#1 ·
Hi everyone,
I was hoping someone might be able to help me make sense of my current situation...
During a laparoscopic surgery to remove a teratoma from my right ovary and a standard cyst from the other, the surgeon performed a patency test on my fallopian tubes. To be honest, they didn't explain the exact mechanics of the test to me, but I was told my tubes are blocked. They suggested that if I can't conceive naturally within a year, I should come back for a procedure to clear them out.
Six months after the surgery, I saw a different gynecologist. Based on my discharge papers, he concluded that natural conception isn't possible for me and that any attempt to "clear" the tubes would be useless—he was quite firm about this, repeating it twice. He explained that during a laparoscopy, the condition of the fallopian tubes is clearly visible.
My discharge summary states:
"...via the previously placed uterine manipulator, methylene blue is injected, which appears in the distal portions of both fallopian tubes but fails to pass proximally or into the abdominal cavity..."
It seems like that last sentence in my medical report provides the actual explanation for why I can't conceive naturally.
I’m just confused. Why did my operating surgeon tell me to come back later for a clearing procedure, while this second doctor looked at the same paperwork and told me natural pregnancy is off the table?
Can anyone explain this specific test to me? Is this a definitive result that proves with 100% certainty that my tubes are blocked and there's no chance of natural conception?
Also, if my tubes are definitely blocked, am I still at risk for an ectopic pregnancy, or will I simply be unable to carry a pregnancy at all?
Thanks.
I was hoping someone might be able to help me make sense of my current situation...
During a laparoscopic surgery to remove a teratoma from my right ovary and a standard cyst from the other, the surgeon performed a patency test on my fallopian tubes. To be honest, they didn't explain the exact mechanics of the test to me, but I was told my tubes are blocked. They suggested that if I can't conceive naturally within a year, I should come back for a procedure to clear them out.
Six months after the surgery, I saw a different gynecologist. Based on my discharge papers, he concluded that natural conception isn't possible for me and that any attempt to "clear" the tubes would be useless—he was quite firm about this, repeating it twice. He explained that during a laparoscopy, the condition of the fallopian tubes is clearly visible.
My discharge summary states:
"...via the previously placed uterine manipulator, methylene blue is injected, which appears in the distal portions of both fallopian tubes but fails to pass proximally or into the abdominal cavity..."
It seems like that last sentence in my medical report provides the actual explanation for why I can't conceive naturally.
I’m just confused. Why did my operating surgeon tell me to come back later for a clearing procedure, while this second doctor looked at the same paperwork and told me natural pregnancy is off the table?
Can anyone explain this specific test to me? Is this a definitive result that proves with 100% certainty that my tubes are blocked and there's no chance of natural conception?
Also, if my tubes are definitely blocked, am I still at risk for an ectopic pregnancy, or will I simply be unable to carry a pregnancy at all?
Thanks.