CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Admins, why is this moderator misconduct being allowed?

Admins, why is this moderator misconduct being allowed?

Started by Jerry Robinson56 · · 👁 4 views · 2 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jerry Robinson56stormytinker40William Bennett53
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#1 ·
The entire discussion here is quite compelling, primarily due to the moderators who hand out red cards like candy to anyone daring to point out the blatant inaccuracies and unscrupulous deception practiced by Elon Musk. Based on his own public statements, one can call him a simple liar and a fraud without any shadow of a doubt.

Then, of course, we have the sycophant Zabotinski stepping in with his usual lowered standards whenever he fails to suppress the truth through other means.

It should be obvious to everyone that I am among the few individuals here standing alone; you can easily identify the opposition by their post counts and registration dates, as they all wait patiently for the moment they can stop pretending to defend the lying Elon Musk.

Furthermore, the constant accusations of "hate speech" leveled against those of us speaking the truth require no additional commentary.
However, I have a constructive proposal.

I propose opening a new thread: ten points for and ten points against the fundamental concept of Tesla vehicles.
I would appreciate your thoughts on this, provided that those who refuse to follow the rules are removed immediately.

Technical data and detailed explanations are absolutely essential here, as they clearly demonstrate that the whole concept is an empty shell, serving as nothing more than a vehicle for Elon Musk and a coordinated group of leeches to drain American taxpayer money.
stormytinker40 stormytinker40 Member
31 messages
joined Feb 2018
#2 ·
Honestly, I have no clue why they locked this thread. You've got my full support.
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#3 ·
William Bennett53, you possess enough experience within this community to understand exactly what kind of discourse is required here. I will reiterate my point, but please, let us not test our collective patience again: we require clarity and documentation. For every accusation, provide a link. If you claim there is bias in moderation, provide a link. If you wish to propose new discussion threads without first presenting documented evidence of prior grievances, refrain from doing so.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads