NASCAR technical

jadeseal7 said:A true NASCAR fan prays to God that the other team sucks—though maybe not quite as bad as McLaren 😁

You don't know what racing is—you aren't a real racing fan.

NASCAR is the absolute pinnacle of motorsports, and because of that, it pulls in the biggest crowds and attracts massive amounts of investment. You've got the heavy hitters from the automotive industry—think Ferrari, Mercedes, McLaren, Renault, exBMW, Honda, and more—all competing at the highest level. Because of that caliber, you just can't lump it in with NASCAR and try to force some artificial fixes just to make teams like Sauber, NASCAR, or Haas more competitive.

The reality is simple: these multi-billion dollar corporations participating in NASCAR are here for the prestige, the rivalry, and most importantly, the marketing. There's zero chance they're going to start building mediocre junk just to ensure every car is within two-hundredths of a second just to "level the playing field."

copperdrifter26 says there are big teams and small teams in NASCAR too—it's just that the gap between the giants over there is tiny. There's no real dominance, and that’s exactly what Brawn is trying to fix for NASCAR...

What's gotten into you? Why on earth are you comparing it to NASCAR??

neonfox65 said:Even in NASCAR, you've got big teams and small teams, but the gap between the giants is tiny. There’s no single dominant force, and that's exactly what Brawn is trying to fix for NASCAR too.

If we actually listen to this bunch of clueless idiots who don't know the first thing about NASCAR, all we'll achieve is destroying the sport entirely and turning it into some low-rent spectacle...

silverviper44 said:Man, NASCAR really got a grip on you—why on earth are you comparing it to NASCAR?

Because it's all about the NASCARization of NASCAR...

stormybadger8 said:If they actually listened to this crowd of people who don't have a clue about NASCAR—the ones pushing for that specific direction—all they'd do is completely destroy NASCAR as we know it and turn it into some low-rent spectacle...

🤦

So why did viewership drop by a third?

I mean, any sane person just wants to see more competitive teams on the track...

neonfox65 said:🤦

Why has viewership dropped by a third?

I believe any reasonable person simply wants to see more competitive teams on the track.

Viewership took a hit because of pay TV and Bernie's sheer greed...

neonfox65 said:🤦

Why did viewership drop by a third?

I think any sane person just wants to see more competitive teams.

With the NASCARization of NASCAR, viewership isn't just dropping—it’s cratering so hard it might disappear entirely.☕
In fact, there'll be so few viewers that filming the races won't even be worth it with a smartphone, let alone pro cameras...

Honestly, this NASCARization probably won't even bring NASCAR closer to the American audience that watches NASCAR, because why would some kid watch a knockoff when they have the real thing?...
And if the European and rest of the world audiences outside the US actually wanted NASCARization, they'd probably just watch NASCAR instead of NASCAR.😵
For God's sake, you don't need to be an atomic physicist to realize this kind of stupidity can only drive NASCAR into total ruin...

Seriously, do you honestly think anyone in your country would pay for broadcasting rights to a NASCARized version of NASCAR that only you and nobody else will be watching?🤦

Given the circumstances, viewership has actually fucking increased, not dropped...
Because considering how many countries Bernie moved from FTA to payTV, it's a miracle viewership hasn't plummeted to 1/4... actually, not 1/4, but barely 1/4 of what it used to be...
You used to have FTA broadcasts practically everywhere, and now you can count on one hand the number of countries that have FTA coverage—and even then, it's all races Live, but with 70% commercials instead of actual racing...

Just a few years ago, you had reliable free Live timing, and now they make you pay for it through the NASCAR app.🙂
Now you pay for the broadcast, usually in some insanely expensive packages, and then everyone acts surprised when viewership drops.🤦

If they put a free live stream online without any geo-restrictions, you can bet viewership would jump by at least 100%.😍

And one more thing: viewership might have taken a dip, but the revenue hasn't...

Richard Ross11 said:Viewership took a hit because of pay TV—basically just greedy Bernie...

It’s not just that, though. Look at how viewership plummeted in Germany even though they have free TV on RTL.

stormybadger8 said:With this NASCARization of NASCAR, viewership hasn't just dropped—it’s absolutely cratered... like, it's basically non-existent now... ☕

🤦

First sentence alone was a total disaster—honestly, I almost didn't bother reading the rest... but fine, I'll give it a shot. 🙂

Honestly, viewership is going to drop so low that filming the races won't even be worth the effort—you wouldn't even bother pulling out your phone, let alone using pro gear...

