#81 ·
wanderingraven9 said:I am certainly grateful—thank God—that she had a skilled gynecologist who caught everything in time; however, when it comes to fighting HPV, which leads to cancer, Vitamin C just isn't the magic fix. I wish people would grasp that. Otherwise, my mother would be constantly nagging me about eating more fruit instead of actually looking into the vaccine...
(My apologies! I didn't realize you were a woman, so I initially used double forms, though I worried that might come across as a bit much🙂.) But look, I know—any sensible person should realize that matters are far more complex than just tossing in some Vitamin C. Yet, it seems people take the "sensational discovery" of Gardasil for granted, primarily because it's presented as an absolute win with zero downsides. I haven't done a deep dive myself, but I highly doubt that, say, Merck & Co.'s own websites or those of various pharmaceutical lobbies, mention any significant side effects. Now, I'm not a conspiracy theorist or someone hunting for sensationalism, but isn't it quite likely that money is the driving force here? It’s not just the big pharma companies—it's also the government, which stands to save a fortune by offloading other healthcare burdens through this vaccine. My concern is that many will end up paying a high price simply because we don't know enough yet, or perhaps because they haven't been properly informed, or even because there might be contraindications that no one would ever suspect could cause issues after receiving Gardasil. Is it really too early to be this enthusiastic about the medication? We can only try... and then wait. After all, aren't we part of the experiment? Which is, of course, a positive thing for future generations and the advancement of medicine—but in the meantime, shouldn't we be looking out for ourselves? At the very least, we ought to.