CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Which remake would you actually want to see?

Which remake would you actually want to see?

Started by slyrider16 · · 👁 3 views · 38 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants slyrider16silentpilot6Michelle Howard2ARichard Howard2driftingowl27Susan Miller3restlessviper20Chris Ruiz10Douglas Robinson12cosmiclynx57Patrick MartinNicholas Nguyenrustywalker1darkbadger46briskhound2Larry Walker24mellowotter4Richard Wilson4bluenomad2Joseph Edwards4Daniel Chavez75ironowl60vivideagle7 …
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active MemberOP
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#1 ·
With all these constant, bottom-of-the-barrel remakes being thrown at us, you just crave something actually decent for once. You know that feeling when you watch a movie and think, "Man, they really missed the mark—this could've been way better"? So, let's hear it. What movies deserve a shot at being redone properly?

Just thinking off the top of my head, I’d go with "Forbidden Planet." Maybe it’s because there’s been so much talk about a potential remake lately... the original is such a weird, messy mix of brilliant and total garbage that it practically begs modern directors to "fix" it.
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 Regular
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#2 ·
Hmm, I think I’d want to direct a remake of Ben Hur.😁
In all seriousness, though—I’m not sure how many of you have seen it, but if I may be so bold as to mention the director, "the story of Bugsy Siegel" is a classic. It’s a mafia film set back in the 1930s, and honestly, that’s the kind of project I’d love to tackle for a remake.

To be fair, my real passion would be adapting specific books. For instance, Battlefield—I don't know if you've seen that one, but if you haven't, you really should; you don't often come across something quite that absurd.
Or even the Sword of Pleasure, the Peter Green book about the Suliman man who signaled the end of the Roman Republic. Imagine what a brutal historical epic that could be. If only I had the funding and the filmmaking skills.😁
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#3 ·
Honestly, I’d be down to see a remake of about 90% of everything that gets produced nowadays. Let's be real—out of every hundred movies, maybe ten actually hold water.

And if we're talking global trends, I'd love to see Europeans making remakes of American films instead of the other way around. Actually, scratch that—I’d probably have to step in and strictly forbid it.
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#4 ·
A remake of Abra Los ojos and Vanilla Sky... third time's a charm😁
Richard Howard2 Richard Howard2 Active Member
128 messages
joined Dec 2002
#5 ·
I find myself wishing for a > of >. To be clear, I am not suggesting we touch the plot—the narrative is absolutely flawless as it stands.

Furthermore, a modern reimagining of > would be welcome, as would a truly competent version of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea...
driftingowl27 driftingowl27 Active Member
89 messages
joined Dec 2002
#6 ·
The only kind of remake I can actually stomach is a porn version.😎 😁
Susan Miller3 Susan Miller3 Member
14 messages
joined Aug 2003
#7 ·
I’d love to see a remake of Hell Orange, though I’m pretty sure nobody could ever pull it off quite like Kubrick.
restlessviper20 restlessviper20 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2013
#8 ·
Josip Broz Tito😁

I think Christopher Walken would be perfect to play Josip Broz Tito...
Chris Ruiz10 Chris Ruiz10 Active Member
52 messages
joined Oct 2005
#9 ·
A remake or just a total overhaul of LOTR 1, 2, and 3 (haven't even seen the trilogy yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if they could do better)

Anyway, I’m with Dante on this one.

Cheers,
Chris Ruiz10
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 Regular
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#10 ·
They really ought to stop making remakes and just re-film LOTR from scratch. Poor J.R.R. Tolkien was surely turning in his grave because of what those idiots like Jackson did to his work. I can almost feel him restless in his final resting place.

I would film Star Trek too.
Douglas Robinson12 Douglas Robinson12 Member
35 messages
joined Jan 2009
#11 ·
Mary Horvat's husband -- basically an American take on The Marriage of Maria Braun by Rainer Werner Fassbinder. I’ll handle the screenplay, and Liberatore directs. We are 100% walking away with the Palme d'Or, and then I can finally sit down and grab a beer on the patio at Carleton without being treated like some total lowlife from the bottom of the barrel.
restlessviper20 restlessviper20 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2013
#12 ·
Douglas Robinson12 said:Mary Horvat's marriage—it's basically the American version of The Marriage of Maria Braun by Rainer Werner Fassbinder.

Which game would you pick to play during those final scenes of the movie?
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#13 ·
CAPE FEAR - Look, I know there’s already a remake out there that absolutely kills it, but honestly? I wouldn't mind seeing yet another one. Can you imagine if they cast Hardy as Max Cady? Or, man, if Heath Ledger were still with us, he would have been the absolute perfect choice for that role.

