Dante said:If you treat Apocalypse Now Redux like some obscure underground flick, sure, maybe I'd call it interesting. You don't really need to "get" underground cinema to appreciate it. But looking at it this way? It’s just a massive blockbuster that flopped hard.
Honestly, I would have loved it if someone actually told me I was wrong and walked me through what makes this movie good. As it stands, my honest impression while watching it? Total indifference.
Let me break it down for you. 🙂
First off, this Redux version is completely unnecessary. It just breaks the flow and drags in elements that add absolutely nothing to the story.
Second, Apocalypse Now is an underground movie by definition because it was funded by one of the iterations of Coppola's Zoetrope studio—basically his own money. So, if you don't call it underground, it's at least indie. 😉
Third, there's something fascinating about how the film works; the whole journey is spent using M. Sheen to imagine just how much of a monster General Kurtz actually is. Plus, the war itself is portrayed as this inevitable, senseless, and utterly idiotic thing.
You call it an anti-climax; I call it the most powerful Brand appearance in cinema history.
Man, for me, it lived up to the terrifying expectations of the characters, building that dread from the very start until the moment he finally shows up.
Maybe it's because that half-lit scene with that heavy monologue (
Horror, horror ....) actually made my blood run cold. 🙂
BTW, I watched the original version on 35mm. 🙂