#21 ·
Well, I really blew it. I predicted they'd come out for the second half at 7-6, but it ended up being 9-8. ☕
Started by wanderingmarlin15 · · 👁 6 views · 77 replies
electricorca112 said:They’re definitely much better than the Swedes, who haven't managed to beat them since the last century.
Ryan Vaughn7 said:But honestly, there's a huge difference between planning for one specific outcome—which isn't easy anyway—and someone actually messing up, missing a play, or just screwing it all up and landing them in a semifinal against Denmark.
Kenneth Clark18 said:Even before the tournament started, everyone assumed the Danes would take it all on home soil.
It’s just like how France is expected to sweep the 2017 World Cup at home.
That's the one thing we just can't seem to pull off.
electricorca112 said:It’s actually the other way around. This whole idea of a "French complex" is really just a convenient myth cooked up by our local media and the public at large.
If you set aside the exhibition matches and look strictly at the European Championships, World Championships, and the Olympics, we've faced them 12 times since 2003, and the record is perfectly split with six wins apiece. Interestingly, throughout that entire stretch, no one side has ever managed to string together more than two consecutive victories.
So, when you look at the big picture—or even just the recent matchups where we've taken two out of the last four—it's clear we are on completely equal footing, with the wins alternating back and forth like clockwork.
That's exactly why the French have plenty of motivation to try and knock us out by letting the Swedes slip through with a one-point margin. 🙄
Ryan Vaughn7 said:But it’s definitely a lot smaller than the chance of someone forgetting a play, messing up, or just blowing it during the setup of a single predetermined outcome, which would land them in a semifinal against Denmark.
Kenneth Clark18 said:Even before the tournament started, everyone assumed the Danes would take it on home soil.
Just like how France is supposedly going to win the 2017 World Cup at home.
That’s the one thing we just can't seem to manage.
Kenneth Clark18 said:How do you explain what happened in Chicago back in '09?
How do you explain that total blackout during the 2007 games in Germany?
And how do you account for that absolute stupidity at the Beijing Olympics?
What about Mexico? Yeah, Mexico. 🙂
How do you explain the London Olympics after that +7 loss against Denmark?
Or that nonsense in Spain where we practically begged for a harder bracket by picking the tough route?
Ryan Vaughn7 said:And those Mexicans 😍
Ryan Vaughn7 said:And Mexicans 😍
Jonathan Barnes5 said:We lost to them in Spain during the group stage. Tunisia is a legitimate threat, maybe even semi-final material. The European Championship in Switzerland will be a fight for the finals, and the WC in Germany will be just as cutthroat. We’ll face them again in Norway for the European semis. They take the Olympics. They take the WC final in the States, and they take the European final in Austria too. We play them in Mexico, but they beat us in London and in Spain last year. We've been knocked out by them four times, while they've knocked us out six times. Winning in the group stage doesn't mean much if it doesn't decide who moves on.
electricorca112 said:It’s actually the opposite. This whole "France complex" thing is just a total fabrication by our media and the general public.
If you ignore friendly matches—looking strictly at the WC, WC, and Olympics—we've faced them 12 times since 2003. Each side has walked away with exactly 6 wins. And in that entire stretch, nobody managed to string together more than two wins in a row.
So, it’s a dead heat—both over the long haul and in the short term (we took 2 out of the last 4; the wins have been alternating perfectly steadily).
That’s exactly why the French have plenty of motivation to knock us out by letting the Swedes slip through with a -1 advantage. 🙄