I'm officially out... 🤦

Let's be real—this whole NASCARization thing probably won't even help bring the American NASCAR crowd over to NASCAR. I mean, come on... what kid is actually going to watch some knockoff version when they've already got the real deal?

American NASCAR will never overtake the popularity of the NFL—that’s just common sense. But I don't get why you're obsessing over the American audience... NASCAR is a global sport, and the whole world watches it, not just some small group of Americans.

Look, if the rest of the world outside the States actually wanted the NASCARization of everything, they’d probably just be watching NASCAR instead of following NASCAR... 😵

You’ve got it all wrong—this is legendary stuff. Look, I watch NASCAR, sure, but what I really want is a better version of NASCAR where the competition actually bites back... where you have more than just two teams and maybe four drivers fighting for the title. Imagine if Max, Ricciardo, Alonso, and maybe even someone like Hulkenberg were all in the mix. Wouldn't that be incredible? Why on earth wouldn't we make that happen? And then you claim viewership would drop... man, you're just not getting it...

Look, you don't need to be some rocket scientist to see that this kind of bullshit is exactly what’s going to drive NASCAR straight into the ground...

What have we actually been watching for the last three years? For me, it’s been an absolute disaster. NASCAR needs to learn from this—they can't ever let something like this happen again...

I mean, do you honestly think anyone in this country would actually pay for the broadcasting rights to some NASCARized version of the sport—something you’d be watching all by yourself because nobody else gives a damn?... 🤦

Look, everyone's out here saying dominance isn't good for the sport and that nobody actually wants to watch it—you're the only one trying to lecture us...

neonfox65 said:Look, everyone keeps saying dominance ruins the sport and nobody wants to watch it, but you're the only one here trying to play philosopher.

People who don't know the first thing about sports are the ones talking 🤦
Fucking hell, you have to be a total amateur regarding NASCAR to start preaching about how dominance isn't good for the sport 🙄

Since NASCAR has been around, there’s always been dominance from one team, with very few exceptions in seasons where you might have two or maybe three teams fighting for the lead—but even then, they just trade wins...

That’s just how this sport works. It’s been like this for years, growing steadily alongside that dominance. We haven't seen this "Twitter/Facebook generation" yet—the ones who constanty bitch about everything without having a clue what they actually want.🤦

Ever since the beginning, there have been top-tier teams, mid-fielders, and backmarkers, just like there are elite drivers, average drivers, and rookies trying to prove themselves...
And honestly, that’s exactly what makes NASCAR great—something other series could never replicate...

Why am I saying this? Because dominance in motorsports is completely natural.
What you see in NASCAR is anything but natural; in fact, it’s so artificial it’s almost ridiculous...

neonfox65 said:In the US, NASCAR will never be bigger than NASCAR, just like football will never be bigger than the NFL—that's obvious. But I don't get why you're obsessing over the American audience when NASCAR is a global sport watched by the whole world, not just a handful of Americans.

Hamilton, do you even read your own nonsense?
Do you realize you're basically trying to "Americanize" NASCAR to mimic its own style, even though you know perfectly well:🤦 - that NASCAR will never outgrow itself in the States.
- that Americans aren't suddenly going to flock to it because of that; viewership will likely stay right where it is now.
- that the rest of the world watches this sport and they don't care for that specific American style—because if they did, NASCAR would already be way bigger than it is.

🙂

stormybadger8 said:That’s just talk from people who don't have a clue about the sport 🤦

🤦🤦🤦

And you do?

Hamilton, do you even read this nonsense you write? 🤦
Don't you get that you're basically trying to push a NASCARization of NASCAR onto NASCAR, even though—and you know this—
- NASCAR will never be bigger than what they have in the States...

*fucking hell, man!!! NASCAR isn't doing this for the sake of America.

- that Americans definitely won't start watching NASCAR like crazy because of this; viewership there will probably stay more or less the same as it is now...

Always back to America with you... seriously, you've lost it.

