ·
Unbreakable is hands down my absolute favorite and best film of his. Everything he’s done since then has just been a bit of a guilty pleasure for me, and honestly, that feeling pretty much tapered off after Lady in the Water. I know a lot of people criticize him for using this "cut and paste" formula—you know, where you can practically set your watch by the predictable plot twist at the end. But to me, that feels like someone deciding they suddenly hate a band just because the guitarist has a specific, repetitive style. It's like his signature move. Once that famous cut-and-paste/plot-twist method stopped feeling fresh, I just wasn't hooked anymore. It also doesn't help that his movies seem to be getting weaker and weaker lately; I'm not even sure if there's anything left that could actually bump him back up to the A-list.

But man, if that guy knows how to work a camera, he really does. I genuinely love his visual style and the way he captures things on screen.
Kenneth Allen Kenneth Allen Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jun 2024
#14 ·
...

It’s an interesting setup at first, I'll give him that—but honestly, I quickly found myself getting bored by his hyper-focused approach to every single story. It feels like he’s constantly trying to sit in multiple chairs at once just to serve those big shots above him. Anyway, one last thing to consider: nobody stays pure these days.

I skipped over some of his early stuff and decided to stop right at Signs (2002)—that was really the only reason I felt like commenting. Those first twenty minutes? The way the setting is introduced, the urban interactions, the dialogue... it’s actually flawless. You could change the color grading, strip the color away entirely, or have any top-tier director sign off on it, and people would believe in it. That driving sequence through town, the conversation between Phoenix and the officer, that effortless atmosphere—it felt like a master observer had meticulously analyzed and prepared every frame.

It makes you wonder if they just had a great day on set, if the crew hit their stride, or who exactly was consulting on the vision... it’s as if he sat down 1:1 with everyone for hours, fine-tuning every tiny nuance to match his specific vision. Whether it was purely solo work or world-class assistance, I can't say, but those opening twenty minutes possess such an impressive sense of environment and communication. But after that? Shyamalan falls back into that usual concentrated style, and it’s almost like you're watching a completely different movie made by a different director.

Nowadays, I picture Shyamalan as some sort of 1950s film duo, and I can already see the titles coming: Shyamalan meets the Mummy, Shyamalan meets the Vampire, Shyamalan meets the Invisible Woman, Shyamalan and the Haunted Lake.... 🙂

If we could somehow pull him out of this murky haze and let him direct something that isn't tied to his specific "auteur" brand, I truly think he could deliver something incomparably better. Because the beginning of Signs really struck a chord with me.

...
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#15 ·
silentcanyon58 said:Unbreakable is his absolute favorite, easily his best work. Everything after that is just a guilty pleasure that loses steam once you hit Lady in the Water.

I forced myself to sit down and rewatch it. It’s a masterpiece, no question about it. A genuine superhero movie, without all those pretentious explosions and over-the-top nonsense you see in stuff like the Avengers. The cinematography is interesting, and you get a flawless performance from Bruce Willis—which, let's be honest, is a rare find for him—alongside Jackson.
I read somewhere that the box office was kind of a letdown and critics weren't feeling it mostly because the marketing was off. The studio insisted on pushing it as this mystery thriller instead of what it actually was: a superhero flick. Even Quentin Tarantino mentioned it, putting it in his top 20 favorites (and I know that guy has seen basically every single moving picture ever made).
Comparing them isn't really fair, but honestly, I'd much rather watch this a few more times than sit through Dark Knight.
silentcanyon58 silentcanyon58 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2011
#16 ·
Matthew Johnson30 said:I actually went out of my way to give this one a rewatch recently, and man, it really is a masterpiece, no question about it. It’s such a genuine superhero movie, too—it avoids all those over-the-top explosions and the sheer pretentiousness you see in stuff like the Avengers. The cinematography is just so engaging, and you get an absolutely flawless performance from Bruce Willis (which, let's be honest, is a rare gem for him!) alongside Jackson.
I was reading up on it earlier, and apparently, the box office numbers were pretty underwhelming and the critics weren't kind, mostly because the marketing was totally off. The studio insisted on pushing it as some sort of mystery thriller instead of embracing its identity as a superhero flick. Even Quentin Tarantino pointed that out, and he actually ranked it in his top 20 favorites—and we all know that guy has probably seen every single moving picture ever made!
Comparing it to other blockbusters feels totally unfair, but honestly? I’d take a few more viewings of this over the Dark Knight any day of the week.

To be honest, I’m actually really glad they didn't market it as a superhero movie. I truly believe that kind of hype would have completely gutted certain essential parts of the story... if it didn't ruin the entire soul of the film altogether. 🙂
Mark White11 Mark White11 Active Member
92 messages
joined Jan 2018
#17 ·
It was originally meant to be this massive trilogy—like, the second installment was supposed to be the one where it finally turns into a full-blown, classic superhero movie. Honestly? I still think those first two films of his are his absolute best. Everything else he’s done lately just doesn't hit the same for me... though, I gotta admit, I actually really dig The Village.

I’ve gotta say, *Signs* is such a wild ride in certain parts—it’s got that one absolutely bone-chilling scene that stays with you. It isn't exactly a masterpiece, but it definitely isn't trash either. It just kind of sits right in that middle ground for me.
silentcanyon58 silentcanyon58 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2011
#18 ·
Just a quick, casual question for the group... am I really the only one here who actually sat through and genuinely loved 🙂Lady in the Water?
Jason Brown4 Jason Brown4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2015
#19 ·
Maybe Unbreakable stands alone. I guess there's just no competition. 👍 It was a great movie, I guess.

Everything else falls a few levels below that. I get why people think The Sixth Sense is good, but honestly, I was nearly dying of boredom watching it. I remember it being just terribly dull, I guess. 🤦 Even Bruce Willis couldn't save this one, especially since I figured out the twist way too early. I guess the movie just didn't click for me. Maybe Signs was better; it had a few deeper moments, even if the whole thing felt a bit underwhelming.

I watched The Village a long time ago, but I don't actually remember it.

The Happening. I barely made it through. It was a killer movie, I guess. 🙂

I haven't even tried watching The Last Airbender—the trailer was probably enough for me. 🤣 This topic isn't really my cup of tea, but even so, it looked pretty pathetic at first glance, I guess.

After Earth is a nonsensical story in every sense, though I guess you could still sit through it until the end. Honestly, the movie isn't quite as bad as the plot suggests; maybe Shyamalan really does have worse stuff out there. If they had just focused on surviving a toxic planet without all the extra mess, it might have been okay. Even little Smith Jr. isn't that irritating, I suppose; he's certainly not the worst.😁

I haven't watched the others, except...

silentcanyon58 said:Just a quick question... am I really the only one who actually enjoyed Lady in the Water? 🙂

Well, here we go. ☕
My verdict: a total slog. BUT... the premise is solid. I guess I'm genuinely curious how this fairy tale would have turned out if someone else had directed it—maybe Steven Spielberg, if he was even still interested in that kind of stuff. Maybe then we'd actually get something engaging and well-paced. 🙂 I guess I found Shyamalan's filmography to be pretty irritating, unfortunately.
Lawrence Booth2 Lawrence Booth2 Regular
297 messages
joined Sep 2022
#20 ·
I actually think Happening is great
my favorite is definitely Zootopia
haven't gotten around to watching Lady Bird yet
as for the others, I’ve caught some in theaters but honestly, they kind of blur together after a while

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads