#21 ·
William Newman67 said:Look, first off, I don't get some of these comments—like "what's the point?" or "it only supports 64-bit." Man, I am stoked! Can't wait for the full release. I already grabbed the beta, just haven't had a chance to dive in yet. This thing is gonna fly compared to Vista because it follows that Macintosh philosophy... we build the OS, and then it's up to everyone else to catch up with hardware and software support. It’s easy to build a high-performance OS when you aren't trying to juggle everything—Vista tries to recognize 99% of all hardware out of the box, which means it's loading a massive amount of .dll files right at startup. No wonder people complain about it being slow. Personally, I've been running Vista x64 for a year now, and there is zero chance I'm going back to Windows XP even if my life depended on it... "Not Responding"... lol.
Try running Vista on 4GB of RAM and maybe you'll change your mind, losers. Next time, actually read what an OS needs to function. What's wrong with a 64-bit system? You aren't stuck with a 3.5GB limit, and there are basically 90% fewer viruses... people are honestly clueless, man. It was the exact same drama when Windows XP launched... "Ugh, this sucks, Windows 98 was the king"... please, give me a break...
😂
God, what a bunch of idiots 🤣—I haven't run into this kind of stupidity in a long time. Truly a rare and endangered species.