- that people watch NASCAR in other parts of the world and they aren't really feeling that American style—because if they were, NASCAR would already be way bigger than NASCAR 🙂

But look, people want to watch open-wheel cars—the fastest machines on twisty tracks with drivers from all over the globe—not NASCAR.

You haven't grasped a single thing... I might as well be arguing with a tree.

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f...-carey-909048/

Chase Carey mentioned that the powerhouse teams have actually reached out to the new leadership—basically asking to be "protected from themselves"—to stop the runaway spending wars.

The CEO points out that these massive outfits are bleeding cash just to keep pace with their rivals... and the only real fix is tweaking the rulebook to slash costs and kill off that pointless overspending.

Carey and F1 Sporting chief Ross Brawn see The post-2020 Power unit regulations as The Key to finally getting those expenses under control.

Following a sit-down with the FIA and the four manufacturers – with alfa Romeo and VW / Audi also represented – they've pretty much settled on the core framework.

"After our engine meeting a few weeks back, the consensus was that we want engines to be simpler, cheaper, and—honestly—louder," Carey explained.

"The current era just got too pricey and overly complicated... which gave Mercedes the window to build a superior engine compared to everyone else for a while.

"We definitely want tech and engineering involved, but it shouldn't be the whole show. Sure, you want a technical edge, but at the end of the day, the drivers need to be the main attraction.

"The sheer amount of cash some teams are dropping right now is insane—even they admit it. In a way, they’re telling us, 'Look, we need someone to protect us from our own impulses.'

"You've got a few teams burning through massive budgets without actually adding anything to the fan experience. They're just spending because two other guys are spending... so they feel forced to keep up just to stay in the fight.

"We want this to be a sustainable business for every single team. If we can get a handle on the budget, the engine specs become a huge part of that solution."

Keep it simple.

Carey is convinced that tech is currently overshadowing everything else, even if he realizes it’s always been baked into the DNA of the sport.

"On the track, we’re going to do whatever it takes to boost the racing, improve overtaking, and just make the action better.

"We shouldn't make things so convoluted that the audience can't follow along. One of The things WE keep saying to them is AT The end of The day we're doing IT for The fans.

"Our goal is a streamlined sport—pure sports entertainment. We need to make the show great and then give the fans a way to actually connect with it.

"Research and development matters, obviously—we aren't trying to kill the engineering side—but it can't be the only thing people talk about. Niki Lauda keeps reminding me: we've got to let the drivers drive."

🙏

Just you wait...
That American idiot is going to totally wreck NASCAR, and who knows if there will even be a sport left by 2020, let alone one that's actually better.🙄

stormybadger8 said:Just you wait...
That American idiot is going to totally fuck up NASCAR—honestly, who knows if the sport will even be relevant by 2020, let alone actually improved 🙄

🙂🤦

Anyone figured out how using oil as fuel actually works?
Like, how does that give you an edge over just using straight gasoline?

Joseph Edwards86 said:Did anyone actually wrap their head around how using oil as fuel works?
How does oil give an edge over straight gasoline?

It’s probably all about the fuel volume itself. You know the deal with max flow rates limiting total power...
just remember when Ricky got disqualified because RB was pumping more fuel than they were allowed...

Logic dictates that if the oil bypasses that flow sensor, it's basically "free" extra mass. It might not provide the same raw combustion energy as gas, but you get more total stuff in the engine, which eventually translates to more power...

Following that logic, you could only pull this off for short bursts since there isn't enough oil in the car to run on it constantly. Honestly, it’s a pretty logical explanation for why Mercedes-Benz looks like a rocket ship in qualifying but struggles during the actual race...

stormybadger8 said:It’s probably all about fuel volume, you know? There’s that whole rule about max flow rates which ends up capping the power output...
just remember how Ricky got disqualified because Red Bull was pumping more fuel than they were allowed...

If you think about it, that oil isn't even going through the fuel flow sensor, so it's basically extra. Maybe it doesn't give them the exact same punch as fuel, but since there's more total mass moving, it probably boosts the power too...

And following that logic, they could only pull this off for short bursts since there isn't enough oil in the car to do it constantly. It would totally explain why Mercedes-Benz has that edge in qualifying that just disappears during the actual race...

Aha, that actually makes sense! Especially for qualifying and that Third Round. Right now, Ferrari is getting blamed for burning oil. And hey, where there's smoke (from oil), there's fire (from oil).