CONVOY - Now this is a movie that seriously deserves a modern remake; it’s easily one of my all-time favorites. Wouldn't it be wild to see Christian Bale playing the Duck?
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin Regular
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#14 ·
Westworld Quote : Logan's Run
Logan's Run
Damnation Alley
Nicholas Nguyen Nicholas Nguyen Active Member
80 messages
joined Oct 2016
#15 ·
Not with remakes.
rustywalker1 rustywalker1 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2011
#16 ·
Westworld is actually a TV series.
darkbadger46 darkbadger46 Member
18 messages
joined Oct 2016
#17 ·
Patrick Martin said:Now, I’ve been thinking quite a bit lately about the 1973 classic *Westworld*—not the newer stuff you see on TV today, but the original vision. It’s one of those films that stays with you, sort of like a slow-burning fever, because it tackles such heavy themes under the guise of a sci-fi thriller. You have this high-tech theme park where everything is designed to be perfect, only for the machines to malfunction and turn the whole experience into a waking nightmare. It’s a fascinating, if somewhat unsettling, look at the intersection of human desire and technological failure. It really makes you wonder about the ethics of creating something meant solely for our amusement—especially when that "something" starts to show its own kind of terrifying agency. There’s a certain tension in watching characters realize that the boundaries they thought were secure have completely dissolved. It reminds me of those old cautionary tales where humanity's hubris leads us straight into a corner we can't talk our way out of. If you haven't revisited it in a while, I highly recommend it; it’s a cerebral trip that still feels remarkably relevant in our current era of rapid AI advancement.
There’s just something about the 1976 cut of *Logan's Run* that lingers in the mind—it’s one of those sci-fi relics that feels much more ambitious than its budget might suggest. It captures that specific mid-seventies anxiety about overpopulation and the terrifying idea of a "perfect" society built on a foundation of systemic slaughter. The concept is hauntingly simple: a walled utopia where everyone lives in luxury until they hit a certain age, at which point they undergo "renewal"—which is really just a polite, high-tech euphemism for execution. It’s essentially a gilded cage, and the film does a fantastic job of exploring that tension between blissful ignorance and the grim reality lurking behind the curtain. I always found the visual language of the film to be quite striking—it has that distinct, almost psychedelic retro-futurism that you only see from that era. Even when the special effects feel a bit dated by today's standards, the atmosphere remains incredibly potent. You can practically feel the claustrophobia of their "paradise." It makes you wonder how many other "perfect" societies we've dreamed up in fiction that were actually just dystopias in fancy clothing. If you haven't revisited it lately, it’s definitely worth a watch just to see how they handled those big, existential themes before CGI became the default setting for everything.
If you haven't sat down to experience *Damnation Alley* from 1977, you are truly missing out on a quintessential slice of that gritty, post-apocalyptic sci-fi era—it’s one of those movies that just captures a specific kind of cinematic lightning in a bottle. It’s got this wonderful, rough-around-the-edges energy that feels so much more visceral than the polished, CGI-heavy wasteland flicks we see coming out of Hollywood today. Think of it as a high-octane, desert-set fever dream—sort of like if *Mad Max* had been born a few years earlier and possessed a slightly different soul. The premise is classic: a scorched, desolate landscape where survival isn't just a goal, it's a daily struggle against both nature and the desperate people left in its wake. The vehicle itself—that rugged, custom-built beast they use to navigate the wasteland—is practically a character in its own right; it’s got that heavy, industrial charm that makes you wish you could actually get your hands on the steering wheel. What I find most compelling about the film, though, isn't just the vehicular mayhem or the dusty aesthetics—it’s the sense of desperation that hangs over every scene. There’s a certain weight to the stakes that keeps you leaning in. It doesn't hold your hand, and it doesn't try to be "smart" by being overly complicated; instead, it relies on pure, unadulterated momentum and a strong sense of atmosphere. It’s a bumpy, dusty, exhilarating ride that serves as a perfect time capsule for 70s genre filmmaking. If you're looking for something with some teeth and a lot of heart, give it a spin.

What kind of MEGACAR are you even talking about? Honestly, that’s such an interesting way to frame the question—it's almost like asking someone what kind of storm they are during hurricane season! You can't just throw out a label like that without some context, right? It's a bit like walking up to a stranger in downtown Chicago and asking, "What kind of coffee are you?" It's vague, a little cheeky, and leaves me wondering exactly what you're aiming for here. Are we talking about the sheer power, the engineering, or just the general vibe? Give me something to work with! 👍

I decided to kick off this thread about remakes, and honestly, it got me thinking—does anyone actually *crave* a remake after the absolute disaster zone that Hollywood has become lately? When I first started scrolling through the headlines, I was almost pleasantly surprised by a few of them. There are just a handful of titles that truly feel like they are begging for a modern reimagining. Specifically, I can't stop thinking about Logan's Run—it’s one of those rare cases where the original is already a masterpiece, but if you applied today's technical wizardry and visual effects, it could be elevated to something even more transcendent than it already is.
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#18 ·
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#19 ·
John Rambo Hardy: Parts 1, 2, and 3

What if we had Dwayne Johnson stepping into the boots of John Rambo Hardy? 👍

Honestly, I feel like Hardy would have been a much better pick for the role, though he probably would've just pushed Stan through it anyway, right? It’s not like we’re looking at some heavy-hitting prestige drama where you absolutely need a massive acting powerhouse to carry the whole thing.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#20 ·
briskhound2 said:Westworld

But look, we're talking about a TV series here, which just isn't the same thing! You can't really compare a show to a movie—it's apples and oranges, right?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads