#41 ·
Look, there were tons of them gathered in front of the clock, so not all of them were leaders 😁
Started by hollowhawk412 · · 👁 11 views · 135 replies
Bradley Nelson2 said:well, there were quite a few cars ahead of Sato, so I suppose they weren't all actually leading😁
darkmarlin16 said:in my opinion, the absolute highlight was seeing Lewis Hamilton overtake Fisichella
I suppose that might have been the only actual overtake of the whole race, if I recall correctly.
neonharbor18 said:Look, you're spot on—once someone pulls ahead and clears the field, the rest of the season just turns into this massive, agonizingly dull slog👎. But honestly? If they actually wanted to spice things up, they should shake up the points system, maybe split it like 30% for qualifying and 70% for the race, then throw a wrench in the works by starting the grid in reverse order based on those qualifying times. Now *that* would be something worth staying awake for.🙏🙏🙏
Raymond Ortiz89 said:That's what I'm saying—Ferrari finally showed some teeth, now they just gotta keep winning.
Look, I pull for Ferrari, but man, there's zero drama when there's no fight, and right now they don't have anyone even remotely close to challenging them, so it feels like their engines might just give up again by the next race.
My god, did I really just type all that out?🤣
Roger Wright94 said:There is one specific detail in some of your calculations that bothers me a bit.
And that is the fuel load.
I see some of you here constantly trying to blame certain (un)successful runs on having too much or too little fuel in the tank.
It would be fine if we were talking about just a few liters—maybe 4 or 5. Right? Am I being reasonable here?
So, I would really like to clear this up.
It bugs me when people try to explain qualifying positions—whether someone is ahead or behind—using a 5 kg difference in weight.
Couldn't that just be the result of hitting the throttle a fraction later or something else entirely? Drivers aren't programmed robots, after all.
What percentage of the total weight does that 5 kg actually represent, and how much does it truly impact lap times?
Roger Wright94 said:There is one specific detail in some of your arguments that I find a little bit troubling.
And that would be the fuel load.
I notice that some people here tend to constantly attribute certain successes or failures to having just a bit more or less fuel in the tank.
I suppose I wouldn't mind if we were talking about just a few liters—say, maybe 4 or 5. Wouldn't you agree? Or am I perhaps overthinking this?
So, I would really appreciate it if we could clear this up a little bit.
It honestly bothers me when people try to explain why a driver ended up ahead or behind in qualifying by citing a difference of 5 kg of fuel.
Couldn't that just as easily be the result of hitting the throttle a fraction later, or perhaps just a slight variation in driving style? After all, drivers aren't programmed robots, right?
What percentage of the total weight does that 5 kg actually represent, and how much of an impact could it truly have on a single lap time?
