Kimberly Wright said:Exactly. There’s basically no counterargument here.
The proof:

The pattern is pretty obvious 🧐
edit: A little hint...
not working construction = grasshopper
working construction = jacked as hell
not working construction = grasshopper
Basically, tons of cigarettes and barely any food = grasshopper
Few cigarettes and solid meals = jacked as hell
Let's try this—some girl walks into the gym wearing shorts, and the guys who've been hanging around there for five or ten years just stare in disbelief 😲 because she actually has more muscle mass in her legs and naturally wider shoulders and a thicker ribcage than those guys who have been obsessively tracking calories and hitting leg day for years.
Then she leaves the gym, drops her intake to 1200 calories because she's dieting for summer, slows down her lifestyle to just doing housework, studying for exams, maybe walking the neighbor's dog, and hits some fat-burn or low-intensity cardio—over a few months, she turns into a total stick, but with model-tier legs.
She shows up at the gym again, and everyone's staring all over again 😲 ...
And then, once she's forced herself to be tiny, she naturally hypertrophies back up by training three times a week and eating slightly more... and people are surprised all over again. 🤣
If you've got the genetics to grow, you grow; if you've got the genetics to lean out, you lean out.
People built to grow have to "torture" themselves just to stay small, while those built to lean out have to "torture" themselves just to get big and stay there.
The big guys want to be small, and the small guys want to be big.
Very simple 🤣