bluewolf4 said:You're fighting for freedom while remaining completely oblivious to the fact that you're building a future devoid of any actual liberty.
So, your freedom ends where mine begins, and vice versa. If the two of us can't reach a mutual agreement on where that line is drawn, then the government will step in. They’ll restrict your freedom just so I can have mine.
It’s like the border dispute between the US and Canada over maritime territory. If we can't settle it ourselves, someone else decides for us.
And that doesn't mean one side loses all their rights. You can smoke, fine—just do it in your designated area. In other words, keep expressing your freedom through smoking, but don't infringe upon my right to express my freedom by being a non-smoker.
Both smoking and not smoking are matters of free choice, aren't they?
As for me, regarding your recent quote, I'll say this:
In the past, there was no freedom for non-smokers.